Another Look @ the 2016 Ru-103 & Te-132 Detections: Some Interesting Findings. + An Afterthought…

Colorado Rocky Mountains… – Saturday May 28, 2016

[With a two US EPA Radnet graphs added on May 29]

Taking yet another look at the “peculiar radioisotope-specific detections” of this past half year, in particular the Ru-103 in Norway (sample period: January 11-18, 2016), and the Te-132 in Germany (sample period: just 2 hours at the onset of April 26, 2016), has revealed some darn interesting details…  Check this out:

I’ll start with the Ruthenium-103 @ Åsterås, just outside of Oslo, Norway.  (First mentioned in (Feb. 14, 2016) https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2016/02/14/ruthenium-103-detected-in-norway-in-mid-jan-2016/

Here shown together with Cesium-137: you can see this first validated detection of Ru-103  since 2011 coincided with an uptick of Cs-137:

Asteras_Ru103Cs137_followedByNoTesting_Jan2016

-> And, as you can see clearly as well, some folks in charge of radiation monitoring have a rather strange logic even in Norway:  After they detect Ru-103 at the highest level since 2011, they just take a break from monitoring for a couple weeks.  

(Maybe they were too busy playing cards in their fallout shelter? hehe [j/k] )

Could, of course, just be automated data processing algorithms that are making sure no “levels of concern” get reached…  (And if that happens, well.. there’s always the folks you share a building with to blame…  Right?)

Now check out the just-Cesium-137 record from this location, with my annotations added:  (March is compressed in time for some reason, but I’ve pasted the record together to show Jan 3 – May 3, 2016).  Note the incredibly well-timed data gaps, 3 times coinciding with an obvious Cesium-137 uptick ánd with extremely unusual radiosiotope-specific detections elsewhere in Europe:

Cs137_asterasNorsk_4months_MarchCompressed

Darn too uncanny to be coincidence, I’d say.

So, I went looking for clues as to what might have been detected right after January 18, during that long data gap.  Something that they don’t want us to see?    Well, check out what I foud on this monitor @ Cheb – Meteostanice Maskovska, Czech Republic:

Showing Cesium-137 and Iodine-131, same period:

C137_I131_Cheb_Meteo Maskovska_CZ_Jan2016

Very interesting, not?   A doubling of both Cs-137 ánd I-131 right then during Åsterås’ data gap!  I mean… Iodine-131?  I know these are mere traces, but… it’s the fact that, as a short-lived artificial fission radioisotope, an uptick in I-131 points at an active fissioning source, and it’s that what makes this significant.  Because the unusual detections span such a wide geographical region, a mere refueling or some other kind of just venting a little can be ruled out.  Ruthenium-103 had not been detected since 2011.  Refuelings and regular venting for various reasons occur all over the place every year.   Like I’ve said for quite awhile now: “Something’s up!”.   Both the Cs-137 ánd the I-131 uptick measured in Czech Republic were not surpassed since:

C137_I131_Cheb_Meteo Maskovska_CZ_afterJan2016

We can see that the radioactive cloud affected this monitor for about 3 weeks.  Then things quited down as far as Cesium-137 goes, but -bizarre and strikingly – there’s two more periods with significant upticks of Iodine-131: immediately following the time of the Helsinki Garage Media story (which I’ve quesioned a-plenty, see, for instance (April 22, 2016), Was Helsinki’s Cs-137 “Localized Garage Waste Leak” A Decoy For Hemisphere-Wide Fallout Upticks? Fukushima? EURDEP/Nullschool DATA + (Some Nuclear Occult Links), and just prior to the Te-132 detection in Northern Germany!

In Germany, where they do actually verify data on a regular basis, you can see (from the Bismuth-214 and other naturally ocurring radioisotopes tested at the German monitors) that they did actually do additional tests after that Te-132 detection, but no other manmade radioisotopes are listed for that site, and the natureal/ enhanced natural measurements were all normal: (I discovered this by odd coincidence the day itself (April 26, 2016): https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2016/04/26/tellurium-132-detected-in-northern-germany/

Te132_Bi214

Within less than 20 km from Seehausen, you can see a slight upticks in gamma radiation as well, possibly due to the further decay of Te-132, which decays by Beta decay to I-132, which in turn decays by gamma decay to stable Xenon-132. Example to that April 26 minor gamma uptick:

within20km_gamma

So, two wind pattern research attempts:

  • What wind pattern hit Southern Norway on Jan. 24, that also hit Western Czech Republic?
  • What wind pattern hit Southern Norway on Apr. 26 that also hit Northern Germany?
    • (And if I were to trace back those wind patterns, where would the windlines intersect, if they did?)

Nullschool…  http://earth.nullschool.net/    (There’s no need for a journalist to quote or refer to me: Just double check what I point at and use your intelligence.  It’s not that hard.  Everything I refer to is 100% public, non-secret, and verifiable by yourself via the links provided @ https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/radioactivity/current-radiation-levels-monitors/all/.

Location coordinates:

  • 52.9 N 11.7 E = Seehausen, D.
  • 50.1 N 12.4 E = Cheb, Cz.
  • 59.9 N 10.6 E = Åsterås, N.

-> you can get the green circle in the right place by changing it in the URL.

So… starting with the correlation between Southern Norway (start of data gap right after Ru-13 detection) and Western Czech Republic (start of Cs-137 & I-131 uptick) on Jan. 24, 2016, 12:00 UTC…  Near the surface, you can tell, there’s not much wind at all: @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/24/1200Z/wind/isobaric/1000hPa/orthographic=-8.75,50.75,1024

Just a bit higher up, already at 850 hPa, you see what I call a pattern “that fits the hypothesis” https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/24/1200Z/wind/isobaric/850hPa/orthographic=-1.71,51.50,1130/loc=12.400,50.100

  • 1) both were in obvious relative slow-down zones in air layers below the jet stream,
  • 2) both were fed with air that came from the jet stream arriving from across the Northern Atlantic…

Annotated screenshot:

2016:01:24:1200Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=-1.71,51.50,1130:loc=12.400,50.100

Are you just as curious as me to see if the jetstream really passed over my #1 suspect?

@ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/24/1200Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-102.91,64.55,512/loc=12.400,50.100

Annotated Screenshot: The red circle (top left) is Fukushima-Daiichi in Northern Japan; the green circles are the 2 monitors in Norway and Czech Republic.  The red arrows from F1 show where the jet stream blew at that moment downwind Fukushima.  The black arrows trace the wind upwind from the 2 monitors in Europe:

2016:01:24:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-102.91,64.55,512:loc=12.400,50.100.gif

Fits nicely…

Added May 29: From this snapshot in time, it seems to me that the most likely place for a data gap or uptick in the US, based on my hypothesis (fallout coming down in jet stream slow-down zones downwind Fukushima on a planetary scale), would have been the monitor @ Salt Lake City, Utah (that lake-dot in the blue slow-down zone on the edge of the northern arrow line in the mid-image dip.  See it?).  Okay… Graphing for Jan. 10 through Feb. 10, 2016…  And there you have it, a spike the day before, preceded by a major data gap:

cewolf;jsessionid=04313BFACAC4CAD74E2A50C86747296D

fits nicely as well…

Closer to my location, the monitor in Colorado Springs, Colorado had fast-wind higher up,  so, also fitting, at that time there isn’t much to see yet.  This one does, however, show a significant data gap starting on Jan. 26:

cewolf;jsessionid=04313BFACAC4CAD74E2A50C86747296D-1

And that actually fits too, if you run Nullschool and click through the 3-hour periods, you can see the slow-down zone move east and south, with the onset of the data gap nicely beginning when the slow zone first reaches this monitor’s area:  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/26/0600Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-102.91,64.55,512/loc=-104.490,38.500

Alright, on to Tellurium-132 land….  Northern Germany and Southern Norway, April 26…

Surface level wind… shows there still a decent amount of wind in the afternoon on April 23rd @ Seehausen in Northern Germany, but – how coincidentally [sarc.], there’s a major no-wind zone over the part of Southern Norway at the beginning of the data gap…  @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/1000hPa/orthographic=0.36,51.77,1130/loc=11.700,52.900

By the time the Te-132 is measured in Germany, there’s not all that much difference.  The slow-down is minor:  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/850hPa/orthographic=0.36,51.77,1130/loc=11.700,52.900

Yet at jet stream height, 250 hPa, you can see Seehausen (Te-132 spike) is in the slower bend, and Åsterås/Oslo (data gap) is in a slow zone:  @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-20.35,62.12,1130/loc=11.700,52.900

2016:04:24:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-20.35,62.12,1130:loc=11.700,52.900

Did the jet stream…?  Nah… Really?

https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-101.42,70.77,512/loc=11.700,52.900

2016:04:24:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-106.93,67.37,512:loc=11.700,52.900.gif

Hm…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Afterthought…

Come on, IAEA, CTBTO, PR specialists, corruptors of science, pro-nuclear cultists, bribed politicians, opportunistic greedy investors, sold-out editors-in-chiefs,

It’s okay.  Really: It’s okay.  You fucked up big time.  Shit happens.  It’s okay. 

That needed “moral revolution” that your frontman Obama referred to in Hiroshima… That’s only needed for you guys who’ve apparently long lost your moral compass with the onset of this misguided nuclear era.  You’ve gotten away with it because you’ve deceived most of us very skillfully.  I mean, it’s impressive the feat of deception you pulled off.  Many of your brightest even believe the lies you’ve fed them.  Maybe you even do.  But you can stop patting yourself on the back now.  The data I compile… don’t get me wrong: I’m just trying to reach you in a language I thought you’d understand.

We, who are energetically plugged in to the web of life of this incredible planet, whom many of us refer to as ‘Mother Earth’, we know the ocean’s in our blood and the mountains ‘re in our bones…  We know something’s off.  We can feel it.  We get clues in dreams and ceremonies.  You can quit the lies now, ’cause it’s game over.  And somewhere deep down in what’s left of your alienated fragmented souls, you know it too.

We will welcome you with open arms at our healing ceremonies, around the campfires deep in the jungles, in the silent meditation retreats high up in the snowy mountains.

Come and find us.

yoda-there-is-no-try

Or wait for us to come.  But meeting we will.

