September 2, 2011 – Leavenworth, Washington [NOT Kansas :-) ], USA –
While traveling across this beautiful country I often ask “self-declared Americans” what they think about the conspiracy theory that ‘the 9/11 attacks 10 years ago were carried out by elements within their own government’. If they’ve looked at it just a tiny bit, MOST no longer believe the official version, realizing something really IS fishy about one aspect or another, and usually they want a new investigation. Polls have long confirmed what I’ve found too: the opinion that things went the way the Bush-Cheney regime said they went is slowly becoming a minority opinion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlPweD6R3Cc. Not that a majority would be needed for arguments to carry weight…
.The disturbing notion, however, that ‘elements within the U.S. government (or close ally Israel…) actively took part in the planning, execution and cover-up of the 9/11 attacks‘ still stops a lot of people’s thoughts, though. It’s as if the very idea is somehow “off-limits”. If you consider THAT, then… “A blank static screen appears”, so to speak. Most just zap back to a familiar (sports) channel and abandon any further investigation, as it is already clear that IF that were the case, they couldn’t accept the implications anyhow.
The sinister implication, of course, is that this country, and by extension the whole world, is currently essentially steered by coldblooded terrorists disguised as public servants. And our taxes keep ‘m going. Civil liberties were rolled back, the longest war in US history is still raging in its aftermath, hundreds of thousands of civilians killed, thousands of American soldiers swept up in the patriotic frenzy… all based on mind-boggling lies. For some, this is too hard to take.
So… Why-oh-why would one possibly have little other option than to question the official version? If liberty is anything you cherish at all, educate yourself. Consider the following very nicely done documentary excerpt just about the use of controlled demolition:
–> there’s MANY more, but just 3 examples of damning books that give overviews and interpretations of rather “odd coincidences” are:
- The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé – by David Ray Griffin
- The Terror Timeline: Year by Year, Day by Day, Minute by Minute: A Comprehensive Chronicle of the Road to 9/11–and America’s Response – by Paul Thompson
- Completely not even touching on the physical evidence of controlled demolitions, Crossing the Rubicon – by Michael Ruppert (of http://www.fromthewilderness.com/ ), corners then-Vice President Dick Cheney as one of the terrorist masterminds. More info can also be found on the related website, http://www.oilempire.us/
Aside from pushing the “Peak Oil” theory ad nauseam, and rather strangely critiquing the allegations of ‘controlled demolitions’ as distractions that would somehow be too hard to uphold in court, one of the book’s strengths lies in its exposing the role the “military exercises” that occurred that day might have played to make the attacks succeed in their objectives. The author’s online video: “Mike Ruppert – The Truth and Lies of 9/11″ may be a faster alternative than this thick book: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6ZD4HqxQIY
- More about the rather unbelievable coincidence of both terrorist-aiding and nearly identical-to-attacks ‘military exercises’ the same day: http://911review.com/means/wargames.html
But don’t stop there. Check these out too:
- Yeah, it’s not perfect and may contain bits of distracting misinformation, (so: like it or loathe it) but the (in)famous video ‘Loose Change Final Cut‘ is still worth a look, in my opinion: http://lc911finalcut.com/
- Scientific peer-reviewed papers that underscore the near-certainty that planted explosives were used to bring down WTC 1, WTC 2 and WTC 7: http://www.ic911studies.org/Papers.html
- Some credible witness accounts of multiple secondary explosions – footage that was kept secret by the US Government, only released in 2010 due to a Freedom of Information Act request: http://www.youtube.com/user/IC911STUDIES#p/u/5/IO1ps1mzU8o
- Scroll down and explore the compilation of articles here: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wrh_9-11_index.php
The big hush-hush remains the likely involvement of the Israeli Secret service (The Mossad), as evidenced by this compilation of news snippets that suggest this is far from “anti-semitic” conjecture:
- http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/israel_9-11_index.html ; as well as:
- “911, Iraq, PNAC , All roads lead to Israel”, by Ryan Dawson, which includes broad context info: http://archive.org/details/IraqPnac911AllRoadsLeadToIsrael (was at http://www.rys2sense.com/ too, but links broken at times.)
- For a historical precedent where Israeli agents blew their allies’ up (in Egypt) and tried to make it look like Muslim extremists did it (a.k.a. a false flag operation), check up on the Lavon Affair (Operation Susannah): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair
- For something more on the Mossad, try the book these assholes tried to ban: ‘By Way of Deception: The Making of a Mossad officer – by Victor Ostrovsk: http://www.amazon.com/Way-Deception-Making-Mossad-officer/dp/0971759502 and the sequel, The Other Side of Deception: A Rogue Agent Exposes the Mossad’s Secret Agenda.
- For a chuckle on the mainstream media’s desperate attempt to frame anything critical about Israel as “anti-semitic”, check out this crap from CNN: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrCMkDS52kc It uses the typical misinformation technique of mixing obvious lies (that there were no jews in the buildings and other nonsense) with facts (that Mossad agents were across the Hudson to “document the event” (If link broken… try Googling “Five Dancing Israelis 9/11” or something along those lines – Skip the ‘Jew references’ found in many intros (which I find very misplaced in reference to the secret wing of an otherwise pluralistic nation-state) and check for the actual revelations) Check out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx9q5N8iV68 and perhaps also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-K8sRo7CTs, as well as other oddities documented in the above links…). Links frequently get removed “due to copyright infringement/excuses”. Search for reposts, or try all these (all different, all worth it):
See also these Resources: http://www.911truth.org/links.php
On a side note, last month an alleged 30-year CIA officer I met at a bar in Wyoming (who supposedly spied in China), used a metaphor when I asked him his take on 9/11 being an inside job [not, but almost verbatim]: “If you run a truck stop and find out that one of your very best clients sexually harassed some of your employees, what do you do? Tell the press the truth about what happened? Or wait until a freedom of information act request forces you to give clues?” With the hint of “one of your best clients” (in terms of military aid/contracts, that would be Israel), I thus asked next: ‘Are you referring to Israel?’ He did not say no, but (very skillfully!) changed the subject. And as I insisted, he did eventually say, “If I tell you more I would have to kill you.” I replied, “Actually, I don’t think you’d HAVE TO… Who’d believe me anyhow?” He seemed to think that was funny.
I think he was legit. He did not tell me more and went to sit somewhere else… I finished my drink and left. And the beat goes on…