Decade-Long Gamma Radiation Record from Argos, Greece

June 18, 2016

Some data I did my usual thing with: pasting 3 month-graphs together per line, going back awhile (in this case starting in Dec. 2005), for the purpose of improving my ability to spot and interpret abnormalities in long term patterns.

For another decade-long record from Greece, see the quite different (and perhaps more striking) data from Lamia, in (May 14, 2016): Rambling Along a Decade of Gamma Radiation Data from Lamia, Greece

  • DATA:  Outdoor gamma radiation via EURDEP, this time I picked the monitor from Argos, Greece.   Not per se ‘validated’ by the authorities that supplied the data, but in my opinion that does not mean the data’s not valid.

3 months per line, most recent at the bottom, and if there was a value above 200 nSv/hr (0.2 µSv/hr –  See Radiation Units and Conversions for help), then a number is indicated on the 3-month graph and the data for that month is shown next with the y-axis left open, so that the highest values are shown.

Starting just before Christmas 2005, we see no spikes for over two years, but summer 2006 saw long data gaps:

39_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet38_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet37_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

Some of these early data gaps could give clues about when and where (San Onofre?)  exactly a major nuclear accident occured that has since lead to significantly elevated thyroid cancer incidence in California, which began before the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe started (about which we now know that it caused massive amounts of radioactive iodine to reach southern California’s coast in Spring 2011…)

36_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet35_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet34_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet33_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet32_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet31_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

At the very end of July 2008, this monitor shows what I call “a glitch dot”: an isolated high value, in this case of over 37 µSv/hr. It occured in the somewhat typical context of surrounding data gaps.

30_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

ChartImg-31.axd

29_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet28_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet27_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

[extra long data gap: from end of May 2009 till late March 2010]

25_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

Fallout coming down from covered-up nuclear incidents might have been compounded by accidents so severe that tiny bits of information even leaked out of tightly controlled China… The Chinese Meltdown at Daya Bay NPP in May 2010 may have caused upticks and data gaps in Europe too:

24_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSetChartImg-43.axdChartImg-46.axd

23_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

ChartImg-47.axd

22_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

ChartImg-52.axd

ChartImg-54.axd

Then, March 11, 2011, the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear disaster ensues…

21_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

We see here again the effect of fallout in lower-than-normal values.  (See also: June 9, 2016: Does BETA radiation affect GAMMA Monitors Negatively?).  Within 2 weeks there’s also an apparent data processing shift

20_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

Indications that much of Fukushima’s radioactive fallout did not reach ground-level until later in 2011 is apparent in this data record as well:

19_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

ChartImg-63.axd

ChartImg-64.axd

ChartImg-67.axd

18_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet17_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet16_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

15_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

–> Looks like some serious fallout conditions in Sept. 2012…

14_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet13_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

ChartImg-85.axd

12_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

11_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

10_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

9_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

–> Except for that seemingly minor uptick on April 18, 2014, the Fessenheim NPP incident is not immediately visible here, but it is quite possible that, just like after Fukushima much of the fallout comes much later.

(DW, 04.03.2016, by Nicole Goebel) Reports: Fessenheim nuclear accident played down by authorities, excerpt:”Both the French nuclear authority, ASN, and the company operating the two Fessenheim nuclear reactors, French energy giant EDF, allegedly did not divulge the gravity of the incident on April 9, 2014, when one of the reactors had to be shut down after water was found leaking from several places.

Researchers from German daily “Süddeutsche Zeitung” and public broadcaster WDR claim the incident at Fessenheim, which is in Alsace near the border with Germany, could turn out to be one of “most dramatic nuclear accidents ever in Western Europe.””

8_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

7_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

–> Possible that the disturbances in Dec. 2014 were related to the radioactive cloud that came from the Zaporizhia NPP in Ukraine.  See Dec. 15, 2014:  Was there a causal link between the Nov 28 2014 Accident at the Zaporizhye Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine and recent Radiation Spikes in Latvia and Romania? and related posts.

The source that caused the major disturbance and spike with data gaps in October 2014 is not known, though upticks during the same period gave me the impression at the time Fukushima was contributing to the Northern Hemisphere’s radiological mess that fall. (Jan. 31, 2016DATA of ‘Fallout Signatures’ on Radiation Monitors Suggest Fukushima Still Going Re-Critical Underground At Times. Airborne Fallout Continues To Come Down Across the Northern Hemisphere.)

ChartImg-104.axd

6_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

5_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

ChartImg-111.axd

4_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

-> Almost no data in Summer 2015, followed by major spikes, data gaps, etc.

3_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

Apparently there’s “a ceiling” in place here, with #13, #15 & # 17 going as high as 10 mSv/hr, but not higher:

ChartImg-117.axd

ChartImg-118.axd

2_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

ChartImg-123.axd

-> This might be a very significant clue, as February saw widespread data gaps and spikes.  France even turned its monitors off in the Southern Hemisphere.   Ruthenium-103 was detected in Norway in January 2016, Tellurium-132 in Germany at the end of April 2016, and upticks (and data gaps in monitoring for) in Cesium-137 were detected in Finland, Norway, Czech Republic and elsewhere.  Even Fukushima-fingerprint activation product Cobalt-60 was picked up again during this period. See also: May 4, 2016:   HIGHEST SINCE 2011: Cesium-137, Ruthenium-103, Tellurium-132 (early 2016)

!-> See my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive for these and many other abnormalities, documented on this blog like nowhere else.

1_Argos_Greece_200nSvHrSet

ChartImg-125.axd

ChartImg-126.axd

ChartImg-129.axd

There is not much that could be concluded from just one such a long-term data record of (mostly unvalidated) data, but it adds to previous documentations.  My impression remains:

  • The monitoring networks are rigged to manipulate the data when it matters most.
  • Much of nuclear accident fallout takes many months before reaching ground level.
  • Nuclear incidents with serious releases of radioactive particles and gasses occur much more frequently that the official accident record indicates.
  • Governments and their so-called independent watchdogs know this and in order to conceal the magnitude of radioactive pollution, they keep “emergency monitoring” to such a short-term minimum that the actual truth of the matter does not become public knowledge.
  • Various releases from the past decade are compounding each other.

And the beat goes on…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

 

| 2 Comments

Geen vuiltje aan de lucht…

June 13, 2016

Some more 3-month gamma radiation graphs plucked from EURDEP (data not per se “validated”.)