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

| 12 Comments

Finland, U still there? *

You know I love to watch what happens to blog stats…

Have I been “too critical” of that “Helsinki garage leak” the Finnish authorities explained the highest Cesium-137 levels since Chernobyl away with?   Is it inconvenient that I point out that that spike coincided with highly unusual spikes and data gaps all over Europe and North America?   Is there someone who prefers this issue hushed?   Does Finland not like that I also point out that this first half of 2016 has “mysteriously” ALSO seen the highest levels of Tellurium-132 since Chernobyl and the highest levels of Ruthenium-103 since 2011?  (Which, as recent short-lived fission products can’t be explained away that way…)   And what is Cobalt-60 doing in the Scandinavian air again?   Hm?

1weekFinlandGone

Been mightily quiet from Japan lately too.  (Used to always be in the top 5, until something suddenly changed this year.  Odd…   Too much wondering about its suspected secret nuclear weapons program in which Fukushima played a role, or something…?    Hm…

Just wondering…  

Much of the peculiar radioisotope-specific detections I documented in these blog posts (much more in my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive):

See also my most recent data-sprinkled ramble,  Fukshima Full-On China Syndrome, Still Fissioning! Just Another Opinion-Ramble, Sprinkled with Data (+ Possible Correction on Recent German Spikes; & Obama in Hiroshima – 2)

Ah… Maybe it’s nothing… [sarc.]

* The headline’s a play on the subject line in this FOIA-released email from back in the day:

410-unit-4-zirc-fire-catastrophe-march-15th.gif

See more in (Dec. 2, 2014)  PLUME GATE – Internal NRC Communications Released under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) proof deliberate Cover-Up of Severity of global Fukushima Fallout in 2011. Recent SFP4 News May Have Been Part of Cover-Up

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 4 Comments

WAKE UP! “Peer Deep into Pandora’s Box…” (Must-See VIDEO!)

Take some TRUTH from a Japanese artist, will you…:

If the link doesn’t work, find “FRYING DUTCHMAN “humanERROR”” on YouTube (@ https:// [delete this space] youtu.be/Q5p283KZGa8 )

H/T to PlowboyGrownUp  (comment @ ENEnews @ http://enenews.com/doctor-fukushima-radiation-be-eating-holes-peoples-brains-report-military-cover-true-radiation-levels-expert-govt-hiding-disastrous-consequences-nuclear-crisis-public-suffering-radioactive-re/comment-page-3#comment-773235), and acknowledged by fellow Fuku-researcher Dr. Goodheart. -> Check out his various quite interesting documentations @ http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/search?q=Fukushima&view=classic

People of the Earth, RISE UP !!! 

We MUST stop these self-deluded psychopaths!!!

Journalists, do not underestimate your responsibility!  DO your home work and make the most hard-hitting investigative journalistic piece you’ve ever written!  Take your time, but DO IT!!!  

If not… you might go down in history like the rest of us…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

co-60, dat gaps, spikes, fukushima, eurdep, radnet

 

| 1 Comment

Fukshima Full-On China Syndrome, Still Fissioning! Just Another Opinion-Ramble, Sprinkled with Data (+ Possible Correction on Recent German Spikes; & Obama in Hiroshima – 2)

Cs137Blip_Spitzbergen

Cesium-137 blowing around in the arctic air…  May 22, 2016

DISCLAIMER – Colorado Rocky Mountains (USA) – May 26-28, 2016

I know it’s overkill by now… I’ve long established the obviousness that the official radiation networks are rigged to hide much of the data when it matters most.  But at the same time, they have let an amazing amount of data slip through the nets, though.  The past couple years of on-and-off scrutinizing of some of this has failed to undo my “mere suspicion” that radioactive clouds continue to come from “Northern Japan somewhere” (or perhaps “something in the Pacific east of there”), with Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Catastrophe site remaining my #1 suspect.   But “What do I know?”…

The detections of the past half year have prompted me to have a new look at the detections in 2014 and 2015, now that I know a little bit more.  There’s no way you end up with a Ruthenium-103 detection in Norway (the first such detection in Europe since the ongoing Fukushima Catastrophe began), followed some 5 weeks later by the highest Cesium-137 detections since 2011 at several locations in Finland, coinciding with widespread data gaps, while many countries just right then in March skipped one or more weeks of radioisotope-specific monitoring (How can they be so blatant and get away with it?); and then in February more spikes and data gaps, with monitors being shut down as far as La Reunion and New Caledonia in the Southern Hemisphere; then followed in April by a spike in Tellurium-132 in Germany, highest measurment in European outdoor air since 1986, accompanied in the same past month by record gamma spikes in Russia, Turkey, Germany, Lithuania, Latvia, a curious spike of artificial alpha radiation in The Netherlands, and so on… -to me- that seems like there’s way too many abnormalities for none of them to be connected to a shared radiation-spewing source. 

Much of this I documented in blog posts, all listed in my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive, of which these radioisotope-specific detections stand out:

That’s quite an interesting bunch of (mostly validated) detections.  The alpha spike as well as the detections of Co-60, Te-132 and Ru-103 have not been explained by any expert, organization or government.  The unbelievably significant data was just posted on the data exchange network and otherwise entirely ignored.  No media attention.  No politician demanding an investigation.  Nothing….  Apparently. 

Lots of noise about the Cesium-137 uptick in Helsinki, subsequently followed by its rather unsatisfactory explanation, but all the far more troubling detections have been hushed.  Anything in the German media yet about that largest-since-Chernobyl detection of short-lived-fission-product Te-132?  (Drop me a link if that happens, ’cause I haven’t come across anything.)

Those detections point at something FISSIONING, not just a waste leak (which is bad enough, but even the leaking Hanford tank farm would not release artificial recent-fission radionuclides in relatively extreme quantities half-way around the world).  Part of what makes them significant is that they occured in the past half year, which is marked by a markedly more ‘disturbed’ radiological landscape:

  • Lots of “glitch dot” spikes,
  • significant upticks, many record spikes
  • tons of short and long data gaps
  • Beta monitors being taken offline
  • Abnormalities like forced-zero data, negative dose rates, baseline shifts and other evidence suggesting changes in data processing to hide what is really happening.

Scrutinize the long-term record of the few monitors that seem to be calibrated to at least not entirely hide abnormalities (every countries seems to have a few monitors that show more than most other monitors).  Take Salaspils, Latvia, for instance.  I don’t think these correlations are coincidence.  The correlation is far too strong:

Salaspils_Latvia_3mo_May26_2016

Also, the Ruthenium-103 Detected in Norway in mid-Jan. 2016 was part of a radioactive cloud that also very clearly contained Cesium-137, as seen in Finish data from Kotka (Southern Finnish coast, east of Helsinki’s notorious garage [sarc.]):

Kotka_Suomi_Cs137_3mo_3Kotka_Suomi_Cs137_3mo_1Kotka_Suomi_Cs137_3mo_2

curiously, again, there was Thorium-232 in the mix as well…  and a significant Be-7 uptick, odd in the middle of winter, not?

Jan24_2016Uptick_containedu103inNorway

Before I continue , some similarities in the recent German spikes has me wondering if they were in fact just calibrations after all.  Most calibrations go to 560 nSv/hr, as well-illustrated in the Lithuanian calibration cluster in February 2016.

Of the three recent spikes in Germany I mentioned, two show a strikingly similar pattern:

Both Saarburg and the Trier-Euren spikes occured in 3 hours, with each of the 3 hours being so similar, that I think these two might actually have been calibrations after all:

saarburg_germany_spike_may24_2016 may20_2016_1week_validated_eurdep_spike-onmay18_2016_6usv-hr_trier_euren_d

-> I don’t know, but just wanted to share that bit of doubt cast on those two spikes.

I wish they had a third category besides “Validated” or “Non-Validated”:  “Calibration”.  I mean… a calibration is at least a moment they KNOW the cause of a spike for.

By not pointing it out, and then framing their disclaimer as “Most of these measurements are unvalidated, which means that defects in the instruments, electronics or software can result in erroneous values. Who visits this site regularly will notice that on an almost daily basis, one or more of the 4200 monitoring stations are out of order and show abnormally high readings. As a consequence isolated violet or red dots on the map are NOT an indication of increased radiological values. Even several violet or red dots near to the same geographical location or near a Nuclear Power Plant is not a certainty of an ongoing accident because they are most likely caused by calibration tests on the related monitoring stations.”, the abnormalities get swept under the rug.  I’ve documented some examples that very clearly were not calibrations.

Anyhow, to continue…     This is just my non-credentialed amateur opinion:   I think that the Fukushima-Daiichi Catatstrophe has shifted gears in spring 2015, as evidenced in bursts of Fukushima-fingerprint radioisotopes in Europe, most notably Co-60 in mixtures and ratios that point at no other source.   I also wonder if progress with the under-construction ice wall on site is bringing to light how far-advanced this  STILL-ACTIVE meltdown truly is.   Not only did the meltdowns lead to a full-on “China Syndrome”, the concentration of Plutonium and various activation products in the fuel geometries is such that fissioning flares up might never end.   Just as grim:  It canot even be ruled out that the corium will grow over time.  Future underground prompt criticalities cannot be ruled out either.

It is interesting that TEPCO just admitted that they’re “still hunting for 600 tonnes of melted radioactive fuel” at Fukushima.   600 tons… where could it be?  Guess that “non-proliferation” isn’t going so well…

I haven’t made the “still fissioning” claim lightly, though.  The more I research the available data, the more I find bits and pieces that add further weight to that hypothesis.

For example… artificial beta radiation is one of the better indicators of nuclear fallout. (Hence the pro-nuclear and highly deceptive US government turning off its fleet of Beta monitors…).   There’s something interesting to be seen on the JRC Station 5 monitor in the Italian Alps:

  • T-BETA-ART (Total Artificial Beta, Outdoor air, Particulates filter only)  @ JRC STation 5, Northern Italy, period Nov. 20, 2014 through May 20, 2016:

JRC5_6 JRC5_5 JRC5_4 JRC5_3 JRC5_2 JRC5_1-> Most notable is the emergence of an aparent fallout cloud in early May 2015, intensifying in mid-June, with more isolated massive burst (of a magnitude higher; note the 2 months with a different y-axis) in July 2015.   (Also visible is the relative uptick that began in October 2015, intensified in November 2015, with data gaps here and there since.  This coincides with the widespread disturbanced I’ve been pointing at.)  This is just “artifical Beta emitters”.  We don’t know which ones exactly.

