(JUST DATA) Baltic Zoom-in on Multiple Radiation Monitors Simultaneously (a EURDEP Snapshot) + Some Radnet data

This blogpost looks at 1 month (pre-January 9, 2016; 12:00 UTC), as found on the EURDEP Public “Advanced” Map (NOTE: Much of its data is “not validated” – See also my disclaimerke), showing selected radiation data from monitors in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Russian Federation, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Poland, and Northern Germany. (And then after that some more random monitors from the US and Europe.)

I have often adjusted the vertical axis to show more detail.  The intended purpose of this post is just to show how a data gap or the tiniest of a gamma uptick can be part of a possibly significant radiological event.   Not making any analysis, just sharing data.

The area marked in the red square is what I’ll focus on:

Jan8_2016_1month_GammMax_EURDEP_allOfEUROPE

And here again that part of Europe, with the checked monitors marked:

BalticZoom_Jan8_1mo_StandardDeviation_annot7

This latest inquiry began with what looked like an instrument error of the Kundu, Estonia gamma monitor, that perhaps was triggered by an actual radiological event, as documented in, Jan. 4, 2016, “Mystery Spike & Uptick in Baltics Part of Widespread Radiological Disturbances, Traces Back with the Jet Stream to the Fukushima Disaster Site… (Or somewhere beyond???)“.

I still have no idea about where exacly the very recent higher-than-usual upticks may have come from. I do not know either if it’s related to the increases documented in earlier post in December that show an upward trend over the years.

(See, for example, Dec. 20, 2015:  ALPHA & BETA Radiation Data Graphed for Mikolajki, Poland (EURDEP, 2007-2015) + other radiation observations…, and Nov. 12, 2015:  Radon-220 Spikes in Croatia: highest since records began in 2009. , and Oct. 28, 2015:  Detected in Helsinki Finland in October 2015: Cesium-134 & 137, Actinium-225 & 227, Cobalt-60. + Detected in Hamburg, Germany: Zirconium-97. ETC ETC.

!-> More posts documenting various aspects can be found in my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive.)

Fukushima remains a possibility, but comes with extreme uncertainty since higher-altitude winds converge over Japan at the moment (see Nullschool screenshots two posts back), meaning that radioactive clouds from just about anywhere in Euroasia or even North America would more-the-less pass over that general area.

In short: the mystery remains unsolved.

 More commentary below these (marked on map above) monitor’s data:

Kunda_Estonia

For orientation, you can find the location names on the map(s) above.

LV0016

Baldone1Baldone2

Riga_Daugava_Latvia

 Jurmala_LatviaJelgava_Latvia

Liepaja_Latvia

SMOLENSK (Russian Federation)

LeningradICP_Russia

Farosund_SwedenGavleSweden

 MAARIANHAMINA (Finland)

OLSZTYN (Poland)

GRENA SARA0208 (Denmark)

Ozerki_Russia

SIAULIAI_0248 (Lithuania)

PUTGARTEN OT ARKONA (Germany)Loviisa_SuomiHELSINKI KUMPULA (Finland)FINO 3 - FORSCHUNGSPLATTFORM (Germany)SAGARD OT MARLOW (Germany)

Lista_NorwayBergen_NorwayVISINGSO (Sweden)

There’s a lot of “little details”… such as that… seemingly random “glitch dots” (one or more isolated high values) are *not random* and should not be dismissed as mere statistical flukes.   Same for “data gaps”, which rather often coincide with ‘disturbances’ not all that far away.   Tiny upticks in gamma radiation may seem insignificant as far as their ‘dose rate’ goes (and would as such be dismissed by media spin doctors), but they very well may point at unusual concentrations of radioisotopes, many of which emit far more alpha and beta rays in their radioactive decay rather than the gamma rays most frequently measured.

See also these posts:

MORE DATA  – ALso from outside the Baltic zoom-in area…

I’m going to just share fairly random snippets of what I’ve looked at.  If nothing else, at least it saves you the time of waiting for the data to load, starting back up every time the system crashes, and so forth.

In many areas the spikes, even as they still seem not that big of a deal dose-wise, are rising well above levels seen during normal precipitation.

Various data records from 2015 show that *something* abnormal is going on, particularly again in the past few months, with upticks that clearly stand out from previous years (See for instance the beforementioned long-term record for ALPHA & BETA Radiation Data Graphed for Mikolajki, Poland (EURDEP, 2007-2015) + other radiation observations… (Dec. 22, 2015).

