Radioactive Braille

 

  • Mersin Gulnar Akkuyu NGS, Turkey, 6 months:

mersin_gulnar_akkuyungs_turkey_3mo_june28_2016mersin_gulnar_akkuyungs_turkey_3mo_sept28_2016

–> The lower than normal values around the peaking week (often found around April 24th) of “the April event” (See Aug. 7, 2016: We’ve Been Dosed…, and various others linked from there), the subsequent data gaps within an erratic patterns, also including lower than normal values, and the over two weeks omitted in the past month…

… Anyways.  I don’t need to keep spelling it out.

virrat_finland_3mo_sept28_2016

The most “positive” way I can put it is that the pharmaceutical industry is going to make a killing.

“[…] Chernobyl exposure during gestation had a significant effect on behavior in adolescent offspring in Finland. Adolescents who were exposed from the second trimester in pregnancy onwards had a 2.32-fold risk (95 % CI: 1.13 – 4.72) of having lifetime depression symptoms, an increased risk of fulfilling DSM-III-R criteria of a Major Depressive Disorder (OR = 2.48, 95 % CI: 1.06 – 5.7), and a 2.01-fold risk (95 % CI: 1.14 – 3.52) of having attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms […]”

–  http://www.ncf-net.org/radiation/LoganovskyLowDoseIonizingRadiationBrain.pdf

——— ———- ———

sacred_mantra_mandala_tn84.jpg

| Leave a comment

Some Fractal Videos

Sept. 27, 2016 – Steering this blog away from radiation graphs, through more infinite realms, before landing it back onto ‘Planet Colorado’.

Some Madelbroth Fractal Zooms:

Without music:

Faster:

Music break:

Unrelated documentary:

 

| Leave a comment

3 6 9

If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.” Nikola Tesla

The below gamma radiation data is available via EURDEP @ http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EurdepMap/Disclaimer.aspx

  • 3 months from Bierset, Belgium

bierset_belgium_3mo_sept27_2016

  • 6 months from Rojen Peak, Bulgaria:

rojenpeak_bulgaria_3mo_june27_2016rojenpeak_bulgaria_3mo_sept27_2016

  • 9 months from Ebsdorfergrund Ot hachborn, Germany:

ebsdorfergrund_ot_hachborn_germany_3mo_march27_2016ebsdorfergrund_ot_hachborn_germany_3mo_june27_2016ebsdorfergrund_ot_hachborn_germany_3mo_sept27_2016

—————————-

teslaquote

—————————-

Disclaimer, Etc.

—————————-

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it was plagiarized.  Please let me know about the assholes that did so.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
| Leave a comment

Achtopol, Bulgaria (EURDEP, 12 years graphed)

This extremely long data record includes bits and pieces that suggest it could be an example of “things have looked worse BEFORE Fukushima”, at least on some monitors.

It starts very erratically, with only a few data points here and there.  By October 2007, a regular daily testing appears without much interruption. That changes quickly, with 2009-2010 suggesting ‘something happened’.   2010 is almost entirely a data gap.  Etc.  Check it out:

Starting in mid-May 2004:

achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2004achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2004

achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2005achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2005achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2005achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2006achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2007achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2007achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2007achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2007achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2008achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2008achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2008

achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2008achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2009achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2009

achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2009achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2009achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2010achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2010achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2010achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2010

achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2011achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2011achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2011achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2011achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2012achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2012achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2012achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2012achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2013achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2013achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2013achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2013achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2014achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2014achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2014achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2014achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2015achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2015achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_july26_2015achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2015achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_jan26_2016achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_april26_2016achtopol_bulgaria_3mo_oct26_2016

—————————-

Observations:

  • Most extreme spikes occured late August – early September 2008
  • Data gaps are nothing new and in the past have gone on for many months on end
  • In the Post-March-2011 period, the largest spike came in October 2011, followed by an increase in data gaps for most of 2012;
  • In late November 2014, there’s a baseline adjustment (data processing change), making dose comparrisons practically meaningless before and after.
  • Leave a comment if you know of specific events correlating with specific nuclear releases.

Non-dubstep Bulgarian Voices:

—————————-

(This blogpost was just to kill some time while I was waiting for that first debate to begin. Based on what I saw, I’d say Hillary “won the debate.”)

—————————-

Disclaimer, Etc.

—————————-

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it was plagiarized.  Please let me know about the assholes that did so.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
| Leave a comment

Everything You Need to Know About the 2016 US Presidential Election

The chances may be dim, but in just 3 minutes and 12 seconds, short enough to quickly watch before the first so-called ‘debate’, you could ‘get it’:

 

| Leave a comment

Background Radiation On The Increase. Example from Northern France: 2011 vs 2016

Sept 26, 2016

Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses.”  – Plato

This presentation is intended to show that the increases seen lately are not merely “seasonal changes”.  Background radiation is on the increase.  I think this due to (seemingly non-stop) fallout events.  This phenomenon appears to have accelerated in the past few years. I suspect this is due to the finest of Fukushima-Daiichi’s fallout finally coming down from the upper atmospheric to ground level (a delayed deposition process that takes 3+ years), as well as (copounded by) new releases from one or more still-fissioning source(s), which could be the same one…

  • Location of Radiation Monitor, data accessed via EURDEP (which interface is better than those of many of its contributors):

48-4n_3-6e_onmap

3 months per line, with same period shown for about 5 years apart, 2010-2011 first, then 2015-2016 (alternating to make comparing easier).

The 102 nSv/hr line makes a good reference to spot the change in half a decade…

  • October-November-December:

48-4n_3-6e_northernfrance_3mo_dec26_201148-4n_3-6e_northernfrance_3mo_dec26_2015

  • January-February-March:

48-4n_3-6e_northernfrance_3mo_march26_201148-4n_3-6e_northernfrance_3mo_march26_2016

  • April- May-June:

48-4n_3-6e_northernfrance_3mo_june26_201148-4n_3-6e_northernfrance_3mo_june26_2016

  • July-August-September, with the 102 nSv/hr line highlighted, same y-axis:

48-4n_3-6e_northernfrance_3mo_sept26_201148-4n_3-6e_northernfrance_3mo_sept26_2016

——- ——– ——–

Same topic: (Sept. 8, 2016)  Background Radiation Keeps Rising. Example from ISTOK, Russian Federation (EURDEP, 18 month graph)

 

| Leave a comment

Europe Basking in ‘Sinking Sun’-Shine?

Mostly European Radiation data of the past 6 or more months.   (The blogpost title is in reference to (May 29, 2015) ‘Land of the Sinking Sun…‘, which lead me to Call for a “Reverse Manhattan Project”…)

  • An appetizer (more data further below):  Ukkel, Belgium (3 months per line, 6 months total, gamma, via EURDEP):

ukkel_belgium_3mo_june25_2016 ukkel_belgium_3mo_sept25_2016

–> data gaps in the midst of the May-June fallout uptick events, and a clear gradual increase over the past month (blue line for reference, data gaps highlighted)

But first some awesome audiovisual distractions, ;-) , without which this blog would just be “boring stuff very few people give a damn about anyhow”…

Sept 25, 2016

How cool is thís!:

 ——- Commercial break (for the awesome CGI):  ——-

And some background grooves to ponder data on  ;-)  :

Meow

——- ——- ——- ——- ——-

DATA

  • 6 months from Manderfeld, Belgium (near Germany):

manderfeld_belgium_3mo_june25_2016manderfeld_belgium_3mo_sept25_2016

–> Highest spike in years just occured

  • 6 months from Varna, Bulgaria (EURDEP, gamma, 3 months per line, most recent at end):

varna_bulgaria_3mo_june25_2016varna_bulgaria_3mo_sept25_2016

–> highest spike in 6 months just occured.