But we do, as mentioned in  !-> (June 6, 2015) Pink Unicorns beach themselves on the shores of Lake Dystopia, have some data from other places that give us clues…

1) For instance: the data flow from Iodine-131 & Cesium-137 detector in Nicosia, Cyprus was turned off right then in May 2015:

cyprus_i131_cs137_eurdep_marchaprilmay_20152) Even more striking:  May 13-15, 2015 (perfectly coinciding with the first spikes in the JRC 5 Beta-Art record) @ Kotka, Finland a mysterious mixture of radioisotopes was detected, which included Cs-134, Nb-95, Mn-54 and Co-60.

ce144_co60_finland_may2015Iodine-131 was picked up in Switzerland:

i131_co60_cernswitserland_may20151The Netherlands showed artificial Beta spikes, amidst likely “enhanced natural” Alpha upticks:

wijnandsradenl_tbetaart_talphanat_may15_2015__1monthprior_croppedJust like this year, Ru-103 was also in that cloud then:

ru103_te132_northfinland_may2015

So couple reflections,

 

  • Though I haven’t seen I-131 detections published lately, the spike in Te-132 is at least as significant.  The FACT that the radioactive cloud in spring 2015 also contained I-131 DOES leave no doubt that “whatever is spewing radioisotopes” is actively fissioning.  Thus,  actual nuclear chain reactions of Uranium that give rise to Cs-134, I-131, Ru-103, etc.  are still ocurring, as evidenced by detections in 2015 and 2016.
  • The presence of Ru-103 (in both springs 2015 % 2016) further underscores what the significance of the presence of Cs-134 and Nb-95 already did:  These radioisotopes have neither medical nor resource exploration use.   They are tell-tale fingerprints of a radioactive cloud that escaped from a badly leaking active reactor core somewhere.
  • In addition, for Co-60 not to just get flushed out of the rubble into the water, but to be hot and volatile enough to go airborne for very long distances suggests that inside this molten corium lava-like blob, massive neutron-bombardment of steel may actually still be happening, at least every time this mini-sun has a fission flare-up…   in the land of the Sinking Sun on the edge of the mighty Pacific Ocean…
    • !–> As I pointed out in my ground-breaking investigative article, (Jan 26, 2016),  Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?, the detections of Cobalt-60 in these whiffs does very strongly suggest this IS all coming from the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Catatstrophe site, because no other nuclear accident in history is known to have such unusual Co-60 concentrations in its fallout and contaminated cooling water.
  • That evidence of highly unusual neutron bombardment is a major part of my wondering about artificial creation of Polonium-210.  It would be darn twisted if they were aware of this (They may not be; I do occasionally think outside the box), but one popular way for experts to belittle the significance of man-made fallout is to refer to “naturally occurring Po-210, a hot alpha emitter”…  See more about this specific pondering HERE.

 

As far as I’m concerned, Cobalt-60 IS thé smoking gun, and that is exactly why I think it was omitted from (not even mentioned! in)  the well-received-by-the-establishment academic study, “Fukushima’s Forgotten Radionuclides: A Review of the Understudied Radioactive Emissions”, by Georg Steinhauser, to which Dr. Ken Buesseler of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute first referred me too.    (Given this blatant omission, Ken’s over-focus on just radioCesium-134/137 and I-131, as well as glaring lack of investigating  “enhanced natural” concentrations and ratios, such as of alpha-emitter Po-210, and so forth (all of which could shed much more light on ‘what really happenened at Fukushima’ and what is happening with the Pacific Ocean ecosystem as a result of Fukushima), I suspect these two fellows are knowingly licking the boots of the IAEA…   But that aside.)

Más data…

The below graphed gamma radiation record for Kicevo, Macedonia (period: Feb. 18, 2014 – May 18, 2016) :

Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.9 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.8 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.7 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.6 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.5 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.4-> Notice: the most extreme spikes in May-June 2015 are seen here as well.

Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.3 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.2

-> A good week after the Ru-103 detection in Norway, we see some gamma spikes here too after January 24, 2016.  Then, right after the largest spike since August 2015, early February 2016, there’s data gaps (seen all over the world).

Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.1-> And here too, a little blip right around the time the spike in Cesium-137 was detected in Helsinki the first week of March 2016…

I don’t know what else I can do.  ;-/  I thought this would have set off alarm bells all over, but it’s been pretty darn quite.

Sigh…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

To come back to the thoughts at the end of yesterday’s Entire Western North America now “Fallout Blind”

So Obama’s in Hiroshima… “Cute show…”  Baffling audacity of deception…

NoFadingAllowed

Obama’s making sure that if the memory “needs to be refreshed”, they’ll be ready to do so.

I find it unbelievable that media outlets aren’t pointing out the utter hypocrisy more (so blatant that it’s outright creepy): there’s a rather big gap between his speeches, and his actual decisions.  He’s the most pro-nuclear president in over 30 years, who’s in fact making sure nuclear weapons will not be eliminated from the US arsenal any time soon.

!-> https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/ArmsControlNow/2016-02-09/Last-Obama-Budget-Goes-for-Broke-on-Nuclear-Weapons

www.armscontrol.org:blog:ArmsControlNow:2016-02-09:Last-Obama-Budget-Goes-for-Broke-on-Nuclear-Weapons

continue reading at source listed above.

For the first time since the 1970s, he’s approved the construction of new nuclear power plants.  The Obama administration worked closely with Japan to cover up the seriousness of the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear catastrophe.  Japan’s State Secrets Act was reportedly “recommended” by the US.

And as far a ridding the world of nuclear weapons…

New York Times, May 26, 2016:   Reduction of Nuclear Arsenal Has Slowed Under Obama, Report Finds

The numbers, shown below, @ open.defense.gov/Portals/23/Documents/frddwg/2015_Tables_UNCLASS.pdf, show that if President Obama would have continued in the tracks of President George W. Bush, the US would be free of nuclear weapons by now, which would have given the US the moral high ground to demand this of other nations.

Instead, the current Commander in Chief has made sure that didn’t happen.   So all his talk in Hiroshima, of the need for a “moral revolution”, was just that:  Talk.  Unfortunately his policies tell a very different story than his eloquent speeches.

open.defense.gov:Portals:23:Documents:frddwg:2015_Tables_UNCLASS.pdfEXCERPT See als:

Sigh…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 6 Comments

Entire Western North America now “Fallout Blind”

May 26, 2016

Like a countdown to full-on nuclear war-like fallout conditions, the Western United States’ BETA radiation monitors have been steadily dropping away.

Just a week ago, in (May 20, 2016) “US Radiation Monitoring Network Becoming “FALLOUT BLIND”“, I reported that the number of Beta Radiation monitors has been steadily dropping since the beginning of the Fukushima Nuclear Catastrophe in spring 2011.  Just this last half year, it was reduced from 6 to 3 left in the western US (with west I mean “west of, but still including, Denver”), and only 14 left in the US.

The trend continues:

US EPA’s Radnet Beta data that was still visible for Grand Junction, Colorado… is apparently no longer viewable…

  • We’ve lost Grand Junction, CO:

DataDisappearing

  • Just a day after my report on the troubling trend, at the end of May 20th, we also lost the last one in the entire Pacific Northwest, Olympia, WA:

Olympia_WA_BetasLastBreath

  • Thus… the very last Beta monitoring station left in the entire western US, Albuquerque, New Mexico... is the last one left in all of Western North America.   It’s become entirely useless, though, spitting out almost entirely redacted data…:

Albequerque_NM_LastBetaStanding

To echo the gist once again:  The official radiation monitoring systems, all over the world, are RIGGED to hide the data when it matters most!

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

I know…   As I’ve touched upon so many times, such as in mid-February in “Former KGB Agent Explains Why My Blog Is Pointless. (1985 Video)“, understanding something is one thing, responding wisely is a whole other matter.  The problem takes on a whole other magnitude when most people are, so it seems, actually not really that interested in studying what’s going on in their world, to come to understanding…

And thus Earth was lost…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Oh… and “OT” – but I don’t think Obama’s visit to Hiroshima is what it’s made out to be.

For starters, it’s beyond disgusting he would go there, like his buddy John Kerry, and not apologize for the war crime those nuclear attacks were. It had NOTHING to do with “ending World War 2”, and EVERYTHING to do with intentionally starting the Cold War, as part of a long-term plan towards establishing a de facto secular-Luciferian “New World Order”.   Honestly, I think he’s there not to pay tribute to the dead, but to the sinister heartlessness that was unleashed there.  Why?  Because they’re counting down… one monitor at a time… to fulfill their psychopathic plans…   and do it again.

Hiroshima, pretty much a refugee city full of families, where the majority of flash-incinerated-to-death were under 10 years old, is not a place you can visit and feel like, “Yup, we would do this again if we feel like it” unless you are a member of a most evil cabal that does not in any way have the best intentions at heart for humanity and kin.

I’ll leave it at that.

Related to the latter…: 

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 8 Comments

+24 µSv/hr Spike in Hungary, Data Gaps Amidst Spikes & Peculiar Detections

Just data:

May25_2016_upticks

The +24 µSv/hr “glitch dot” @ Taborfalva, Hungary, was ‘not validated’, but in my non-expert opinion that doesn’t mean much when they don’t bother to validate anything at this monitoring site:

Taborfalva_Hungary_24uSvHrGlitchDotSpike_May25_2016

In a 3 month context, with the disturbances correlating with “peculiar detections” elsewhere in Europe:

Taborfalva_Hungary_3months

That and a very nearby other monitor show, as is otften the case, very different details, though they share the “data gaps amidst spikes” theme, with a data gap possibly hiding similarly or even more extreme spikes:

2days2nearbyMonitors

1 month data:

Pusztavacs_Hungary_1mo_May25_2016

Bujak_Hungary_1mo_May25_2016

Zalaegerszeg_Hungary_1mo_May25_2016

1 month data from 2 monitors at the same location:

2monitors_at_SzolnokRepuloter_Hungary_1mo_May25_2016monitors_at_

Some examples from outside of Hungary:

BilyKoiz_CzechRepublic_1mo_May25_2016

Praha_CzechRepublic_1mo_May25_2016Ottenschlag_Austria_1mo_May25_2016BranauInn_Austria_1mo_May25_2016Sostanj_Slovania

Related blogposts can be found in my (just updated) Nuclear Blog Post Archive (or by clicking ‘Home’ and scrolling down in time).  A small selection:

–> See MANY MORE in my Nuclear Blog Post Archive

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 8 Comments

+ 6 µSv/hr radiation spike @ Saarburg, Germany (May 24, 2016; near Luxembourg)

Online Radiation Monitors, May 24, 2016

This is the 3rd such spike in 10 days in the same region.