Schemmerhofen_OT_Ingerk_Deutschland_3mo_14juni_2016Bretten_Deutschland_3mo_14juni_2016Zettersfeld_Oostenrijk_3mo_14juni_2016Wormeldange_Luxembourg_3mo_14juni_2016

Frankrijk_45.3N_0.7E__3mo_13juni2016Frankrijk_44.2N_4.7E__3mo_13juni2016Wremen_Germany__3mo_13juni2016Herbeumont_Belgien__3mo_13juni2016

Merson_Gulnar_Akkuyu_NGS_Turkije_3mo_14juni_2016Souda_Griekenland_3mo_14juni_2016ARGOS_GRIEKENLAND_3mo_14juni_2016Birkfeld_Oostenrijk_3mo_14juni_2016Ploee_Croatia_3mo_14juni_2016

Just ignore the past few weeks.  I hear it helps.

See also:

This blog post is part of a set of “pieces of the puzzle” in my “data thriller series” about a MAJOR radiological emergency “mystery”…  Read all blog posts for more ‘context’.   Educate yourself, then contact “the media” for a clue what time it is

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

…time to drink some Margaritas by a string of blue lights

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 3 Comments

A Sprinkle of US EPA Radnet DATA (Colorado, Alaska, etc – First half June 2016) + more

June 12, 2016

Used: US EPA Radnet:  https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/query.do

Just checking a few monitors in the Colorado area:

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE

A high spike on June 11, 2016 @ Colorado Springs…  and the apparent beginning of a data gap @ Denver (Radnet cuts off the dates without data if it  happens at the beginning or end of a data request period. Note the begin and end dates:)

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-1

Further West:

Data was also cut @ Grand Junction, CO:

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-2

And in the state over, in Utah, where the data flow wasn’t cut, except on June 8 (data gap), and a brief but apparent ‘fallout pattern’ can be seen on the 12th:

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-3

To the South, Albequerque has gone silent, with a data gap that began on May 28, after a rather data-gapped month:

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-4

On the coast, hints that whatever’s causing the inland spikes and data gaps “might have come from even further west”:

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-6

An uptick in the past week @ Corvalis, OR:

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-8

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-9

Not much to see in Hawaii, as jet stream blows further north:

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-11

Alaska:

NOte the small data gaps @ Juneau, AK:

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-7

cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-10cewolf;jsessionid=C808A14DA3A98CD5296E7D4E04EC36AE-13

A list of inactive EPA stations that quit updating their radiation data, via NETC: @ https://netc.com/inactive-epa.php

What else?

Nothing new, I guess…  The Wieringerwerf monitor in The Netherlands was turned off (turned its data flow off to the public, as it is likely programmed to do automatically) after the 5000 Bq/m^3 T-Beta-Art spike, which coincided, to the north in Southern Finland with an uptick in Cesium-137, AND again one of those oddly coinciding (“enhanced natural”???) Thorium-232 detections…

ChartImg.axd

ChartImg-1.axd

All co-incidental, of course…

Nevermind… ;-/

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 2 Comments

Europe Going “Fallout Blind” as well…

June 11, 2016

Basically the below data charts further illustrate that the so-called nuclear watchdogs, the very agencies entrusted with environmental safety and alerting the population in case of nuclear releases into the environment are on top of their game… but not for what the unsuspecting public pays them to, but the very opposite:  The radiation monitoring systems are RIGGED to hide or alter the data when it matters most. 

The radioactive cloud that moved over Europe in the past few weeks has made it even clearer than already established: that if the situation is serious enough, as appears to have been the case, the most relevant data, such as T-BETA-ART (total activity in a cubic meter of air from artificial Beta-emitters), gets automatically redacted in Europe as well.

The monitor in Cyprus, not shown below, spits out (what to me looks like) useless data as far as T-Beta-Art goes, leaving 19 monitors:  14 in The Netherlands, and 5 in very close proximity in the Italian Alps (you have to zoom in on EURDEP to see them individually).  While Gamma can give hints (especially through its data gaps… and ironically-with-a-twist, its lower-than-usual values ;-/), Beta is the better one for detecting fallout.

This is Europe’s best de facto “(Beta-emitting) fallout detection network”, with 7 of the 19 monitors showing unusual data in the past 1 month (pre June 10, 2016), with short data gaps on the others:

T_BETA_ART_outdoorAir_1month_max_preJune10_2016

What happens when a thick radioactive cloud moves over the continent (besides suspicious interruption in radioisotope-specific air sample analyses)?  We may get to see some data, but if the event is longer-lasting than a brief spike, the data flow gets cut, as seen here:

NL_T_BETA_ART_spike_thenNiks

So far, media has remained completely silent.  Politicians have not said a word.  Everyone stayed calmly ignorant.  And years or decades from now there won’t even be any way to link upticks in cancers or various other ailments to specific radiation releases, because officially those releases…  didn’t even happen.

While a spike earlier in the month May (2016) reached a record-high 10,000 Bq/m^3 T-Beta-Art at the same monitor on the coast, this most recent one was followed by a substantial data gap, suggesting it might have gone even much higher than the previous record.  See (June 8, 2016)’s  Breaking: BETA Radiation spikes from The Netherlands to Russia + Snapshots of 3-month Radiation Graphs + (EURDEP) for details about the May-June radioactive storms passing over Europe…  Sparks and all…

The other Dutch high value, closer to Germany, inland, occurred at the very beginning of June (see 1-month data, below) and reached over 9 Bq/m^3 T-BETA-ART:

Vredepeel_T_BETA_ART_NL_preJune10_2016

Data gaps most likely correspond with spikes that the rigged system was able to catch and hide.  This leaves just seemingly isolated high values, often near data gaps:

2_NL_BETAart_1week_preJune10_2016

At the 5 Italian T-BETA-ART monitors we see the following:

In the below graphs is 1 month on the left, with the last week of that “zoomed-in”,  on the right. An apparent data processing shift is clearly how the rigging is pulled off here.  Also note the couple negative values:

JRC_Station_1_T_BETA_ART_Italia_1mo_1wk_Jul10_2016JRC_Station_3_T_BETA_ART_Italia_1mo_1wk_Jul10_2016JRC_Station_5_T_BETA_ART_Italia_1mo_1wk_Jul10_2016JRC_Station_7_T_BETA_ART_Italia_1mo_1wk_Jul10_2016JRC_Station_9_T_BETA_ART_Italia_1mo_1wk_Jul10_2016

See also:

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 7 Comments

Listen to “the Russian Woodpecker” on Short Wave Radio Online

Since I don’t have a radio handy, I went looking online to see if I could hear the “Russian Woodpecker”, which reportedly retured at the end of 2013, since having been gone since 1989…   See my previous blogpost (and watch the movie!), Chernobyl and “The Russian Woodpecker”.

