Highest Cs-137 Measured Since May 2011 @ Ivalo, Far-Northern Finland (March 7, 2016)

Via my page for Online Radiation Monitors -> EURDEP (Advanced Public Map)

IvaloOnMap_Cs137detections_1month_March15_2016

Since all the attention Helsinki’s March 3-4, 2016 record-high Cesium-137 detection got (SEE:  (March 7, 2016), Peculiar Radiation Spikes in Europe (@early March 2016) Suggest “Mystery Radiological Emergency” is ONGOING + Largest Cesium-137 detection since 1986 @ Helsinki, Finland (!), and (March 9, 2016) “Helsinki Cesium-137 Mystery solved, But Greater Mystery of widespread Radiation upticks Remains…“, I figured I should at least mention this peculiarty in some just-released data:

Following an uptick in Be-7, a small but significant uptick in Cesium-137 was observed all the way north (location on map, above):

Ivalo_1

Could the cold low-level nuclear waste leak in STUK’s Helsinki garage (surface) set off another surface monitor a thousand kilometers to the north a few days later?    Not impossible perhaps, but I seriously doubt it.    The Ru-103 detection in Norway in January and the widespread upticks and data gaps the past half year or so (see my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive) are just too odd to simply sweep it under some garage rug, imo.

For Ivalo via EURDEP, I browsed through the months and you have to go all the way to May 2011, right after the Fukushima accident to find a measurement as high at what was just detected for this location.  Just purely coincidentally… the same week saw the highest Cs-137 since Chernobyl at Helsinki.  We all know by now that was nothing.  Just a monitoring location sharing the building with a nuclear waste processing company… (Really?  That’s almost funny…)

(Note: If you set the max value at 1.2 Bq/m^3 (as I did for the above graph), you’ll find that a few times the LLD (Lower than Lowest Detectable), or MDC (Minimum Detectable Concentration) surpasses this level, but with nothing quantifiable detected.)

In Finland, the surface air was going roughly the same direction that time.  I added arrows of where the higher-up air was coming from.  This does not per se mean that’s where the uptick in Cs-137 came from.  The uptick in Cs-137 was preceded by an uptick in Be-7, though (which is generally made by cosmogenesis in the upper atmosphere through interaction of cosmic rays with oxygen and nitrogen).    This Be-7 uptick, however, was most likely the result of reactions with solar protons from the recent solar flares.   In any case, both cases occur higher up and the detector is at ground level, suggesting air from higher up made its way down.  Which makes sense when looking at the wind:

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:07:1500Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=0.88,60.85,512:loc=28.843,68.560–> At the time of this Be-7 uptick on March 4, as well the subsequent Cs-137 uptick on March 7, there was a slow-down in the air layers higher above, as is obvious on this Nullschool map for 250 hPa (jet stream height), shown above, with the approximate location of this monitor marked:  http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/03/07/1500Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=0.88,60.85,512/loc=28.843,68.560, which is when higher-up air can more easily descend.

Hence it is alse quite likely that the uptick in Cs-137 came from higher-up, possibly from quite far away.

Without making time-adjustments (so very rough), the same windline passes mainly over Canada, to eventually pass of far-Northern Japan, etc. – and round and round the wind blows…

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:07:1500Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-150.06,51.71,512The (US EPA Radnet) monitors circled in red are Juneau, Alaska, Richland, Washington and Salt Lake City, Utah, for which this is the last 2 weeks’ data:

Juneau_AK_March1.15_2016

Richland_WA_March1.15_2016 SLC_UT_March1.15_2016

-> In all 3, the first spike is likely due to the solar flare, and perhaps so is the small data gap, although what missing data would show is of course “anyone’s guess…”

And to close, the closest Radnet monitor near me, Colorado Springs…  More inland the air layers get mixed better and especially at higher altitude, you have a better chance of getting a whiff of what may be in the air much higher up.

If they wouldn’t hide the data, that is…:

ColoradoSprings_CO_March1.15_2016

Yeah… what can I say…?   The nuclear industry, of which the so-called nuclear watchdogs are a part, have not much credibility left…

There’s an uptick with a massive spike on Radmon (one of the alternative allegedly independent networks), in the very south of Norway:

RadmonSPike_Kristiansand_Norway.gif

… and there’s a data gap (and some forced-to-zero instances) on most Norwegian monitors the same week.   In this example you can also see a very minor uptick March 13-14, coinciding with the massive spike shown above:

HItraNorway_1week.gif

Just calling a spike “unvalidated”, as in this French example, doesn’t mean there wasn’t actually something in the air that caused the spike, either:

PA0KRS924MA_76_SIT_GM_northwesternFranceCoast_1week_preMarch15_2016

Spike in one place at the same time as data gaps elsewhere, and this time not coinciding with solar flares?  Coincidence?

k-index via http://www.solarham.net/planetk.htm

http-:www.solarham.net:planetk.htm

In short:  Some of the thin spikes of late may indeed have been just solar-flare related, but solar flares do not cause Cs-137 or Ru-103 upticks, so obviously there’s more going on.  And the widespread data gaps make it overly clear that the official radiation monitoring networks are rigged to hide the data when it matters most.

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, Fair Use Statement, Etc.

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it is plagiarized.  Please let me know.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
Advertisements
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Highest Cs-137 Measured Since May 2011 @ Ivalo, Far-Northern Finland (March 7, 2016)

  1. Pingback: Quick Mix: Data Gap followed by Spike on Cyprus; + Magnitude Unknown of Leak at Kakrapar Nuclear Power Plant in Gujarat, India | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  2. Pingback: A Look at a EURDEP Oddity in Lithuania | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  3. Pingback: Dark Morning in Belgium | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  4. Pingback: Was Helsinki’s Cs-137 “Localized Garage Waste Leak” A Decoy For Hemisphere-Wide Fallout Upticks? Fukushima? EURDEP/Nullschool DATA + (Some Nuclear Occult Links) | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  5. Pingback: Planetary Emergency RED ALERT: Wind Patterns Trace Beginning of Major Radiological Disturbances in Europe to FUKUSHIMA: Plausibility of Still-Fissioning “Underground Breeder Reactor Gone Wild” | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  6. Pingback: Request for Investigative Assistance. WANTED: Verification of MAJOR Nuclear Accident in 2016: WHEN, WHERE, HOW BAD, and WHO is covering it up? | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  7. Pingback: HIGHEST SINCE 2011: Cesium-137, Ruthenium-103, Tellurium-132 (!-> Period: Jan.-Apr., 2016) | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  8. Pingback: PLANETARY Radiological RED ALERT Situation ONGOING | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  9. Pingback: Fukshima Full-On China Syndrome, Still Fissioning! Just Another Opinion-Ramble, Sprinkled with Data (+ Possible Correction on Recent German Spikes; & Obama in Hiroshima – 2) | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  10. Pingback: Finland, U still there? * | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  11. Pingback: Shhh | Allegedly Apparent Blog

Thank you for commenting. Your comment won't show until approved. Sometimes that can take awhile. - mvb

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s