  • 6 months @ Narva-Joesuu, Estonia, on which “the April Event” shows up a bit delayed but extremely pronounced, with suspected later fallout waves omitted:

narva_joesuu_estonia_3mo_june25_2016narva_joesuu_estonia_3mo_sept25_2016

  • 6 months of Cesium-137 concentrations in air samples from Kuopio, Finland:

kuopio_finland_3mo_cs137_june25_2016

–>  The time that spikes were observed elsewhere in late April, a sampling was skipped, and then when the highest value in a long time was observed, they quit sampling (or sharing their findings) for over 3 weeks…  [That nuclear monitoring logic again…]

kuopio_finland_3mo_cs137_sept25_2016

–> second-highest Cs-137 measurement for this monitoring location in at least 6 months just occured the other week.

  • 6 months from mostly data-gapped Dolegna Del Collio, Italy:

dolegnadelcollio_italy_3mo_june25_2016dolegnadelcollio_italy_3mo_sept25_2016

–> I don’t know what to make of the Italian data, they seem to be experimenting with new ways to obscure that little they’re willing to share.  Almost looks like seismographs at the end…

  • 1 year @ Ulvenhout, The Netherlands:

ulvenhout_nederland_3mo_dec25_2015ulvenhout_nederland_3mo_march25_2016ulvenhout_nederland_3mo_june25_2016ulvenhout_nederland_3mo_sept25_2016

–> highest spike in a year just occured.

  • Iodine-131 data from CERN, Switzerland shows Iodine-131 detections have become more frequent than ever (in the past decade of data gathering) in the past two years; (the big spike in March 2011 is from Fukushima-Daiichi’s meltdowns in Japan):

completecern_i131

Also notable is that an uptick in this short-lived artificial radioisotope at the end of August 2016:

2ndhighestsince2011_aug29_2016_cern_i131

–> That I-131 uptick was the second-highest for that location since 2011.

  • 6 months @ Quévy-le-Grand, Belgium:

quvy-le-grand_belgium_3mo_june25_2016quvy-le-grand_belgium_3mo_sept25_2016

–> Highest spike in 6 months just occured.

Anyhow.

Here, some colors “to compensate”:

And some swirling fractals set to psytrance, because… “We’re All One”…

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, Etc.

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it was plagiarized.  Please let me know about the assholes that did so.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
| Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Your Right To Panic Should Never Be Infringed Upon.

Soon it will be Sept 25, 2016

You know, that blogpost with oh-so-damning radiation data, the latest in a series of sorts, maybe I’ll write it… morrege…*

*tomorrow.

Sometimes I say that I’m inching towards speechless again, often, shortly after, followed by dozens of blog posts… A couple times I disappeared my blog.  I’ve hoovered over the “delete blog” button again recently…

winteriscoming_endsept2016

Colorado Rockies:  Snow Higher Up…  Winter is Coming Again…  Seems to do that annually…

I don’t know anymore…

This blog post is likely a waste of your time, again.  I guess it’s your choice…  Anyhow…  I doubt I have more to add.  It’s almost a habit by now.  I check radiation (and various other meteo and solar science-related) monitors, sometimes I find stuff, write about it, and in some rare cases thousands of people check it out. And then I have my “whatever moments” again.  Repeat ad nauseum for years…

It may be a good excercise in futility, and perhaps it serves a purpose that only escapes me in these … degenerate times… , but it feels somewhat ridiculous to dedicate myself to the search for truth when the very globalizing culture I find myself in appears to be committed to maintaining illusions.  Decepion.  Indoctrination.  Outright lies.  Schemes.     Like ‘democracy’, ‘press freedom’, ‘safe nuclear power’, ‘just wars’, ‘sound monetary policy’,…  when in actuality, under the varying veneers, we’re living in extremely corporation-steered oligarchies, with primarily de facto propaganda outlets; the world is slowly but surely being poisoned with radioactive fallout so bad it is apparently deemed necessary, by the very elites that fucked up majorly with their nuclear gamble, to keep the masses in the dark about it; and millions of people are killed, maimed and migrating (to regions with not always the most compatible cultural landscapes…) all because of the geopolitical scheming of the richest of the richest being carried out by well-funded and armed ‘indoctrinated patriots’ of whatever stripe…

Anyhow…  My laptop charger needed replacing and thus the online world, radiation monitors and the captivating US election show included, dropped off my radar since last blog post 5 days ago…  In part as a side-effect, I’ve talked a bunch to people in person whom I don’t meet up with very often.  Depressing.  Nearly all might be considered ‘mainstream‘ by my own undefined standards, although the same criteria might define me as ‘not so much mainstream‘, if you know what I mean.

5 days ago… I was working on inserting radioisotope-specific data onto a gamma graph from Greenland.  Just for fun. Didn’t get very far, was still in Autumn 2015… taking a fresh look at some of the weird detections then…  Very incomplete: you see the major spike in mid-October @ Nuuk Sara 0159, Greenland.  Before and mostly after, especially around Oct 25, 2015, you can find widespread disturbances in Europe, including spikes, “glitch dots”, and, of course, data gaps.  But also very peculiar radioisotope-specific detections, like Zirconium-97, strangely coinciding upticks in (oherwise to be considered to be natural) Thorium-232 (examples of these two shown in below graph):

nuuk_sara_0159_greenland_3mo_dec19_2015

but also upticks in Cesium-137, Cesium-134, And even Iodine-131 and Cobalt-60. Curious detail: in many cases the Greenland spike comes AFTER the radioisotope-specific detections much further east.  Look again at (Oct. 28, 2015) Detected in Helsinki Finland in October 2015: Cesium-134 & 137, Actinium-225 & 227, Cobalt-60. + Detected in Hamburg, Germany: Zirconium-97.: look closely:

helsinki_ac225_co60_midoctober2015.gifactinium225_227_helsinki_oct2015.gifhelsinkicesium134-137_oct2015.gif

As you can see in the Greenland insert, the Zr-97 comes later, after the big gamma spike.  Did the air move erratically enough for this to show up that way or does it suggest something about origins?   But if these detection are related, as in ‘originating from the same spewing source’, then… well… then that would be ‘majorly odd‘ to say the least: As mentioned then, the half-life of Zr-97 is only 16.7 hours, meaning that it is nearly impossible to detect a week after the nuclear fissioning from which it arose…:

zirconium_97_detected_northerngermany_oct25_2015.gif

So:  like with ‘the April (2016) Event”, WTH?, right?    What if the radioactive cloud didn’t come from across the Atlantic and from across the Pacific, but from somewhere within Europe?   As an uncredentialled one-person amateur self-described nobody, I suppose I have done a lot as far as data-watching, but it remains a nearly impossible task to figure out where a radioactive cloud originated from when you find signs that there obviously is or was one…

Anyway, sorry for the repetition.  I guess this blog post will be a ramble…  Yeah… rambles… not the most flattering way to describe my research either, but… whatever. 

In regards to (Sept. 9, 2016) Odd Data Gaps in the Belgian Radiation Data on the Day of the Brussels Bombings (March 22, 2016), I’ve even wondered  one bit-out-there-but-not-impossible pondering: namely “what if?” ‘they’ , the powers-that-be, covertly (false flag-style) pulled off the Brussels Attacks in an attempt to ultimately save lives:  What if there really was a major release of radioactivity from the Doel NPP outside of Antwerp, and a Terror Level 4 would accomplish: 1) nuclear personnel being send home, away from the hot zone, 2) air flights being canceled and thus airlines flying around the thick of the hypothetical radioactive air, 3) stress levels being raised so high that if people felt unwell it could easily be blamed on “the situation”, 4) flooding the news with stories related to the attacks, away from what could otherwise ruin a key part of the economic motor of Europe.  You know what I mean?   Anyway.  Probably not thát bad, but you never know… Only mentioning the thought in case it propels someone else to dig into where exactly the key disaster response folks were prior to the attacks to see if there are traces of emergency meetings the day or night before.   Might lead no where, but since I’m already out there in the crazy land of Fukushima-recriticalities and such, might as well go all-out tin-foil-hatted every now and then, right?