I found this pretty awesome online Short Wave radio receiver from The University of Twente in The Netherlands, streaming live:

!-> @ http://websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901/

Sure enough, if you look for the distinct signal, you can find it.  Interestingly, it moves frequencies, and seems accompanied by triple-beeps and other repetitive signals.  Various other weirdness can be noticed alongside…

woodpecker_sw

Here’s an example of it jumping frequencies:

jump.gif

Wikipedia has this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duga_radar

Fascinating.

To find the signal:

First of all, it is apperently not contineous, so you might be checking right at a moment when it isn’t being transmitted.  Or it may be at a different frequency than usual.  Zoom out and search for the dotted line in the SW waterfall setting.

Easiest, I found, is to zoom in until you see the markers.  The “woodpecker” signal often appears on or near the Jammer / “Sound of Hope”.

FindTheWoodpecker

Then zoom out some 4 times to see more bandwidth:4zoomOuts

In this case it appeared below 11,000 khz:

thepattern

If it’s some kind of over-the-horizon type of radar, and primarily meant as a nuclear war deterrent, may it be successful.

It would be incredibly sad if military rationalizing were to spin so far away from common sense as to result in a return to the use of nuclear weapons…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Perhaps somewhat related: Zero Hedge, June 10, 2016Paul Craig Roberts: “Fellow Americans, Wake Up & Escape The Matrix”

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

May Peace Prevail On Earth

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| Leave a comment

Chernobyl and “The Russian Woodpecker”

You have a big problem now, the kind that can get you killed

From the YourTube intro (youtube.com/watch?v=q1poYZCO7qk):

A thrilling investigation into the ghosts of the Soviet Union and the mind of an irradiated Ukrainian artist on a quest to discover ‘the crime and criminals’ behind the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.   Unforgettably eccentric artist Fedor Alexandrovich begins his quest by revealing to the world an enormous secret Soviet weapon that stands in the shadow of Chernobyl, and which Kremlinologists in the 1980s thought might be a giant mind-control device.  But what Fedor discovers is much more sinister.  While his theory that Chernobyl was an inside job may seem mad, the audience too starts to question reality when secret police appear and one of the crew members is shot by a sniper, as revolution, paranoia and terror engulf the crew. This Sundance Grand Jury winner and darling of critics worldwide pushes the boundaries of the documentary form while telling a crucial story about the deadly dance between Ukraine and Russia, and hinting at what Putin has in mind next.”

Watch @  http://www.russianwoodpecker.com/

https-:vimeo.com:ondemand:therussianwoodpecker

RELATED:

EXCERPT:  (by Zen Gardner)  “Knowing what we know now about Mossad’s stuxnet virus capabilities and the outright sabotage of the Fukushima reactors, amongst others, we need to revisit Chernobyl.

I ran across this connection when studying the various HAARP type facilities around the world, all of which were preceded by the Russian “Woodpecker” phenomenon in the 70’s and 80’s. Interestingly enough, the giant “Steel Yard” as NATO called it, is located in Chernobyl, Ukraine. Within the “exclusion zone” of the now defunct Chernobyl reactor.

Why then was this reactor blown up? Retaliation? See for yourself.

Coincidence? Or a Deliberate Sabotage!

Wikipedia says:

The Russian Woodpecker was a notorious Soviet radio signal that could be heard on the shortwave radio bands worldwide between July 1976 and December 1989. It sounded like a sharp, repetitive tapping noise, at 10 Hz, giving rise to the “Woodpecker” name. The random frequency hops disrupted legitimate broadcast, amateur radio, utility transmissions, and resulted in thousands of complaints by many countries worldwide. The signal was long believed to be that of an over-the-horizon radar (OTH) system. This theory was publicly confirmed after the fall of the Soviet Union, and is now known to be the Duga-3 (Russian: ????-3) [1] system, part of the Soviet ABM early-warning network. NATO military intelligence had photographed the system and given it the NATO reporting name Steel Yard.

And conveniently abandoned now, as it was within the now 30 km nuclear “dead zone” after the Chernobyl disaster.

They couldn’t even ship the massive antenna array anywhere it was so contaminated. […]”

Continue reading @ http://www.zengardner.com/was-chernobyl-revenge-for-the-russian-woodpecker/

[h/t:  E.E.F.  Thanks!]

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 1 Comment

NASA Ocean Phytoplankton Researcher Found Dead

CBS Baltimore, June 7, 2016:  http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2016/06/07/missing-nasa-scientist-found-dead-maryland/

Hat Tip: Kevin Blanch @ https://     youtu.com/H5lvkd7-vE4 (*)

Screenshot of article:

2016:06:07:missing-nasa-scientist-found-dead-maryland

Click to watch at source

Possibly related:

NukePro, Feb 11, 2016, “A Scientific Basis For Destruction Of Ocean Food Chain Via Radiation“.  Screenshot excerpt.  Click image to continue reading @ NukePro:

http-:nukeprofessional.blogspot.be:2016:02:a-scientific-basis-for-destruction-of.html(*) PS: Though I share the concerns for the ocean’s creatures, for the lack of transparency, for madmen having infiltrated every branch of governments, including the nuclear weapons command and oversight agencies worldwide, I do not “fear for my life”.  I know I’m mortal.  I’ll die when it’s time.   All we are is dust in the wind…

The Truth prevails. 

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

Added right after posting: 

https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2016/06/10/nasa-ocean-phytoplankton-researcher-found-dead/   New development in the possible suppression of independent news:  So… I post this (above), and check out the result.  No problem:

A

But then I click home and see that those visiting the site’s home page actually won’t see the latest addition:

B

As if the last one doesn’t exist yet.   Interesting…  Wonder what else people can’t see… ;-/

And yes, I think it has become thát bad.  We have entered a super-high-tech version of the media landscape of the old totalitarian repressive Soviet Union.  I can say what I want (that  part’s nice), but few will be able to hear me.  They got it covered.

5 more minutes later:  Looks normal now.  Some kind of weird delay?  Anyhow.  Noted.

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

| 1 Comment

3-month BETA Radiation Graphs for All 17 Russian Federation (Western Russia only, via EURDEP)

June 9, 2016

Just passing along some (mostly unvalidated) radiation data from Europe. 