Data via EURDEP, validated:

Saarburg_Germany_spike_May24_2016

3 month context:

Saarburg_Germany_3mo_preMay24_2016

locationSaarburg.gif

See previous few months of blog posts (or click ‘Home‘ and scroll down) for broader context of increasing data gaps + spikes, amidst very “peculiar” detetions, including (all in 2016!) a spike in artificial alpha radiation, detections short-lived fission radioisotopes Ruthenium-103 and Tellurium-132, as well as upticks in Cesium-137 and detections of Cobalt-60.  On the latter, make sure to study (Jan. 26, 2016):  Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?

We’re in the midst of a nuclear crisis the world has never seen before.  Fukushima suffered full-on ‘China Syndrome’ meltdowns, of which one or more coriums is still actively fissioning.   The cover-up must end.  (This is my understanding and opinion. DISCLAIMER)

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 15 Comments

Denver & Colorado Springs 2 weeks of Radnet data

Just a blip of 2 weeks of US EPA Radnet data, on which you can see a data gap around another monitor not so far away showed a spike:  Denver & Colorado Springs, Colorado.

Anyone who pays close attention to the official (albeit often “not validated”) radiation data has seen evidence of apparent ‘algorithms’ operating within the data processing software that appears to have only one purpose: to hide as much of the evidence of highly unusual radioactive fallout events.

Denver_ColoradoSprings_CO_2weeks_preMay24_2016_dataGapAtSpikeTime

Would you like “a wind map clue” with that?  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/16/1500Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-143.44,34.72,512/loc=-105.210,39.245

The systems are rigged to deceive the public that all is well, while in all actuality not all is well whatsoever:   We’re in the midst of a nuclear crisis the world has never seen before.  Fukushima suffered full-on ‘China Syndrome’ meltdowns, of which one or more coriums is still actively fissioning.   The cover-up must end.

Nuclear fission is neither safe nor clean.  It’s extreme disrespect towards humanity in general, particularly downwinders (which is increasingly everyone), the communities ravaged by the Uranium mining, as well as various imperilled species and future generations burdened by the spreading fallout, leaks, and growing piles of unsafely stored nuclear waste.

I’m hopeful.  But something’s got to change.

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 7 Comments

Cobalt-60 Detected in Southern Norway (2 Locations, May 2016!)

Disclaimer – May 23, 2016

I have been keeping an eye on Cobalt-60, thinking that if routine testing would continue, then, given all the upticks and data gaps lately, it would only be a matter of time before this Fukushima-fingerprint radioisotope would get picked up again.

!-> The significance of this neutron activation product, Cobalt-60, is explained in more detail in my groundbreaking research, see: (Jan. 26, 2016):  Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?

Normally a monitor turns yellow on the EURDEP Advanced Map (rather than its light blue “below detection limit” dot).  Sneaky little devils!:  The whole map only showed light blue dots:

Co60map_nocolorchange_may23_2016_1ma

Because I think we’re dealing with full-on ‘China Syndrome’ and still-fissioniong molten coriums underneath Fukushima-Daiichi’s nuclear catastrophe site, this has been and remains my #1 suspect for causing the major radiation upticks and strange detections this past half year.  Thus, I found it hard to believe that no one has picked up Co-60 yet.  So, eventhough the map told me that there was nothing to be seen, I decided to check all the monitors individually anyway.  Lo and behold, TWO actually measured, and validated, Cobalt-60 this past month!

  • May 2 – 4, 2016, VALIDATED Measurement at monitor# NO3001, just outside of Oslo, @ Åsterås, Norway, where Ruthenium-103 was also picked up in January (2016).
  • May 6 – 13, 2016, VALIDATED Measurement at monitor # NO3002, at Sola, southwesten coast of Norway.

These detections coincided with a significant uptick of Cesium-137:

Co60_Cs137_Asteras_Norway_May3_2016_1moMay23 Sola_Norway_Co60_Cs137_data1mo_May23_2016

Noteworthy also is that in both cases the concentration of Co-60 is only about half  that of Cs-137, meaning it is in the same order of magnitude.   This was also the case right after the Fukushima disaster began, for both on-site groundwater samples and far-away detections, such as in Finland.

The radioactive trace whiff that blew over Finland just last year, in May-June 2015 also had this Co-60 to radioCesium ratio (same order of magnitude), ánd that one back then also contained Iodine-131, Cesium-134, and Niobium-95, among other validated detections.

Everything points at Fukushima having fission-flare-ups significant enough for its fingerprint radioisotopes being picked up all the way around the planet.

In a nutshell:  This is what I think is going on:  One or more of the molten coriums at the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Catastrophe site are in full-on ‘China Syndrome’, and it is STILL ACTIVE.  This molten fissioning lava-like blob could be anywhere from a few hundred meters deep to several miles.  Deep underground hydro-volcanic explosions (when the lava-like corium meets a water layer) are leading to burst of releases.

Sweet dreams, everyone…

im-telling-you-the-man-and-the-dog-are-working-together

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 13 Comments

Chronological Overview of Nuclear-Related Blog Posts

Finally got to updating my ‘Nuclear Blog Posts Archive‘.  Check it out.

That’s all.


PS:    I have a pretty good idea of what the monitors would show  in Belgium if the NPPs in Doel or Tihange were to have a major accident…

Hoevenen_nearAntwerp_Belgium_1maand21mei2016Ukkel_nearBrussel_Belgium_1maand21mei2016

No, I’m not claiming either of ’em did.  If that were the case, there would be nothing to see on the monitors!.

:-D”   

That’s (apparently) part of the standard procedures of the perception management that goes with the deceptive nuclear industry.  A pro-nuclear politician cannot be trusted.  Period. The agencies in charge of oversight are entirely in cohoots with the industry.  Period.

Oostende_B_3ma_22mei2016

DeBlankaart_B-3ma_22mei2016

These data gaps more likely have ‘something‘ in common with the data gaps and spikes found all over the planet in recent months…  Perhaps even something “impossible“…  It has the potential to make one feel “a little blue”...

Maaaybe… there’s even some kind of connection between the explosion sounds heard in Iwaki, Fukushima prefecture in early February, and France turning off both its public radiation monitors in the Southern Hemisphere… and the crazy radiosiotope detections in Europe the past few months…?   Not to mention that mystery Alpha spike in The Netherlands… .

See my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive for a variety of documentation that SOMETHING’S UP.  Take it from one of the few independent bloggers and news aggregators covering this issue:  Whatever is going down is apparently big enough for a complete gag order for ALL mainstream (and so-called alternative) news outlets.

Wrap your mind around that fact, if you dare!

tumble… tumble…

…This corium-dug rabbit hole might take you deeper than you expected…

Peace –

chickens

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

 

| 3 Comments

Record Radiation Strikes Eastern Turkey (near Iran)

Location of spike, with 24 hour graph insert, showing a 12+ hour disturbance with a peak value (so far) of + 2 µSv/hr:

Ozalp_inVan_inTurkey.gif

Just the 24 graph (in nanoSievert, divide by 1,000 for microSievert – see Radiation Units & Conversions for additional help; Data can be verified via EURDEP’s public “Advanced Map”, one of the options @ Online Radiation Monitors.  Note the European Commission’s all-mighty disclaimer (aka “Not all shown measurements are validated.  Anything suggesting abnormal radiation levels is just your imagination.”)  Note my DISCLAIMER, too:  I’m just a laptop-wielding mountain dweller, entirely unaffiliated with the freak shows that pass for ‘governments’, any and all institutions, experts, or goat fuckers, for that matter.  Everything I post may be taken for entertainment.   But you are, of course, at liberty, to take it some other way as well…

VanOzalp_Turkey_24hrs_May21_2016.gif

Here’s the 1 month:

Ozalp_Kurdistan_1month.gif

  • And here’s the past 6 months with the y-axis at 0.3 µSv/hr to show the natural variability range better:

Ozalp_Turkey_3mo_2.gif

Ozalp_Kurdistan_3months.3

Just like the spikes and data gaps at various monitors in Europe and the US, this is obviously, again, extremely unusual.   Monitors high up in the mountains often pick up on radioactive clouds driving over better.

A look at wind patterns shows it lies on the jet stream path, with a slow-down in the 500 hPa height, and very little wind below that layer: See it move at nullschool, with Özalp, Van, Turkey (38.7 N, 44.0 E) marked: @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/21/1200Z/wind/isobaric/500hPa/orthographic=19.52,48.36,1024/loc=44.000,38.700

You can follow lines, right?    Here’s a larger view: https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/21/1200Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-57.38,92.78,272/loc=44.000,38.700

It’s what I call, “uncanny”…

2016:05:21:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-57.38,92.78,272:loc=44.000,38.700

Care to have a peek at what this monitor showed in spring 2011?  Tada:

Ozalp_Van_Turkey_311period_4mo

 

 

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

 

 

| 14 Comments

Major Seafood Industry Insider: Pacific Seafood “Undesirable for Human Consumption”

Earth, May 21, 2016

One of the world’s largest distributors of seafood, Green PolkaDot Box announced on May 19, 2016 that they’re buying  Day Boat Seafood LLC, a Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)-certified fishery and primary producer of wild caught seafood in the Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea.  An interesting little admission somehow slipped into their financial press release, as seen @ http://financialpress.com/2016/05/19/gpdb-announces-a-purchase-agreement-for-one-of-the-largest-u-s-suppliers-of-fresh-caught-msc-certified-seafood/  (excerpt, emphasis added):

“[…] The average adult over 45 years old and living in the United States consumes seafood 3-4 times, monthly.   Yet, because of the nuclear disasters in Japan and radioactive contamination spreading through the Pacific Ocean, vast species of fish and plant life are being adversely affected and are undesirable for human consumption.   The best quality, wild caught seafood from the Atlantic and Caribbean is part of a well-managed sustainable but limited supply. This acquisition by GPDB is a critical move to ensure consistent access to popular high quality, sustainable-sourced seafood at the very best value for its customers. […]”

You think the industry itself would make that up, as if they’re completely clueless as to how serious the situation is becoming in the Pacific Ocean?

http-:financialpress.com:2016:05:19:gpdb-announces-a-purchase-agreement-for-one-of-the-largest-u-s-suppliers-of-fresh-caught-msc-certified-seafood.gif

Personal Opinion Note:

The contamination detected in wild-caught salmon from the North American Pacific Northwest has not prompted me to stop eating Pacific seafood.  I will wholeheartedly continue to support fishermen from that region as I know some of them personally and knów they would quit bringing food to the market if they themselves believed it to be unfit for human consumption.   (Had some wild-caught smoked salmon from Alaska today, actually. ;-)  )   To guarantee food safety, some have tested their own catch, at their own expense (example: Seattle Times, Jan. 20, 2014: Fishermen test their own salmon for Fukushima radiation).  So far contamination has not reached over 50 Bq/kg of RadioCesium, which is *my own limit*.   (I would be far more hesitant to eat wild mushrooms or wild boar from contaminated land areas, rather than seafood, at this point. Even leafy greens that were in the rain during some of those data gapped periods I’d have more concerns about, as well…)

FYI:  Japan has the strictest limits in the world, at 100 Bq/kg.    The United States, however, under the nuke-pushing (and LYING) Obama administration, has raised the limits after Fukushima to 1200 Bq/kg, eventhough it has been documented that consumption of much less severe contamination can cause adverse health effects in some people over time.

