Mid-May 2017 Radiation Spikes had Nothing to do with Hanford. Schumann Resonance Frequencies are not increasing either. [Sigh…]

[Note: Some details, re SFP4 for instance, in the above video are questionable, see (Feb. 2016) Plume Gate and the NRC FOIA documents 5 Years Later)

Downwind from what’s upwind, Planet Earth May 24, 2017

It pretty much doesn’t matter how much time I put into documenting extremely unusual pieces of scientific evidence of “fallout events”, does it?  Even if I were to trace wind patterns or suggest possible sources of ongoing covered-up nuclear spewing disasters.  Audiences are tiny, dozens to hundreds at the most.  Blog traffic appears diverted.  And the few so-called alternative outlets that focus on nuclear news all too often appear part and parcel of a sophisticated multi-layered broad-spectrum ‘Controlled Opposition’, putting on very convincing (seeming) ‘distractions shows’, and all…  At least, that’s my impression, OPNION, if you will.

I’ll start off with a few more EURDEP 3-month graphs, and then compare the US EPA Radnet data from near Hanford with some other locations.

Just like I’ve focused briefly on the “Ninja Dots”, I could do a whole blog post on the ‘data compression’ phenomenon, another trick up the deceiver’s sleeves.  For example, @ Ilfov (Lacii Morii), Romania a nice example of apparent “data compression: is seen around April 9, 2017, below.  Also visible, of course are the data gaps and what looks like two ‘baseline adjustments’….  Anyone’s guess what’s being hidden…

Same period, a few more 3-month composites from other locations:

This monitor at Ankara Cancaya, Turkey…:

… has shown some interesting events in the past:   September 2016:

Second half March 2016:

Onset December 2015:

Back to this month of May 2017…  I do not know how many nuclear accidents / incidents are compounding the radiological landscape by now, but one thing remains clear:  We’re essentially “on our own”.   Iodine-131 detected at ground levels all over Europe? “Perhaps a pharmaceutical leak in Eastern Europe?  Little time goes by, and ‘information overload’ has most of us forget about it.  Everything become a blur of various unknowns…

The tabloidesque troll-infested news aggregator site ENENews showed two US EPA Radnet gamma graphs in an attempt to illustrate, or at least imply, that a significant radioactive cloud was released from the tunnel collapse on the Hanford Nuclear Reservation @ ENENews, May 18th, 2017 “ALERT: Officials warn of more collapses at US nuclear site — “High spikes” in radiation levels recorded — Expert: Plutonium could go airborne — Major concern over radioactive releases — Gov’t delays revealing data to public (VIDEOS)

The two graphs, for Richland and Ellensburg, Washington show clear spikes outside their usual variability range.  Now, ENEnews has done this another handful of times:  Right when apparent fallout signatures show up across much of the northern hemisphere, some mainstream outlets and/or major wire services launch one or more nuclear stories with a local angle.  Hanford, Nevada Test Site, Indian Point, St. Louis,…  All these locations’ troubles surely deserve more attention and funds, so more media attention is a good thing.  But… the use of radiation graphs to underscore the serious implied risk to the public raises suspicions for me.  (I know there’s medication to reduce my ability to be suspicious, but I find that approach suspect. -hehe)

In the gamma ranges, some show the upticks better than others.  Via the US EPA Radnet site (via Online Radiation Monitors –…–> https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/query.do I picked Gamma Range 3 and graphed from May 6 through May 22, 2017, with splatter plot, rather than the line setting, ’cause that way you can better see if a “spike” is more like an isolated high value (which I often call “glitch dots” if they’re super-high):

The tunnel collapse reportedly was on May 9, 2017 (see the ENENews piece above for links to news in the days and week after):

You could clearly see slight disturbances beginning around May 9th, and a significant spike between May 10 and May 12.   Surface winds were all over the place and shifting, which would diffuse a release signal and make it difficult to discern at long distances:

!-> Image plucked off (very good overview of the collapse and related very serious challenges and problems at Hanford): ZERO HEDGE, May 9, 2017:  “Serious Situation” After Tunnel Collapse At WA Nuclear Facility; Evacuation Ordered, No-Fly Zone In Place

!-> Also: I have visited the area (and its ‘Reactor B‘, studied its challenges and concluded, “These big underground double-walled (and already beginning to fail) storage tanks contain enough radioactivity to utterly ruin the entire Pacific Northwest, and all waste combined at the Hanford Site, if not dealt with properly and timely, has the potential to practically render all of North America uninhabitable.   The Hanford Site is among the most pressing challenges to be dealt with on this planet.” in (May 30, 2013) The Hanford Site, holding the Pacific Northwest at Nuclear Gunpoint

