“The greatest guilt of today is that of people who accept collectivism by moral default; the people who seek protection from the necessity of taking a stand, by refusing to admit to themselves the nature of that which they are accepting; the people who support plans specifically designed to achieve serfdom, but hide behind the empty assertion that they are lovers of freedom, with no concrete meaning attached to the word; the people who believe that the content of ideas need not be examined, that principles need not be defined, and that facts can be eliminated by keeping one’s eyes shut. They expect, when they find themselves in a world of bloody ruins and concentration camps, to escape moral responsibility by wailing: “But I didn’t mean this!”
― Ayn Rand, Russian-American novelist
Just a quick mention of another peculiar radiation data detail that could come in handy to determine whether or not a particular disturbance in the monitoring landscape is due to artificial fallout or not. It’s a very rare one.
We’ve seen the drop-to-zero effect; often at the beginning or end of a data gap; We’ve seen the lower-than average values, ditto; We’ve even seen ‘baseline adjustments’, and that sometimes radiation doses or specific concentrations go into the negative (which from a purely physics standpoint makes no sense, but if you consider ionizing radiation’s real-world effects on electronic circuitry it does); There’s the isolated high values I call “glitch dots”; There’s the obvious monitor calibrations; There’s the kind of fallout patterns that makes a curious observer go ‘wtf’, practically always left ‘non-validated’ (NV) by the data providers…
And now, not mentioned before (I think; maybe I have and forgot…), there’s this “read between the lines” strangeness, an effect only seen on monitors that show data in fine morse-code-like lines (seen mostly in he UK, Spain, & Turkey):
In 3-month context, visible that first week, with the much more obvious fallout patterns, starting with data gaps in April and going full-on obvious in May 2016:
Here’s a variation of the same type of data pattern, somehow strangely deviating from a predominant value line (note the zoom-in on the y-axis [the default setting is 0 to 400 nSv/hr]:
In most cases you can’t even see it without extreme zooming in.
Due to their minimal ‘dose rate value’ differences, they’re not affecting the average dose rate of that instant, hence they do not show up with the settings ‘Maximum Value”, nor “Standard Deviation”. They’re a class to themselves, likely designed, like it appears the purpose of the entire official incredibly-well-rigged monitoring network is: not to show but rather to conceal potentially health hazardous radioactive pollution.
What shall we call them? “Ninja dots” ? They’re always dressed in black, invisibly crawling between mainstream dose rate values, sneaking up on unsuspecting ‘useless breathers’ in an other dimension (sometimes referred to as ‘reality’)…
[Added on May 7, 2017: Someone combed through the data from Glenanne, “UK”, and found these 3 ‘ninja dots’ in its recent record, and passed them along… (look closely!, you’ll see ’em):
And this forced-down-to-zero value:
[Added after posting] OPINION / SPECULATION:
Now, if you ask me what I think causes these “ninja dots”, there’s several possibilities. One is that if the value of a specific gamma range exceeds its natural variability, that for the monitors in the UK, Turkey, Italy and Spain, where data comes in narrow bands, it doesn’t cause a dot in the next higher-value gamma energy range band, but in-between. That’s one possibility. Another one is that when a decay energy associated with a rare artificial radioisotope is detected, it has its own “band”, so to speak.
Below, I add an “artist impression” of this speculation. Let’s take some data from the “Spring Event 2016”, that mystery nuclear accident or massive release that left marks across monitors in both northern and southern hemispheres.
