Crestone, Colorado, USNORTHCOM –Dec. 3, 2016
I was wondering…, “What would be the WORST headline I could come up with, given ‘the situation’?” – hehe. (I have other ones, maybe worse, but those could come in handy after the 16th, when the lines between “reality” and FICTION are blurred just one notch more…)
Just before everything I utter gets misinterpreted…: please understand I respect people’s choice to “live in a bubble“. I trust that if you’re one of them New Babylonian bubbly folk, that you avoid blogs like mine. In that worst case you stumbled into this pit, please understand I do not intend to pop your bubble, even if I deep down would actually like to (in an animé fictional realm you could relate to, of course…).
This blog is merely an ARTISTIC outlet.
Trust me on just this one thing: This blog (ultimately owned by Google actually, so make no mistake about this: what I think I post and what you see… may not even be the same, WHEN push comes to shove… Facebook-style… you know what I mean. Or at least: you should know what I mean.): This blog is highly unlikely to ever resemble whatever you think it is. If you got an issue with it, leave me be, just take it up with Google. They can shut shit like this down in no time.
When it comes to proxy realities, like radiation data, the field where the fucks I could give are grown… is a barren wasteland. But when it comes to actual biospheric reality, that perceptual field is overgrown into a wild jungle, so dense, dark and moist… you might reveal your modernist conditioning… when getting lost in it… sooner than you think…
So, anyhow… I was going to actually entertain myself next with nothing less than Washington’s Blog’s disclaimer! Yep: ;-)
Washington’s Blog, which I visit every now and then, because I have often appreciated the research and references incorporated into their analyses, has a disclaimer (on the right side of their page), headlined, “National Security and Copyright Notices”
It’s different from MY DISCLAIMER and when I read theirs, I thought… “Hm… let me add a whimsical commentary to that National Security Notice.” ;-)
All of this is, of course, purely “for entertainment purposes only!” (see also my disclaimer).
In bold WB’s, alternating with my nonsensical rambles of utter irrelevance:
We are NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, we are calling for the reinstatement of our government.
Bullshit. Calling for the reinstatement of “our government” means you realize that those who are effectively running the government now are not legitimate. Illegitimate governments need to be overthrown for a legitimate government to have a chance of being reinstated. I would ABSOLUTELY call for the overthrow of this fucked up corporate fascist mess, IF I knew how it could be done! The rabbit hole goes véry deep. And hence, truly: I’m clueless on HOW it could be accomplished. I just stare into space. Those in charge like me there, that much I know…
I feel sadness and powerlessness.
I… I… I…st… I stutter, I shudder in horror,… I mutter… on this muttering blog… And hence I call for nothing at all…
and just opt… OUT
…to entertain… .
We are not calling for lawlessness. We are calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law.
Semantics. We still HAVE “rule of law”.
Yet, just like it’s always been: those in control call the shots on how the laws are selectively applied. Quite a number of laws on the books have always sucked. Not sure when ‘rule of law’ actually equaled ‘justice’, as you seem to imply (?). When? During the time that most Native Americans were pushed onto mere ‘reservations’? FUCK YOU if that’s what you meant. During the Great Depression? During the great world wars? During the nuclear war against the Earth when entire Pacific Nations’ islands were obliterated? After JFK was assassinated? Before 1995? 2001? Before or after the NDAA was signed into law? (See March 18, 2012: Waving the Winning Obama Flag, while Executive Order “NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS” is signed…)
No, seriously: What era do you refer to? That mysterious era “when America was great”… thát one? Very ‘mythical’ in its appeal, but, come on, WHEN wás that?
I mean… ‘return’ to rule of law? You KNOW the NDAA is law. I know you read it, because you published better write-ups on the matter than I did. If you want a more JUST rule of law, then, in a situation WITH an illegitimate government in control, WITH vast array of utterly insane laws on the books, FOR REAL: just wondering, but: Aren’t you going to HAVE TO ignore the existing laws that you don’t like? Thát kind of “taking the law in your own hands” (by discounting the laws you don’t accept) IS the very definition of “lawlessness” … at least… as far as civil law is concerned.
(I’m not a lawyer, DO NOT accept anything I write. I make this overly clear: this is just ‘a ramble’.
“I’m not the authority you’re looking for.”)