Unlike the radiation monitors that detect and measure only Total Artificial Beta, (T-BETA-ART), which are almost all in The Netherlands (+ 1 in the Italian Alps and 1 on Cyprus), most European “All BETA (every kind mixed)” monitors are in Poland and Romania.  Strangely they do no seem to correspond very well to known fallout events…   Two examples:

BETA_Swinoujscie_Poland_3mo_preJune8_2016

BETA_Arad_Romania_3mo_preJune8_2016

The Russian monitors, however, which in the Standard Deviation setting are all in just yellow on the map, do show interesting details when you adjust the y-axis.   When viewing 1–month Beta data for Outdoor Air, with setting: Standard Deviation, the EURDEP map also shows them all, here annotated so you can find the location of the below-graphed monitors:

http-:eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu:EurdepMap:Default.aspx._1maand_8juni2016tiff

Each line shows 3 months of BETA radiation data (varying y-axis):

The upticks and data gaps in mid-May till now (June 8) stand out in some locations.  The last few weeks have been data-gapped-away in some areas:

BETA_Syktyvkar_Rusia_3mo_preJune8_2016

BETA_UKHTA_Rusia_3mo_preJune8_2016

BETA_Nariyan_Mar_Russia_3monthsBEFORE_the3mo_preJune8_2016  BETA_Kirov_Rusia_3mo_preJune8_2016   BETA_Ekaterinburg_DUBR._Russia_3mo_preJune8_2016  BETA_Zasheek_Russia_3mo_preJune8_2016BETA_Vologda_Rusia_3mo_preJune8_2016  BETA_Astrakhan_Russia_3mo_preJune8_2016

Monitors that most clearly show a Beta uptick around the same time (within days) of the April 26 Te-132 measured spike in Germany:

BETA_Nizhni_Novgorod_Rusia_3mo_preJune8_2016 BETA_Rostov_On_Don_Russia_3mo_preJune8_2016

Other:

BETA_Murmask_Russia_3monthsBEFORE_the3mo_preJune8_2016

BETA_Samara_Rusia_3mo_preJune8_2016

BETA_Swinoujscie_Poland_3mo_preJune8_2016

BETA_Leningrad.ICP_Rusia_3mo_preJune8_2016

BETA_Severodvinsk_Rusia_3mo_preJune8_2016  BETA_Arkhangelsk_Russia_3monthsBEFORE_the3mo_preJune8_2016

For additional commentary, see previous bunch of posts.

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

 

 

| 1 Comment

Does BETA radiation affect GAMMA Monitors Negatively?

Al is de leugen nog zo snel de waarheid achterhaalt ze wel.” – Nederlands spreekwoord  (Rough translation of this Dutch proverb: No matter how fast the lie, the truth eventually catches up.)

June 9, 2016

(Click ‘Home‘ and scroll down to this period, or check the Nuclear Blog Posts archive for a list of related posts).

In the past few blog posts, I’ve pointed out some odd “measurements”.  It is rare to see an activity or dose rate dip into the negative.  It makes no sense and suggests two possibilities: either some factor can cause electrical effects in the monitor itself, giving rise to a negative value, or the cause for the nonsensical value lies in the (rigged) data processing (for instance some kind of formula that’s intended to hide spikes in case of unusually high nuclear fallout reaching a ground-level monitor, such as perhaps a reduction of spiking raw data to produce lower-than-normal values.  If the formula were a bit over-zealous it could even produce negative values?)

I found a few more such examples of gamma dipping down just this past day or two, which I find striking given the significant T-BETA-ART spikes on the Dutch coast (see last post for more details, but the 3-month graph is repeated here):

Wieringerwerf_T_BETA_ART_3month_June8_2016

I suspect that BETA radiation may be involved in triggering a GAMMA monitor to show either data-forced-down-to-zero values, or DATA GAPS.   For instance, the massive 10,000 Bq/m^3 spike in artifical Beta emitters in The Netherlands 10 days ago, coincided with a data gap in the midst of an uptick/disturbances of the Gamma monitor at Ukkel (near Brussels, and home of the Belgian royal meteo service KMI) a bit to the south in Central Belgium:

Ukkel_BijBrussel_Belgium_3maanden_preJuni8_2016

Geographically (and wind pattern-related) a bit less “right next to each other”, below are two more examples of Gamma-dipping-down: Often the timing does not correlate nicely for these 3 monotors many hundred of kilometers apart (in the UK, The Netherlands and Germany), but for this weeks Beta uptick, it did:

Upticks_and_downticks_Herstmonceux_UK_3mo_8juni2016Upticks_and_downticks_Bretten_Germany_3mo_8juni2016

Unrelated to the above observation, I found a massive Beta spike in western Russia on April 27, just one day after the mega-spike of Tellurium-132 was detected in Northern Germany early the 26th of April:

BETA_Nizhni_Novgorod_Rusia_3mo_preJune8_2016.gif

-> This adds further geographical context to that Te-132 detection.  Clearly this wasn’t some isoalted local mystery.  It fits observations so widespread that everything points at a MAJOR release of radioactivity having occured.

!-> The other day’s blogpost (June 7, 2016) puts a couple radioisotope-specific graphs together that illustrate this as well: included in  Down is Up: Negative Activity Rate, T-Beta-Art & Cs-137 Upticks (Eurdep data)

I might continue gathering long-term data sets.  Personally I find this boring-as-can-be by itself,  but it seems I’m one of the only bloggers doing this.  By being able to see the long term evolution of the radiological landscap so easily, you can spot patterns otherwise missed.   Extreme-sounding allegations, such as that Fukushima-Daiichi is still fissioning, something I’ve been claiming for years, and which is generally resolutely denied as “impossible” by officials (with the exception of an anomalous RT report last week) or “nonsense” by trolls, is slowly becoming documented fact.

Only continued vigilance and perseverence seems appropriate in the face of a surreal apathetic mainstream media.  Perhaps these efforts will only be valued decades from now…  I don’t know.  I’ve tried to quit this ridiculously time-consuming hobby of “monitoring the monitors” so often, but so far I always come back to it, for no other reason that feeling COMPELLED.

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 3 Comments

Breaking: BETA Radiation spikes from The Netherlands to Russia + Snapshots of 3-month Radiation Graphs + (EURDEP)

Added June 9th:

Ozalp_Van_Turkey_nearIran_3mo_preJune8_2016St_Ciers_Du_Taillon_17_nearBayous_France_3mo_PreJune8_2016Kirchdorf_Im_Wald_Germany_gamma_3mo_PreJune9_2016

Original post left as-was:

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

June 7, 2016 (June 8, 2016, 0:45 am UTC)

NOTICE:

DATA

Scroll down for the two beta radiation data graphs (at the end of this blog post). [as well as seen next blog posts.]