No one can make me make light of the challenges or the dangers at Hanford.  But trying to freak people out with massive radiation spikes AS IF it came from Hanford deserves to be exposed as bullshit if that part of the story doesn’t hold up.  WHERE ELSE the ‘radiation release’ could have come from might be far more scary, though…  (See my previous post, (May 20, 2017Tumble Down the Corium-Dug Rabbit Hole: Did the Radioactive Cloud that just Blew over Europe (containing COBALT-60, Ru-103, Nb-95, Cs-134, Cs-137, Na-22, etc.) originate at Fukushima-Daiichi, Japan? for one vein of wondering…)

The jet-stream fan-out (see nullschool data below), after it makes landfall is similar in those few days.  I picked May 10 @ 3:00 am local time for the wind patterns just a bit above surface @ 700 hPa via nullschool, with that bend in the Columbia river marked as a reference point, zoomed and turned so that the Pacific is visible:

https://earth.nullschool.net/#2017/05/10/0900Z/wind/isobaric/700hPa/orthographic=-147.16,44.17,500/loc=-119.428,46.092  screenshot of that:

When we look at jet stream delivery’, the wind patterns at that moment for at 250 hPa:  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2017/05/10/0900Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-147.16,44.17,500/loc=-119.428,46.092  annotated screenshot:

Alright, so ENENews may just have screwed up again by mixing two pieces of news into one: a tunnel collapse at Hanford and a radiation spike around the same time.

‘Cause if you just look at some other locations, such as a few examples shown below, and ask yourself if those spikes, data gaps and disturbances observed NOT just near Hanford were likely to have originated from ‘some release’ from Hanford… the answer is: obviously NOT.  They included near-simultaneous spikes far-away as well as in UPwind (from Hanford) locations.

Notice: Due to the EPA omittig data gaps when the data gap is at edge of a query period, the following two have a different x axis, making visual comparison with the other graphs less obvious:

Further east the upticks and spike much more closely resemble the timing for the onsets of this wave of spikes also seen in Europe, documentation of which I included in: (May 20, 2017) BREAKING: Ruthenium-103, Cobalt-60, Niobium-95 & Cesium-134 Validated Detections in Finland, Cesium-137 Uptick, Artificial BETA upticks in The Netherlands and Italy, as yet another Mystery Radiological Disturbance rolls across Europe… (EURDEP, MAY 2017)  If we’re talking about a radioactive cloud from the same source, this can only be explained by fast traveling higher-up winds…

And these no way you can explain the Alaskan upticks with Hanford either:


In short: the use of Radnet data showing spikes right after an alarm was declared at Hanford, pitched as likely due to releases from an old plutonium-containing tunnel at Hanford, just to add punch to a Hanford story was not entirely bullshit.  At best, it was a pure coincidence and an oversight on the reporters.  At worst it was a deliberate diversion story.

Also, on-site at Hanford they maintain that there was no release into the air.    The response by Hanford’s emergency personnel makes me wonder if they noticed some alarming details in the radioactive cloud and acted as a precaution assuming that ‘somewhere on site’ might have been the source.   In the following days, the surveys noted nothing out of the ordinary for the site’s surface: http://www.hanford.gov/files.cfm/SamplingDataPurexTunnelMay192017.pdf

The final word on this collaspe, May 22, 2017: “There was no spread of contamination” – SOURCE: http://www.hanford.gov/news.cfm/DOE/Tunnel_Cover.pdf

Does ANY news outlet care to wonder then WHERE those high and widespread spikes came from?   Apparently not…  Freak’n Orwellian reality we’re in, my friends…

As documented in the past few posts, widespread gamma upticks, both in the US and Europe, corresponded (at the few monitoring sites in Europe that share this data) with artificial Beta emitters, ánd validated measurements of Niobium-95, Cobalt-60, Ruthenium-103 and Cesium-134, yet NOT ONE major news outlet delves into this mystery…    Perhaps the data pearls thrown to us-swine is all just a remnant, a left-over from a dying past, when genuinely aiming-for-democratic-control, free independent press & transparency weren’t hollow sloganeering…

Just blips of denial of the overarching control grid

Image plucked off, SOURCE: https://andrewdhall.wordpress.com/

Oh, and one other thing…  The Shumann Resonance” is not spiking.  I’m shaking my head after watching some very entertaining videos…

The atmosphere is being swamped with ionizing particles, which increase both discharges of thunderstorm clouds, as well as increasing the conductivity of the upper atmosphere.  When did this spiking began?  When Fukushima kinda disappeared from the news in 2014?  When radioactive clouds containing Cobalt-60 began to be detectable even at ground level?  Get over it New Age dreamers: the Schumann Resonance frequencies are still the same.   We’re not “waking up”.  We’re asleep, becoming enslaved within a technocratic machination of misguided madmen, losing the battle for genuine democracies that give a damn about integrity and transparency.   Weapons’ sales are off the charts, as are suicide rates, substance abuse, increasing cancer rates, etc.  Stop trying to give it all a positive spin…

The observed spikes, which are just significantly increasing amplitudes of the static in the part of the extra low frequency (ELF) range of the electromagnetic spectrum that includes the Schumann Resonance frequencies.