“Full disclosure”:  Maybe I’m nuts, but, I really enjoyed swimming in the Pacific in October 2014, and have walked on a Fukushima beach in November 2013.  In a “when in Rome, act like the Romans” moment, I actually even ate seafood in Fukushima (north of Iwaki, some 15 miles south of the disaster site) that rather memorable day…

My main concern is not for (generally time-delayed) ‘direct effects’, eventhough hundreds of thousands, if not many millions, will suffer due to the long-term effects of the Fukushima-Daiichi Catastrophe in the coming decades, and perhaps centuries to come; my main concern, however, is for other species, and how changes in their health and abundance affects other species, including us.

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 2 Comments

US Radiation Monitoring Network Becoming “FALLOUT BLIND”

“[…] 

And when the rain comes down
Would you choose to walk or stay
Would you choose to walk?
Would you choose to stay?
Would you
Walk walk walk walk walk away  ?

[…]”

– Blogpost Soundtrack: The Sisters Of Mercy – Walk Away

The United States’ EPA Radiation Monitoring Network (Radnet)’s has only 140 listed public monitors…

  • 136 monitors show data for the past month (which barely constitutes ‘a network’ given the vast area left unmonitored.  In contrast, The Netherlands has more monitors than all of North America combined)
  • Of these operational monitors, even just for the first half of May 2016, about 1/3rd show substantial data gaps, likely hiding highly unusual measurements.
  • Of those 136, only 14 monitors still report Beta radiation data.  Since Canada and Mexico’s networks are even worse (or non-existant / not viewable to the public in near-real-time), that’s it for all of North America.
  • Since Alaska’s Beta monitoring was cut last month, and Arizona’s and Texas’ Beta Monitoring were axed this May 2016, that only leaves Olympia, WA; Albuquerque, NM and Grand Junction, CO as the only 3 remaining Beta monitors in the entire Western United States.

!-> See also, (May 18-20, 2016 – Completed!) US EPA Radnet data: First Half of May 2016, All Monitors, Graphed

Pure Beta emitters include: Strontium-89 & -Strontium-90, Tritium, Carbon-14, Krypton-85, Ruthenium-106, Sulphur-35, Bismuth-210 (which decays to alpha-emitter Polonium-210), etc. (Noteworthy: The EPA quit testing for Tritium in 2012; also: Strontium-90, skyrocketing in Fukushima’s groundwater is practically left unmonitored downwind/downcurrent);

Significance of Cutting Beta Monitoring

4341-4Besides the fact that a significant aspect of nuclear fallout consists of pure beta emitters, which go completely undetected by the gamma monitors, many radioisotopes decay in more than one step, often including involving a mix of gamma, beta and/or alpha decay pathways.   The radioactive decay of Iodine-131, for instance, is majority-beta-decay.   Tellurium-132, detected in Northern Germany less than a month ago, is also primarily a Beta-emitter.  Even the radioactive decay of Cesium-137 occurs for 95% through Beta decay.  (Because it also emits 5% gamma, it can be detected in a gammasprectroscopy, and if the fallout cloud is dense enough also affect gamma monitors).

In short:  Nuclear fallout, from a meltdown accident or bomb detonation, emits mainly BETA radiation.  This makes it far more dangerous when inhaled or ingested, where it can cause localized mutations in cells and various other effects that can express themselves, often years even decades later, as leukemia, cancers, heart diseases, immune system disruptions, etc.

By cutting Beta radiation monitors on the one hand, and redacting the remaining data on the other, we the people are left in the dark on the current fallout realities.

We’re on our own.

“[…] 

Black
Black planet
Black
Black world
Run around in the radiation
Run around in the acid rain
On a
Black
Black planet

[…]”

THE SISTERS OF MERCY – Black Planet

pc_76a314fb243acd6eb92dc9615c5900ef

 — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 4 Comments

Texas and Arizona Turned OFF All Beta Radiation Monitoring…

After ALASKA Turned Off Beta Radiation Monitoring Amidst Major Gamma Upticks, the Lone Star State’s very last Beta Radiation monitor was apparently shut off in early May as well, right at the time of what looks like the onset of a spike:

SanAngelo_TX

Zoom in on Beta-only:

SanAngelo_TX_Beta_May2016_lastdata

Both Beta monitors left in Arizona, @ Tucson & Yuma, did not return after the latest data gap…

tucson_azyuma_az

!!!-> All other Texas, Arizona (and most other official US monitors) (for period: May 1 – 17, 2016 ; Beta + Gamma ranges 2-5) have been added to my marathon blogpost,  US EPA Radnet data: First Half of May 2016, All Monitors, Graphed.

…Kind weird that Tepco will suspend decommissioning works at Fukushima plant during G7 Summit, some 500 km away, don’t you think?  Why?…

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 2 Comments

(OT), but…

… Always interesting to see the effect of a just-published blog post on blog stats…

...

…and the beat goes on…

And then there’s those rumblings again…

https://www.rt.com/news/343420-nato-nuclear-war-russia

screenshot excerpt:

343420-nato-nuclear-war-russia

…and the beat goes on…

| 3 Comments

+ 6 µSv/hr Radiation Spike @ Trier-Euren, Germany (near Luxembourg)

Bit higher than the spike reported not so far from there a week ago (See May 13, 201, “5 µSv/hr Radiation Spike @ Berus, Germany – w/ Nullschool (+ Dutch & Belgian data)

Not that anyone in a position of official power will start paying attention to what is happening in the Northern Hemisphere’s radiological landscape, but I thought – why not – I’d just pass it along.  The data is public, and in this case, again, ‘validated’…

Location:

Location_Trier_Euren

8 day period, pasted together from 2-day graphs:

8days

The spike data (3 times an hourly average) was ‘validated’ (meaning someone double-checked it and found no reason to doubt the measurement.  The monitor’s working just fine):

May20_2016_1week_validated_EUrdep_spike onMay18_2016_6uSv.hr_Trier_Euren_D

Within 3 month context, with 2 different y-axis:

3mX_7kY

3mX_0.2kY

You no longer “need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows”, do you?

May 18, 2016, 9am UTC… 

!-> @  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/18/0900Z/wind/isobaric/500hPa/orthographic=-10.21,51.87,1024/loc=6.600,49.700

Care to take a guess where it may be coming from?

Northpole view, same time, jet stream height @ 250 hPa…

!-> @  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/18/0900Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-113.56,78.44,270/loc=6.600,49.700

Tip: Just follow the clues down some corium-dug rabbit hole

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Couple more observations, but I don’t have the time it takes to write the narrative (about values sometimes going BELOW normal in cases of fallout, etc.).  SO just a couple graphs with no further commentary:

doel_herstmonceuxUkkel_datagapBeja_Portugal

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Off-topic (OT), but…

PS:  Don’t be surprised if them NATO-aligned “experts”  find “evidence” of “Russian involvement” in the downing of that plane…   Wouldn’t be the first false flag in history to move things towards where they want to take things….

See also Washington’s Blog, May 18, 2016, NATO Announces War Policy Against Russia

Although, they could just play the ISIL/ ISIS/IS card too (seeds being planted for that, see here).  Just don’t forget who’s beind thát…  (Anyways, all just speculation, of course.  But officials seem darn well-versed in speculation themselves lately, in rather predictable ways…   Amazing what they can allude to without even having found the plane…)

Not quite clear on the ultimate objectives (besides destabilization of Europe in preparation for moving the EU to a more war-approving far-right?), but in any case, it’s smelling like some kind of disgusting geopolitical game is being pushed…

Anyhow.  Not that I know what’s up.   In any case: sad.  

See also my disclaimer…

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 5 Comments

Sangre De Cristo Mountains by Crestone (SLV Spring 2016)

It helps to look outside… at the incredibly beautiful place I’m in…  

Recent rains have turned the valley green (Though much can change in just one month, doesn’t look like it will get as wet as last year, that was record breaking -> See  More Nature Photos (SLV, Southern Colorado – First half of June 2015)), while it still fell as snow higher up.  Photos were taken on May 17, 2016, from the bends in T road between Moffat and Crestone in Southern Colorado (USA):

5.17.2016b5.17.2016a

Other photo blog posts from 2016 in include:

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 3 Comments

US EPA Radnet data: First Half of May 2016, All Monitors, Graphed

nuclear-beach-clean-up_annot_jfqquote.jpg

May 16-20, 2016

For this blogpost, I graphed 2 weeks of selected data (Beta + Gamma ranges 2, 3, 4 & 5; where available) for each of the 140 monitors accessible through https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/query.do for the period May 1 through May 17, 2016. 

Note: always check the x- and y-axis.  When a data period starts with a data gap, Radnet will not graph that part.  Look closely, it’s not always obvious.

 The US Government has this disclaimer for the below-shown  data:

HAHAHAHA-No-you-Can39t--meme-8033

Want to know what’s really going on?

OFFICIAL NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: The data contained on these pages does not constitute an official position, review, statement or confirmation of integrity by the Environmental Protection Agency. It is not for use in any official manner unless reviewed and approved by an authorized agent of the Environmental Protection Agency.

In short: The data the US government supplies to the public does not necessarily have integrity.  (Yeah, I figured, given the track record of some other things coming from this government… ) 

But anyhow… for what it’s worth…  The theme of the current ongoing “Data thriller series” hasn’t changed yet:

Which nuclear disaster site(s) is/are spewing massive amounts of various fission products into the air lately?  IS IT coming from the Fukushima-Daiichi catastrophe site?  If not, then WHERE is it coming from?

(!-> See also European measurements in 2016 of Te132, Ru103, & Cs137, and various documentations of the recent upticks, such as 10 years of data from Lamia, Greece, and various other related posts.)

So…

!-> Via my page Online Radiation monitors.