Another ‘anyhow’:  I was doing something similar for a data-gapped monitor in France when I discovered the April 26, 2016 Tellurium-132 detection in Northern Germany, the first such detection since right after the onset of the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Catastrophe in spring 2011.    Not only was that a smoking gun of a major nuclear release, but the fact that the measurement showed a European concentration 100 times higher than in 2011 made it all the more striking that not one mainstream outlet has bothered to report on it.  The public  data (and in that case: ‘validated’) is just as available to journalists as it is to me.  Couple weeks later there were Cobalt-60 detections in Norway.   Data gaps and spikes all over the place.   Anyhow…

I’m merely wondering “if various nuclear plants are melting down all over the place” (too many nuclear accidents, so cover it all up) or “if Fukushima went recritical ánd ís getting worse” (one nuclear accident só bad it’s freaking out even the experts, so cover up all the dire details and evidence; stick to a scripted fake narrative).  Problem is: with over 400 active reactors, mostly in the Northern Hemisphere, and obviously with heavily data-gapped data records… it certainly has been ‘worth the try’, but…  is it time to conclude yet that “they got it covered”, as I’ve stated many times, and to “let it go”, as the brainwashed “all is well”-crowds seem to suggest?  I don’t know the answer…

Have Fukushima-Daiichi’s missing cores, however deep they would have melted down by now, never really quit fissioning…?  and is the catastrophe revving up its ‘Sinking Sun’ situation in uncontrolled phases of deterioration, possibly even growing in corium size, breeder-reactor-gone-rogue style???  Just wondering ’cause:  How bad is it to warrant such an over-the-top complete media blackout?   I still think the latter, namely that the fallout clouds are still primarily arising from the Fukushima rubble (I really don’t know beyond thát), but the media silence…  I can’t say I truly understand it.

Either way, regardless of origin:  Why?   Come on: panicking ought to be embraced as part of the human experience.   Is it really panic-worthy?  LET US PANIC, then!  Jeez…  What’s wrong with these nuclearists?  Scared of a little world-economy-crashing panic?   ;-)

But seriously:  What would be the reasoning behind the complete media blackout?  An economic powerhouse, the global size of over 200 billion dollars a year, being at stake?    Just greedy assholes, basically?  That’s all???   Are they not thinking this one through very well, or what?  Unless contaminating the planet was the point from the get-go, who benefits from getting rich quick if the price is…  kinda everything possibly, if you can look past this 21st century… Would they be that shamelessly short-sighted?

Anyways…

  • New T-BETA-ART spike above 3 Bq/m^3 @ Wijnandsrade, The Netherlands:

wijnandsrade_nederland_3mo_t-beta-art__sept25_2016

It could have been the blog post’s headline.  Though: Not that it says much, ’cause Nederland is the only country with an actual ‘network’ for T-BETA-ART (likely one of the better gauges for artificial fallout, most of which comes in Beta, rather than Gamma radiation emitters…).

Europe’s T-Beta-Art monitoring “network”:

the_t_beta_art_network_1month_highestvalue_sept25_2016

If I were to imagine the IAEA commenting…

Good job, Sweden, nobody noticed what happened.  Smooth data gap. Well done:

ritsem_sweden_3mo_sept25_2016

Applause for Spain.  The few monitors that aren’t totally useless made sure the values didn’t go higher than normal.  Nice data gaps.  Don’t worry about the lower than normal.  Lower is a good thing.  Our target audience is too distracted to understand much anymore anyway:

miravete_spain_3mo_sept25_2016

Turkey, Good job on the data gap, but you may want to attune the algorithm to kick in the data-gap-mode faster and longer, perhaps based on other decay energy levels than your current scheme.   You’ll get there…

ankaracankaya_turkey_3mo_sept25_2016

Don’t worry about the glitch dots.  Only obsessed nerds get the significance of those anyhow…

izmir_turkey_3mo_sept25_2016

Well done again, Spain, nice data gap, smooth baseline shift after the data gap.  But what the hell just before the last few days of data gap?   That looks suspicious.  Get with the program, Spain.

karaman_turkey_3mo_sept25_2016

Czech Republic…  Still looks noticeable.  Tweek the algorithms a bit… That last fallout pattern could be a 3-day data gap, problem solved.  Okay?

tusimice_czechrepublic_3mo_sept25_2016

Two monitors right next to each other in France’s Rhone Valley, right near a mega-dirty bomb (aka a nuclear power plant):

rhonevalley_44-3n_4-7e_tn0krs805ma_26_sit_gm__france_3mo_sept25_2016

Un +50 µSv/hr spike, mon amis:

rhonevalley_44-3n_4-7e_tn0krs924ma_26_sit_gm__france_3mo_sept25_2016

Like a banned pro-nuclear troll used to say, albeit not in these exact words:

“There will always be more radiation data to misinterpret.”

——- ——- ——-

To end on a less cynical note:

It is time for industry insiders to acknowledge the situation as it is and as it is unfolding, and work to IMMEDIATELY shut down ALL meltdown-capable fission reactors worldwide, as well as stop all construction of the dozens of new nuclear reactors under construction.

The cover-up must end.

earth— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, Etc.

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it was plagiarized.  Please let me know about the assholes that did so.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
| 3 Comments

Plato:

And don’t you think that being deceived about the truth is a bad thing, while having a grasp of the truth is good? And don’t you think that having a grasp of the truth is having a belief that matches the way things are?

————–

| 3 Comments

Six Months (Some more EUR-EP DATA)

Certainly not in regards to ‘correct spelling’ at time of posting, but as far as keeping an eye on the official radiation monitors brought together by The European Commission’s Data Exchange Platform (EURDEP), tonight… I feel in recent months I might have been…

Prettig gestoorde mensen geven inderdaad beter NOOIT op… ;-)

Same old, same old:

Same deal as previous posts: 3 months per line, 6 months per monitor, y-axis adjusted to show more detail, gamma radiation only.  Source: EURDEP public advanced map

Ottmaring, Germany:

ottmaring_germany_3mo_june19_2016ottmaring_germany_3mo_sept19_2016

Odiham, UK:

odiham_uk_june19_2016odiham_uk_sept19_2016

  • Bierset, Belgium:   (Striking how the fallout events of May 2016, after “the April Event” were so pronounced on many monitors..)

bierset_belgium_3mo_june19_2016bierset_belgium_3mo_sept19_2016

  • Dourbes, Belgium:

dourbes_beslgium_3mo_june19_2016dourbes_beslgium_3mo_sept19_2016

  • St-Jan-in_Eremo, Belgium:

stjanineremo_belgium_3mo_june19_2016stjanineremo_belgium_3mo_sept19_2016

  • Nummer Een, The Netherlands  (“nummer een” is Dutch, meaning ‘number one’, or in Japanese, Dai-ichi):

nummereen_nederland_3mo_june19_2016nummereen_nederland_3mo_sept19_2016

  • Vrouwenpolder, The Netherlands:

vrouwenpolder_nederland_3mo_june19_2016vrouwenpolder_nederland_3mo_sept19_2016

  • Heerenhoek’s, The Netherlands: (with a blue line added so you can better see the May fallout event stand out, as well as the increase of the past month, leading up to the spike event this past week, which was in part due to rain bringing an end to a heat wave.)

heerenhoeds_nederland_3mob_june19_2016heerenhoeds_nederland_3mob_sept19_2016

–> Reason I mention that is because it wasn’t just ‘a lot of sudden rain after a hot late summer week’ causing the spikes.  Obviously radiological pollution has been on the increase, making spikes more exttreme in a rainout event.  Or so it seems.  What do I know… 

Enzovoort…

I guess the uptick of pre-Sept 19, 2016 has been sufficiently documented by now…

No further comments.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| Leave a comment

Cobalt-60 Detected in Slovenia?

