It’s Nov. 11, 2015 in the Colorado Rockies… 9:45pm Mountain Time.
Internet through Mifi.
What shall I look at tonite…
Like Radon-222, Radon-220 (Rn-220) is another one that can be ‘natural’ or “enhanced natural”. Naturally occuring as a part of the decay chain of Thorium (Th-232 & Th-228), the decay chains leading to Rn-220, http://periodictable.com/Isotopes/086.220/index2.full.prod.html also shows it can be added on by at least 4 types of Plutonium isotopes, just to pick something (Pu-228, Pu-232, Pu-236, Pu-240, Pu-244). The end-product is, again, stable lead, in this case Pb-208.
EURDEP has various monitoring networks for the same isotope sometime, just by different names. One, Rn-220-EEC, for instance has just these two monitors in Croatia:The one on the right is BATINA, Croatia.
This past 1 month shows both Radon-220 and Radon-222, with what looks like significant recent spiking after a day-long data gap:
This monitor started measuring at the very end of 2009. Here’s the entire record: Dec. 2009 though Nov. 12, 2015. Watch the top graph in particular, Radon-220. See its complete decay chain @ http://periodictable.com/Isotopes/086.220/index2.full.prod.html. (Note: Maybe this is unrelated, but… MOX fuel, which was in the fully-melted-down-and-out Reactor 3, as well as in spent fuel (some of which burned up too) contains Plutonium-240 (Pu-240), one of the many radioisotopes that in its decay chain passed through a Rn-220 phase. Just a thought.) Anyhow…
I marked the level that was never surpassed pre-Fukushima with a red line for both, starting with 2009:
!–> A first “highest measurment of Rn-220 since data collection began at the end of 2009” is recorded at this monitor between March 13 and March 20, 2011, clearly due to Fukushima, and corresponding with lots of other radioactive particles reaching all the way to Europe and beyond:
By the beginning of summer 2011, the US EPA had already declared the accident basically over and returned to ‘routine monitoring’ (which is practically nothing as far as sample analysis goes). Most of the fallout much higher up hadn’t even begun reaching ground monitors… (at least, that’s still my impression, to which this record only adds…).
Rn-220 and Rn-222 “behave” quite diferent at times, which is interesting in and of itself, I find. Just watch them seperately.
I have no idea what happened.
I’ve checked EURDEP enough over the past few years to notice, though, now already weeks ago (around the time of the Oct. 25, 2015 massive upticks, documented in the previus dozen or so blog posts), that very recently something véry unusual has been taking place. A radioactive cloud that contains large amounts of Bismuth-214, Radon-220, some Zirconium-97, Cesium 137 & Cesium-134, and then some… It’s definitely newsworthy.
Given the measurements in the United States indicate it’s coming from across the Pacific, I suspect it’s coming from Fukushima-Daiichi. If not, something extremely serious occured somewhere else.
Mainstream and so-called alternative media are completely silent.
Well, not exactly ‘silent’. They’re making a lot of noise… but NOT about this…
Let’s look at a couple BETA & ALPHA radiation monitors in Europe… Anything unusual happening? There’s the networks of Poland and Romania. The Russian data is only good for the data gap record.
Here’s one from Russia: “HaHa” …
I suppose it comes with the territory:
Lightly edited on Nov 12, 2015,
…when Budapest, Hungary saw an unvalidated glitch dot of significance, after a half-week data gap, most likely merely inserted “with the best of intentions”
… for public perception management purposes…
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Disclaimer: I think a significant amount of my “Nuclear News” subtab links might be ‘controlled opposition’ sites.
I encourage anyone (me, myself & I) to
If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized. Please let me know. All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog. Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner. For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice. If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
[This blog post was originally posted “privately”, during a period after Oct 5, 2015 when this blog was not visible to the public.]