Colorado Rocky Mountains… – Saturday May 28, 2016
[With a two US EPA Radnet graphs added on May 29]
Taking yet another look at the “peculiar radioisotope-specific detections” of this past half year, in particular the Ru-103 in Norway (sample period: January 11-18, 2016), and the Te-132 in Germany (sample period: just 2 hours at the onset of April 26, 2016), has revealed some darn interesting details… Check this out:
I’ll start with the Ruthenium-103 @ Åsterås, just outside of Oslo, Norway. (First mentioned in (Feb. 14, 2016) https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2016/02/14/ruthenium-103-detected-in-norway-in-mid-jan-2016/
Here shown together with Cesium-137: you can see this first validated detection of Ru-103 since 2011 coincided with an uptick of Cs-137:
-> And, as you can see clearly as well, some folks in charge of radiation monitoring have a rather strange logic even in Norway: After they detect Ru-103 at the highest level since 2011, they just take a break from monitoring for a couple weeks.
(Maybe they were too busy playing cards in their fallout shelter? hehe [j/k] )
Could, of course, just be automated data processing algorithms that are making sure no “levels of concern” get reached… (And if that happens, well.. there’s always the folks you share a building with to blame… Right?)
Now check out the just-Cesium-137 record from this location, with my annotations added: (March is compressed in time for some reason, but I’ve pasted the record together to show Jan 3 – May 3, 2016). Note the incredibly well-timed data gaps, 3 times coinciding with an obvious Cesium-137 uptick ánd with extremely unusual radiosiotope-specific detections elsewhere in Europe:
Darn too uncanny to be coincidence, I’d say.
So, I went looking for clues as to what might have been detected right after January 18, during that long data gap. Something that they don’t want us to see? Well, check out what I foud on this monitor @ Cheb – Meteostanice Maskovska, Czech Republic:
Showing Cesium-137 and Iodine-131, same period:
Very interesting, not? A doubling of both Cs-137 ánd I-131 right then during Åsterås’ data gap! I mean… Iodine-131? I know these are mere traces, but… it’s the fact that, as a short-lived artificial fission radioisotope, an uptick in I-131 points at an active fissioning source, and it’s that what makes this significant. Because the unusual detections span such a wide geographical region, a mere refueling or some other kind of just venting a little can be ruled out. Ruthenium-103 had not been detected since 2011. Refuelings and regular venting for various reasons occur all over the place every year. Like I’ve said for quite awhile now: “Something’s up!”. Both the Cs-137 ánd the I-131 uptick measured in Czech Republic were not surpassed since:
We can see that the radioactive cloud affected this monitor for about 3 weeks. Then things quited down as far as Cesium-137 goes, but -bizarre and strikingly – there’s two more periods with significant upticks of Iodine-131: immediately following the time of the Helsinki Garage Media story (which I’ve quesioned a-plenty, see, for instance (April 22, 2016), Was Helsinki’s Cs-137 “Localized Garage Waste Leak” A Decoy For Hemisphere-Wide Fallout Upticks? Fukushima? EURDEP/Nullschool DATA + (Some Nuclear Occult Links), and just prior to the Te-132 detection in Northern Germany!
In Germany, where they do actually verify data on a regular basis, you can see (from the Bismuth-214 and other naturally ocurring radioisotopes tested at the German monitors) that they did actually do additional tests after that Te-132 detection, but no other manmade radioisotopes are listed for that site, and the natureal/ enhanced natural measurements were all normal: (I discovered this by odd coincidence the day itself (April 26, 2016): https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2016/04/26/tellurium-132-detected-in-northern-germany/
Within less than 20 km from Seehausen, you can see a slight upticks in gamma radiation as well, possibly due to the further decay of Te-132, which decays by Beta decay to I-132, which in turn decays by gamma decay to stable Xenon-132. Example to that April 26 minor gamma uptick:
So, two wind pattern research attempts:
- What wind pattern hit Southern Norway on Jan. 24, that also hit Western Czech Republic?
- What wind pattern hit Southern Norway on Apr. 26 that also hit Northern Germany?
- (And if I were to trace back those wind patterns, where would the windlines intersect, if they did?)
Nullschool… http://earth.nullschool.net/ (There’s no need for a journalist to quote or refer to me: Just double check what I point at and use your intelligence. It’s not that hard. Everything I refer to is 100% public, non-secret, and verifiable by yourself via the links provided @ https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/radioactivity/current-radiation-levels-monitors/all/.
- 52.9 N 11.7 E = Seehausen, D.
