ALL

Intention of this page is give easy access to near-real-time radiation levels from all over this beautiful planet Earth.

I’m using mainly μSv/hr (microSieverts per hour) for easy comparisons.  See ‘Radiation Units’ to better understand the scientific units used, and do conversions yourself.

For a quick check, I use these:

Other Networks to check include:

See also  Nuclear News Links.

-> By Country (hold mouse pointer over ‘Nuclear tab’ to navigate there):

  • Australia
  • Belarus  [added April 30, 2015, after Chernobyl Forest Fires]
  • Canada
  • China (Hong Kong)
  • Japan
  • Russian Federation
  • USA
  • !!!–>  Europe – All combined (including Iceland, Turkey and Russia): EURDEP – the European Commission Joint Research Centre – Institute for Transuranium Elements combines data from thousands of radiation monitors from all over Europe.
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Belarus  (not in EURDEP)
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • The Netherlands
    • Iceland
    • Ireland
    • Poland
    • Switzerland
    • Serbia
    • Slovenia
    • UK
    • Ukraine  (not in EURDEP, [added Dec. 2014, after Zaporizhia NPP cover-up]
    • [suggestions welcome…]

-> For extra resources:

  • Global
  • !-> News (links)
–>   For some suggestions to set up your own radiation monitoring station, soil and/or food analysis lab: See my independent & comprehensive list for equipment sources (Geiger Counters and much more), see HERE.
DISCLAIMER  (All provided information should not to be misunderstood for health or safety advice.  My intent is to be of benefit for those committed to accurate reporting, those interested in the actual truth of the matter, as well as to challenge misinformation. All opinions and posts are subject to change without notice.  What you do with the information found on these pages is your own responsibility.)

 Content on blog & pages may be outdated.  Check the date.

——————

DISCLAIMER

Advertisements

42 Responses to ALL

  1. Pingback: “Access Denied” – Blog Blocking Confirmed ! | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  2. Pingback: Some Additional Observations Re. recent mystery Latvian Radiation Spike, and its possible link to the Zaporizhye Nuclear Power Plant accident. (Dec. 4, 2014 “Final Update”) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  3. Pingback: Accident confirmed at Ukraine’s Zaporizhye Nuclear Power Plant. (Link to Latvia Radiation Spike?) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  4. Pingback: What’s up with (Nov 28, 2014) Radiation Spike in Latvia? ‘EURDEP’ shows peak of 600nSv/hr (0.6µSv/hr). Highly unusual for Sea Level. Does Additional Data Suggest a Possible Cover-Up of a Radiological Incident? | Not All Alleged Is Appar