“But you can’t make people listen. They have to come round in their own time, wondering what happened and why the world blew up around them.”

– Ray Bradbury; Fahrenheit 451

The fallout scene, outside the world of gaming, has been very calm in Colorado lately:

1 month US EPA Radnet G5+7, 4 weeks, ending April 18, 2016:

denver_4weeks_sept17_2016

On EURDEP the illusion was created of a Cobalt-60 detection @ Drnove, Slovenia with a yellow dot, normally signifying a measurement above the LLD (MDC):

co60_april17_2016_croatia

Whether or not anything was measured can, unfortenately, not be ascertained, as… in similar fashion to some Croatian data, all shown values were kept at forced-down-to-zero values, with no LLD’s nor measured concentrations given:

drnovo_croatia_co60_cs137_1mo_sept17_2016

  • Radioisotope-specific data @ Sola, Norway, one of the locations where Co-60 was detected in the aftermath of “the April Event” ceased sample-testing, or ceased sharing the data with the public in early July:

SOLA_CO60_CS137_5months_PreSept18_2016.gif

Más Data…

Below: EURDEP, 6 months, gamma, ending Sept 17 or 18, 2016; y-axis adjusted to show more detail.  Just a sampling.  In no particular order.  Just for documentation.  Click ‘Home’ and scroll down for various additional data.

  • Sanok, Poland:

sanok_poland_3mo_june18_2016sanok_poland_3mo_sept18_2016

  • Izmir, Turkey:

izmir_turkey_3mo_june18_2016

izmir_turkey_3mo_sept18_2016

  • Zwiesel, Germany:

zwiesel_germany_3mo_june17_2016zwiesel_germany_3mo_sept17_2016

  • Napf SMN, Switzerland:

napf_smn_ch_3mo_june18_2016napf_smn_ch_3mo_sept18_2016

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| Leave a comment

Suffer Your Interpretation

Sept. 17, 2016

EURDEP gamma radiation data, often not validated by the authorities that supplied it.  .  Offered “for entertainment purposes only,” just like this video:

Based on some of its comments, the second half might be best watched

ON ACID.   Surround sound, high volume.  Add popcorn as needed.

:-)

Data can be checked via Online Radiation Monitors -> EURDEP (a better interface than most participating countries’ own), @ http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EurdepMap/Disclaimer.aspx

One half year per monitor, y-axis often adjusted to show more detail, 3 months per line, last data (or lack thereof): Sept. 16 or 17, 2016.

  • Fürstenzell OT Gföhret, Germany:

furstenzell_ot_gfoehret_germany_3mo_june17_2016furstenzell_ot_gfoehret_germany_3mo_sept17_2016

  • Rothamster, UK:

rothamsted_uk_3mo_june16_2016rothamsted_uk_3mo_sept16_2016

–> Many other UK examples in Radiation Spikes Across Southern UK

  • Miravette, Spain:

miravette_spain_3mo_june17_2016miravette_spain_3mo_sept17_2016

  • Ulrichsberg, Austria:

ulrichsberg_austria_3mo_june16_2016ulrichsberg_austria_3mo_sept16_2016

  • Oostende, Belgium:

Oostende_Belgium_3mo_June17_2016.gif

oostende_belgium_3mo_sept17_2016

–> Note the upticks on various monitors several days before it began to rain, when it was merely just summertime-hot. And the May 9-1oth spike being omitted here…

  • Bursa Orhaneli TS, Turkey:

bursaorhaneli_ts_turkey_3mo_june16_2016bursaorhaneli_ts_turkey_3mo_sept16_2016

  • Schärding, Austria:

schaerdingaustria_3mo_june17_2016schaerdingaustria_3mo_sept17_2016

  • Doel, Belgium

doel_belgium_3mo_june16_2016doel_belgium_3mo_sept16_2016

–> Note the last 10 days is a data gap. Compare to Miravete, Spain and Fürstenzell OT Gföhret, Germany, shown above.

I make no mistake about it: IF something were to go awfully wrong at a Belgian NPP, the monitors would almost certainly become “data-gapped”.

Related (?):

Ritsem, Sweden

ritsem_sweden_3mo_june17_2016ritsem_sweden_3mo_sept17_2016

–> Note the last 4+ days are a data gap

Venray, The Netherlands:

venray_nederland_3mo_june17_2016venray_nederland_3mo_sept17_2016

  • Burgh-Haamstede, The Netherlands:

bursh_haamstede_nederland_3mo_june17_2016bursh_haamstede_nederland_3mo_sept17_2016

  • Ebeleben, Germany:

ebeleben_germany_3mo_june16_2016ebeleben_germany_3mo_sept16_2016

Payerne SMN, Switzerland:

payerne_smn_ch_3mo_june17_2016payerne_smn_ch_3mo_sept17_2016

April 16, 2016 @ 12 noon UTC, 1 day, T-GAMMA, Standard Diviation:  the rain system that brough floods to England seen here, as an uptick/spike phenomenon, moving across Belgium and The Netherlands:

standarddiviation_1day_april16_2016_1200utc

 Lately, there are far too many spikes to document most.  Some are record high (see previous post).

No comment.

| Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New All-Time Record-High Gamma Spike @ Pamhagen, Austria (highest since monitoring began there in 2002)

In Eastern Austria, not so far from Vienna, a monitor @ Pamhagen, Austria showed a bit of a dose diviation for the two days preceding the (UTC time) evening of April 15, 2016:

pamhausen_april15_2days

Here’s the location:

EURDEP_2day_StandardDiviation_Sept15_2016_1830UTC.gif

I had a look to see if it was unusual.   Unusual enough for a blogpost, I decided: unprecedented.

Here’s the past 15 months:  in this period, 180 nSv/hr is only surpassed once, today (September 15, 2016), the very end of this 15 month period:

pamhagen_austria_3mo_sept15_2015

-> the unusually high early August spike can be seen here as well.

pamhagen_austria_3mo_dec15_2015

-> the upticks and widespread disturbances of October-November only showed up here in October.pamhagen_austria_3mo_march15_2016pamhagen_austria_3mo_june15_2016

-> the peak period of “the April Event” does not stand out here from other upticks, though the fallout waves, such the one in mid-May did show up, albeit it barely differentiable from what are likely natural rainouts.  Now this:

pamhagen_austria_3mo_sept15_2016

As is the case at so many monitors in the past 2 years, upticks, in this case upticks over 120 nSv/hr (0.120 µSv/hr), are on the increase.  That spike there at the end just licked the 0.210 µSv/hr. 

This monitor’s data record started in December 2002 with two daily averages.  Daily monitoring starts in earnest in mid-January 2003, still with just daily averages.  There were significant multi-days data gaps in spring 2003 and late 2010.  The 0.120 µSv/hr was first surpassed with an uptick-disturbance in late Sept. 2007, reaching 0.140 µSv/hr. However, this was the very week the data changed from daily averages to the current hourly averages, and turned out that the variation range became a little wider with the increased resolution.   Most upticks remained under 0.120 µSv/hr, and never surpassed 0.145 µSv/hr until late july 2014, when a new record of 0.174 µSv/hr was reached. 

You can see in the above graphed data that the 0.180 µSv/hr mark was reached in August 2015 and again almost in October 2015.   So it turns out:

The spike just today was the highest on record for this monitoring location, reaching 0.210 µSv/hr, 50 % above the pre-Fukushima variability ceiling of 0.140 µSv/hr.