The below graphs show three 1-month radiation graphs pasted together (3 months per line), in no particular order.  The exact location can be found with the coordinates listed unde the monitor name.   This adds to many months of documentations that without any doubt:   Something’s up!

RhoneValei_ZuidOostFrankrijk_3months_befurJune8_2016

Lamia_3mo_May31_2016Brasov_Roemanie_3months_preJune8_2016SivasKangal_Turkije_3maanden_June8_2016Kicevo_Macedonia_3months_preJune8_2016VaduzSMN_Switzerland_3months_befurJune8_2016Hessisch_Oldendorf_Germany_3monaten_befurJune8_2016

(–> For that phenomenon, see also Down is Up: Negative Activity Rate and also March 21st’s Negative Dose Rate)

Witmarsum_Nederland_3maanden_preJuni8_2016Halsteren_Nederland_3maanden_preJuni8_2016CentraalWestFrankrijk_3months_preJune8_2016Nitra_Slovania_3monaten_befurJune8_2016VlissingenHaven_Nederland_3maanden_preJuni8_2016Oostende_Vlaanderen_3maanden_preJuni8_2016Moussala1_Bulgaria_3months_preJune8_2016Aflenz_Osenreich_3monaten_befurJune8_2016Ransart_Belgium_3maanden_preJuni8_2016Ukkel_BijBrussel_Belgium_3maanden_preJuni8_2016Cahirciveen_FarWesternEire_3months_preJune8_2016Freistadt_Ostenreich_3monaten_befurJune8_2016JustSOuthOfLuxembourg_France_3maanden_preJuni8_2016Meiringen_Switzerland_3months_befurJune8_2016Andujar_SouthCentralSpain_3months_preJune8_2016

Bastongne_Belgium_3maanden_preJuni8_2016

A  Wondering…

I don’t know about you, but I’m under the impression that waves of fallout are moving across the European landscape, increasingly affecting ground-level monitors.   That much of what is causing these upticks is not just “natural radon progeny” is evident from the various man-made fission products detected in the past few months, some of them in the highest concentrations since 2011, or even since Chernobyl in 1986.  Some documentation highlights of recent events was repeated in the previous blog post, here.

And along the lines of previous ponderings, I’m not so sure that “manmade CO2-driven global warming” (on which various recent news reports blame the widespread flooding and other extreme weather) is the main driver behind extreme weather conditions in Europe the past 10 days…

Kr85_possibleClimateEffects

Krypton-85 from nuclear fission enhanced air ionization and, thus, interferes with the atmospheric-electrical system and THE WATER BALANCE of the atmosphere…

Can’t rule out that it plays some role in recent sparkiness either…  Next image below: only showing lightning that hit the ground, past 24 hours (bright colors are most recent); See latest @ http://www.lightningmaps.org/blitzortung/europe/index.php?lang=en

June8_2016_1amUTC_Lightningstrikes24hoursEurope

To continue my wpondering…:   Krypton-85 is a major nuclear industry waste product, is a Beta-emitter, and is not specifically tested for on any of the monitors.  Beta is shielded by just a few inches of air, making a significant detection rare, because the radioactive cloud needs to 1) be at ground level where the monitors are, and 2) be dense enough to make a dent in natural background levels from mainly radon progeny.

Here’s a Beta-radiation monitor from Russia, showing only 24-hour averages, also for the same past 3 months (no data for past 5 days):

Kursk_Russia_BETA_3maanden_preJuni8_2016.gif

Remarkable artifical Beta uptick on the Dutch Coast:

The past month also saw the most and most unusual spikes in T-BETA-ART (Total Beta radiation from decay energies specifcally from artificial radioisotopes), monitored for in The Netherlands.  While just half a day ago, when I posted the previous blog post, I mentioned the upticks of 6 and 18 Bq/m^3, since then the upticks have risen again, showing the now second-highest on record with nearly 5000 Bq/m^3 artificial Beta:

BETA_Art_SPikingAgain_June7_8_2016

Here’s the 3-month record:

Wieringerwerf_T_BETA_ART_3month_June8_2016

As documented in future posts, the last spike was followed by a multi-day data gap…

(Note: Keep in mind that this is barely monitored for and this detection in The Netherlands does not in any way indicate that fallout levels are higher there than elsewhere in the Northern Hemisphere.  The opposite could be true.  It is simply not possible to make such an assessment with so little data.)

However… https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/06/09/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-7.01,51.46,1024/loc=5.100,52.800

2016:06:09:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-7.01,51.46,1024:loc=5.100,52.800

-> The location of the T-BETA-ART spike coincides with a jet stream wind (250 hPa) slow zone.  This fits my hypothesis that fallout is being delivered by fast-moving upper-tropospheric wind, to reach ground level (and sometimes its monitors) in slower areas.   Interesting is also that at time of checking, one of the clearest such zones coincides with fierce lightning in north-western Italy (see lightning map above).

At time of posting, the suspected fallout zone is moving east towards/into Germany. (Use Nullschool link above for possible additional clues).  Just a thought:   Might be a good time for well-equiped scientists to do additional precipitation and air sampling for alpha, beta-, and gamma spectroscopies.   Would be interesting to pinpoint which artificial radioisotopes specifically are in the latest mix…

Partial Northern Hemisphere perspective shows a pattern that by the time you get upwind to Japan, passes over Hokkaido

2 days ago:  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/06/07/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-108.52,70.34,512/loc=5.100,52.800

When clicking through in time (3 hours or 1 day intervals), then you see that the jet stream was in place over Fukushima a few days ago.   It takes just a couple days for the fastest-moving air to blow that far at that altitude.  At time of Beta spike, a jet stream slow zone is in place at the monitor: https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/06/09/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-108.52,70.34,512/loc=5.100,52.800   Annotated Screenshot:

2016:06:09:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-108.52,70.34,512:loc=5.100,52.800

At time of the Beta spike, a jet stream slow zone is in place, possibly creating “atmospheric fallout waterfall conditions”.  At that time the same wind line passes over Hokkaido, north of Fukushima.  However, when looking back a few days in time, you’ll see that the fit might be more perfect than is apparent when looking at just one time window.  (The jet stream meanders a bit.  To do this with more precision would require many more screenshots to adjust for the wind moving in both space AND TIME.)