Basically the planetary “frequency of life” is being disrupted.

Don’t let that stop you from giving it all a lovely-sounding positive spin, though, so you have an easier time avoiding facing the demons in the eye…

wobb… wobb… wobb…



Posted in Politics | 4 Comments

Tumble Down the Corium-Dug Rabbit Hole: Did the Radioactive Cloud that just Blew over Europe (containing COBALT-60, Ru-103, Nb-95, Cs-134, Cs-137, Na-22, etc.) originate at Fukushima-Daiichi, Japan?

nuclear_red_Alert!!!-> For the extremely peculiar radiation data I’m referring to, see this morning’s (May 20, 2017) post: BREAKING: Ruthenium-103, Cobalt-60, Niobium-95 & Cesium-134 Validated Detections in Finland, Cesium-137 Uptick, Artificial BETA upticks in The Netherlands and Italy, as yet another Mystery Radiological Disturbance rolls across Europe… (EURDEP, MAY 2017), of which is a key excerpt:

Kotka_FInland_Cs134_Co60_1month_validated_w.table copy

Ratio of Co-60 to Cs-134 in this AIR sample is more than 2:1, anomalous even for nuclear bomb tests, unheard of for nuclear meltdowns.  Is something UNPRECEDENTED unfolding somewhere? 

Did it come Fukushima-Daiichi?  

I’m afraid so.  

The implication, namely that underground (at-least-for-periods-) sustained fission reactions have not yet ended, is as mind-blowing enormous as that allegation / suspicion has been since it was first suggested in spring 2011.

I have been raising this dire prospect as a distinct possibility since (Aug. 3, 2013) Radioactive Iodine in Seaweed and Sludge, Summer 2013? (Hints of Recent Criticality Events…) + Data suggests radioactive fallout still blowing around the world?, even before I went to Japan later that year.  I have made the case for its possibility in a number of posts, including (May 29, 2015) Land of the Sinking Sun… and (Nov. 20, 2015) Debunking the ‘Impossibility’ of Ongoing Criticalities at Fukushima-Daiichi

As described in my ground-breaking exposé on Co-60 (Jan. 26, 2016) Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?, it turned out that one of the kelp seaweeds I had sent to a lab for radioisotope-analysis contained a very significant trace of Cobalt-60, yet no radioCesium…  Similar with the air sample from the other day at Kotka, Finland: MORE Co-60 than Cs-134.  That’s incredible.  Why?  In the meltdown accidents of Three Mile Island (TMI) and Chernobyl, Co-60 was in fact quite insignificant compared to radioCesium and various other radioisotopes.  This is because it requires an enormous amount of free neutrons to turn that tiny trace (just 0.282% of regular steel) of the iron isotope Fe-58 into Co-60, by double neutron uptake via Co-59.  At Fukushima-Daiichi, however, it shows up in strangely extreme quantities, especially in the cooling water of what’s left of Unit #3, the reactor that had been loaded with Belgian MOX fuel (mixed oxides containing a much higher concentration of Plutonium).

I suspect this is the smoking gun and the very reason why Cobalt-60 was omitted from key academic literature to begin with.  They started off by making the public belief (through nuclear insider operations such as Kelp Watch (Dr. Kai Vetter, UC Berkeley / Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, not exactly neutral on nuclear issues, to say the least) and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute (WHOI, with historic ties to nuclear interests and the defense department), that Cs-134 is the best “key tracer of the Fukushima nuclear disaster”.  In addition, by implementing a policy of “don’t test for anything else if no radiocesium is found”, a policy the US EPA also applies for testing (or not) for Strontium-89/90, they reduced the chances of finding  such strangely isolated Co60 traces to about zero.  Then academics studying fallout aspects of the Fukushima catastrophe, apparently working for the nuclear industry, somehow managed to omit Co-60 from the list (and thus suggested further studies…) of Fukushima-related radioisotopes…  and Voila, as if by magic trick we have ourselves a de-facto fait accompli:  When a strange mixture of various man-made radioisotopes, including also indicators of relatively recent fission (Nb-95 and Ru-103), also contains a bizarre amount of Cobalt-60… academia and the unquestioning mainstream media can keep its head in the sand and pretend they “have no clue” where it came from.