!-> For some pointers to do this yourself, see my (July 4, 2015) post, How to scatter plot the EPA’s Radnet data  (still mostly correct.  They’ve fixed some problems since then, left most as-was…):

In the alphabetical order (by state, then by monitor location), as found on that first-mentioned US EPA Radnet query scroll-down option.  No annotations added.  I didn’t graph the other gamma ranges as I haven’t found that to add much extra detail.  Note the absence of Beta monitoring at most locations (most of it dropped after Fukushima began spewing i spring 2011, some dropped more recently, like in Alaska, as well as Texas and Arizona, as well as the data gaps in ranges 2 and 3, which may be hiding highly unusual detections.

Anchorage_AK

Fairbanks_AK

Juneau_AK

Birmingham_AL

Mobile_AL

Montgomery_AL

FtSmith-AR

LittleRock_AR

Phoenix-AZ

Tucson_AZ

Yuma_AZ

Anaheim_CA

Bakersfield_CA

Eureka_CA

Fresno_CA

LosAngeles_CA

Riverside_CA

Sacramento_CA

SanBernardinoCOunty_CA

SanDiego_CA

SanFrancisco_CA

SanJose_CA

ColoradoSprings_CO

Denver_CO

GrandJunction_CO

Hartfort_CT

Washington_DC

 

Dover_DE

Jacksonville_FL

Miami_FL

Orlando_FL

Tallahassee_FL

Tampa_FL

Atlanta_GA

Augusta_FL

Honolulu_HI

DesMoines_IA

MasonCity_IA

 

Boise_ID

IdahoFalls_ID

Aurora_IL

Champaign_IL

Chicago_IL

May 18, 2016

Alright, they made this surreal time-consuming…  It’s só bad, it seems done on purpose.   But, anyhow, all that means that it will take me longer.  So, to continue…

FortWayne_IN

Indianapolis_IN

KansasCity_KSWichita_KS

Lexington_KY

LOUISVILLE_KY

PADUCAH_KY

BatonRouge_LA

Shreveport_LA

Boston_MA

Worchester_MA

Baltimore_MD

Orono_ME

May 18, 2016 (I can only do a bit of this every day, as the system seems designed to encourage ‘giving up’.  Soooo slooow…)

Anyhow, continued (same May 1-17, 2016 period):

Portland_ME

BayCity_MI

GrandRapids_MI

Duluth_MN

Pfff…   Not to mention the crashes “due to internal errors” (which apparently take years to fix…).  I’ll finish this another day, I suppose…

AndOnAndOnThisGoes

May 19, 2016 A few more: same period.   (The second half of May will need to be done seperately.  One of the issues with Radnet is that they don’t allow for graphing more than 400 data points…) 

STPaul_MN

JeffersonCity_MO

Springfield_MO

StLouis_MO

Jackdon_MS

Billings_MT

GreatFalls_MT

Charlotte_NC

Greensboro_NC

Raleigh_NC

Wilmington_NC

Bismarck_ND

Kearney_NE

Tiring…

GoodOl.EPA_Radnet_May19_2016

But carrying on…

Lincoln_NE

Omaha_NE

Concord_NH

Edison_NJ

LasVegas_NV

Reno_NV

Albuquerque_NM

Carlsbad_NM

NavajoLake_NM

Albany_NY

Buffalo_NY

NewYorkCity_EML_NY

Rochester_NY

Syracuse_NY

Yaphank_NY

Cincinnati_OH

Cleveland_OH

Columbus_OH

Toledo_OH

OklahomaCity_OH

Tulsa_OK

Corvalis_OR

Portland_OR

Bloomsburg_PA

Philadelphia_PA

Pittsburgh_PA

SanJuan_PuertoRico_OccupiedTerritories

Providence_RI

Pierre_SD

Columbia_SC

Charleston_SC

RapidCity_SD

Knoxville_TN

Memphis_TN

Nashville_TN

Amarillo_TX

Austin_TX

Corpus_Christi_TX

Dallas_TX

ElPaso_TX

FtWorth_TX

Harlingen_TX

Houston_TX

Laredo_TX

Lubbock_TX

SanAngelo_TX.gif

SanAntonio_TX

SaltLakeCity_UT

StGeorge_UT

Harrisburg_VA

Richmond_VA

VirginiaBeach_VA

Burlington_VT.gif

Ellensburg_WA

Olympia_WA

Richland_WA

Seattle_WA

Spokane_WA

LaCrosse_WI

Madison_WI

Wilwaukee_WI

Shawano_WI

Charleston_WV

Casper_WY.gif

 — That’s ALL of ’em! —

Now IF I (or you?) had the patience to do this … for every monitor (as shown above), for every 2-week period… since, let’s say, since January 1, 2011, maybe then something significant could be figured out about the recent detections of highly unusual radioisotopes in Europe, as well as the origins of what makes monitors go silent (data gaps)…

SUGGESTION:  If one were to create enough long term graphed data records… and then scrutinize how spikes and data gaps move through space, while watching wind and weather maps correspondingly, then it may be possible to narrow down the hunt for one or more spewing nuclear disaster site(s).

At least to general regions like: “Northern China/Japan/Russia/Ukraine”,  or “Southern China/India/MiddleEast”,  ” Europe/Turkey”, “North America”, or “elsewhere,” (or so – the classifications would emerge from the research), and with decent probability.   Now I think, “Fukushima-Daiichi”, but I can’t call that much more than a guess.  As people have commented elsewhere: could be a nuclear military vessel somewhere in the Pacific too.   Lots of possibilities indeed…

So: I don’t know.  But we all know, however, that the CTBTO could figure it out very easily and quickly.  They could be sipping their coffee in the morning while watching the latest maps of radioactive clouds swirling around the world on their screens as their super-sensitive sensors and super-computers process the latest information.  My interpretation of the complete media silence means that at the very top of the nuclear cartel (IAEA & Co)  know exactly what happened when and where.  (Otherwise there would be vocalized concerns for “What’s going on?!, Where is this coming from?!”   There isn’t a peep to be found anywhere.)   And the tiny bit of data allowed to shine through their smokescreens is perhaps just part of an experiment to see if we’re truly the complete idiots they hold as for.   (I think we may be “complete idiots” indeed, unless we prove them wrong…)

Many institutions could figure it out too.  The Austrians and Swiss ran some great models the first month of the disaster .  The Norwegians did a great job and were the last to quit, yet also véry early on, just 2 months in, on May 13, 2011, as reported in my blogpost the day after, “NILU abandons Fukushima forecasting: reliable data blackout cited. (The return of Zardoz…)

If a significant detection of Ru-103 in Norway, a relatively massive spike in Te-132 in Germany, or a spike in artificial alpha radiation in The Netherlands, and records being set amidst data gaps all over the place (all in 2016), all apparently fail to get any politician concerned, nor get any journalist off his/her ass, nor even rouse academia’s curiosity… then -when it comes to nuclear matters – probably nothing ever will again…

In my little mind, I’m beginning to see a world in which “the future has arrived.”  It is dystopian.  It’s as if the West, once a bastion of free press and investigative journalism, and by current-day extention most of the world, has become a high-tech version of the Soviet Union of the 20th century.   Like the Pravda then, most media outlets will just censor themselves to avoid the to-be-expected heat.

I’ve come to believe that only *a cancellation of the likely stand down order, directly from the nuclear industry top*, could change the complete media blackout.   And thus it doesn’t matter what I write here.  I think this blog is mainly just entertainment to them, on the one hand, and a dissident voice to fine-tune their censoring algorithms with, on the other.  They got it covered.

I’ve seen it before, like at the end of 2014, when the Zaporizhia NPP suffered a major incident and either had a partial meltdown or had to vent masisve amounts of radioactivity into the atmopshere… Like recently, I documented evidence of the radioactive cloud like no other source… but in the annals of official history, there never was a release of radioactivity into the environment…  “It never happened”.

It’s so unbelievably sad to witness.  No backbone to be found anywhere…?   Does that mean that, essentially, all governments, universities and media outlets can be blackmailed somehow?   And in the worst case scenario, a country’s non-compliance may result in what?   A “nuclear accident”, “nuclear bombing”, “terrorist attack”, all of the above???

When you dig deeper and deeper, and tumble down this molten-corium-dug rabbit hole,… very few possibilities remain “impossible”…   ;-/

Anyhow…  So…   My impression is that this radioactive cloud of late had its origin all the way from across the Pacific, and that it shows up on monitors at ground level only there where 1)  the jet stream slows down enough 2) air layers below it slow down too 3) air layers are mixing (more so inland than on the coast, it seems. -> Example from Alaska.), and of course, 4)  there has to be a functioning monitor right then and there.   Even monitors a mile or less from each other can have véry different detections due to how chaotic dispersion patterns are. (fluid dynamics, weather & microclimates, geographical differences,…), then add slightly differently calibrated monitors, possible differences in data processing,… etc., and it becomes véry difficult for the lay person to figure out what might be happening…

The main problem (or at least that’s my impression) is that the official radiation monitoring systems, which clearly have superb equipment, appear to be operated with the objective of covering up abnormalities, rather than exposing them.

… Giving thanks for cute kittens, rainbows, and apple pie.

PEACE –

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 4 Comments

Artificial ALPHA & BETA Radiation Spikes in The Netherlands

May 16, 2016

“Mysteriously” coinciding with major radiation upticks across the world, as far as I know documented on this blog like nowhere else, this bit of data shows we are indeed looking at nuclear fallout moving across the landscape.

Wieringerwerf_NL_1maand

Unlike Gamma radiation, which requires heavy shielding to be stopped, Beta and Alpha radiation can be stopped by just a few inches of air or paper, so a particle has to strike a monitor directly for it to even be detected, making this a very significant (and rare!) detection. It is almost harmless UNLESS ingested or inhaled.  In that case, even small amounts can cause health problems many years or decades later.

Location:

T_BETA_ART__eurdep_1month_preMay17_2016_maxValues

Unlike JRC Station 5 in Italy, and Nicosia, Cyprus, which always seems to pick up tiny amounts of Beta-Art & Alfa-Art, the network in The Netherland very rarely does.  And it is relatively massive spike, coming less than two weeks after a spike in Tellurium-132 was detected in Seehausen, Germany…

The data shown above and below was not validated (NV), but in my non-expert armchair opinion that doesn’t mean all that much.  The Netherlands rarely ever ‘validates’ anything anyhow.  You have to be in Germany for insanely disturbing ‘validated data,’ which the entire mainstream media still completely ignores just the same.