On Jan. 3, 2016, the data from Spitzbergen was cut.  Sadly it wasn’t just one of the standard “avoid panic” 48-hour delay tactics.  Like the year-record-long data gap of late December, so far, it stuck:

LONGYEARBYEN (Norway).gif

(Unfortunately weve lost all four monitors in Iceland.  I suppose they showed a little too much detail in the pristine air there…  -> See also 2015’s, “Four years of Radiation Data: EURDEP @ ‘Raufalhöfn, Iceland’ – (Long Term Pattern Spotting – Part 3 of 4)” and “EURDEP’s Automatic Omissions continue: A look at Iceland’s radiation monitoring Post- Chernobyl Forest Fires & Post- Fukushima’s May 2015 Re-Criticality Flare-ups“.)

Same up north in Alaska’s interior.  As I’ve pointed out before, when a radioactive cloud makes landfall, it may get picked up on the coast, but inland there’s much more turbulance, mixing air from different air layers, so that more contaminated air from higher up can set off ground monitors more, as ilustrated with data in last June’s “Fin Whale Die-Off by Alaska area ‘a Perplexing Mystery’… + More Data Rigging Evidence: EPA Radnet Beta radiation monitor @ Anchorage spiking when DATA GAPS @ Anchorage“, on which you can see the seemingly random “gitch dots” in coastal Anchorage corresponding with far more significant upticks inland @ Fairbanks, “of course” accompanied by their now-notorious data gaps:

fairbanks_anchorage_ak__june15_21_2015_.jpg

So, in short, the “glitch dots” aren’t “glitches”, but more likely an indicator of an air mass higher up containing fallout.  I suspect they’re likely caused by a hot particle directly striking a monitor.

And data gaps don’t mean the monitor’s not working.  Whoever programmed the data processing / public interface simply made sure we don’t get to see anything that could be “of levels of concern“, as the EPA puts it.

Fairbanks, AK is still streaming data, with these (marked with black squares) data gaps since early November, broken up in 4 graphs (with the y-axis set automatically):

Fairbanks_EarlyNowFairbanks_lateNov

The second week of December saw abnormally high values for particularly Gamma range 2, mixed with lots of short data gaps, a patterns that has “fallout cloud” written all over it, in my opinion.Fairbanks_Dec2015Fairbanks_earlyJan2016

What else…? Hm…

Well:   I saw an ‘Alert’ sign near Pittsburg, PA on the NETC’s map yesterday.  Didn’t take a screenshot, and since I’m not a member, I can’t see the graphs.  SO had a look at the US EPA’s Radnet, where upticks have been quite pronounced the last 4 days, shown below.

“Interestingly” (or typically…), the initial spiking in Gamma range 3 has a data gap in it, thus likely omitting the suspected peak value.  I wouldn’t have noticed if it wasn’t for the data gap also showing on the other gamma ranges.  Beta seemed unaffected by that early spike:

PittsburgPA_2weeks_Jan8_2016_MiniGammaDataGap

Pasted 2 x 2 weeks together for Beta-only, does show the upticks rose just above their usual range:Pittsburg_BETA_1month_tillJan8_2016

Nice gaping data gap in San Juan, Puert Rico…:

PuertoRico_Dec25_2015_Jan8_2016

Back to EURDEP, a “glitch dot” following a disturbance that brough the baseline down.  The drop’s probably snow, and the glitch dot a hint of that mystery fallout still flying higher up.

Croatia_Osijek

Hungary: One monitor shows an uptick, another very close by shows an uptick with 1 extreme value within it, while the week is sprinkled with various data gaps:

PapaHungary

PapaRepuloterHungary

Given the upticks have been going on for awhile, I doubt underground nuclear testing by North Korea has anything to do with what’s been showing up on monitors for months.  For the latest on that, check with the CTBTO @ https://www.ctbto.org/

Anyways…  Not much to say, just thought I’d share some of the data I looked at.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

A list of other nuclear-related posts can be found in chronological order in my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive (recently updated).

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, etc.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
Advertisements
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to (JUST DATA) Baltic Zoom-in on Multiple Radiation Monitors Simultaneously (a EURDEP Snapshot) + Some Radnet data

  1. Pingback: Me: Spike! EURDEP: What Spike? | Allegedly Apparent Blog

  2. Pingback: Spate of Mysterious Radiation Upticks (and Data Gaps) Continues. 3 months of data from Steinfort, Luxembourg | Allegedly Apparent Blog

Thank you for commenting. Your comment won't show until approved. Sometimes that can take awhile. - mvb

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s