(Well done, nuclear industry, were it not for me drinking about a hundred doses of Ayahuasca in 2013 and following Amazonian visions all the way to the edge of the Fukushima exclusion zone in some crazy-making omen-following destabilizing shamanic attempt to shift the energetic momentum of modernity away from an approaching nuclear war…, a self-inflicted ordeal from which I have yet to fully recover…  But that’s another story altogether.)

Was Co-60 omitted from the official academic records (such as Steinhauser’s “Fukushima’s Forgotten Radionuclides”) for the same reason there was an apparent media gag order on Europe’s largest measurement of Telurium-132 since Chernobyl (April 26, 2016 in Northern Germany)  Why did that not make that into even one media outlet in Europe?  Is this why every new wave of Iodine-131, such as those detected earlier this year (2017), fails to be traced to a specific origin?   The truth of Fukushima appears to have been declared off-limits.  Do they really think they can just kick this fissioning can into the future until some hoped-for solution is secretly found within their tiny inner circle?

See, my opinion would be more easily dismissed as utterly implausible were it not for the fact that various other independent researchers arrived at similar conclusions by vastly different routes…

  • *I* arrived at the likelihood of ‘Fukushima Still Fissioning!‘ by two converging pathways:  by tracing fallout patterns observed on radiation monitors in US and Europe with the jet stream to Fukushima, and by investigating the significance of Cobalt-60 as a key tracer of Fukushima fallout.  And then, combined with questions that arose from looking into the significance of Thorium-231, I arrived at ‘the implication’ they certainly would want to keep hidden:  That part of the Fukushima-Daiichi complex might have served as an advanced research facility, experimenting with unusual fuel geometries for either the purpose of siphoning off fissile material (possibly for a secret nuclear weapons program), or for ‘breeder reactor’ research.  Pretty crazy conclusions to feel compelled to arrive at…
  • Based on piecing together a wide array of news snippets Dr Goodheart of A Green Road Blog interestingly posed the exact same possibility in (March 20, 2013): Fukushima Secret Nuclear Weapons Research Lab, Plutonium Weapons Research – Breeder Reactor? US Illegally Sent Japan Tons Of Weapons Grade Plutonium, Now It Is Demanding That Japan Send It Back
  • And to make matters worse, Yoichi Shimatsu, former Editor of The Japan Times Weekly, arrived at the exact same possibility, not through studying fallout, nor pondering curious radioisotope-specific data, nor by piecing together various news articles, but by noting strange Japanese behavior, which included observations such as:   “[…] suspicious activities also pointed to a high-level cover-up, including systematic undercounts of radiation levels, inexplicable damage to thousands of imported dosimeters, armed anti-terrorism police aboard trains and inside the dead zone, the jamming of international phone calls, homing devices installed in the GPS of rented cars, and warning visits to contacts by government agents discouraging cooperation with independent investigations. These aggressive infringements on civil liberties cannot be shrugged off as an overreaction to a civil disaster but must have been invoked on grounds of national security. […]” on Rense.com in the exclusive (Sept. 8, 2011) Shimatsu – Proof Of Fukushima Weapons Program.

Hence I feel compelled to raise this possibility yet again.  My sense is that, on a time-scale of multiple decades, certainly affecting future generation, quality of life for complex carbon-based life forms, such as humans, is at stake.

Aside for the culture-shift-demanding challenge at hand to shift this discord to harmony, the situation contains the ultimate obstacle: The nuclear industry, including the IAEA and affiliated so-called official watchdogs, has been hijacked by mafia-like powers, with the full backing of all the world’s most powerful militaries, who have no regard for the sanctity of Life.

I don’t know how to respond to this impression.

Praise yourself lucky you don’t live inside my mind…

Posted in Politics | 5 Comments

BREAKING: Ruthenium-103, Cobalt-60, Niobium-95 & Cesium-134 Validated Detections in Finland, Cesium-137 Uptick, Artificial BETA upticks in The Netherlands and Italy, as yet another Mystery Radiological Disturbance rolls across Europe… (EURDEP, MAY 2017)

May20_2017 copy

May 20, 2017…

Nippy… – Colorado Rocky Mountains (USA) – May 20, 2017

Scroll down for the radiation data from Europe.

Man it’s been chilly the past few days…  Almost -6 Celsius last night…   Glad it’s warming up today.  I hope that was the last bit of night frost for a very mild but dragging on winter…   Elevation 8200 ft. with hail, and fresh snow higher up yesterday:


Radiation Data:

The significance of Cesium-134, Niobium-95, Ruthenium-103 and Cobalt-60 is not in their (trace!) amounts, but that they’re detected at all.  And, taken together, a pharmaceutical or resource exploitation leak can be dismissed.