DISCLAIMERS:  Via Online Radiation Monitors -> EURDEP (!-> note their disclaimer: @ http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EurdepMap/Disclaimer.aspx ), and mine: @https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/disclaimer/

The data details, with some annotations added:

wieringrwerf_nl_may17_2016_1mo_betaart_alfaart-1

Just to echo what I’ve been saying for quite awhile now: In short: EVERYTHING POINTS AT A RECENT MAJOR NUCLEAR DISASTER UNFOLDING.  

I really don’t think it’s all that unreasonable to ask: 

WHERE is this coming from?!

Drop me a comment if you know more.  Thanks.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.

[Added] Correction:  The Alpha spike was ‘ART’ (artificial), but the Beta uptick was ‘NAT’ (natural) (in the last annotated screenshot it was initially incorrectly labeled ‘ART’ as well, which in this case I presume is what they would call “enhanced natural”, meaning caused by a manmade release of radioisotopes that also exist in nature (such as Radon-220, for example)

 

| 17 Comments

NDAA, 2016 version: US Military Draft for Women, Further Militarization NATO Borders with Russia

sheep-obama2

O’bahh-mahh… O’bahh-mahh…

Colorado (USA), May 16, 2016

I’ve mentioned the NDAA before in  (Mar. 8, 2012), “Waving the Winning Obama Flag, while Executive Order “NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS” is signed…“… Well, the prediction then came through (Obama was reelected), and apparently he’s ready to renew and expand this horrific piece of legislation…

!-> h/t:  Washington’s Blog (Mar. 16, 2016), Defense Bill Coming This Week: A Boost for War and Tyranny;

Couple excerpts (emphasis added):

“By Ron Paul, Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

For many of us concerned with liberty, the letters “NDAA” have come to symbolize Washington’s ongoing effort to undermine the US Constitution in the pursuit of constant war overseas. It was the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2012 that introduced into law the idea that American citizens could be indefinitely detained without warrant or charge if a government bureaucrat decides they had assisted al-Qaeda or “associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States.

No charges, no trial, just disappeared Americans.

[…]

Unless some last minute changes take place, this latest NDAA will force young women for the first time to register to be drafted into the US military. For the past 36 years, young men have been forced to register with Selective Service when they turn 18 or face felony charges and years in prison. Under a perverted notion of “equality” some people are cheering the idea that this represents an achievement for women. Why cheer when slavery is extended to all? We should be fighting for an end to forced servitude for young men and to prevent it being extended to women.

[…]

Along with extending draft registration to women, the latest NDAA expands the neocons’ new “Cold War” with Russia, adding $3.4 billion to put US troops and heavy weapons on Russia’s border […]”

!-> Read in full @ Washington’s Blog

PEACE –

GunControl

*** Public Service Announcement. ***

 Swiss Army General to Citizens:

“Arm Yourselves, Europe’s On the Verge of Civil War.”

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| Leave a comment

Rambling Along a Decade of Gamma Radiation Data from Lamia, Greece

Fiction?

As part of my “data thriller series” (a genre all of its own in the data post-fukushima art movement), and of course “just for your infotainment” (see also my disclaimer), for this blogpost I again pasted together 3 months per line, in this case (via Eurdep’s Advanced Map @ Lamia, Greece) starting in April 2006, and ending today, May 14, 2016.

Except for marking March 11, 2011, I didn’t add annotations.  I’ll ramble a bit after this data set (neither  the data, nor my rambles, may not be validated by the authorities that supplied the data to the European Commission’s Data Exchange Platform.  Check with them to see if they want their boots licked, or something….) about what I see in it, and other things you should totally ignore.  [sarc.]

Greece_Lamia.gif

Starting in 2006 – scroll down for how “the landscape” changed to where we’re at today…  (Yes, this is actually a subcategory of *landscape painting*…)  [sarc.]  Read into it whatever you want.  I find the progression at the end darn … hm… what word should I use?   “Suggestive?”

“DATA, baby”:

Lamia_41Lamia_40Lamia_39Lamia_38Lamia_37Lamia_36Lamia_35Lamia_34Lamia_33Lamia_32Lamia_31Lamia_30Lamia_29Lamia_28Lamia_27Lamia_26Lamia_25Lamia_24Lamia_23Lamia_22Lamia_21Lamia_20Lamia_19Lamia_18Lamia_17Lamia_16Lamia_15Lamia_14Lamia_13Lamia_12Lamia_11Lamia_10Lamia_9Lamia_8Lamia_7Lamia_6Lamia_5Lamia_4Lamia_3Lamia_2Lamia_1

There’s 5 instances the data goes above 0.4 µSv/hr.  To show those seperately with an undefined y-axis, here you go:

Lamia-JULY2010_GlitchDotLamia_Aug_Spet_2013Lamia-Sept2010Lamia_Sept2011Lamia_July2015

Couple observations:

  • That something serious also occured in 2010 is obvious from many long-term records.  I’ve pointed at that also in relation to the Khazakstan Saiga Antelope die-offs, brought up the possibility of a major meltdown having happened at Daya NPP in China (near Hong Kong, though Hong Kong was likely not downwind), as well as a possible factor in the finding that the vexing mysterious scientist-baffling ecological havoc in the Northern Pacific began well before March 2011.  Some see that as evidence that nuclear fallout has nothing to do with all of this.  I like to think outside that box.  It’s not unlikely whatsoever that many pre-2011 nuclear accidents have been covered-up.   The thyroid cancer upticks in some parts of California definitely point in that direction (no matter how they spin it differently).  It’s in fact my impression that this fallout-dosing is happening RIGHT NOW all across the world.
  • There’s some possible evidence of the serious  Zaporizhia (ZNPP) nuclear incident in the Eastern Ukraine, which appears to have been accompanied by a large radioactive cloud that drifted over Europe after Nov. 27, 2014, !-> See (Jan. 11, 2015)  “Can the Rumor from Poznan, Poland and Romanian news of a “Radioactive Cloud” (Both Dec. 5, 2014) be traced to ZNPP too?“.  This can be found here as well in disturbances and data gaps.
  • The most striking in this record is the impressive upticks that have occured in waves in the past 5 years, since the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear catastrophe began.   A lot of that super-hot very volatile fallout takes YEARS to come down.   We’re in it.   It is happening NOW.  While the mainstream media is asleep at the wheel reporting on quite a lot of bs, we are de facto in a planetary nuclear emergency situation so bad that it resembles what nuclear war fallout would look like.   You can also see that just in the last few days, as found all over the world with data gaps amidst spikes, SOMETHING’S UP.  You do not get a Telurium-132 detection at a 10,000% the concentration it was detected at in Europe in 2011 without somthing extremely serious having happened.

In short: EVERYTHING POINTS AT A RECENT MAJOR NUCLEAR DISASTER UNFOLDING.  

My take:  it’s either a full-on meltdown somewhere new… (I think that would be véry news-worthy!  Right?) OR, bit out there but not impossible, the underground molten Fuksuhima coriums have entered a new stage of deterioration, and their transient ongoing fissioning, that I’ve suspected for years now, has shifted gears…   (I think that would be véry news-worthy!  Right?) 

Take your pick.  Now add complete mainstream media silence to the picture.   If the situation we’re apparently in doesn’t drive you half-way up the wall, there may be something wrong with you.  Ask your doctor about Fukitol.

The most disturbing part is the absence of media coverage, imo.  We are in deep sh*t, my friends.  The nuclear cartel apparently has thát much power that they dictate what makes the news, and what doesn’t.   They probably already figured this out:  they’re going to have to kill me if they want me to stop, because my love for this planet is indestructible.  Something’s wrong.  And I am convinced the challenges at hand can be addressed successfully when faced. 

Honesty and transparency is going to be non-negotiable.  Either our emerging planetary civilization becomes ethical in its use of power, or things will only get worse.  The latter would be a lose-lose situation.  Unless we’re in the midst of an alien takeover.  I still think it’s more likely organized crime has just “gotten out of hand a little.”  If you know what I mean…

I think that at some level of awareness, “they” know this too.   This is why I disagree with some vocal activists who proclaim we (so-called supposedly anti-nuclear activists, or whatever box not all of us quite fit in…)  “will be killed”?  Because:

(1) I don’t know what’s going on.  […] Well, that’s not completely true, I suppose.  I say that a lot, and for what I provide (“data art” and “art interpretations”) that’s true, BUT… .  Here’s the thing:   Using the scientific means, I can’t figure it out.

(2) But having used very unconventional shamanic means in 2013, I ‘got’ one thing, though:   the actual reality of what is going on there is energetically incomprehensibly intense.

Because of that latter aspect, I personally consider it more likely I’ll get hired than killed.  ;-)   No need to tell me “be safe”.  I am, regardless of the realm/dimension I’m in.  There are forces being mobilized from even outside this solar system.  Essentially, this misguided “nuclear era” is  a multi-dimensional emergency situation.  It is not unprecedented.  Entire planets have been lost before.  It can be different here.   There are warrior spirits, unheard of for centuries, haunting current-day shamans.

Timeless truths are on our side.  We’ll turn this around. 

Somehow.  Some day.

We must.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 5 Comments

5 µSv/hr Radiation Spike @ Berus, Germany – w/ Nullschool (+ Dutch & Belgian data)

EURDEP / Nullschool data.

Related?  !->  HIGHEST SINCE 2011: Cesium-137, Ruthenium-103, Tellurium-132 (early 2016)

When I wrote the previous post (May 13), “A Year in Central France & Other Graphed Radiation Pieces (Germany, Switzerland, Slovania,…)“, all part of an ongoing investigation into the obvious major nuclear accident that no mainstream media outlet has mentioned a word about, I also noticed a spike at the German-French border.  When clicking on the maroon dot, you get the monitor right next to it, which didn’t spike.  You have to zoom in all the way to get see both.  Location of the spike and a couple other monitors I’ll look at marked on this map:

BerusLocation

A zoom in on the data from these couple monitors, marked on this map (for the map, I used a screenshot of EURDEP, see Online Radiation Monitors).  First the data:

Berus_Germany_1mo_May13_2016_spikeValidated BerusSPikeWithDataGaps

That massive VALIDATED spike occurred just after 9 am on May 10th.   

And just FYI:  5.86 µSv/hr is extreme!  –> You have to remember that when Finnish researchers went up in an airplane to fly through the thick of the Chernobyl cloud, the background level IN this cloud was 0.8 µSv/hr.

