- Denver, Colorado:
- The very same time period, including the Nov. 11 spike measured in Denver, here (shown below) as seen on the Colorado Springs, Colorado Radnet monitor:
- Grand Junction, Colorado: NO DATA (monitor turned off)
Good they have a good disclaimer, eh?! Otherwise, I suppose, they could be taken to court on serious corruption charges. Or what else would you call it when an agency in charge of environmental protection works so closely in cahoots with the nuclear industry that the data processing software is apparently programmed to hide anything that could hint of there being something seriously wrong?
Reason for my checking was a jet-stream-altitude wind slow zone, which I’m under the impression to often correspond with radiation upticks (or data gaps for that matter). If the suspected mega-spikes were natural, there would be no reason to hide them, right? The fact alone that data is hidden from public view exactly at such times that I would expect Fukushima-related spikes is telling, isn’t it? My suspicion remains, as it has been for years now, that this is due to the ongoing Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear catastrophy, which isn’t just leaking into the Pacific Ocean, but continues to spew untold amounts into the atmosphere as well.
Now go ahead and deny this. And make sure to be ‘baffled’ and ‘puzzled’, and ‘at a loss’ for the ‘mysterious’ consequences to fauna and flora in various hotspot fallout zones across the Northern Hemisphere… which, sadly, are simply ‘to be expected‘ when tons and tons of nuclear waste is dumped into the environment on a daily basis for what is now over 4 years.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Disclaimer: Information and beliefs, are no substitute for knowledge. And the possibility cannot be completely ruled out that I am bat-shit-crazy, lost in nonsensical attempts to ‘interpret silence’…
If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized. Please let me know. All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog. Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner. For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice. If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
[This blog post was originally posted “privately”, during a period after Oct 5, 2015 when this blog was not visible to the public.]