This came from either a nuclear reactor or a nuclear bomb test.

!-> It is a mixture that is véry similar to the mystery detections of May 2015, mentioned in June 6, 2015’s Pink Unicorns beach themselves on the shores of Lake Dystopia, when the mixture also included Iodine-131, and was reported on by Finland’s STUK in late May 2015: @ http://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/radiation_safety_watchdog_detects_airborne_radioactive_particles_says_no_cause_for_alarm/8003739  After “asking the neighbors”, they later stated that they never figured out where it came from.  This time, there has been no press release (yet?), as of posting this.

Though the amounts are truly the tiniest of traces, the fact that radioactive pollution of such a bizarre mixture cannot be traced to a source, at least not for public consumption, I do actually find ’cause for concern’ all by itself.

Here’s the most recent data:

  • Kotka, Finland: Cs-137 & Cs-134:

Kotka_FInland_Cs137_Cs134_1month_validated_w.table copy

Ruthenium-103 (with Cesium-137 again):

Kotka_FInland_Ru103_Cs137_3mo_May20_2017 copy

  • All these detections were ‘validated’.  Here’s the details for Niobium-95 and Ruthenium-103:

Kotka_FInland_Nb95_Ru103_1month_validated_w.table copy

Cesium-134 & Cobalt-60, showing a striking ratio of more Co-60 than radioCesium (!):

Kotka_FInland_Cs134_Co60_1month_validated_w.table copy

!!!-> I have looked into the significance of Cobalt-60 as an extremely significant Fukushima-related artificial (neutron activation product) radioisotope in (Jan. 26, 2016)   Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?, suspiciously OMITTED from key academic literature (probably because of its implications…).

This is the 3rd spring in a row, each time in the period April-May, that both Cobalt-60 AND indicators of recent fission were detected (in 2015: with I-131, Zr-97, Ru-103, Nb-95; in 2016: preceded by Te-132; in 2017: with Ru-103, Nb-95), each time also accompanied with Cesium upticks and widespread disturbances.

Possibilities thus remain the same three I’ve brought up before:

WHERE did it come from? 

  • Also noteworthy were minuscule (just above the LLD of 3 Bq/m^3) upticks of artificial Beta radiation and “enhanced natural” alpha emitters @ Biddinghuizen, The Netherlands

Biddingenhuizen_TheNetherlands_TbetaArt_TAlpfaNat_3mo_May20_2017 copy

As well as a significant spiking of artificial Beta in Northern Italy:

JRC_Station7_T-Beta-Art__T_Aplha_Art__3mo_May20_2017 copy

This shows that the radioactive cloud is apparently widespread, combined with wind patterns, reducing the chance that it came from a local/nearby Finish, Swedish or Russian source.

Some locations also picked up slight Be-7 upticks as well as some Sodium-22 (Natrium-22, or Na-22) shortly before:


A cluster of ‘Standard Deviation’ in the French-speaking part of Belgium stood out on the European map for early May 19, 2017.  It turns out to correlate with a moving dip in the jet stream, combined with a rain-out that then progressed across Germany.  The disturbances are also picked up erratically and less pronounced across the British Isles, further suggesting that this latest radioactive whiff likely came from across the Atlantic…

StandardDeviationCluster_Wallonie_May19_2017_12noon_ETC_12hoursSetting copy

So, a quick look at jet stream, and just below, wind patterns for Southern Finland in the air sampling period May 17-19, 201 via Nullschool…


https-:earth.nullschool.net:#2017:05:16:1800Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-12.13,57.77,596:loc=26.900,60.500 copy

-> This shows that detection in both The Netherlands and Italy make sense for a jet-stream-delivered whiff, as well as the rain-out across Belgium into Germany…  The sampling at Kotka, Finland comes right after, and also fits, as the jet stream’s curve moves north in the following days.  With air layers already mixing from their travel across land, it possible some of it reached ground-level, where the monitors are.


https-:earth.nullschool.net:#2017:05:18:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-12.13,57.77,596:loc=26.900,60.500 copy.jpg

North Pole view does show that in the preceding days, the jet stream blew straight over Fukushima, leaving that possibility open:


Next are a sampling of various T-GAMMA monitors, showing 3 months at a time, in no particular order:

Kiev_Ukrain_FrenchMonitor_3mo_May20_2017 copySochtenau_Germany_3mo_May20_2017 copyLiberec_Letisti_CzechRepubli_3mo_May20_2017 copyLomnicky_STIT_Slovakia_3mo_May20_2017 copyMartelange_Belgium_3mo_May20_2017 copyDahlenburg_Germany_3mo_May20_2017 copySlavonski_Brod_14_Croatia_3mo_May20_2017 copyUkkel_Belgium_3mo_May20_2017 copyBiringen_Germany_3mo_May20_2017 copyMugla_Milas_Kemerkoy_TS_Turkey_3mo_May20_2017 copyOostende_Belgium_3mo_May20_2017 copyCherkessk_Russia_3mo_May20_2017 copyWeinheim_Germany_3mo_May20_2017 copyMayrhofen_Austria_3mo_May20_2017 copyGurteen_Ireland_3mo_May20_2017 copyRakican_Slovenia_3mo_May20_2017 copySorbiers_42_AG_CP_France_3mo_May20_2017 copyParis_SacreCoeur_France_3mo_May20_2017 copySauda_Greece_3mo_May20_2017 copyCanakkale_CAN_TS_Turkey_3mo_May20_2017 copyVinje_Norway_3mo_May20_2017 copyAmsterdam_Nederland_3mo_May20_2017 copyBitola_Macedonia_3mo_May20_2017 copyBreisach_Germany_3mo_May20_2017 copyCeresole_Reale_Italy_3mo_May20_2017 copySaintLeger_Belgium_3mo_May20_2017 copyTihange_Belgium_3mo_May20_2017 copyJaca_Spain_3mo_May20_2017 copy

Voila.  At least this latest radioactive cloud is hereby somewhat ‘documented’.  Drop me a comment when ‘experts’ come up with a funny story to explain it away again…  Can’t wait! ;-)

PS:  The half-life, by beta decay, of Niobium-95 is only 35 days, suggesting a very recently ACTIVE source (recent fission), to still be detectable. Ruthenium-103’s half-life is also only 39 days.

——– ——– ——–

Rolling back into the San Luis Valley over Wolf Pass last Monday:


Posted in Politics | 3 Comments

A Decade of English Ninjas Crawling through Wattisham’s Gamma Alleys…

Just picked a monitor and graphed about a decade of “gamma” data.  I say ” “gamma” “, because obviously the way the UK displays its data is game for some interesting ‘data processing hokus spokus’, such as the phenomenon I described in (May 2, 2017) The “Ninja Dot” – Reading Between The Lines: a EURDEP gamma graph detail

Further scrutiny of this peculiar “ninja dot” phenomenon, especially when looking at that little bit of radioisotope-specific data that is available to the non-credentialed amateur public, such as from Scandinavian monitors especially, leaves me with the impression that ninja dots indeed indicate some kind of abnormal fallout condition.

The sneaky part, well done by those who designed this fallout-obscuring data display, is that ‘ninja dots’ do not show up on ‘Maximum Setting’, nor ‘Standard Deviation’ and won’t affect averages either, making it surreal-time-consuming to even find ’em.   If radiation data used for statistical analysis is processed similarly, you’ll never be able to correlate fallout with likely related illness clusters, as fallout conditions are concealed in the very way the data is presented.   Clever bunch they are… ;-/

Here’s Wattisham, UK, as shown on the EURDEP T-Gamma map, graphed for 1 month at a time, 3 months per line strung together, and annotated with easily ignorable narrative of my own ponderings….    Data gaps are marked with a red square, ninja dots with a magenta one, obvious baseline shifts with a blue line and glitch dots below 90 nSv/hr or above 180 nSv/hr are circled.

  • Wattisham, England (UK), almost a decade:

Starting out on Nov. 18, 2007:

1_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Feb17_2008 copy2_Wattisham_UK_3mo_May17_2008 copy

y-axis adjusted to 300 nSv/hr to show the July 2008 record spike and left at that for the rest of the graphs:

3_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Aug17_2008 copy4_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Nov17_2008 copy5_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Feb17_2009 copy6_Wattisham_UK_3mo_May17_2009 copy

Major ‘ninja dot’ cluster in late October 2009, with lots of data gaps and another baseline shift in 2010 perhaps being related:

8_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Nov17_2009 copy9_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Feb17_2010 copy10_Wattisham_UK_3mo_May17_2010 copy11_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Aug17_2010 copy12_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Nov17_2010 copy13_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Feb17_2011 copy

–> Times are somewhat different compared to the disturbances, data gaps and spikes seen @ Achtopol, Bulgaria (EURDEP, 12 years graphed) and @ Rambling Along a Decade of Gamma Radiation Data from Lamia, Greece, and other long-term graphs I’ve pasted together, but what can be said for all of ’em is that clearly major radiological disturbances are not something that developed after 2011.  It seems highly likely (to me, from data impressions) that several major nuclear incidents/accidents were successfully covered-up before.