  5. Pingback: Radiation Spikes and Nuclear Reactor Refueling Operations… & Other Random Puzzle Pieces | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  6. Pingback: BREAKING – Zaporizhia NPP: CIA-run ‘Radio Free Europe’ Breaks Media Silence: Donetsk Separatist Official Warns Of ‘Second Chernobyl’ | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  7. Pingback: Medcom Geiger Counter Measurements in Southern Colorado – Dec. 2014 Notes. | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  8. Pingback: Sudden uptick in European Blog Traffic. People searching for more information about ZNPP | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  9. Pingback: Some EURDEP Public Map Observations (Jan. 9, 2015). And then some… | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  10. Pingback: Latvian Nov. 28 Spikes Revisited: Nullschool Data Shows Perfect Correlation with ZNPP Wind Path! | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  11. Pingback: Cover-up of Zaporizhye Nuclear Accident Near-Certain | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  12. Pingback: Gaging Recent Radiation Spikes: How do the Recent Gamma Upticks Compare to those Observed after Chernobyl? | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  13. Pingback: Four years of Radiation Data: EURDEP @ ‘Vlissingen Haven’, The Netherlands – (Long Term Pattern Spotting – Part 1 of 4 ) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  14. Pingback: Four years of Radiation Data: EURDEP @ ‘Gaevle (Gävle), Sweden’ – (Long Term Pattern Spotting – Part 2 of 4 ) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  15. Pingback: Four years of Radiation Data: EURDEP @ ‘Raufalhöfn, Iceland’ – (Long Term Pattern Spotting – Part 3 of 4) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  16. Pingback: Years of Radiation Data: EURDEP @ “Schauinsland / Freiburg, Germany ” (Part 4 of 4) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  17. Pingback: Did Germany just get a Massive Amount of Fukushima Fallout and “No One Noticed”? (A Eurdep-Nullschool investigation of the Nov. 16, 2014 radiation Upticks…) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  18. Pingback: DATA of ‘Fallout Signatures’ on Radiation Monitors Suggest Fukushima Still Going Re-Critical Underground At Times. Airborne Fallout Continues To Come Down Across the Northern Hemisphere. | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  19. Pingback: SLV – February 5, 2015 Photos – (+ Feb 3-4 Rad. Uptick documented & Radiation Data Sources) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  20. Pingback: More Geiger Counter Measurements: Flight Brussels -> Atlanta ; (Elevated Beta Radiation Signal Found in Data!) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  21. Pingback: More Geiger Counter Measurements: Flight Brussels -> Atlanta (Elevated Beta Radiation Signal Found in Data!) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  22. Pingback: Fingerprints of an ongoing Cover-Up? EPA data makes Fukushima look over 1000% less serious than Chernobyl… | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  23. Pingback: IF Yuzhnoukrainsk’s SUNPP released radioactivity April 11(ish), 2015, then it blew South into Turkey… where EURDEP’s monitors are all turned off… (“Hmm…”) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  24. Pingback: F… F… Something with an F… (Not SUNPP, but much Further Upwind…) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  25. Pingback: Chernobyl’s Radioactive Forest Fire. [April 29, 2015] – Location on map, Wind & Radiation Monitoring links | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  26. Pingback: Additions: Belarus Radiation Data, Satellite Image of Chernobyl Fire, EURDEP-Sweden goes silent, ESTONIA & LATVIA Radiation Graphs,… | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  27. Pingback: Bismuth-214 as a Fallout Indicator? Systematic Omissions: More Evidence of EURDEP Hiding Data when it Matters Most… | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  28. Pingback: Chernobyl Forest Fire UPDATE – w/ Final Additions: 150+ Bq/m^3 Cs-137 in air 100 km from Forest Fires on April 29 | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  29. Pingback: They won. | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  30. Pingback: Pink Unicorns beach themselves on the shores of Lake Dystopia | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  31. Pingback: Anyway… | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  32. Pingback: Summer Solstice 2015 – Blip | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  33. Pingback: Whale Die-Off by Alaska area ‘a Perplexing Mystery’… + More Data Rigging Evidence: EPA Radnet Beta radiation monitor @ Anchorage spiking when DATA GAPS @ Anchorage | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  34. Pingback: Fin Whale Die-Off by Alaska area ‘a Perplexing Mystery’… + More Data Rigging Evidence: EPA Radnet Beta radiation monitor @ Anchorage spiking when DATA GAPS @ Anchorage | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  35. Pingback: What really happened at Blayais NPP near Bordeaux, France? Regional Radiation Monitors were turned off. | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  36. Pingback: Chernobyl Grass Fires (End of June, Begin of July – 2015) – A Quick Look | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  37. Pingback: Gamma-Spectroscopy Results of Colorado Radioactive Freak Rain: Fukushima’s Fissioning Mini-Sun on the Edge of the Pacific Ocean is COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTROL | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  38. Pingback: Mainland USA June 14 2015 Radioactive Rain & Lichen Data Revisited – A More Balanced Analysis. + Strontium Data! | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  39. Pingback: Chernobyl Wildfires – Again. (August 2015) | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  40. flyingcuttlefish says:

    FYI – Ken Beusseler’s Double Life
    http://flyingcuttlefish.wordpress.com/2016/03/02/double-life/
    plus great comment by L.M. on his credentials …