(But, basically, in short: recent detections in Europe seem to fit with my hypothis that manmade nuclear fallout from Fukushima is playing a significant role in all of these abnormalities…)

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Sleep tight.  Might want to wash the clothes you walked in the rain with, take an extra shower, run a carbon air filter indoors, and eat nutricious healthy food with plenty of anti-oxidants, etc.  Most health effects won’t show until years, or even decades, from now.   Be well.

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

This blog post is part of a set of “pieces of the puzzle” in my “data thriller series” about a MAJOR radiological emergency “mystery”  My take?  I think Fukushima-Daaichi went re-critical and is spewing untold massive quantities of radioactive fallout into the air and sea. 

    I can only wish that my efforts to document all this is somehow helpful

to bring a peaceful end to the misguided nuclear era. 

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

 

| 2 Comments

Down is Up: Negative Activity Rate, T-Beta-Art & Cs-137 Upticks (Eurdep data)

June 7, 2016

OT opening:  The Swiss sure have a way of celebrating the opening of a tunnel… LOL:

Anyhow…  Some radiation data, via Online Radiation Data, from EURDEP land:

This is a first one for me:  After  the (March 21, 2016) Negative Dose Rate (EURDEP, Luxembourg), there’s now also a negative activity rate:

NegativeActivity.gif

“haha”   Rigging busted again!

How many artificial beta decays in those cubic meters of air?   “Minus one decay”?    [sarc.]

Did “emergency data rigging” kick in, or something? 

Might there be a connection to Cesium-137 spiking elsewhere, like @ Helsinki, Finland, where a 300% increase has been observed in the past few weeks, for no apparent reason:

Helsinki_Cs137

What about Gamma monitors going haywire?

SOudagreece_June7_2016_1month.gif

Surely no “levels of concern” are being reached, are there?  ‘Cause at some locations the 2016 trend suggests otherwise.  (Lamia’s 10-year data graphed here);   Past 6 months, pre June 7, 2016:

Lamia_Greece_HalfYear_EndingJune7_2016.gif

“See something?  Say something!”   Hello officer, I’d like to report an act of ongoing nuclear environmental terrorism…

Check out the last 12 hours Artificial Beta on the coast of The Netherlands @Wieringerwerf:  It just reached 6 and then about 18 Bq/m^3

6_x3_equals_18

-> These (non-validated) measurements stand in stark contrast to the period (post-Fukushima) March 2011 through May 2013, when measurements generally stayed below 1 Bq/m^3 and never surpassed 3 Bq/m^3 !

Did you know that on May 23, 2013, the “Lowest Detectable Level” (LDD) was then, just after some data gaps, simply changed to < 3 Bq/m^3, thus making all details invisible?

May23_2013

Poof.  They’re on top of the game…  Except that it’s not a game…

The last two spikes ( 6 and 18 Bq/m^3 T-BETA-ART) on June 7, 2016 are visually lost in the resolution of a 1-month graph… because two earlier spikes this past month went much higher!  Múch higher:  On May 30, less than 2 weeks ago:  the highest artifical Beta spike on record for that monitoring location, part of an apparent radioactive cloud that took 10 hours that day to pass over (at ground level)…:

10hoursOfartBetaCraziness_May2016.gif

That “something’s up” is no longer mere wondering or speculation.  I have documented enough (see Nuclear Blog Posts Archive for a chronological overview)  for that to now be established FACT.  Everything is pointing at a concerted ongoing mega-cover-up.  The RT reference, see next link, might have been a “testing of the waters”, but that which could have been front page & prime time world news (every day for 5 years actually) didn’t spread…

Did you see June 4th’s “Anatomy of a Serbian Data Gap + RT: Fukushima Still Fissioning!

novisad_serbia_annot_3mo_prejune5_2016.gif

How about the apparent FACT that the Ruthenium-103 detection in Norway in January 2016 was accompanied by a Cesium-137 uptick. And, also a strike towards the apparent data rigging (data gaps to hide the worst): Cesium-137 upticks apparently tend to be flanked by data gaps… What’s up with that?

cs137_asterasnorsk_4months_marchcompressed1_annot2

Perhaps a clue about that first data gap, immediately following a curious detection of Ruthenium-103 at the same location in Southern Norway, can be found in the perfectly coinciding 3-week-long uptick of both Cs-137 as well as IODINE-131 at Cheb-Meteostanice Maskovska, Czech Republic:

Cz_Cs137_I131

Makes me wonder how high the detection might have gone in the data-gapped areas…

And the most-curious spike of also-short-lived fission product Tellurium-132 on April 26 (2016) in Germany occurred at such a spike/data gap time as well:

The fact that it was followed shortly after by detections of Cobalt-60 strongly hints at Fukushima being the source.

Te-132 & I-131 indicates active recent fission

Co-60 points at Fukushima-Daiichi. 

But all thát would imply at least one thing:   Shunichi Tanaka, chairman of Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority, whom as recent as Oct. 22, 2015 stated that, “Recriticality is physically impossible” IS DEAD WRONG.   

I guess the Japanese are wasting precious tax money on highly unqualified people for extremely important positions…   ;-/   Just like everywhere else…    But I guess we already knew that too…:

Nov. 20, 2015:  Debunking the ‘Impossibility’ of Ongoing Criticalities at Fukushima-Daiichi

And the mainstream media?  

[crickets…]

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 1 Comment

Qaqortoq (Greenland BACK ONLINE after Half Year Data Gap. Complete Gamma Record (EURDEP, Spring 2011-2016) & More

June 6, 2016

DATA

  • A fresh look at a very significant spike at Qaqortoq in August 2015 lead to a bit of a “walk in radiation monitoring land”…
  • There’s additional signs the jet stream was/is loaded with radioCesium and more…

Starting out with Qaqortoq, Sara, Southern Greenland. Click images for more detail:

Qaqortoq_1

Qaqortoq_2

Qaqortoq_3

Qaqortoq_4mega

-> the y-axis is changed from 160 nSv/hr to 240 nSv/hr, to be able to show the increased values

Qaqortoq_5

Qaqortoq_6

Qaqortoq_7

At the end of June 2014, the data processing is obviously changed, bringing the baseline back down, and narrowing the variability:

Qaqortoq_8

Qaqortoq_9

Qaqortoq_10

Qaqortoq_11

Qaqortoq_12

On August 25, 2015, there is a MASSIVE SPIKE (+27 µSv/hr), followed by disturbances:

Qaqortoq_13

Details of the spike:

Qaqortoq_13spike

A month and a half after the spike, the monitor is disappeared.  No data to be seen from early december 2015 till last week, early June 2016:

Qaqortoq_14mega

Clearly the widespread data gaps and spikes in Europe at the end of August 2015 had their origin most likely far west of Europe, beyond Greenland…

A look at the wind patterns on August 25, 2015, 12:00 UTC, 250 hPa:

2015:08:24:1500Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-168.08,117.51,512:loc=-46.000,60.700

I started out with adding arrows to the image below.  Then, to see if I would end up or pass over other specific nuclear sites, I turned te globe and turned arrows to the above screenshot.

