Looking Back at the 9/11/2001 State-Terrorist Attacks: the official story is BULLSHIT

September 2, 2011 – Leavenworth, Washington [NOT Kansas :-) ], USA –

While traveling across this beautiful country I often ask “self-declared Americans” what they think about the conspiracy theory that ‘the 9/11 attacks 10 years ago were carried out by elements within their own government’.  If they’ve looked at it just a tiny bit, MOST no longer believe the official version, realizing something really IS fishy about one aspect or another, and usually they want a new investigation.   Polls have long confirmed what I’ve found too: the opinion that things went the way the Bush-Cheney regime said they went is slowly becoming a minority opinion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlPweD6R3Cc.   Not that a majority would be needed for arguments to carry weight…

.The disturbing notion, however, that ‘elements within the U.S. government (or close ally Israel…) actively took part in the planning, execution and cover-up of the 9/11 attacks‘ still stops a lot of people’s thoughts, though.  It’s as if the very idea is somehow “off-limits”.  If you consider THAT, then…   “A blank static screen appears”, so to speak.  Most just zap back to a familiar (sports) channel and abandon any further investigation, as it is already clear that IF that were the case, they couldn’t accept the implications anyhow.

The sinister implication, of course, is that this country, and by extension the whole world, is currently essentially steered by coldblooded terrorists disguised as public servants.   And our taxes keep ‘m going.  Civil liberties were rolled back, the longest war in US history is still raging in its aftermath, hundreds of thousands of civilians killed, thousands of American soldiers swept up in the patriotic frenzy… all based on mind-boggling lies.   For some, this is too hard to take.

So… Why-oh-why would one possibly have little other option than to question the official version?   If liberty is anything you cherish at all, educate yourself.  Consider the following very nicely done documentary excerpt just about the use of controlled demolition:

.

AND ALSO…:

–> there’s MANY more, but just 3 examples of damning books that give overviews and interpretations of rather “odd coincidences” are:

The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé

.

.

.

The Terror Timeline: Year by Year, Day by Day, Minute by Minute: A Comprehensive Chronicle of the Road to 9/11--and America's Response

.

..

.

Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil

Aside from pushing the “Peak Oil” theory ad nauseam, and rather strangely critiquing the allegations of ‘controlled demolitions’ as distractions that would somehow be too hard to uphold in court, one of the book’s strengths lies in its exposing the role the “military exercises” that occurred that day might have played to make the attacks succeed in their objectives.  The author’s online video:  “Mike Ruppert – The Truth and Lies of 9/11″ may be a faster alternative than this thick book:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6ZD4HqxQIY  

But don’t stop there.  Check these out too:

The big hush-hush remains the likely involvement of the Israeli Secret service (The Mossad), as evidenced by this compilation of news snippets that suggest this is far from “anti-semitic” conjecture:   

See also these Resources:  http://www.911truth.org/links.php 

On a side note, last month an alleged 30-year CIA officer I met at a bar in Wyoming (who supposedly spied in China), used a metaphor when I asked him his take on 9/11 being an inside job [not, but almost verbatim]: “If you run a truck stop and find out that one of your very best clients sexually harassed some of your employees, what do you do?  Tell the press the truth about what happened?  Or wait until a freedom of information act request forces you to give clues?”  With the hint of “one of your best clients” (in terms of military aid/contracts, that would be Israel), I thus asked next: ‘Are you referring to Israel?’  He did not say no, but (very skillfully!) changed the subject.  And as I insisted, he did eventually say, “If I tell you more I would have to kill you.”  I replied, “Actually, I don’t think you’d HAVE TO…  Who’d believe me anyhow?”  He seemed to think that was funny.

I think he was legit.  He did not tell me more and went to sit somewhere else…  I finished my drink and left.   And the beat goes on…

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Looking Back at the 9/11/2001 State-Terrorist Attacks: the official story is BULLSHIT

  1. Pingback: April 22, 2015 Photos /// [Relaps-Slip #1] | Not All Alleged Is Apparent…

  2. Pingback: Dark Morning in Belgium | Allegedly Apparent Blog

Thank you for commenting. Your comment won't show until approved. Sometimes that can take awhile. - mvb

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s