So, please forgive me for being a wee bit disturbed by the (so far) complete mainstream media blackout on what went down at some hitherto-to-be-confirmed nuclear power plant or lab, and is clearly still happening, especially in light of the validated detections, including the Te-132 @ 100x the European post-Fukushima levels @ Seehausen, Northern Germany. Then add the numerous recent spikes and data gaps all over the place and this absence of academic, media and political outcry quickly becomes “a true wtf situation”…

Some more data:

  • The monitor right next door, Überherrns-Berus, Germany, doesn’t show the spike, only an uptick:RghtNextToBerus_D
  • The glitch dot near the NPP in Vlissingen Haven, South Netherlands didn’t go as high, nor was it “validated”, but it occured 24 hours later, just after 9 am on May 11:

VlissingenHaven_week_May13_2016

DoelNPP_1week_May13_2016-> I include that to show that whatever set off the Vlissingen monitor was unlikely “just an instrument error”.  Various disturbances can be found moving across the European radiological landscape.   It just takes too much time to map it to the extent that the original source, or various sources, can be figured out.   To find the original and main source looking at data gaps might be the most helpful, but the spikes, likely “less diluted” due to being more of a direct-downwind hit, can offer clues too.

So next, I’ll trace the Berus, Deutschland spike via Nullschool’s wind map, @ http://earth.nullschool.net/

9 am on May 10th @ 49.3 N, 6.7 E

just above the surface @ 1,000 hPa -> @ http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/10/0900Z/wind/isobaric/500hPa/orthographic=4.95,49.10,2048/loc=6.700,49.600, you can see the area in a zone with almost no wind:

2016:05:10:0900Z:wind:isobaric:1000hPa:orthographic=4.95,49.10,2048:loc=6.700,49.600

Just above, the wind is coming from the south and the monitor is located in the edge of a zone that’s also devoid of wind:

2016:05:10:0900Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=4.95,49.10,2048:loc=6.700,49.600

@ 700 hPa the wind is coming more from the southwest, and there’s wind coming roughly from the southeast out of the slow zone over the Alps.  Wind blow to the UK, where data gaps moved over…

2016:05:10:0900Z:wind:isobaric:700hPa:orthographic=4.95,49.10,2048:loc=6.700,49.600

Now, at jet stream altitude, at 250 hPa, there’s an interesting slow zone moving west to east, while the wind is moving  the other way (this is one of the aspects that makes figuring out a fallout pattern really complex: wind direction at different altitude is complex enough as it gets, but he slow-down zones within these air layers move differently than the wind.  This means that spikes, data gaps and glitch dots may appear to appear somewhere earlier, not because the fallout cloud reached over that zone first, but because a slow-down zone allowed fallout to come down there sooner.

So, here’s that (@ http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/10/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=4.95,49.10,2048/loc=6.700,49.600 ):

2016:05:10:0900Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=4.95,49.10,2048:loc=6.700,49.600

But if you start 3 x 3 hours before, @ http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/10/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=4.95,49.10,2048/loc=6.700,49.600, and then click forward the 3-hour snapshots, you can see that just in the hours before the spike, a slow-zone moved over:

2016:05:10:0600Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=4.95,49.10,2048:loc=6.700,49.600So… if the spike was caused by nuclear fallout delivered from above, then the windline to follow is likely one that, at 250 hPa, is just a bit east of the monitor itself, as wind below it would blow it slightly west…

http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/10/0600Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-107.08,68.37,512/loc=6.700,49.600

2016:05:10:0600Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-107.08,68.37,512:loc=6.700,49.600

Now, if I seize my bad “confirmation bias” habit of pointing at Fukushima, which this windline (at least without making adjustments for the couple days it takes for an airmass to move at that altitude) and continue… http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/10/0600Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-275.60,54.31,512/loc=6.700,49.600

2016:05:10:0600Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-275.60,54.31,512:loc=6.700,49.600

… then, as you can see… there’s possibilities in North Korea, Israel, Turkey, Eastern Europe somewhere…    In other words: because of lack of monitors, the data being redacted from the few monitors we get to see, and wind + precipitation over thousands of miles causing extremely chaotic patterns (I guess that would fall under ‘fluid dynamics’ and generally sophisticated computer programs are used for this.)…  It’s not that it can’t be figured out by the public (you and I), but it’s a major challenge.

Are these “swirls hitting ground level” after more than one circulation around the globe?  Quite possible, since this mess has now been going for many weeks.

Just putting this out there in hopes others take it further and pin this spewing reactor down.  Previous such attempts (for example, from February: Unusually High Radiation Spikes in the Alps. A Close Look @ Spittal/Drau, Austria (EURDEP/Nullschool) has landed me at Fukushima-Daiichi’s Cauldrons of Hell, but the implications (especially of it still fissioning to the extent recent fission product can be detected on the other side of the planet!)  are rather heavy to accept that with just tracing a couple wind lines…    Got a better idea, WITH documentation?

You might also want to look into “Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?“, ’cause where those whiffs came from in Finland last year was never solved either…  (See, for an exaple of such high strangeness as recent as (Oct. 28, 2015) Detected in Helsinki Finland in October 2015: Cesium-134 & 137, Actinium-225 & 227, Cobalt-60. + Detected in Hamburg, Germany: Zirconium-97., among others…)

Anyone who dismissed this as just all just nonsensical “conspiracy bs”, SHOW ALL OF US who are wondering wth is going on YOUR analysis and documentation of where these radioisotopes are coming from.  Or shut up.  

[crickets…]

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, Fair Use Statement

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it may be plagiarized.  Please let me know.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
| 2 Comments

A Year in Central France & Other Graphed Radiation Pieces (Germany, Switzerland, Slovania,…)

Crestone, Colorado (USA) – May 13, 2016

Via EURDEP, 16 months of gamma graphed for Moulins, France:

France

Just to pick a monitor…  starting in Feb. 2015, 3 months per line, with the most recent at the end:

Moulins_France_5Moulins_France_4Moulins_France_3Moulins_France_2Moulins_France

Smack in the middle of that data gap, the largest detection of Telurium-132 (SINCE CHERNOBYL!)  was detected downwind in Northern Germany, on April 26, 2016.   There is some suggestive data from elsewhere in Europe and the United States that that may come from afar, but this is far from certain.    But that there was a MAJOR nuclear incident the past month, likely a full-on meltdown, one that not one mainstream media outlet has said even one word about, that much is pretty clear.

Fallout appears to be coming down all over the place. 

Record data gaps amidst record spikes.

Just check “standard deviation” on Eurdep’s pubic “Advanced Map” for the past few days, then look at Nullschool to see the jet stream slow down zone correlating with the upticks.  Trace it.  Tell me what your #1 suspect is.   Tools found on my page with Online Radiation Monitors.

Couple more examples:

NAPF_SMN_Switzerland

Denkingen_DuitslandFAHY_Boncourt_SuisseTodraz_Slovania

Come on, Europe, figure out what happened where and publish your findings.  Drop me a link with what you find.  I’m just some guy with a laptop, sipping coffee in a hippie town in the Colorado Rockies using every bit of spare time I can find to do this.  (Hideous nuclear cover-ups drive me nuts!)

A major nuclear accident getting covered-up is plenty of reason to drop everything and get researching.   

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, Fair Use Statement

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it may be plagiarized.  Please let me know.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.

 

 

 

| 1 Comment

New Fallout Map for Japan: Soil Samples

Colorado – USA – Friday the 13th, May 2016

[h/t unincredulous @ ENEnews forum, “Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here”]:

Various citizen based radiation testing labs that have been established since the 2011 Fukushima disaster have joined forces to make their data available, all in one place.

The website includes multiple languages and a search tool to look for various types of food along with location and other details to provide radiation testing results. The current database includes food testing. […]” continue reading at Simply Info @ http://www.fukuleaks.org/web/?p=15469

!!!->  The map can be found @ http://www.minnanods.net/maps/leaflet/

And these are some screenshots taken on May 13, 2016:

Visit the source to be able to click on the dots to get the specific data for Cs-137 & Cs-134.  Unfortunately no other radioisotopes have been included (yet?).

www.minnanods.net:maps:leaflet._May13_2016screenshot_1tiff

Zoom in on the larger Tokyo region shows the relative hotspots north-east of Tokyo

www.minnanods.net:maps:leaflet._May13_2016screenshot_5_Tokyo_and_Chiba

The Fukushima City area:

www.minnanods.net:maps:leaflet._May13_2016screenshot_4_FukushimaCityAreai

Sendai area:

www.minnanods.net:maps:leaflet._May13_2016screenshot_3_Sendai

Interesting little cluster between Sendai and Fukushima:

www.minnanods.net:maps:leaflet._May13_2016screenshot_2tiff

Many MUCH higher independent detections, including in Tokyo, have been reported by Fukushima Diary over the years.   See also other news sources listed in my Nuclear News links page.

safecast

Check the original sources for most recent findings.    

Related Blogposts:

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, Fair Use Statement

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it may be plagiarized.  Please let me know.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
| Leave a comment

6 years of Gamma Graphed for Okhony, Новгородская область, Россия

In the tradition of “long term pattern spotting”, here a spot sort of inbetween Moscow and Saint Petersburg, with the gamma radiation data (via EURDEP) graphed

from July 12, 2009 till today, May 12, 2016,  see further below these two maps:

locationokhony

Starting in July 2009, 3 months pasted together per line:

Okhony_Russia_27Okhony_Russia_26Okhony_Russia_25Okhony_Russia_24Okhony_Russia_23cOkhony_Russia_22cOkhony_Russia_21cOkhony_Russia_20Okhony_Russia_19cOkhony_Russia_18Okhony_Russia_17cOkhony_Russia_16cOkhony_Russia_15cOkhony_Russia_14cOkhony_Russia_13Okhony_Russia_12Okhony_Russia_11Okhony_Russia_10Okhony_Russia_9Okhony_Russia_8Okhony_Russia_7Okhony_Russia_6Okhony_Russia_5Okhony_Russia_4Okhony_Russia_3Okhony_Russia_2

okhony_1b

Okhony_Russia_1

Note:  Sorry for that repeated part in the last two 3-month lines.  I somehow had skipped January, and don’t feel like re-doing the whole set of 3-months-per-line.

All I wanted to show was just another example of the unusual daily averages in the past 6 to 9 months, with particularly February 2016 standing out for this one (coinciding with a massive disturbance and dats gap in Lithuania, among other puzzle pieces..). 

Some monitors show much more detail.  Click ‘Home’ and scroll to some bits and pieces I’ve documented (and speculated about) in the past 6+ months.

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, Fair Use Statement

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it may be plagiarized.  Please let me know.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
| Leave a comment