Here’s Fairbanks, Alaska, [below] showing just Gamma Energy Range 4, and Beta Radiation. Beta Spiked, and then a data gap followed. Soon after all Beta monitoring in the US was brought to an end and we ended essentially “fallout blind”… Not a word in the press; what’s new?… Superimposed on these US Radnet data (via https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/query.dohttps://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/query.do ), I put a UK-style “artist’s rendering” of how that might look there, with lower-than-average for the beta spike, and a ninja dot for what could be another-energy-range’s spiking, or an unusual decay energy (like Tellurium-132, to name “something out there“…):
And if you wonder why Beta was data-gapped into wishful thinking oblivion, ponder what happened to Gamma Energy Range 2 shortly after:
To leap from the last two graphs, going even further outside the topic of mere “ninja dots”:
If you figure out what precisely was the source of the planet-wide radiological disturbances in Spring 2016, leave me a comment. Here are some of the possibilities that I’ve come up with over the past year:
Possibilities range…. from a major deterioration at Fukushima-Daiichi [added nuance: or a source upwind from the jet stream funnel that occurs over the Japan region!: (April 29, 2016): Planetary Emergency RED ALERT: Wind Patterns Trace Beginning of Major Radiological Disturbances in Europe to FUKUSHIMA: Plausibility of Still-Fissioning “Underground Breeder Reactor Gone Wild”, to a cabal-approved media-hushed (July 22, 2016) nuclear bomb test by Saudi Arabia (perhaps in the French-occupied South Pacific? hm… Gotta wonder why they (April 23, 2016) turned off both their southern hemisphere monitors in February 2016, right?…, to even a (April 29, 2017) Brussels-bombing-covered-up RPV rupture in Belgium, to name just a few.
You think all these above-mentioned “possibilities” are CRAZY-OUT-THERE, right? I actually agree. This cover-up is disturbing. If you’re rolling your eyes, just tell me one thing, though, will you: Got a better hypothesis? Tell it, in detail, with data, for the world to see, just like I have.
I almost never claim certainty, but that much is certain: SOMETHING *extremely dire* happened in 2016 and it is thoroughly being covered-up. All-isolated, no 1 monitor tells the story, but when taken dozens together, the picture is crystal-clear: in the first quarter of 2016, something extraordinarily significant occurred in the radiological landscape of this planet.
Just like the screaming implications of the ‘Plume Gate’ FOIA-released documents, the complete mainstream as well as controlled-opposition “alternative” media SILENCE implies a coordinated cover-up.
Those are just a few of the numerous cases that render all them zealous proponent of ‘more nuclear energy!’ a bunch of total contemptible bullshitters. If all were so safe and squeaky environmentally clean, why all the obvious cover-ups, the denial, the data gaps, the obvious media silence? Hm?
Plume Gate, as well as the Spring 2016 event are just two of many, you know. For example, I have yet to see the full-blown exposé of the cover-up of the radioactive leak that escaped from the Zaporozhye NPP in Ukraine at the end of 2014. The nuclear leak that “never happened”, ’cause, as the New York Times echoed from the reality-denying spin chambers in Kiev:, the accident wasn’t even in the nuclear area of the power plant
Not only were there bizarre rumors… [(Jan. 11, 2015): Can the Rumor from Poznan, Poland and Romanian news of a “Radioactive Cloud” (Both Dec. 5, 2014) be traced to ZNPP too?, but the damn rumors actually proved to be right, with massive spiking of a couple excellent monitors in Latvia perfectly downwind: (Jan. 11, 2015) Latvian Nov. 28 Spikes Revisited: Nullschool Data Shows Perfect Correlation with ZNPP Wind Path! And when the whole thing was dismissed because the “hacked documents” were mistranslated, and my pointing out of the mis-translation was unable to show up in any comment thread… (Jan. 4, 2015) Please Note: The Radiation Reported in “leaked documents” from Zaporozhye / Zaporizhia NPP is NOT “5 mSv/year”, but 5 µSv/hr !!! (RT mistranslation being spread widely) I mean, for fuck’s sake, man, even air traffic was suggesting something was up… (Jan. 8, 2015) FlightRadar24’s View of Eastern Ukraine Dec. 27, 2014 – Early Jan. 2015 (A Sampling of Tracked Flights)
This spring’s apparent fallout patterns visible on selected monitors may end up like last springs: will the ones who know ever come forward?
And thus, as if nothing happened, the beat goes on…