  41. MVB says:

    My last communication (shared @ https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2015/11/08/another-round-of-looking-into-recent-radiological-disturbaces/ ) apparently ended the conversation:

    From: Michael Van Broekhoven
    To: Ken Buesseler
    July 11, 2015 @ 11:46 AM Mountain Time

    “Dear Ken,

    In response to,

    “>I have replied to you before, and I’ve seen Georg Steinhauser’s detailed response last time to your concerns. I have not seen that you have considered his comments.“

    Re. the Co-60 in one of my kelp samples, George believes that’s most likely from a medical dump. It’s assumed that due to the lack of Cs-134/137 in that kelp sample, that it’s not from Fukushima. I understand that train of thought, but I’m not so sure. I do not know how these isotopes maybe behave differently in air and water, or how they move through the ecosystem. I don’t exclude the possibility that the assumption that there must be Cesium in it for it to be from Fukushima is per se correct. I think this is perhaps one of those arena were lots of discoveries can still be made. Certainly not ignoring his input. It IS a possibility, and one perhaps even worth exploring. If you ever explore the area around Kubui, Hokkaido, perhaps you you find the barrels leaking with Co60? I described everything I could find about my samples in https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2014/01/19/radioisotope-analysis-hokkaido-japan-kelp-safe-radioactive-food-pacific-ocean/

    But what I find odd is that TEPCO never even mentioned Co60 until August 2013, with 1,200,000 Bq/m^3 Co-60 measured in water that had leaked from a “tank, which contains processed, concentrated water from which Cesium has been removed“. See, if one of those Cesium-devoid highly polluted tanks had a huge leak, you absolutely could end up with upticks of isotopes without an uptick in Cesium. That’s one of several possibilities to end up with Co60 without Cs134, I think. I’m just sharing my thoughts. I hope you’ll consider them as well.

    Now, the question I asked you, which you left unanswered, was:

    “Have you assumed Po-210 and stable lead levels/ratios would remain the same and not tested for it? Have you been testing for Po-210 and Pb-206 levels?”

    That was the question you seemingly ignored. Po210 is all over decay chains of what we know leaked. It’s logical that you’d detect upticks and unusual ratios. Yet you’ve made statements to the media about “naturally occurring Po210” without, as far as I’ve seen, pointing out that Po210 may be artificially added as well, creating “enhanced natural” levels. See, I’m hesitant to get involved with your otherwise really good sounding research due to statements like,

    “the dose from Fukushima cesium is considered insignificant relative to the dose from naturally occurring polonium-210, which was 1000 times higher in fish samples studied, and both of these are much lower relative to other, more common sources, such as dental x-rays.” (on http://www.whoi.edu/page.do?pid=127297 ).

    That last part doesn’t sit right with me either. What doses are you comparing? When you ingest the emitting source, there’s additional effects, some that may not show up until decades later. It just can’t be compared to an X-ray dose like that. Those are the kinds of sound bites I’d expect from someone who’s part on the cover-up and as such diverts attention away from some rather damning aspects. Not accusing you of that, just letting you know that those are statements that have major holes in them and give the impression you’re not bloody damn serious about exposing the cover-up in all its aspects. I’m sure I can learn a lot from you, but maybe you guys have some blind spots too.

    Probably long enough of an email. Thanks for your consideration.

    Kind Regards,

    Michaël Van Broekhoven”

    [end quoted email]

  42. flyingcuttlefish says:

    He may have trouble doing analysis since he isn’t trained in the most relevant areas.
    Leuren Moret comment –
    “…Because Buesseler is a marine chemist, he is not a geochemist, biochemist, geoscientist, biological scientist, or expert on circulation and recycling of radionuclides. That is a very very specialized and scientifically challenging field to work in and it takes many years to become proficient in radiation effects. …”

Thank you for commenting. Your comment won't show until approved. Sometimes that can take awhile. - mvb

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s