The Boston Tea Party (I’m sure you’ve heard of it) was an act of de facto “lawlessness”, at least from the perspective of the British Empire (in terms of “sovereignty” (and the empire completely disregarding anyone else’s) comparable to the current American Empire), which was wielding political power on the east coast until then. The equivalent of such an anarchistic act of property-destructive civil disobedience would undoubtedly be labelled ‘terrorism’ today.
Rule of law is awesome when both rulers and their laws are aligned with dignity and aim for genuine justice. In EVERY other case, FUCK advocating for “rule of law”!!!
Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, we are calling for its enforcement.
Okay. … That’s cute.
Let me ask you a question: How do you ‘enforce’ the Bill of Rights?
Just as an exercise in thinking (a mental activity that once-upon-a-time wasn’t frowned upon as if it were somehow by default “mental”…). Let’s say your very constitutional First Amendment is under fire.
[First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Second Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” – See USA Declaration of Independence & Bill of Rights and Later Amendments for more.]
Let’s say… (just imagining fictional things for your entertainment…) let’s say that the mainstream press is no longer a check on the balance of power, but has been co-opted by corporate interests into a vast propaganda machine that ultimately serves the financial elites (sorcery-based fiat money and all that…), with the backing of a vast military-industrial complex (“comply or destruction”). A little far-fetched, I know, but just ponder it as a hypothetical possibility. [sarc.]
Let’s say dozens of alternative outlets have sprung up over the past decade(s). And after decades of covert subversion-attempts, then –tada, hello 2016!– an overt campaign emerges to neutralize the possibility for an actual ‘independent free press’ to re-emerge.
A couple “notes”…
Mainstream journalists get detained. Was this just to make sure “the message” gets out far and wide: that we’ve entered a new era…?
Blogs like your very own [Washington’s Blog was included in the PropOrNot list] get labeled ‘Russian Propaganda outlets’ by an apparent psychological operation run through a mainstream media outlet, (Washington Post) and picked up by all the others big names.
Washinton Post, Nov. 24, 2016: Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say…
The most powerful information-flow-accommodating media corporations (Facebook, Google,…) join the offensive and frame unwelcome speech as “Fake News”, which they announce they will try to eradicate.
Add to all that the military context, which includes massive numbers of military troops and equipment amassing on the borders of Russia (see Nov. 7, 2016: NATO Places 300,000 Troops on HIGH ALERT “to attack Russia” (?) , Ready “within less than 180 days”… […]”); and that the closest allies, namely the European “Union”, pass a law to “counter Russian propaganda” too…:
Basically, let me sketch the situation as following: Politically MEANINGFUL ‘Freedom of Speech’ has been abolished. You may still be able to speak your mind, but if it doesn’t fit the the State-approved narrative, you won’t be heard, except perhaps by a few of your closest facebook friends, whose response will be closely monitored and dealt with on an “as needed, case-by-case basis”. OR… you get a wide audience, get exterminated as “a terrorist” and you serve as “an example”…
Got the picture?
Okay, so that’s where the Second Amendment comes in, no?
You know, that “right to bear arms” thing… You do know that’s just a fashion statement, right? They could just have well written “your right to wear a tie, a mini skirt, or a burka should never be infringed upon,” but as we all remember from highly accurate Westerns, back in them old’n days, people BORE / WORE guns. Not more to it.
So, don’t get confused. It has nothing to do with the fact that you’re not going be able to get close enough to a mothaf’cker who ought to be assassinated, if you’re not even allowed to bear arms.
