June 11, 2016
Basically the below data charts further illustrate that the so-called nuclear watchdogs, the very agencies entrusted with environmental safety and alerting the population in case of nuclear releases into the environment are on top of their game… but not for what the unsuspecting public pays them to, but the very opposite: The radiation monitoring systems are RIGGED to hide or alter the data when it matters most.
The radioactive cloud that moved over Europe in the past few weeks has made it even clearer than already established: that if the situation is serious enough, as appears to have been the case, the most relevant data, such as T-BETA-ART (total activity in a cubic meter of air from artificial Beta-emitters), gets automatically redacted in Europe as well.
- Online Radiation Monitors –> EURDEP Public “Advanced Map” – disclaimer
- Radiation Units & Conversions
The monitor in Cyprus, not shown below, spits out (what to me looks like) useless data as far as T-Beta-Art goes, leaving 19 monitors: 14 in The Netherlands, and 5 in very close proximity in the Italian Alps (you have to zoom in on EURDEP to see them individually). While Gamma can give hints (especially through its data gaps… and ironically-with-a-twist, its lower-than-usual values ;-/), Beta is the better one for detecting fallout.
This is Europe’s best de facto “(Beta-emitting) fallout detection network”, with 7 of the 19 monitors showing unusual data in the past 1 month (pre June 10, 2016), with short data gaps on the others:
What happens when a thick radioactive cloud moves over the continent (besides suspicious interruption in radioisotope-specific air sample analyses)? We may get to see some data, but if the event is longer-lasting than a brief spike, the data flow gets cut, as seen here:
So far, media has remained completely silent. Politicians have not said a word. Everyone stayed calmly ignorant. And years or decades from now there won’t even be any way to link upticks in cancers or various other ailments to specific radiation releases, because officially those releases… didn’t even happen.
While a spike earlier in the month May (2016) reached a record-high 10,000 Bq/m^3 T-Beta-Art at the same monitor on the coast, this most recent one was followed by a substantial data gap, suggesting it might have gone even much higher than the previous record. See (June 8, 2016)’s Breaking: BETA Radiation spikes from The Netherlands to Russia + Snapshots of 3-month Radiation Graphs + (EURDEP) for details about the May-June radioactive storms passing over Europe… Sparks and all…
The other Dutch high value, closer to Germany, inland, occurred at the very beginning of June (see 1-month data, below) and reached over 9 Bq/m^3 T-BETA-ART:
Data gaps most likely correspond with spikes that the rigged system was able to catch and hide. This leaves just seemingly isolated high values, often near data gaps:
At the 5 Italian T-BETA-ART monitors we see the following:
In the below graphs is 1 month on the left, with the last week of that “zoomed-in”, on the right. An apparent data processing shift is clearly how the rigging is pulled off here. Also note the couple negative values:
- (June 4, 2016) Anatomy of a Serbian Data Gap + RT: Fukushima Still Fissioning!
- (May 26, 2016): Entire Western North America now “Fallout Blind”
- Etc. (Click “Home” in the top menu/bar and scroll down for lots more.
- Much more in recent months, listed chronologically in my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive, a sub-tab of the Nuclear tab in the top banner.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —