Validated Ruthenium-103 Detection ERASED from Norwegian Radiation Data (EURDEP 2016)

[Added: The below became outdated: As of checking on Sept 10, 2016, the Ruthenium-103 data had become accessible again as it was before.  Left rest of the blogpost as-was.  It was correct at the time of posting:]

—— ——- ——

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever.”

– 1984 (by George Orwell)

The nuclear establishment is now actively shrubbing the record clean of inconvenient detections…

In February I reported, Ruthenium-103 Detected in Norway (in mid-Jan. 2016) and luckily took a screenshot of the data:


Just a half year later, that wouldn’t even be possible anymore.  Not only do validated detections of Cobalt-60 no longer show up on the visual overview map, and zero-values (which might actually be indicators of Beta-emitting fallout) get erased (example Belgium):


… and entire data sets getting erased following major spikes (example Estonia):


… and now we can add to that list:  previously validated detections of highly suspicious artificial radioisotopes, like Ruthenium-103 vanishing…

In this case, a yellow dot still shows on the map for January 2016:


Ru-103 was detected near Oslo, Norway in January 2016.  It was the highest such detection since 2011.  The data is no longer viewable…

But when you click on it to see its data, it directs to Berrylium-7 data instead.  You can view data of some other things, but the Ru-103 option has been erased…


Like it never happened…

And on a side-note, the data gap (short week of no data gathering) over New Year’s was not an isolated incident, either…


So:  What happened at the beginniing of 2016?  Was it related to the upticks and strangest of detections that happened later in spring?  Where did it all come from?  Why the ongoing media silence?

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Orwellian times are upon us…


— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —


— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —


If you are viewing this page on any website other than it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Validated Ruthenium-103 Detection ERASED from Norwegian Radiation Data (EURDEP 2016)

  1. Pingback: Fukushima-Daiichi having FISSION Flare-Ups? Saudi Arabia Test a Nuclear Bomb? A Major Nuclear Meltdown Cover-Up Somewhere? Which one is it??? | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  2. Pingback: A year @ Ukkel, Belgium (EURDEP data) | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  3. Pingback: Okay… | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  4. Pingback: Standard Deviousness | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  5. Pingback: A Decade of English Ninjas Crawling through Wattisham’s Gamma Alleys… | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  6. Pingback: The Gulag Will Be Decentralized in 22 minutes. | Allegedly Apparent Blog

Thank you for commenting. Your comment won't show until approved. Sometimes that can take awhile. - mvb

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.