June 13, 2017
Starting on Dec. 13, 2015, below, showing the down-is-up drop-to-zero type of “fallout pattern”… at the onset of March 2016… again another example: right at the time of the Cesium-137 Helsinki Garage hoax (See, among others: April 22, 2016: Was Helsinki’s Cs-137 “Localized Garage Waste Leak” A Decoy For Hemisphere-Wide Fallout Upticks? Fukushima? EURDEP/Nullschool DATA)…
Some disturbances around March 27th, while the Te-132 detection on Apr. 26, 2016 in Germany barely shows here, but the subsequent ground-reaching fallout waves (which (Norway, May 2-13, 2016) contained Co-60) in the following months shows here too at the end of May into June:
Because this monitor hadn’t seen a zero value since early March 2016, hence this blog post:
No idea if it’s related to a release somewhere or “just a glitch”, but… Could it be after-effects related to the measurement of the crazy mixture (Ru-103 + Nb-95 + Co-60 + Cs-134) just 3 weeks ago? (Southern Finland, May 17-19, 2017 – Details in (May 20, 2017) “Ruthenium-103, Cobalt-60, Niobium-95 & Cesium-134 Validated Detections in Finland, Cesium-137 Uptick, Artificial BETA upticks in The Netherlands and Italy, as yet another Mystery Radiological Disturbance rolls across Europe… (EURDEP, MAY 2017)”)
Another slight ‘Standard Deviation’ dot on the Portugese coast:
Looking at artificial Beta and Alpha decay energy detectors (on EURDEP’s “Advanced Map, T-BETA-ART & T-ALPHA-ART, via http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EurdepMap/Disclaimer.aspx – See more options via my Online Radiation Monitors page in the Nuclear tab above) can sometimes give at least a hint of radioactive pollution being the reason for Gamma abnormalities.
The following record from JRC Station 1, Italy (one of the 5 monitors véry close to each other in Northern Italy) suggests an artificial beta emitter or mixture is blowing around indeed:
The second (blue) Graph is Radon 220 & 222 combined, which began rising dramatically after the “Spring 2016 Event” (which really could be part of the March 11, 2011 ongoing mega-catastrophe…), also when (theoretically absurd, but likely circuitry interference effects of fallout) NEGATIVE T-BETA-ART values were observed here. Just like with “Ninja dots”, “forced zero values” and “data gaps”, these negative values might be due to effects of artificial fallout. Here’s 6 months from early March 2016 onward. (Not all forced-zero and mini-data gaps are highlighted.)
For many other radiation-detection-related observations, hit Home, and keep scrolling ad nauseum, or see the chronological list in my Nuclear Blog Post Archive
For what it’s worth… if anything.