“The atomic industry can take catastrophes like Chernobyl every year.” – Hans Blix, Director of the IAEA 1981-1997
“Don’t believe anything they say.
And at the same time,
Don’t believe that they say anything without a reason.”
– Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804)
We are in the midst of a de facto nuclear war, as far as radioactive fallout and its consequences go. Wave after wave, monitors show value spikes, often reaching new records, dive-downs, odd zero values, sometimes even going into the absurd negative, and show a variety of clues hinting of ‘fallout patterns’, including peculiarly times “baseline shifts” and often simply being turned off: the ominous ‘data gap mode’.
Either TEPCO’s Fukushima-Daiichi’s is still fissioning and spiraling further out of control, and aside from continuing ground, groundwater and ocean contamination, also sending untold amounts of hazardous radioisotopes into the air, OR… there have been MANY serious (INES-5 and up / partial or full) nuclear meltdown accidents since March 2011, compounding the already troubling environmental radiological pollution situation.
The amount of radioactive pollutants sent into the environment by TEPCO by now exceeds that of ALL above-ground US nuclear bomb tests combined. (!-> See some references in AGRD‘s (March 6, 2013) Fukushima Compared To Hiroshima, Chernobyl and 2,400 Open Air Nuclear Bomb Tests, Background Ocean Radiation Levels Pre/Post Atomic Age, Peak Ocean Radiation Level 180,000,000 Bq/m³)
And if you don’t know “what that means”, let me remind you of this quote seen in the Washington Post:
“[…] In 1997, the National Cancer Institute reported that the Cold War detonations at the Nevada Test Site had polluted nearly the whole of the country with drifting airborne radioactive iodine, creating somewhere between 10,000 and 75,000 cases of childhood thyroid cancer. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that of the nearly 600,000 Americans dying of cancer every year, 11,000 will be because of those tests. […]”
– (April 12, 2014) Reality Check: Debunking The Wall Street Journal’s “Radiation Reality Check”
Low Level Radiation and Immune System Damage: An Atomic Era Legacy, by Joseph J. Mangano
Additionally, also ponder the fact that Fukushima 2011-2012 wasn’t only “on par with or múch worse” than Chernobyl (1986), but that leaking of radioactive materials from Fukushima-Daiichi NPP into the environment (air, ground, groundwater, ocean) hasn’t stopped yet 6+ years later, and then ask yourself if it is even remotely believable that Fukushima won’t cause exactly what the bomb testing era and Chernobyl unleashed. What do you make of officials who make such obviously deceptive bullshit statements? Should they be arrested? Firing squad? [j/k]
You may also “entertain yourself” by pondering Greenpeace’s 2006 http://www.greenpeace.to/publications/chernobyl_health_report.pdf
Going by extremely limited official data, and other interesting documentations (included in (April 26, 2016) Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster 30th Anniversary, such as:
… and perhaps, after you’re done with all of that, the likely cause of a striking increase in a variety of health issues will begin to become apparent to you as well, in stark contrast to what officials have been stating.
Aside from extremely limited official data (such as shown in (Aug. 28, 2017)’s The Thyroid Cancer “Hockey Stick”), the amount of “anecdotal evidence” (for myself in primarily the western United States) is rising: From bits and pieces of stories I’ve heard, I’m under the impression that illnesses associated with low dose radioactive fallout exposure are rising notably: stillbirths, low birth weight; birth defects, including babies being born with heart birth defects (!!!-> see the Chernobyl Heart documentary for some insights), cataracts and even cancers; also: a concerning seemingly sudden increase in cancer diagnoses among people younger than 50; many people struggling with suppressed/challenged immunity disorders, symptoms of fatigue, lethargy, anemia, as well as mystery symptoms that resemble fibromyalgia, lyme disease, and so forth.
It’s happening. It’s not some ‘possible’ thing down the line.
WE’RE IN IT.
[There is zero joy in “we told you so”]
And the way top officials are acting, it’s clear: This just the beginning.
