Inching Towards Speechless Again… (w/ Couple EURDEP graphs revisited)

Sunday July 24, 2016

I’m going to pretend (as an excersize) that the recent spiking this week is due to a nuclear incident somewhere.  Some active nuclear reactor let out a radioactive cloud…

I’ll start with Lamia, Greece (shown a bit further below), which data processing adjustment I find reminiscent of the data processing shift that occured at Exeter, UK, in the sense that the monitor was showing ever increasing levels, which had been building for months, and then poof, it was shifted to a more condensed uneventful output:

EXETER_UK_3mo_ENdingAPril24_2016

That shift occured precisely when the Cs-137 levels spiked in Finland.  And the data gap two months later occured right around the time of the Te-132 detection in Germany:

EXETER_UK_3mo_EndingJuly24_2016

So, here’s the past 3 months @ Lamia, Greece again.  Did something of significance trigger this shift on June 15, 2016?   Or this is a delayed effect of what happened in April?  And is all of this just more from “the gift that keeps on giving…”…?

Lamia_Greece_3mo_EndingJuly22_2016

Now look at the Cs-137 / I-131 graph @ Nicosia, Cyprus, also in that part of the Mediterranean:   The I-131 upticks come later, but the Cs-137 upticks begin at the exact same time in mid-June:

NicosiaCyprus_Cs1337_I131_EndingJune23_2016

Then the puzzle becomes: where do you see the little spike first.  It’s from stuyding the 2011 record that I believe that the initial spike is actually tiny, as far as dose goes undifferentiable from natural radon progeny spikes, then there’s data gaps, and (often) eventually you get to see more obvious fallout patterns.

4 Examples from 2011 (March 11 marked, 3 month graph):

The upticks in Belgium were tiny, zero values occured (not yet erased) and the weeks of data gaps managed to keep the population in oblivion:
Essen_Belgium_3mo_PreJune1_2011

Switzerland saw disturbances and upticks.  Glitch dots as high as a couple microsievert may have seemed isolated but were clearly part of exactly how fallout clouds actuallyshow up on this monitoring system:

LaChauxDeFonds_SMN_Switzerland_3month_PreJune1_2011_

Jersey, UK, off the coast of Northern France: here too, the initial uptick (within 48 hours) is small, the overall baseline begins to go up, and “glitch dot” values may occur, going over 1 µSv/hr:

JerseyUK_3mo_preJune1_2016

And example of an absurd one, 280 milliSievert in the midst of a data gap.  Guess they hadn’t cleaned the dust off yet when they turned this one on.  Data gaps taper off, some more zero values, and an obvious data processing shift 2 month later:

PiatraNeamtToacaRaStation_Romania_3month_preJune8_2011
And so on and so on…

Back to 2016…

So it is completely possible that the upticks of the past week are actually LATE effects of whatever happened in mid-April 2016, which even @ Ukkel, Belgium was followed by significant data gaps (and if going by the 2011 Essen, Belgium record, the time frame of this having come all the way from Japan is completely possible now as well):

ukkel_belgium_3mo-endingjuly21_2016

The late April and the mid-June “events”, are they from seperate origins, or coming from the same spewing source?

Demene_Latvia_3mo_EndingJuly23_2016
When you look at my posts from the past few months, you might “get the picture”…

Remember the Beta spikes?  They fitted nicely with a delayed fallout pattern as well (June 8, 2016) Breaking: BETA Radiation spikes from The Netherlands to Russia + Snapshots of 3-month Radiation Graphs + (EURDEP)

I still think it’s ongoing waves of Fukushima fallout falling out of the upper atmosphere, mixed with what’s obviously an actively fissioning source.  I think that’s the same source: Fukushima-Daiichi, and the Cobalt-60 is what gives it away.  Unless some psychos are setting off nuclear bombs every now and then.  Maybe I’m naive, but I think someone would notice. [sarc.]

Hence my post (July 22, 2016)  Fukushima-Daiichi having FISSION Flare-Ups? Saudi Arabia Test a Nuclear Bomb? A Major Nuclear Meltdown Cover-Up Somewhere? Which one is it???

Something HUGE happened in April this year (2016).  ENORMOUS.  The Te-132 data makes that clear.  And possibly earlier.  Maybe it’s been building for half a decade, and the radioactive burbs are getting bigger.  Personally I think Fukushima is spiraling further out of control.   But we won’t really know any day soon, as I think the scene is a miliatry operation, with a public perception management wing on the one hand (with a time-line of lies being apologized for and all), and an on-site engineering wing that’s trying to tackle an issue for which the technology does not yet exist.  If they fail, the Ocean will eventually be toast.  The rest follows.  Could be centuries, but they know that.  Anyhow…

The fact that RT could just state, ““[…] Five years after the Fukushima tragedy, the exact location of the highly radioactive “runaway” fuel remains [a] mystery for TEPCO. The absolutely uncontrollable fission of the melted nuclear fuel assemblies continue somewhere under the remains of the station. […]” and then… [crickets]  … not one big American, European (or Japanese for that matter) media outlet jumps on that with front page headlines… is in and of itself a feat of media control.  (included in June 26, 2016 (Some EURDEP radiation data, RT: Fukushima Still Fissioning, How did they get to “600 Tonnes of Nuclear Fuel Missing”?,…)

Onward to the Tokyo Olympics 2020…  “Tralalal”   No idea what to do with all the waste yet, but… meanwhile they’re building (worldwide) over 60 new reactors…    I don’t know if I could ever add something that would tilt the scales towards just a tiny bit more sanity in this matter…

The couple decades of electicity is just a trick.  Looks like the main plan IS to make the planet a whole lot more radioactive.  If that were the plan, then how they’re acting makes perfect sense.  Only then, though.        So… I’m inching towards speechless again…

I guess I’ve done my part exposing the lies and ongoing cover-up.

— Peace OUT —

For what it was worth, if anything…

— — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
Advertisements
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Inching Towards Speechless Again… (w/ Couple EURDEP graphs revisited)

  1. Pingback: We’ve Been Dosed… | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  2. kukukrine says:

    Hi,
    Strange colors on some tubes in the core of Leibstadt’s reactor in Switzerland meaning something happened lately and now complicates restarting it. And so implying 2 months delay for restarting it after one month off.
    Seems close to the beginning of a melt down process…? (In the news, lenouvelliste.ch, in french, 22.08.2016). Could it explain the actual so different monitoring values between Austria and Switzerland, through wind dispersion, venting, adding to the rest?
    Your job is great, I’ve tried to do so but am still not able enough with computers. Might be superposing some patterns could give some clues with different hights of wind. For that adding a section for collecting the news of NPP failures could help.
    Many, many thanks.

  3. MVB says:

    Merci. It’s one of many possibilities. Or it could at least be a factor in compounding the fallout landscape, only making it more complicated. When time opens up I may look more at the possible Swiss nuclear issues. I think the swiss monitors are better than the Austrian (just as the Latvian monitors are clearly better than the Finnish, to name another regional difference in where what shows up and where nothing is to be seen more often…).

    By the way, the swiss interface of its own radiation data platform is excellent, one of the few to do better than EURDEP (most are much worse than EURDEP): via @ https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/radioactivity/current-radiation-levels-monitors/switzerland/

    For other readers, the French-language article refered to @ http://www.lenouvelliste.ch/articles/suisse/argovie-des-problemes-techniques-prolongeront-l-arret-de-la-centrale-nucleaire-de-leibstadt-570514

Thank you for commenting. Your comment won't show until approved. Sometimes that can take awhile. - mvb

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s