Some of those major releases might have blown in from outside of Europe, from the US or even further upwind.  The report from UCLA: “California Thyroid Cancer Incidence Well Above National Average”, in which I initially jumped the gun on by stating “FUKUSHIMA FALLOUT the most obvious cause!” (because none of the newscasters pointed out that study concerned an uptick that began long before 2011… The study period was 1999-2008),  suggests the high likelihood of a major nuclear accident in California pre-2009, for instance.   Other clues hint at a Chinese Meltdown at Daya Bay NPP in May 2010.

The way the industry has lacked independent oversight since its inception in the 1940s, and remains interwoven with national security related military secrecy policies, in all likelihood, we’ll be left with our own best guesses and suspicions on the one hand and official reassurances and denial on the other.  The way the Fukushima disaster was handled right from the beginning, and still, tells me nothing has fundamentally changed.

(I think they’re leaving these data bread crumbs to get entertained by people like me…)

Anyhow, I marked the onset of the Fukushima-Daiichi triple-meltdown nuclear catastrophe with the green arrow.  As is the case for most monitors in Europe, little minor gamma blips can be seen within 48 hours, but it takes many months before the bulk reaches ground monitors.   A few years in, it is uncertain how many other sources are making the crossing of signals too complex to say anything sensible about aspects of the shown, but I’ll point out a few that I found interesting:

14_Wattisham_UK_3mo_May17_2011 copy

–> a ninja dot right at the onset of a baseline shift.  I interpret that as specific decay energies associated with fallout triggered a data processing shift to better hide fallout patterns.

15_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Aug17_2011 copy16_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Nov17_2011 copy17_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Feb17_2012 copy18_Wattisham_UK_3mo_May17_2012 copy 219_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Aug17_2012 copy20_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Nov17_2012 copy21_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Feb17_2013 copy22_Wattisham_UK_3mo_May17_2013 copy23_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Aug17_2013 copy24_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Nov17_2013 copy25_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Feb17_2014 copy26_Wattisham_UK_3mo_May17_2014 copy27_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Aug17_2014 copy28_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Nov17_2014 copy29_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Feb17_2015 copy30_Wattisham_UK_3mo_May17_2015 copy31_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Aug17_2015 copy

–> During the sampling period May 22-25, 2015, véry close to the timing of that ninja dot here at Wattisham, a bizarre mixture of artificial radioisotopes was measured @ Rovaniemi, Finland, inlcuding Cs-134, Cs-137, I-131, Co-60 and Niobium-95.  Regarding the blogpost that documented that set of data, (June 6, 2015) Pink Unicorns beach themselves on the shores of Lake Dystopia, it must be pointed out again that *The green LLD’s are NOT “detections”. Their signal did not stick out of the noise to be called a detection.*, but the other detections were validated, and admittedly never explained.

This adds to my impression that the “ninja dots” indeed signal unusual decay energies.

32_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Nov17_2015 copy33_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Feb17_2016 copy

(–> In mid-January, (air sampling period Jan. 11-18, 2016), the highest concentration since 2011 of Ruthenium-103, accompanied by a Cs-137 uptick, was detected in Southern Norway. Note the ninja dot at this spot right after… )

A very striking set of ninja dots, next graph below, correlates precisely with the timing of the Helsinki Cesium-137 spike.  To recap, at the onset of March 2016 major disturbances, spikes and data gaps where seen all over Europe.  In the midst of that, the story broke that at a monitor in Helsinki, Finland the highest concentration of Cesium-137 was measured since 1986 (when parts of Scandinavia received a significant amount of fallout from the USSR Chernobyl disaster in Northern Ukraine).  A few days later it was ‘discovered’ to be a very local issue: a nuclear waste package in their building’s garage had ruptured.  See (March 9, 2015) Helsinki Cesium-137 Mystery solved, But Greater Mystery of widespread Radiation upticks Remains… and several data posts before and after.   That Cesium peeked much further away, and even Iodine-131 data @ Nicosia, Cyprus showed an abnormality, and so forth, was not mentioned in any media outlet. End of story for the mainstream media.   This set of ninja dots fits with my suspicion that something far more serious occurred ‘somewhere…‘:

34_Wattisham_UK_3mo_May17_2016 copy

–> Interesting also that there’s such a data point on March 21, fitting with another pondering of mine, touched upon in (April 29, 2017): Does Belgium play a key role in my “Data Thriller Series” of the Spring 2016 Radioactive Cloud that No Media Outlet Dared Touch Upon?

No ninja dot in the April 24 – May 1, 2016 period, however, likely because of the data gap…  The uptick/slight disturbance in May 2016 at this monitor is much more pronounced elsewhere, such as @ Herstmoncieux (further south). -> The drop-down-to-zero values with data gap seen @ Herstmoncieux correlate nicely with the Artificial BETA upticks seen across the North Sea in The Netherlands.