2015:08:24:1500Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-167.73,72.04,512:loc=-46.000,60.700

–> As you can see, the southern side of the jet stream passed over Northern Japan, but not directly over Fukushima.   Directly upwind of the spiking monitor, one arrives much further north.  If you keep going, you’ll also pass over Western Europe (including France, Belgium & The Netherlands), merging more with that (grey arrow) core of the jet stream.

An extremely time-consuming process-of-elimination (of radiation monitors elsewhere) could help pin-point the source of this extreme radiation spike.

A peek at the week of that spike:

GammaMax_1week_PreAug29_2015_1200UTC_map_annot1.gif

I’ll start in Greenland:  The data gap is shared by the two other monitors, but the spike is not visible in any way on the two more northern monitors (1 week data):

Greenland_SpikeWeek_Aug2015

That French monitor on the Canadian Atlantic coast showed nothing:

NorthEastCanadaianAtlanticCoast.gif

On Spitzbergen, a Norwegian island in the Arctic sea shows a striking data gap right that week:

Spitzbergen_NorwegianArctic.gif

At that time, there was still one monitor left in Iceland.  It showed a clear uptick within a fallout-pattern-like disturbance period, with an earlier data gap.  Here shown together with a monitor in Luxembourg:

Iceland_Luxembourg.gif

That spike in Europe is off-the-charts (well, I changed the y-axis so it’s ON the chart, non-validated like most its data, but… a MILLI-Sievert glitch dot?).  That’s extreme.

It was part of an apparent disturbance, with also data gaps in the months before and after:

DIppach_Luxembourg_3mo_Spet29_2015

If this connected somehow to the August 2015 radiological weirdness in Greenland, then there’s a possibility that it fits “my hypothesis about glitch dots”, which is that when hot volatile fallout moves very high up, it doesn’t affect ground monitors much, unless a hot particle directly hits such a monitor. The data then appears like an isolated dot, seeming like an instrument error, a glitch, so to speak.  Hence I call these “glitch dots”, but I consider them a possible clue to a higher-altitude manmade radioactive cloud.  

Because of its extremeness and it appearing part of a disturbance, I’m going to run another nullschool wind query for 250 hPa, for 49.6N, 6.0E on 1800 UTC Aug 22, 2015, and see where thát higher-up air might have come from:

https://earth.nullschool.net/#2015/08/24/1800Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-114.17,81.42,512/loc=6.000,49.600

2015:08:24:1800Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-114.17,81.42,512:loc=6.000,49.600

F1 = Fukushima (top left)

The usual result: the northern jet stream seems involved in the delivery of major fallout. 

You can see that shortly after that insanely high glitch dot, the jet stream slows down.  A look at two monitors in Southern Norway shows further evidence of that I might be on the right track:

showing a gradual increase that week, there’s a data gap that appears to be hiding a spike on Aug. 23-24 @ Oslo, Norway‘s Gamma record:

Oslo_gamma_3mo_Sept29_2015

The monitor right next to it, @ Åsterås, Norway has radioisotope-specific data.  Here showing Be-7, for a clue of higher-up air coming down, and Cesium-137, usually a major component of a fallout cloud:

Asteras_Norway_Be7_Cs137_3mo_Sept29_2015

–> Cesium-137 spikes over 400% out of its normal (2015, nuclear era) variability, coinciding with a significant Berrylium-7 uptick.  You can see also that Be-7 is already rising the sample period before the Cs-137 spike, while Cs-137 doesn’t show much change yet.   The data gap nearby comes at the tail end of this Cs-137/Be-7 spike.

So, it seems the cause of the upticks and data gaps: 1) has a significant manmade component to it (yea, sorry excuse-producers, but volcanoes do not spew Cesium-137), and 2) is being delivered from higher up.  This is NOT “just surface dust blowing around”.  Just surface dust would neither be accompanied with such a major uptick in Be-7, which is naturally made by cosmogenesis in the upper atmosphere (or artificially as part of nuclear waste in a reactor), nor would it affect monitors on the same days thousands of miles apart.  That REQUIRES the jet stream to explain it.

Now I want to check a windmap and trace the downwind path and see how close I’d get to data-gapped Spitzbergen and mega-spiking Southern Greenland (less than 48 hours later.)

If you start on Aug 17 and move forward in time in 3-hour leaps, you see how one sample period includes a variety of conditions:  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2015/08/17/1200Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-28.51,76.62,512/loc=10.267,59.133, including some that fit and some that don’t.

Elsewhere in Europe, there’s many more monitors that offer potential clues too. 

I start out with two Lithuanian monitors, but it turns out that those spikes have a typical pattern corresponding with a monitor calibration.  The minor upticks before occurred AFTER the spike in Greenland.  If there’s a connection then that COULD hint hint of the origin being more likely upwind of Greenland, with detections in Europe following.   A look at the other abnormalities could bring more certainty about that…

Lithuania:

Lithouwen_2.gif

Latvia never disappoints:

LatviaNeverDIsappoints_2

-> 3 months @ Salaspils, Latvia shows possible fallout patterns both before and after August 25th, 2015:

Salaspils_Latvia_3mo_preOct29_2015

This leaves increased room for a source in Europe, which would decend and hit ground monitors there and elsewhere on its later rounds around the hemisphere.

Continuing with week data in search of more potential clues:

Ampsin 3, not so far from Tihange / Huy, Belgium shows a significant uptick the day before:

NotFarFromTihangeIn a 3 month period, you see it is relatively unusual, and possibly part of fallout whiffs reaching ground level for weeks that summer 2015.  Hard to tell which of these are just radon progeny rainouts and which have an artificial part to ’em…

NotFarFromTihangempsin3_Belgium_3maanden_PreSept29_2015

-> So, if I take that as “partially fallout”, then this would hint towards Europe’s upticks preceding the Greenland spike.