Next is some 2011 data.   Same y-axis.  Compare the spike today (last 3-month graph,  above) to the post-Fukushima uptick, below.   Here’s the 9-month period, starting with a 3-month line with 2 months prior to March 11, 2011’s Fukushima meltdowns and the resultant uptick 1 week later:

pamhagen_austria_3mo_april15_2011

Upticks have been going higher in the past few years, but in 2011 they were just a bit more frequent, rather than much larger:

pamhagen_austria_3mo_july15_2011pamhagen_austria_3mo_oct15_2011

—– —— ——

Why is the spike just now, mid-September 2016, so much larger, relatively speaking, than any of the spikes in 2011, for this location?  Why was this also the case in the UK  this week?  As well as visible on various monitors elsewhere?   It is not ‘calibrations’ and obviously nothing ‘very localized’ either.  It has been warm, sure, record-breaking warm for September in some places in Europe, but it’s been warmer in June, July and August.   Obviously this is outside ‘natural variability’.  

@ spike time, September 15, 2016 @ 12:00 UTC… the location is in the véry slow zone of the jet stream…

See @  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/09/15/1200Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-10.71,50.64,1024/loc=16.900,47.700     Annotated screenshot:

201609151200zwindisobaric250hpaorthographic-10-7150-641024loc16-90047-700

If the radioactive air came from abroad, where did it come from?   If it’s “merely” the finest dust now coming down some 3+ years after it went up to the upper stratosphere…, meaning ‘fallout from the 2010 mystery meltdown somewhere and/or the 2011 mega-meltdowns of Fukushima-Daiichi, Japan’, no way of telling.  No way of telling if it’s related to “The (fissioning source!)  April Event” either, or even if it’s related to something new entirely.   Got an answer, drop a comment.

All I know is that it was a record-high.  Sorry I have little more to share than the obvious.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

| 2 Comments

One Year graphed for Cs-137, Be-7, Co-60 & Ru-103 @ Southern Norway (EURDEP radioisotope-specific)

Sept 15, 2016

Like the data-gapped gamma records, monitors that have proven their capacity to detect trace amounts of very peculiar artificial radioisotopes have ceized relaying data.  Has monitoring just ended at Southern Norway’s two radioisotope-specific monitors?

Here’s a partial record for one of the two (the other one, @ Sola, is on the coast), showing just over 1 year record for Cesium-137 and Berrylium-7, with the January 2016 detection of Ruthenium-103 and the May 2016 detection of Cobalt-60 inserted onto the Be7-Cs137 graphs:

Åsteräs (sp?), Norway is just outside of Oslo, starting in summer 2015, (just over) 3 months per line.  (Y-axis (concentration in Bq/m^3) varies from radioisotope to radioisotope:)

asteras_norway_be7_cs137_3mo_nov15_2015

–> a spike in August 2015.  Significant relative upticks in Autumn-Winter 2015…

asteras_norway_ru103_be7_cs137_3mo_feb15_2016

-> Note the data gap after the Ru-103 detection.  (‘Cause when you detect something highly unusual, you make sure you don’t come up with more damning evidence of something having gone seriously wrong somewhere, right?   Amazing, that nuclear logic…)

asteras_norway_co60_be7_cs137_3mo_may15_2016

-> Note the data gap immediately following the Co-60 detection.  (‘Cause when you detect something highly unusual, you make sure you don’t come up with more damning evidence of something having gone seriously wrong somewhere, right?   Amazing, that nuclear logic…)

asteras_norway_be7_cs137_4mo_sept15_2016

-> Data gap following the uptick at the very beginning of June 2016.  And then… apparently, no data has been supplied from Southern Norway since early July 2016… in what is now a data gap spanning over two months.

(Cause… Is something highly unusual unfolding and that same “nuclear logic” is being applied?  Hm?  

[crickets…])

Also noteworthy:

  • In January, the ratio of Ruthenium-103 to Cesium-137 was about 1:10.  I don’t know if that’s odd or not.
  • I do know, however, that, in May, the ratio of Cobalt-60 to Cesium-137 of about 1:2 was EXTREMELY odd:

asteras_norway_c060_cs137_1mo_may15_2016

Cobalt-60 is véry interesting.    See its significance in regards to Fukushima fallout…

[hint hint…]

All shown Norwegian data was ‘validated’ (V).

Which cannot be said for this past 1 month @ Salt Lake City, Utah (US EPA Radnet data):

slc_ut_1month_2-3-5-7_gamma_sept15_2016

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| 4 Comments

Beautiful Weather…*

Sept 15, 2016

“Finally some rain!”*

… looks like the first raindrops in 3 months* are finally coming down in Europe:

cork_airport_eire_3mo_sept15_2016chimay_belgium_3mo_sept15_2016northcentral_france_47-8n_2-5e_3mo_sept15_2016bursa_orhaneli_ts_turkey_3mo_sept14_2016

ankaracankaya_turkey_3mo_sept15_2016

Those graphs show 3-months from EURDEP’s public map with gamma radiation.

  • CERN, Switzerland:  Very curious, the “old dust blowing around” upticks of Cs-137 were always accompanied by I-131 upticks these past few months.  Also striking is that the I-131 concentrations are significantly higher than those of Cs-137, so much that sometimes I-131 was detected, but Cs-137 didn’t surpass the LLD:

cern_ch_3mo_i131_cs137_3mo_sept15_2016

–> While the LLD (aka MDC, minimum highly-certain detectable concentration) was raised higher just once in the beginning of August 2015, this late August 2016 spike in Iodine-131 was the highest I-131 concentration in almost 2 years:  since the sample period Nov 3 – 10, 2014 for this monitoring location.

The week following that November 2014 spike saw widespread upticks in gamma & beta, part of a period I paid extra attention, starting with “Did Germany just get a Massive Amount of Fukushima Fallout and “No One Noticed”? (A Eurdep-Nullschool investigation of the Nov. 16, 2014 radiation Upticks…)“, (!-> also seen on the I-131/ Cs-137 monitor @ Nicosia, Cyprus, as documented in Jan. 31, 2015’s DATA of ‘Fallout Signatures’ on Radiation Monitors Suggest Fukushima Still Going Re-Critical Underground At Times. Airborne Fallout Continues To Come Down Across the Northern Hemisphere.); and also resulting in figuring out that the Zaporizhia NPP in Ukraine, contrary to official reports, actually did release a large radioactive cloud in the late Nov.-Dec. 2014 period.

What’s going on now? 

Probably nothing.*

Iodine-131, formerly* a short-lived artificial fission product that would indicate a leaking fissioning reactor core somewhere, now just… grows on trees – could be pollen -, or, even more likely: it’s probably due to unprecedented manmade global warming

More nuclear power plants could help solve that problem!* 

oifmktns4npytvnf769b.png

* My apologies for the sarcasm. 

—- —- —-

Added shortly after posting this on Sept 15, 2016:

What I assumed was just a calibration of the I-131/Cs134/Cs137 radioisotope monitors in Czech Republic (mention of these spikes was included in the ETC. of (Sept. 10, 2016) The Abyssmal Data Gap of Digne-Le-Bains, France (EURDEP, 18 months), ETC.

was followed by what is now almost 2 weeks without any new data, a bit odd for Czech Republic:

holesovletisti_czechrepublic_iodine131_3mo_sept15_2016

Note the significant disturbances in Turkey in the preceding gamma graph.  Or the curious coincidence of the I-131 uptick @ CERN, Switzerland just before.

On longer time periods, such as north of Prague close to where Germany and Poland meet @ Usti Nad Labem – Habrovic, Czech Republic, for I-131 & Cs-134:

3 months per line, starting on July 15, 2015:

ustinadlabem_habrovice_czechrepublic_i131_cs134_3mo_oct15_2015

-> The spike at the end of July, early August 2015, which can be found on many gamma monitors as well, and which I didn’t write much about.  Most of my documentation is from during and after the Autumn 2015 upticks.

