Down is Up: Negative Activity Rate, T-Beta-Art & Cs-137 Upticks (Eurdep data)

June 7, 2016

OT opening:  The Swiss sure have a way of celebrating the opening of a tunnel… LOL:

Anyhow…  Some radiation data, via Online Radiation Data, from EURDEP land:

This is a first one for me:  After  the (March 21, 2016) Negative Dose Rate (EURDEP, Luxembourg), there’s now also a negative activity rate:


“haha”   Rigging busted again!

How many artificial beta decays in those cubic meters of air?   “Minus one decay”?    [sarc.]

Did “emergency data rigging” kick in, or something? 

Might there be a connection to Cesium-137 spiking elsewhere, like @ Helsinki, Finland, where a 300% increase has been observed in the past few weeks, for no apparent reason:


What about Gamma monitors going haywire?


Surely no “levels of concern” are being reached, are there?  ‘Cause at some locations the 2016 trend suggests otherwise.  (Lamia’s 10-year data graphed here);   Past 6 months, pre June 7, 2016:


“See something?  Say something!”   Hello officer, I’d like to report an act of ongoing nuclear environmental terrorism…

Check out the last 12 hours Artificial Beta on the coast of The Netherlands @Wieringerwerf:  It just reached 6 and then about 18 Bq/m^3


-> These (non-validated) measurements stand in stark contrast to the period (post-Fukushima) March 2011 through May 2013, when measurements generally stayed below 1 Bq/m^3 and never surpassed 3 Bq/m^3 !

Did you know that on May 23, 2013, the “Lowest Detectable Level” (LDD) was then, just after some data gaps, simply changed to < 3 Bq/m^3, thus making all details invisible?


Poof.  They’re on top of the game…  Except that it’s not a game…

The last two spikes ( 6 and 18 Bq/m^3 T-BETA-ART) on June 7, 2016 are visually lost in the resolution of a 1-month graph… because two earlier spikes this past month went much higher!  Múch higher:  On May 30, less than 2 weeks ago:  the highest artifical Beta spike on record for that monitoring location, part of an apparent radioactive cloud that took 10 hours that day to pass over (at ground level)…:


That “something’s up” is no longer mere wondering or speculation.  I have documented enough (see Nuclear Blog Posts Archive for a chronological overview)  for that to now be established FACT.  Everything is pointing at a concerted ongoing mega-cover-up.  The RT reference, see next link, might have been a “testing of the waters”, but that which could have been front page & prime time world news (every day for 5 years actually) didn’t spread…

Did you see June 4th’s “Anatomy of a Serbian Data Gap + RT: Fukushima Still Fissioning!


How about the apparent FACT that the Ruthenium-103 detection in Norway in January 2016 was accompanied by a Cesium-137 uptick. And, also a strike towards the apparent data rigging (data gaps to hide the worst): Cesium-137 upticks apparently tend to be flanked by data gaps… What’s up with that?


Perhaps a clue about that first data gap, immediately following a curious detection of Ruthenium-103 at the same location in Southern Norway, can be found in the perfectly coinciding 3-week-long uptick of both Cs-137 as well as IODINE-131 at Cheb-Meteostanice Maskovska, Czech Republic:


Makes me wonder how high the detection might have gone in the data-gapped areas…

And the most-curious spike of also-short-lived fission product Tellurium-132 on April 26 (2016) in Germany occurred at such a spike/data gap time as well:

The fact that it was followed shortly after by detections of Cobalt-60 strongly hints at Fukushima being the source.

Te-132 & I-131 indicates active recent fission

Co-60 points at Fukushima-Daiichi. 

But all thát would imply at least one thing:   Shunichi Tanaka, chairman of Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority, whom as recent as Oct. 22, 2015 stated that, “Recriticality is physically impossible” IS DEAD WRONG.   

I guess the Japanese are wasting precious tax money on highly unqualified people for extremely important positions…   ;-/   Just like everywhere else…    But I guess we already knew that too…:

Nov. 20, 2015:  Debunking the ‘Impossibility’ of Ongoing Criticalities at Fukushima-Daiichi

And the mainstream media?  


— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —


— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —


If you are viewing this page on any website other than it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Down is Up: Negative Activity Rate, T-Beta-Art & Cs-137 Upticks (Eurdep data)

  1. Pingback: Breaking: BETA Radiation spikes from The Netherlands to Russia + Snapshots of 3-month Radiation Graphs + (EURDEP) | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  2. Pingback: Artificial Beta Uptick @ Wijnandsrade, NL (+ 6 months at monitor in Belgium & UK) | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  3. Pingback: Narva-Joesuu, Estonia (EURDEP, 27 months) | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  4. Pingback: Luxembourg (EURDEP, 6mo) | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  5. Pingback: I Used To Blog about Covered-Up Nuclear Disasters… | Allegedly Apparent Blog

Thank you for commenting. Your comment won't show until approved. Sometimes that can take awhile. - mvb

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s