The apparent ‘kill target’ of this de facto nuclear war appears to be primarily human beings, though many other species are affected in varying degrees too. Effects are slow-emerging, fallout patterns erratic, sensitivities varying and not well understood, making ascribing ‘the suspected cause’ to any speceific leak or even “as a fallout consequence”… “scientifically challenging”, and certainly so without a genuine truth-oriented concerted effort.
Efforts from the United Nations’s IAEA, UNSCEAR, WHO, as well as those of so-called “nuclear watchdogs” have shown to be pro-nuclear-industry biased, systematically downplaying fallout health consequences, often contradicting findings from clearly more genuine less-funded independent researchers. Why? I think because if the nuclear industry were honest, there would be no nuclear industry.
DISCLAIMER: I have zero officially or academically recognized credentials. I’m just some dude with a laptop hanging out in wifi-land. This blog is just my personal outlet, purely “for your entertainment”. !-> See also my DISCLAIMER. For comforting bullshit statements about everything being just fine, contact your government officials. Yeah, the ones that allow these nuclear corporations to ruin it for the rest of us. Have fun with that.
Whether the perpetrators are doing it (malignantly or misguidedly) on purpose (as part of a sinister or eugenics-steered “culling the herd” type of agenda), or out of sheer ignorance is unclear to me, but THE WAR, —and no one would object to this term if all new cancer cases, immune deficiency disorder symptoms, miscarriages, spontaneous or chosen abortions, birth defects, psychological distress and related suicides were reported on in detail—, is being waged primarily on two fronts: relentless waves of radioactive fallout on the one hand, and an ever-more obvious ‘information war’ on the other, in which news stories (and even video games and fictional movies) are launched to misdirect, distract and/or confuse the masses from the actual reality, derail in-depth inquery and undermine objective clarity and certainly, sowing doubt, making a meaningful response through democratic means practically impossible.
North Korea’s nuclear bomb tests have been underground so far. Those wouldn’t leak much more than some isotopes of Argon and Xenon. The certainly wouldn’t give rise to the observed spikes (See (Nov. 12, 2017) A Lot More than Ruthenium-106 in that Radioactive Cloud (DATA) and (Nov. 15, 2017) Oct. 2017 Ru-103 Detections Highest since 2011 + Record High MDCs @ Switzerland Radiation Monitoring stations; + Czech Republic I-131 & Cs-134 Measurements During “Ru-106 Cloud” compared to 2011, nor the crazy detections this past spring (See (May 20, 2017) BREAKING: Ruthenium-103, Cobalt-60, Niobium-95 & Cesium-134 Validated Detections in Finland, Cesium-137 Uptick, Artificial BETA upticks in The Netherlands and Italy, as yet another Mystery Radiological Disturbance rolls across Europe… (EURDEP, MAY 2017)), or last spring 2016 for that matter (See (May 4, 2016) HIGHEST SINCE 2011: Cesium-137, Ruthenium-103, Tellurium-132 (early 2016) and (Aug. 7, 2016) We’ve Been Dosed…), to name some examples of what I’ve documented.
IF they’ll go above-ground with the nuclear “testing” / war against the Earth, it might be as part of the cover-up. As far as I can tell, the antagonism with the US is staged. The nuclear club is tight. They cover for each other, have done so for decades. Which doesn’t mean this psycho secretive cabal that is steering the mega-deception won’t decide to take out some cities for maximum trauma-based mass mind control purposes. They might.
But when it comes to fallout, we’re already in it. The radioactive clouds are spewing out of large melted-down nuclear reactors, some are likely from small incidents causing relatively small leaks (NTP Fleuris (medical radioisotope producer), Belgium (here and !-> HERE for an example of what they do with the data after the fact…), some appear to have been large but brief bursts (Zaporizhia NPP, Ukraine Nov-Dec. 2014 to name a fairly recent covered-up release of a giant radioactive cloud over Europe – See overview of blogposts in which I documented that in (Jan. 12, 2015) Cover-up of Zaporizhye Nuclear Accident Near-Certain), and at least one is of the relentless unceasing enormous kind: That is the five-worst-case-scenarios mega-catastrophe of Fukushima-Daiichi’s 3 full meltdowns and at least one major spent fuel fire, and its highly likely ‘China Syndrome‘, with the possibility of ongoing criticalities. For some hints in that direction, try these 4:
How was that for an intro to some more boring radiation data?
This is the hardest part of even basic independent investigations into nuclear fallout events (of the late night armchair internet kind): It is generally extremely time-consuming to even get a grasp of the basic data available. And if you want to dig a little deeper, it would become crazy expensive. [No one’s bothered yet, but I accept cryptocurrency donations. You can still be the first! ]
This blogpost is yet another contribution of mine to the attempts of ‘members of the general public’ to find out FROM WHERE and STARTING WHEN a massive radioactive cloud began to spread across the planet in recent months.
Official explanations simply don’t cut it.
The story the French nuclear
coverup agency, err “watchdog”, IRSN, spread far and wide by Reuters and the zero-scrutiny establishment media (The Guardian, etc.) is so in-our-faces FLAWED — there being !-> A Lot More than Ruthenium-106 in that Radioactive Cloud, for starters —, that it calls for further exposure and inquiry. Hence I’ll give it another round. Perhaps my last. [I’ve been saying that for years…]
In no particular order:
- Kladovo, Serbia, 6 months:
Oh yeah… By the way… I’m tired of looking at radiation data (yes, REALLY, I am), but I somehow continue to feel compelled to show “all of you”, what has become apparent to me from scrutinizing such data over far longer periods than the database interface’s max. settings (generally 1 month max). The significance of some details (zero values, lower than usual values, isolated high values, data gaps, etc.) only dawned on me after doing this for years. Some basics of what can be seen on these graphs is described in the blogpost, (Sept. 17, 2017) “Couple EURDEPs” – Attempted EPILOGUE Re. Observations & Musings from the land of ‘Monitoring Radiation Monitoring’… (heavily sprinkled with YT Music & Videos)
As you can see, I string together 3-month periods by putting 3 months at a time together and taking screenshots of those. My main data sources are EURDEP (European Commision Radiation Data Exchange Platform) and Radnet (of the US Environmental Potection Agency (EPA), included in the list at Online Radiation Data.
Additional basics in !-> (Jan. 25, 2014) Some Pointers to See Through Nuclear Deceptions
In this blogpost I share a very large amount of graphs again, including one 15-month period (5×3 months), a few 9 months and a whole series of 6 month data sets. I often adjust the y-axis to show more detail. Rolling… (most data accessed late on Nov. 14., 2017)
What a ‘fallout pattern’ can look like: ninja dots (@ Odiham, UK after June 25th), lower-than-average doses & zero values, amidst upticks and data gaps.
No data @ Odiham, UK since July 23, 2017…
Was it in June that the nuclear mayhem shit show hit the jet stream fan?
- Kefalonia ,Greece, first 9 months from 2011; then 21 months prior to Nov. 14, 2017:
Just for “for the hell of it”… Here’s 9 months after Feb. 14, 2011 (when effects of the preceding (2010 and earlier) also-covered-up nuclear accident(s) hadn’t completely stopped yet either):
Okay, now here’s 21 months from 2016-2017 ending at the bottom right with Nov. 14, 2017, starting with a brief recap of the “Spring 2016 Event”:
The notes I added refer to the following observations made in spring 2016:
“Notice anything in the past half year?”
- Exeter, UK, 9 months (look closely at March & June):
- Cherkasy, Ukraine, 6 months:
- Koppigen SMN, Switzerland, 6 months:
- Uzhhorod, Ukraine, 6 months:
- Schierke/Brocken, Germany, 6 months:
Dig’n the data gaps the last 3 months, Germany?
…Then what is by now a 5-month-long DATA GAP:
“Slovakia February 2017… ???”
- Warcop Range, UK, 6 months:
Vlissingen Haven, The Netherlands, 6 months:
- Kirikkale, Turkey, 6 months:
- Kiltrough, Ireland, 15 months:
- Sprimont, Belgium, 6 months:
- Muehlheim-Kaerlich, Germany, 9 months:
Vnajnarje, Slovenia, 9 months:
For what it’s worth… if anything…
Good luck to us all.
Be well !