Curiously this monitor ceized relaying radioisotope-specific data at the end of October 2015:

ustinadlabem_habrovice_czechrepublic_i131_cs134_3mo_jan15_2016

…And remained silent all the way until áfter the Helsinki Cs-137 spike (at the onset of March).  The beginning of “the April Event” is visible, and many higher-than-usual measurements were made since:

ustinadlabem_habrovice_czechrepublic_i131_cs134_3mo_june15_2016

ustinadlabem_habrovice_czechrepublic_i131_cs134_3mo_sept15c_2016

-> A long-lasting data gap started back up at the end of July 2016, to which at this monitoring location the suspected calibration is the only exception.  What if it wasn’t “just a calibration”?  What is the correlating uptick and disturbances on some monitors are further ‘suggestive evidence’ that yet another major release took place somewhere?

You know, if instead of qualifying the data as V (validated data) or NV (not validated), they added a third category (CAL, as in calibration), that would take the guessing out of it.

But I guess keeping the public guessing is part of their intention…

—- —- —-

| Tagged , | 1 Comment

Radiation Spikes Across Southern UK

Sept 13, 2016

Just data. Mostly “unvalidated”.  Read my disclaimer if you haven’t yet (The gist of which is along the lines of, “This is just an amateur blog site, which may be taken “for entertainment purposes only.”), and if the widespread upticks of late freak you out, just check with authorities.  I’m sure they can come up with some type or standard reassurance a la The doses are insignificant.  Bananas can measure higher than this.  In any case, there is no immediate health danger.  Please ignore dangerous rumors.  Everything is under control.”

For “a parallel universe” that COULD be related, explore the links from (Sept 12, 2016), “Calling for a “Reverse Manhattan Project” to Contain & Pacify the Radiation-Spewing Full-On Still-Fissioning ‘China Syndrome’ Ongoing Nuclear Catastrophe at Fukushima-Daiichi, Japan.

3 months per line per monitor.

  • London’s monitor @ Grays Inn was turned off in mid-May and has yet to come back online:

london_uk_3mo_sept13_2016

  • Shobdon, UK:

shobdon_uk_3mo_sept13_2016

  • Plymouth, UK:

plymouth_uk_3mo_sept13_2016

  • Hurn (Bournesmouth), UK:hurn_bournemouth_uk_3mo_sept13_2016
  • Shawbury, UK:

shawbury_uk_3mo_sept13_2016

  • St Mawgan, UK:

st_mawgan_uk_3mo_sept13_2016

  • Alderney, UK:alderney_uk_3mo_sept13_2016
  • Aberporth, UK:
  • aberporth_uk_3mo_sept13_2016
  • St. Athan, UK:

st_athan_uk_3mo_sept13_2016

Some 3-month graphs from outside the UK:

  • Brest, France:

brest_bretagne_france_3mo_sept13_2016

  • Miravete, Spain:

miravete_spain_3mo_sept13_2016

Pecs, Hungary:

pecs_hungary_3mo_sept13_2016

  • Kherson, Ukraine:

kherson_southernukraine_3mo_sept13_2016

No Comment.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 4 Comments

Artificial Beta Uptick @ Wijnandsrade, NL (+ 6 months at monitor in Belgium & UK)

Italy and Cyprus have a few T-Beta-Art monitors as well, but The Netherlands is the only country in the world (that I know of) with a monitoring network for T-Beta-ART (which I believe means the total activity rate due to decay energies specifically tied to artificial beta radiation emitters), therefor keep in mind: a detection there says nothing about the situation elsewhere.  Detections remain just traces, but relatively speaking, “fallout conditions” may be far worse in areas without monitoring.   That being said, the 3 Bq/m^3 was surpassed twice in the south of the country:

  • 3 month graph showing both T-Beta-Art & T-Alfa-Art, ending Sept 13, 2016: @ Wijnandsrade, Nederland:

Wijnandsrade_Nederland_3mo_Sept12_2016.gif

The last time The Netherlands saw (more significant!) T-Beta-Art spikes was in May-June, in the aftermath of “The April Event”, as documented in (June 8, 2016): BETA Radiation spikes from The Netherlands to Russia + Snapshots of 3-month Radiation Graphs + (EURDEP)

Note:  None of the data was ‘validated’ by the authorities that shared it with the European Radiation Data Exchange Platform (EURDEP).  Read also my disclaimer.

While in the area… 

6 months @ Shoeburyness, UK  & Wasseiges Belgium, side by side (3 months per line):

shoeburyness_uk_3mo_june12_2016wasseiges_belgium_3mo_june12_2016

–> The likely spike-time of “The April Event” was omitted (= data gap, highlighted in red square) in both countries.  And for May: seemingly minuscule dose upticks in the UK may actually correspond with apparent ‘fallout signatures’ elsewhere.

And the past 3 months:

shoeburyness_uk_3mo_sept12_2016wasseiges_belgium_3mo_sept12_2016

–> Note the uptick and gradual increase in the past few weeks.


Related:

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| Leave a comment

Calling for a “Reverse Manhattan Project” to Contain & Pacify the Radiation-Spewing Full-On Still-Fissioning ‘China Syndrome’ Ongoing Nuclear Catastrophe at Fukushima-Daiichi, Japan.

Crestone, Colorado (USA) – Sept 12, 2016

This blogpost contains, essentially, ‘nothing I haven’t already said before.’

It just remains “slightly baffling” that RT can basically ask a question, as in “Where did the 600 tons of missing nuclear fuel go?” (or, to quote: “Five years after the Fukushima tragedy, the exact location of the highly radioactive “runaway” fuel remains [a] mystery for TEPCO“)  ánd pretty much in the same article answer the question: “[…] absolutely uncontrollable fission of the melted nuclear fuel assemblies continue somewhere under the remains of the station. […]” (here) and somehow this allegation of ongoing fission over a half decade after disaster struck didn’t get picked up as a front page bombshell news piece…   “Go figure…”

And thus, for at least a little longer that which has been denied from day one, even as a possibility, by TEPCO, the Japanese government and all other nuclear-related authorities, remains is the realm of relatively insignificant little blogs like mine…

Even before I had already delved into its likelihood, with rambles like (May 2015) Land of the Sinking Sun…  Over 15 months ago, on June 9, 2015, I expressed my lament in the form of issuing a

Radiological Emergency – Northern Hemisphere – RED ALERT !

That week I reiterated the case that I had already been making for awhile, purely based on observing the monitors & wind patterns and especially on véry curious detections of artificial radioisotopes, for which experts did not have an explanation.  (They still don’t and have admitted that.)  I asserted again my “over-the-top borderline insane allegation” (of “the impossible“), namely that FUKUSHIMA IS STILL FISSIONING.

It’s been a ride.  Learned a lot…  But even back then in Spring 2011 in the early weeks of the disaster I had already figured out that it was a worst-type nuclear disaster and announced it was an “INES-7” weeks before that was officially announced.  Within weeks I echoed very concerned voices, such as March 27, 2011 – Cirincione: it will end very, very badly; and soon after, I raised this dark possibility as early as May 17, 2011 in “China Syndrome” possible at Fukushima Daiichi?  In the last few years this blog has become more of my depository of curious and striking radiation detections, my amateur attempts at interpreting the data, and related pondering, mixed with unrelated stuff (as this blog remains primarily “just a personal outlet”).