35_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Aug17_2016 copy

–> The spike after May 29th might be due to swirling fallout waves blowing around Europe in the aftermath of that major nuclear incident/accident/deterioration, particularly a whiff that included the strong gamma-emitter Cobalt-60, as suggested by two detections in Norway in the May 2-13 period.   Indicating that ‘whatever was going on’ was hemisphere-, if not planetary-wide, in significance, by the end of May, the US Radiation Monitoring Network Became “FALLOUT BLIND” (Beta monitoring turned off)… Outside the handful of readers of this blog, not a peep about it was to be heard…

36_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Nov17_2016 copy

–> The spike with ninja dots in the week Sept 11-18, 2016 correlates with many spikes during that time, including a striking Cs-137 uptick the next week @ Harku, Estonia.  (The end of this Cs137/I131 graph was meant to illustrate that the “iodine leak” from Halden, Norway wasn’t just Iodine. – See also April 12, 2017, It took the IAEA over 4 months to post this Halden Report (a Ramble MIX, with lots more EURDEP graphed radiation data) and related posts), but note the mid-Sept Cs-137 spike –  INSERT:

Harku_Estonia_Cs137_I131__3mo_Nov15_2016 copy

Wattisham, UK, continued:

37_Wattisham_UK_3mo_Feb17_2017 copy38_Wattisham_UK_3mo_May17_2017 copy

For what it’s worth…

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment


The connection with bee colony die-offs might be outdated, as it has been better linked to pesticides since, but the parts touching on the Schumann frequencies and its connection to biological life, I found watch-worthy.

In addition to the interesting well-done documentary above, for those who’re falling for the alternative hype that “the Schumann Frequency is increasing!”, I’d refer to:

!!!-> http://www.stillnessinthestorm.com/2017/04/must-read-schumann-resonance-advanced-science-psychophysical-regulation-and-psi.html for a better understanding of the phenomenon.

Speculation of effects of ionizing pollution (radioactive fallout) on the noise amplitudes in the low frequency spectrum, or wondering about ELF scalar weaponry, and such, might be for another time.

—– —– —–

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

REMEMBER. (A Few Speeches by American Indian Activists Pearl & Russell Means)


Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Hovenweep National Monument, Anasazi Heritage, and back to Colorado…

—– ———— —–

May 14, 2017Some photos:


And so… this brief but so-needed journey  (See half dozen previous blog posts of this “mini” road trip around the Four Corners area of the US Southwest.) winded down…

From Cameron, Arizona I drove into the night, heading north-east, back into Navajo Nation lands…

Thought I spotted a hitch-hiker… Was is? And was that a young woman?  Thís late?   Anyone’s been around the rez, even for short periods, knows things can get rather ‘unpredictable’ well after dark…  After several miles feeling like a coward, I pushed the fears of picking up a complete stranger in the pitch-dark of the rez. away, with concerns for her/his(?) safety, and turned around.  Sure enough, she was still there:  quiet drunk, Navajo, and then apparently in disbelief that some random white dude from Europe was her safe ride home.  :-)  It felt good to do what so many people have done for me before I bought my first car in my mid-30s.

Eventually, I parked somewhere unknown-to-me, coyotes howling nearby in the moon light, and quickly fell asleep, exhausted.

I woke up to the surprise sight of Shiprock Mountain again, this time in the southern distance.   Not a bad place to wake up:

From there, I decided to swing by the ‘Canyon of the Ancients’ and its Hovenweep National Monument.  Some impressions:






Just before Durango, (or after depending on how you drive, I suppose), already back in Colorado, the beautifully built and nicely presented informative Anasazi Heritage Center near Dolores, CO;  With [Sleeping] Ute [Chief] Mountain in the back:


Couple impressions:




From a presentation, below, on how the ancient Pueblo natives likely headed south due to climate-change-induced severe drought.   (“Hm… how odd” [sarc.], very dramatic local climate changes long before industrial emissions…):


Nevermind on that “hot topic”… [though if you wonder where thát track of my wondering & pondering has lead me, see, for example, Nov. 27, 2011, Why I Question the CO2-driven Global Warming “Scientific Consensus”].


And eventually…

Rolling back into home-sweet-home lovely Colorado…



Ha Ha:


Here’s a few more Henry L. Menchen quotes:

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out… without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.”
“Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.”
“In war the heroes always outnumber the soldiers ten to one.”

Other side of same sign:



Hope the inspirations of this journey never seize to remind me…

— ————- —


— ————- —

Posted in Politics | 1 Comment