Fun fact side note: That erroneous interpretation of the US 2nd amendment, namely that it is essentially the constitutional right to KILL DESPOTS ánd those who fund and protect them, is just something I learned in a history class in a foreign country. [Maybe not directly, but it was kinda insinuated…] They probably got it ALL wrong, being foreigners and such…
Funny how wrong I can be [my specialty!]…, but I was “indoctrinated” that that’s why the US Constitution is so powerful: At one point, these “educators” (including ‘books’ [like the internet but printed on paper]) actually managed to convince me that that Second Amendment gives one the right to KILL agents of law enforcement, military and political heads of state IF those very individuals are serving a vastly different agenda than one that serves ‘We the People”. SO funny in hindsight. hahaha
After over two decades of being a law-abiding tax-paying human being labeled, ‘legal alien’, who signed up with the US Selective Service and all, it was quite the relief to learn that it was just a fashion statement. ‘Cause, as you know, I do like fashion, at least to look at. (See for instance the blog posts, (Dec. 2, 2011) Icelandic Fashion and Window Installations; and (July 2, 2016) Antwerp, Belgium, May-June 2016), etc. …)
So… back to the little hypothetical thinking game… Let’s say meaningful freedom of speech as a aspect of political discourse has been effectively neutralized, and it appears that only a well-directed wrathful revolt can stop the seemingly unstoppable slide into a dystopian totalitarian nightmare…
Thén what? [ Thank G*D this is “just hypthetical”…, right?!! ]
We are patriotic Americans born and raised in this country. We love the U.S. We don’t seek to destroy or attack America … we seek to restore her to strength, prosperity, liberty and respect.
Well, I’m not. Not patriotic. Like most forms of GroupThink, I find allegiance to tax districts disgustingly narrow-minded. I was born on this planet, sure. I do feel a sense of responsibility to this Earth, which has nourished, sheltered and awed me all along. But a fucking country? You kidding me? When do you think you are? The 18th century?
So, no: I’m NOT “a patriotic American”. I do not love the U.S. unquestioningly. I love the land and most of the people I’ve met, and the spirit I’ve felt here RESONATES, but the United States you’re probably reminiscing about had already been effectively sabotaged when you were born. What’s left is a totalitarian machination masquerading as a democracy. You say you love the US, because you don’t even dare say otherwise anymore. That’s how brainwashed you are. It’s okay, man, I understand brainwashing. We’re all in the same boat, for real. But please… This country, like any country, doesn’t exist outside your imagination. Why does it seem real to you?
Your imagination has been hijacked. Get real.
We don’t support or like Al Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, or any similar or supporting groups. We think they are all disgusting.
I don’t like violence either. Sucks being on the receiving end, especially. But what are you actually saying, that you’re a tax resister?
It’s a sickening admission, but I do actually support Al Qaeda, ISIS and them sand people in Talibanistan. Not for real in my own mind, but for real in my own actions: I’ve admitted thát in my blog post, (April 15, 2011) I Donated Money to a Terrorist Organization. It wasn’t appreciated, but…
Ironically, you, Washington’s Blog…, kinda hinted in that direction yourself with your articles, … and () … and () … . [fuck it, I know I read about it on your site… Look it up yourself…].
Or am I connecting dots shouldn’t be connected, as per Totalitarian Ordinance X?
The nation’s top legal scholars say that draconian security laws which violate the Constitution should not apply to Americans.
The US Constitution, for whatever a piece of ideas is worth, for real, legally: it actually applies to all people (It’s *We The People*, NOT “we-white-pretend-Christian-fundamentalist-brainwashed-US-born-American-Citizens”, in case you failed to grasp the opening line of the Bill Of Rights): all PEOPLE within the geographical, or at least perhaps philosophical…, borders of the United States of America.
It has nothing to do with whether or not the current criminal gang and their unwitting henchmen gave you a piece of paper that tells you you’re “an American citizen”, as if that somehow makes you special. These rights are self-evident and inalienable. You can CALL me “an alien” all you want, and I can play along with this sick joke for convenience purposes, and as such you may try to trick me into believing that inalienable rights don’t apply to me, but excuse my difference of opinion: I think you’re misguided in that view.
There very well may be aliens on this planet, but I’m not one of them. I’m a human being. Born and raised on Earth. So go fuck your pathetic patriotic bullshit propaganda already. Whose agenda does it serve anyhow? Aliens’ agenda?! And I don’t know if you’re catching that, but my attitude is actually more ‘American’ than yours.
Should you attempt to shut down this site or harass its authors, you are anti-liberty, anti-justice, anti-American … and undermining America’s national security.
Oh. hahaha. Damn! You’re invoking “national security”? Wow. Okay, I concede. I know it’s not (cause I’m just rambling while drinking wine,) but… IF there had been a pissing contest between our disclaimers, undoubtedly: YOU WON! Yay: You’re a winner!!!
Until that last line I thought you were being serious! Thanks for humoring me at the end.
Joke’s on me.