Very sadly, truly unfortunately, it is beginning to look like I might have been right all along…

A quote from 15 months ago:

“[…]  FUKUSHIMA IS STILL FISSIONING  […]  Before you roll your eyes, answer me some questions, will you.  It’s either thát, or there’s a meltdown happening somewhere that “nobody” knows about yet… Given rather peculiar “Fukushima fingerprint”-type radioisotope detections, I think, sense, feel, and know, this must be investigated.   So I’m calling on any and all courageous inquisitive people with integrity, scientists and government agencies with the ability to get to the bottom of this:

WHERE IS this recent (Spring 2015!) synthetic (not naturally occurring) radioactive fallout cloud that passed over parts of Europe (including Zirconium-97, Iodine-131, Cesium-134 & 137, Cobalt-60, Ruthenium-103, and Niobium-95) COMING FROM ?

[…]  These are solid scientific no-nonsense tell-tale signs of either a majorly leaking nuclear fission reactor, or a nuclear bomb having gone off.   Those are the only two options left.  Simple leakage from resource exploration uses of certain radioisotopes, or from medical applications can be ruled out: Cs-134, Ru-103, Nb-95 and Zr-97 have no such application use.  None.   It hás to be something else!  Though one never knows, I think it’s safe to say that if an actual nuclear bomb had gone off somewhere, surely ‘someone would have noticed‘.  Right?   (I mean… Come on…)  Get it?   Okay:   It’s coming from a major nuclear accident.

Meanwhile we’ve had the very significant concentrations detected in European air samples of Ruthenium-103, Tellurium-132, Cesium-137, as well as detections of Cesium-134, Actinium-225 & 227, Iodine-131, Zirconium-97 and (“of course“) Cobalt-60.  For some of these, the concentrations, while still technically ‘traces’, were the highest since 2011 or even 1986.

So, I am still waving my paper fork: 

The mainstream media cover-up must end. 

This world is full of amazing creative people who don’t even get a chance to apply their unique genius and alternative perceptive abilities to help contain and pacify this spiraling-out-of-control nuclear mess.   The media blackout, the nuclear cartel’s deeply embedded (self-) deceptions and its widespread resultant ignorance, denial or demoralization is simply not helpful.  The self-deluded and secretive “nuclear village” cannot tackle this one as part of its “business-as-usual”.  The situation itself begs for a “reverse Manhattan project”, to quote from a June 26, 2016 blogpost:

“This planetary nuclear crisis calls for nothing less than ‘a Reverse Manhattan Project’, in every way: complete transparency instead of secrecy, healing instead of poisoning, fostering peace instead of war, genuine consensus-oriented international rule of law instead of imperialistic domination politics, incorporating indigenous wisdom and energy healing approaches rather than ultra-rational scientific reductionism.”

In short:  Something must change.  Radically. 

She agrees too:

frompinterest_artistunknown

Now HOW to go from the current situation to a more sane future…  I don’t know.  Although this seems to be a given, in my view: honesty in the reporting about what is actually happening would be a start.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

6 months @ Sodankylae Finland (EURDEP, gamma)

Sept 12, 2016

sodankylae_finland_3mo_june12_2016

sodankylae_finland_3mo_sept12_2016

— — —   —— ——- ——-  — — —

 

| Leave a comment

Columbus Still Landing…

Sept 11, 2016 – 200 years ago this was all still part of the Ute Territories, Southern Colorado (USA)

Just passing along the below Democracy Now! report from indigenous struggle to stop the Dakota Pipeline:

h/t: http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/exposed-online-community-leaks-identity-of-dakota-pipeline-dog-attackers/

From DN! (my emphasis):

Sept 9, 2016:  “In North Dakota, Governor Jack Dalrymple has activated the National Guard ahead of Friday’s ruling on the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s lawsuit against the U.S. government over the $3.8 billion Dakota Access pipeline. The move comes as U.S. District Judge James Boasberg is set to rule today on an injunction in the lawsuit, which is challenging the Army Corps of Engineers’ decision to issue permits for the pipeline, arguing it violates the National Historic Preservation Act.

Thousands of people representing more than 100 Native American tribes have traveled to the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation to resist the pipeline’s construction.

On Saturday, September 3, the Dakota Access pipeline company unleashed dogs and pepper spray on Native Americans as they attempted to stop the company from destroying a sacred tribal burial site.

The bulldozers and company security guards were forced to retreat. On Thursday, Governor Jack Dalrymple said the National Guard will be deployed Friday …”

More @ http://www.democracynow.org/2016/9/9/headlines/north_dakota_governor_calls_out_national_guard_over_pipeline_protests

!-> For the latest updates, check National Native News. (NNN)

—– ———- ——

ww.nativenews.net:decision-day-national-guard-activated-appeal-calm.gif

—– ———- ——

Possibly at least somewhat related Posts:

 

| Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Bilbao & Santander, Northern Spain (Basque Region): In Early March 2016, You Could See Finland From Here… (EURDEP; lots of data: Helsinki Cs-137 March 2016 spike revisited)

Online Radiation Monitors –> EURDEP –> Public Advanced Map via their Orwellian DISCLAIMER.  For help with nanoSievert, microSievert, etc., see Radiation Units & Conversions.

—– ——- —–

1907648_10203459081187132_3651417066822388703_n-1.jpg

—– ——- —–

3 months per line.  Both in North-Eastern Spain, I’ve highlighted the data gaps for Santander, but left the graphs unannotated for Bilbao.  I also added the Cesium-137 + Be-7 data from Helsinki, Finland.  (No I-131 or Cs-134 was detected @ Helsinki in measureable concentrations during this period). All three monitoring locations each time so it’s easier to spot correlations between them:

santander_basqueterritories_spain_3mo_dec10_2015bilbao_basqueterritories_spain_3mo_dec10_2015

Helsinki_Finland_3m0_Cs137_Be7_Dec11_2015.gif

–> Very apparent spikes and data gaps during the Autumn 2015 disturbances, in some cases correlating with Cs-137 upticks 2000 km to the north…

santander_basqueterritories_spain_3mo_march10_2016bilbao_basqueterritories_spain_3mo_march10_2016

Helsinki_Finland_3m0_Cs137_Be7_March11_2016.gif

note the y-axis.  The peak value is about 1,000 x higher than usual.

–> Early January and mid-February disturbances with some data gaps.  And then a striking uptick-spike and data gaps between Feb. 27 and March 7, 2016, which ‘coincidentally’ again correlates with the spike in Cs-137 @ Helsinki, Finland.   It’s one of the few events in the radiological landscape that actually got some media attention, but expert authorities, and the media parotting them without questioning, only focussed on the Cesium-137 spike in Helsinki and never, not even once anywhere outside this blog that I know of, mentioned that widespread and often véry pronounced upticks, spikes and correlating data gaps across the continent.  The Helsinki Cesium spike was shortly after explained away as just a localized event due to some benign nuclear waste package in the garage of the monitoring agency that had leaked… (See a couple additional graphs for this period further below).

santander_basqueterritories_spain_3mo_june10_2016bilbao_basqueterritories_spain_3mo_june10_2016

helsinki_finland_3m0_cs137_be7_june11_2016

–> An apparent fallout pattern in late March @ Santander, with increasing data gaps @ Bilbao.  The peak period of “The April Event” shows for Bilbao (as a data gap around Aprl 24th), but not at the monitor in Santander.  That might be due to these monitrs being calibrated to different decay energies or energy bands.

santander_basqueterritories_spain_3mo_sept10_2016bilbao_basqueterritories_spain_3mo_sept10_2016

Helsinki_Finland_3m0_Cs137_Be7_Sept11_2016.gif

!-> Note the Cesium-137 uptick in mid-August.

Think that’s just old Chernobyl dust blowing in the summer breeze?   Think again.  Data from elsewhere suggests it came from an actively fissioning source, as evidenced by I-131 upticks.