- 50.1 N 12.4 E = Cheb, Cz.
- 59.9 N 10.6 E = Åsterås, N.
-> you can get the green circle in the right place by changing it in the URL.
So… starting with the correlation between Southern Norway (start of data gap right after Ru-13 detection) and Western Czech Republic (start of Cs-137 & I-131 uptick) on Jan. 24, 2016, 12:00 UTC… Near the surface, you can tell, there’s not much wind at all: @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/24/1200Z/wind/isobaric/1000hPa/orthographic=-8.75,50.75,1024
Just a bit higher up, already at 850 hPa, you see what I call a pattern “that fits the hypothesis” https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/24/1200Z/wind/isobaric/850hPa/orthographic=-1.71,51.50,1130/loc=12.400,50.100
- 1) both were in obvious relative slow-down zones in air layers below the jet stream,
- 2) both were fed with air that came from the jet stream arriving from across the Northern Atlantic…
Are you just as curious as me to see if the jetstream really passed over my #1 suspect?
Annotated Screenshot: The red circle (top left) is Fukushima-Daiichi in Northern Japan; the green circles are the 2 monitors in Norway and Czech Republic. The red arrows from F1 show where the jet stream blew at that moment downwind Fukushima. The black arrows trace the wind upwind from the 2 monitors in Europe:
Added May 29: From this snapshot in time, it seems to me that the most likely place for a data gap or uptick in the US, based on my hypothesis (fallout coming down in jet stream slow-down zones downwind Fukushima on a planetary scale), would have been the monitor @ Salt Lake City, Utah (that lake-dot in the blue slow-down zone on the edge of the northern arrow line in the mid-image dip. See it?). Okay… Graphing for Jan. 10 through Feb. 10, 2016… And there you have it, a spike the day before, preceded by a major data gap:
Closer to my location, the monitor in Colorado Springs, Colorado had fast-wind higher up, so, also fitting, at that time there isn’t much to see yet. This one does, however, show a significant data gap starting on Jan. 26:
And that actually fits too, if you run Nullschool and click through the 3-hour periods, you can see the slow-down zone move east and south, with the onset of the data gap nicely beginning when the slow zone first reaches this monitor’s area: https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/26/0600Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-102.91,64.55,512/loc=-104.490,38.500
Alright, on to Tellurium-132 land…. Northern Germany and Southern Norway, April 26…
Surface level wind… shows there still a decent amount of wind in the afternoon on April 23rd @ Seehausen in Northern Germany, but – how coincidentally [sarc.], there’s a major no-wind zone over the part of Southern Norway at the beginning of the data gap… @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/1000hPa/orthographic=0.36,51.77,1130/loc=11.700,52.900
By the time the Te-132 is measured in Germany, there’s not all that much difference. The slow-down is minor: https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/850hPa/orthographic=0.36,51.77,1130/loc=11.700,52.900
Yet at jet stream height, 250 hPa, you can see Seehausen (Te-132 spike) is in the slower bend, and Åsterås/Oslo (data gap) is in a slow zone: @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-20.35,62.12,1130/loc=11.700,52.900
Did the jet stream…? Nah… Really?
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Come on, IAEA, CTBTO, PR specialists, corruptors of science, pro-nuclear cultists, bribed politicians, opportunistic greedy investors, sold-out editors-in-chiefs,
It’s okay. Really: It’s okay. You fucked up big time. Shit happens. It’s okay.
That needed “moral revolution” that your frontman Obama referred to in Hiroshima… That’s only needed for you guys who’ve apparently long lost your moral compass with the onset of this misguided nuclear era. You’ve gotten away with it because you’ve deceived most of us very skillfully. I mean, it’s impressive the feat of deception you pulled off. Many of your brightest even believe the lies you’ve fed them. Maybe you even do. But you can stop patting yourself on the back now. The data I compile… don’t get me wrong: I’m just trying to reach you in a language I thought you’d understand.
We, who are energetically plugged in to the web of life of this incredible planet, whom many of us refer to as ‘Mother Earth’, we know the ocean’s in our blood and the mountains ‘re in our bones… We know something’s off. We can feel it. We get clues in dreams and ceremonies. You can quit the lies now, ’cause it’s game over. And somewhere deep down in what’s left of your alienated fragmented souls, you know it too.
We will welcome you with open arms at our healing ceremonies, around the campfires deep in the jungles, in the silent meditation retreats high up in the snowy mountains.
Come and find us.
Or wait for us to come. But meeting we will.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized. Please let me know. All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog. Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner. For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice. If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…