Fukuchima fallout in US

3/28/2011 (midnight SMT) — So, by all meteorological forecast models, the “radioactive cloud” should now be spreading its menace to the Western US, and soon most of the Northern Hemisphere.  If you haven’t seen the models yet, see a previous post, ‘Radiation Cloud Movement’, which gives easy access to those models.  But those are models, I want facts.  Best place still is the link I listed on my USA page for UC Berkeley:  http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/UCBAirSampling.

UC Berkeley has announced that West Coast rain has traces of radioactive iodine (I131,I132), radioactive cesium (Cs134, Cs137), and radioactive tellurium (Te132) according to their Nuclear Engineering Air Monitoring Station.  Yesterday they logged:

“3/26 (6:20pm): Rain water sample results posted for 3/24 – 3/25. I-131 and Te-132 activities are lower than previously observed (3.12 and 0.27 Bq/L resp.) while Cs137 remains near the high point at ~0.5 Bq/L.”

I-131 @ 3.12 Bq/liter for rainwater on the West Coast.  That’s perhaps not very harmful, but definitely significant.  (“safe levels” for infants supposedly are 100 Bq/liter, at least that’s the Japanese standard).  Bq is ‘Becquerel’, a unit for radioactivity expressing “disintegrations per second”.   Iodine-131 has a half-life of 8 days and is genrally considered dangerous for about 3 months.

Cs137 @ 0.5 Bq/L for rainwater on the West Coast is well below levels seen in Japan, but… a bit troubling nonetheless.  The half-life of Cesium-137 is 30 years, leaving it dangerous for about 600 years.  The radiation dose from drinking such water may still be very low (lower than radiation exposure on a regurlar plane flight from coast to coast in the US), but… on such flights you don’t get served drinks with radioactive Cesium, which if you were to drink it could end up in tissues and do unpredictable harm.  So the comparison to X-rays, flights, etc, is only half the gauging.

Using the Rad Pro Calculator, if I were to drink 1 liter of this Cesium-137 contaminated California rainwater, what would be the equivalent dose?  Again, it depends on the distance.   Reported reading are often “just over the surface”, so let’s put in Cs137, 0.5 Bq and choose different distances to get an idea of the equivalent dose:

1cm —-> ………………………………………… 0.0003820 µSv/h

(1 inch = 2.54 cm / 1 cm = 0.394″ )

0.1cm (a millimeter) —-> ………………. 0.0382047 µSv/h

0.01 (like the ticknes of hair) —-> …. 3.8204886 µSv/h

0.001 (“direct contact”) —-> …… 382.0490020272 µSv/h

Check there FAQ page for some basics: http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2044#others

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

Thank you for commenting. Your comment won't show until approved. Sometimes that can take awhile. - mvb

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s