Same last 3 months @ Nicosia, Cyprus, showing Cs-137 (black)  + Iodine-131 (blue):

Nicosia_3mo_Cs137_I131_Sept11_2016.gif

 —– —— ——

Now a look at both these two (data already shown above, just shifting the 3-month period over one month) and some extra ones, with early March put in the center for a closer look at the very time when Helsinki’s monitoring station measured the highest concentration of Cesium-137 since right after the Chernobyl accident in 1986…

santander_basqueterritories_spain_3mo_april11_2016

Here’s the Cesium-137 spike @ Helsinki, Finland, also note the uptick in January, and the fact that monitoring was reduced to a fraction of what was daily sampling after the spike (with more time not sampled than sampled nowadays…):

Helsinki_Finland_Cs137_3mo_April10_2016.gifbilbao_basqueterritories_spain_3mo_april11_2016

Here’s Kotka, Finland, just to the east of Helsinki, next.  Note the upticks in January (following in the footsteps of the Ruthenium-103 detection in Southern Norway), as well as just after the Helsinki spike, followed by two weeks of zero testing:

kotka_finland_cesium137_3mo_april10_2016

The highest Cs-137 measurement in far-northern Ivalo, Finland followed right after the Helsinki spike:ivalo_farnorthern_finland_cesium137_3mo_april10_2016

Want some Iodine-131 data with that?  Bit of an uptick at the onset of March, then a data gap: aka ‘Not for public disclosure‘.  (No sh*t.  That would totally blow Helsinki’s decoy story otherwise, wouldn’t it? …)   Nicosia, Cyprus:  Cs-137 + I-131:

nicosia_3mo_cs137_i131_april10_2016

Istanbul Sile, Turkey.  Notice anything in early March?

istanbul_sile_turkey_3mo_april10_2016

(No… Alright… I must be halucinating data…)

Was it merely a coincidence that the Exeter, UK monitor was adjusted right then?exeter_uk_3mo_april10_2016

This Visaginas, Lithuania monitors seems to scream “major fallout event” – the onset of which follows right after the Helsinki Cs-137 spike…:

Visaginas_Lithuania_3mo_April10_2016.gif

The very period is data-gapped away @ Klaipeda, Lithuania:

klaipeda_20364_lithuania_3mo_april10_2016

Mostly data gaps @ Hallandsvadero, Southern Sweden, but ‘something’ was picked up between March 1 – 12, 2016…:

hallandsvadero_sweden_3mo_april10_2016

Similar timing @ Bilecik, western Turkey:

bilecik_turkey_3mo_april10_2016

The very period is data-gapped away @ Ayden, western Turkey:

aydin_turkey_3mo_april10_2016

Salaspils, Latvia, the high values (and note the data gaps):

salaspils_latvia_gamma_3mo_april10_2016

And the lower ones to see the disturbances better:salaspils_latvia_gamma_low200nsvcapped_3mo_april10_2016

Warsaw, Poland: peak value on March 9, amidst disturbances (significant for daily averages!):warsaw_poland_3mo_april10_2016

Moussala-1, Bulgaria:

moussala1_bulgaria_3mo_april10_2016

I hope that suffices to make my point:  It is highly unlikely that the leaking waste package in the garage of Helsinki’s monitoring HQ (STUK) was all that was going on.

In fact, the correlations are striking, and the upticks of Cs-137 can’t just be dismissed as “just dust”, since the 3 major upticks of the first half of 2016, two coincided with  detections of radioisotopes normally only detected after a major release/accident/meltdown.  Such as the detection of Ruthenium-103 in Norway in the second week of January (perfectly coinciding with Cs-137 upticks there and elsewhere), as well as the massive upticks that followed the above 3-month period (“The April Event”, culminating in the highest measurement of (very recent fission indicator) Tellurium-132 in Northern Germany, and followed by upticks of Iodine-131 & Cs-134 in Czech Republic, and detections of Cobalt-60 at two locations in Norway in May (during the time of the Cs-137 upticks and major gamma disturbances in various locations).

These could be 3 or 2 seperate events, compounding each other and making figuring out which caused what spike too complex to do “by hand”.  The IAEA and CTBTO know what’s up.  they have the better monitors and software to figure all this stuff out quickly.  But they’re not talking.  Their primary commitment is not to human health, transparancy or even the “peaceful use” of nuclear fission technology, but to SECRECY, above all else.   That much is clear.

The thing is… if (IF!) these major releases have their source(s) in Europe, then the radioactive cloud movement is a total mystery to me.  I just don’t see how you can get to the apparent distribution from Finland to Spain to Turkey, within 48 hours… It just makes little sense to me, still.

And hence… I still think the fallout came from very far away…  and the Helsinki “leaking waste package” story was planted (perhaps even the package was too) to flood mainstream media with a fake intrigue, a brief research suspense, and then a “bizarre” relieving happy ending… “Oh, good, just a very localized waste container that leaked. Fwewee!”)  …all the while the entire continent got sprinkled with traces of nuclear waste (or a lot more than “traces”, as we don’t know what the data gaps are hiding…) …  And then we all got dosed some more by the end of April and following that “event”…  while the media remained silent.  Completely silent.

Some day this might become known as one of the greatest news blackouts of 2016…

They had just ran a nuclear story less than two months before.  No need to report on the European highest Tellurium-132 detection since Chernobyl…  Why not?  Because it’s such a short-lived radioisotope than when it’s detected it is for sure, zero doubt about that, coming from an actively fissioning source.  You can’t swipe that under the rug with a nuclear waste or just dust or forest fire re-suspension story.  It’s a smoking gun.

I think its bullet is still actively shooting its way down

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| 1 Comment

Two Days

Sept 11, 2016 – EURDEP, 2 days, just a couple I looked at:

ankaraturkey_2days_sept11_2016southengland_2days_sept11_2016limoges-france_2days_sept11_2016centralnorwegiancoast_2days_sept11_2016

| 2 Comments

+0.5 µSv/hr Spike @ Ankara Cankaya, Turkey (EURDEP, 1 year)

ankara_cankaya_turkey_3mo_dec10_2015

–> Fallout signature at the tail end of the Autumn 2015 disturbances.

ankara_cankaya_turkey_3mo_march10_2016

ankara_cankaya_turkey_3mo_june10_2016

-> Timing of that one is roughly inbetween the Helsinki Cs-137 Garage Event & “The April Event”…

ankara_cankaya_turkey_3mo_sept10_2016

–> Note this past week at the end of this last 3-month graph.

—- ——— —-

| Leave a comment

Known Not-To-Be-Knowns @ Central France (EURDEP, 15 months)

march28_2016_1day_standarddiviation_gamma_eurdep

Interesting mainly for its data gap record, with a “glitch dot” spike at the end of March 2016

centralfrance_bv0krs809ma_18_sit_gm__france_47-5n2-9e_3mo_sept10_2015

centralfrance_bv0krs809ma_18_sit_gm__france_47-5n2-9e_3mo_dec10_2016

centralfrance_bv0krs809ma_18_sit_gm__france_47-5n2-9e_3mo_march10_2016

centralfrance_bv0krs809ma_18_sit_gm__france_47-5n2-9e_3mo_june10_2016

centralfrance_bv0krs809ma_18_sit_gm__france_47-5n2-9e_3mo_sept10_2016

— —- —- —

seesay_0.gif

But not when the suspects are actually government officials, of course…

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.

| Leave a comment

Trending Now: Jill Stein (The Better Female Candidate For US President)

  • 1. Miranda Lambert
  • 2. Keith Urban
  • 3. Minnesota Vikings
  • 4. Pitt football
  • 5. Jill Stein
  • 6. Home Refinance Rates
  • 7. Greta Van Susteren
  • 8. Cable TV
  • 9. 2016 Cars
  • 10. Uma Thurman

Yes, actually… Voting Americans can vote for a woman who’s not a sociopath.  Of the 4 main candidates, she may even be the better one…

Her campaign page @ http://www.jill2016.com/

| Leave a comment