Cesium-137 Data @ Sola, Norway (2011-begin 2016)

Feb. 18, 2016 – DISCLAIMER

Wondering if I could find an additional clues to where that mid-January Ruthenium-103 detection near Oslo, Norway might have come from, I was browsing through some Cesium-137 monthly data…  It’s just some data.  Could come in handy as a reference at some point, perhaps.  Figured I might as well turn it into a blogpost.

Cs137Detections_Past Month_Feb18_2016

You can see the data gaps when it matters most, and upticks long after things where declared “back to normal”.  Apart from that, there’s not all that much to see.  In the graphs below, the dots are the center of a sampling period that’s usually about a week.  Dates at the beginning and/or end may repeat themselves.  (So what looks like a data gap here isn’t always one.)   Pull up the detailed data via EURDEP’s Public “advanced map” yourself for more details.

The radiosiotope-specific radiation monitoring record in Sola, Norway begins just before the beginning of the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Disaster began, with  what looks like a couple tests in January and February 2011:

Sola_23_Start

Before the radioactive cloud reached Europe, we get an idea of some values that could be close to “background” (as a result of nuclear bombings, and other nuclear “accidents”, like Chernobyl, all of which have laced the atmosphere with Cesium-137 (half-life: about 30 years).  Then -poof- there’s no data until the middle of April 2011:

Sola_21

The part that’s off-scale above, is shown again, below, with the y-axis adjusted:

Sola_22b.c._F1

By June 2011, Cs-137 already seem to have normalized…

Sola_20

But that’s one of the deceptions.  Many more whiffs were still to come…

Sola_19Sola_18Sola_16

Most of the data shown here is ‘validated’, but a couple high values, such as this spike in spring 2012 wasn’t ‘validated’ (which doesn’t mean it wasn’t real, though…):

Sola_17b

The record continues in summer 2012 with what looks like a return to “normal”…:

Sola_15Sola_14

until significant upticks return, again in winter.  Quite pronounced in Dec. 2012 through Feb. 2013:

Sola_13

And things quiet down again…

Sola_12Sola_11Sola_11Sola_11Sola_10

Winter 2013-2014 is relatively quiet, though:

Sola_9Sola_8Sola_7Sola_6Sola_5

A slightly higher-than-usual uptick in mid-March 2015:

Sola_4

An apparent spike in mid to late August 2015:

Sola_3Sola_2

And most recently rising to a value that also slightly higher than average.  That week of the peek value in mid-January (2016), Ruthenium-103, a sign of recent fission, was detected in Norway as well (See Ruthenium-103 Detected in Norway (in mid-Jan. 2016));

Sola_Norway_End

No data has been released since (time of checking: Feb. 18, 2016).

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Cesium-137 Data @ Sola, Norway (2011-begin 2016)

  1. Pingback: HIGHEST SINCE 2011: Cesium-137, Ruthenium-103, Tellurium-132 (!-> Period: Jan.-Apr., 2016) | Allegedly Apparent Blog

Thank you for commenting. Your comment won't show until approved. Sometimes that can take awhile. - mvb

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s