This next one shows 3 months from a monitor in North-Central France, with a 1 week insert.  Its data shows a “glitch dot” (isolated high value) of a whopping +720 µSv/hr on Aug. 25, same time as the Greenland Spike, following shortly after a data gap:

NorthCentralFrance_3Mo_preSept29_2015_withinsert.gif

–> That’s striking, to have “glitch dots” on the same day in very different places (Greenland & France).  So if these are related, the higher-up fallout cloud could have been HUGE that summer 2015.

To be continued…

This blog post is just part of a set of “pieces of the puzzle” in my “data thriller series” about a MAJOR radiological emergency “mystery”.  

    I can only wish that it is somehow helpful

to bring a peaceful end to the misguided nuclear era. 

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| Leave a comment

Anatomy of a Serbian Data Gap + RT: Fukushima Still Fissioning!

Distraction intro:  Flashmob Brussels Central Train Station.  When I’m in Belgium, I pass by here on my way to the center of Brussels. Enjoy:  http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20160605_02324022

Now something else:

We’re getting closer to mainstream acknowledgement that the ongoing nuclear catastrophe at the Fukushima-Daiichi complex isn’t just leaking untold amounts of nuclear waste products into the Pacific, that it is also still leaking into the atmosphere, will increasingly affect the entire planet, and, as I have been suspecting and documenting clues of for years, a true full-on STILL FISSIONING “China Syndrome” with no end in sight is the reality we’re faced with.  The sooner humanity pulls its head out of the sand, the better.  — June 5, 2016

Incredible clues about what some data gaps might hide troubling evidence of:

On April 28, 2016, I wrote: Serbia & Slovakia Turned their Radiation Networks Off…”  Meanwhile there have been lots of upticks, spikes, data gaps, and véry peculiar radioisotope-specific detectionsThe Serbian monitors came back online, and it turns out some of the most striking detections, such as a very significant spike in short-lived fission-radioisotope Tellurium-132 in Germany, Fukushima-fingerprint activation product Cobalt-60 in Norway, as well as Beta spikes in The Netherlands, and Beta monitors being turned off in the US, all occured during this data-gapped period.

To illustrate the alleged, I added a couple annotations of noteworthy things that happened elsewhere during that data gap:

NoviSad_Serbia_annot_3mo_preJune5_2016

If that’s just a coincidence, maybe I’m a penguin.  Click for a closer look.

The rigging of the official radiation monitoring network has become so in-our-face, the European Commission and all relevant nuclear watchdogs, even so-called environmental organizations, must either be asleep at the wheel, or under strict orders (by the IAEA?) to keep silent about this increasingly blatant betrayal of the public trust.

It is of course just a snapshot and not the whole story.  You’re welcome to go read and re-read my disclaimer a few more times, but I just updated my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive again, and in there you can find a lot more documentation of the ongoing cover-up.

References for the added annotations in the 3-month graph above include, but are not limited to:

And, again, múch more in the chronological (archive) list @ https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/radioactivity/fukushima-hanford-blogposts/

+ CHINA SYNDROME ALMOST OFFICIALLY ADMITTED!

In case you missed it, my long-time suspicion that one or more of the molten nuclear cores underneith Fukushima-Daiichi is STILL FISSIONING, has – 5 years into this mess! – reached the quasi-mainstream media outlet RT, as relayed by news aggregator ENEnews:

tv-unsettling-discovery-fukushima-problem-greater-previously-thought-plant-chief-reveals-600-tons-nuclear-fuel-melted-location-mystery-top-official-really-fuel-never-be-able-wind-leaving-molten

Meanwhile, in true Orwellian fashion, as the greatest ecological catastrophe in history unravels further, all major mainstream media outlets are still pretending like nothing is happening…  If they want to recover any semblance of credibility, they’re not going to be able to stretch their marathon of denial much further.  Or so I fathom…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 1 Comment

Shhh… (The Sound of 10,000 Thunderbolts Clapping)

North America, May 31, 2016

www.lightningmaps.org:blitzortung:europe:index.php?lang=en_SunMay29_2016

Interesting lightning show that was over Europe, eh?  (So I heard…)

AJsparks.gif

Seemed to have a rather high concentration of “radon progeny” in it…  [sarc.]  (Lightning map screenshot is from couple days ago (didn’t write down the exact time); Data accessed via http://www.lightningmaps.org/blitzortung/europe/index.php?lang=en )

fukushhhh I’ve touched on how ionizing radiation, such as from nuclear fallout, changes the conductivity of air in the past:

!!!-> @ https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/gaging-recent-radiation-spikes-how-do-the-recent-gamma-upticks-compare-to-those-observed-after-chernobyl/

I do not know if it was a factor.  See also my disclaimer.  … Although: some data shared below surely is “suggestive”.  Just noting that the crazy thunderstorms correlated nicely with higher than usual radiation upticks, data gaps as well as forced-down values in many locations.

Perhaps related to that pondering is also the effect of Krypton-85 and other such nuclear waste gasses on climate.  You can find reference to this even in IAEA documents, like https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:26044629  Excerpt:

“The study shows that krypton-85 from nuclear fission enhances air ionization and, thus, interferes with the atmospheric-electrical system and the water balance of the earth atmosphere.”

Anyhow…  I know… some people have encouraged me to use more catchy headlines.  I could have run this one:

” 10,000 Bq/m^3 Artificial Beta in Thunderstorm Air over Europe!!! “

Haha.  [sarc.] Yeah…  Europe’s media doesnt even give a hoot when Tellurium-132 is detected in its air at 10,000% the levels reached in 2011.

Having made ‘radiation monitor watching’ a hobby, which goes well with really strong coffee and red wine (or both  – hehe), I seem to have tumbled down the corium-dug rabbit hole so deeply that the fissionion glow now illuminates the welcoming sign enough to discern it:

“Welcome to WTF Land!

Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.”

Alright…

Care for a clue whether or not the radiation blips during those thunderstorms in Europe was all “just natural”, or if perhaps it had an artificial contributor to it?  Spoiler Alert: The artifical BETA radiation component (think Iodine-131, Cesium-134/137, Strontium-89/90, Tellurium-132, Krypton-85, etc.) basically “overpowered” the natural ALPHA component to make the latter appear as if suppressed down to zero, or < LLD.

ChartImg-12.axd.gif

Always fun [sarc.] to see how the monitor closest to the headquarters of Belgium’s Meteo services responds to such abnormalities:  Ukkel, near Brussels, Belgium:

Ukkel

Bierset_B

Lommel_B

Thát’s a fascinating thing (in the above Ukkel graph): that values-diving-down phenomenon, which I haven’t understood the physics behind yet:  Apparently in cases of radioactive fallout, the ionizing radiation doesn’t just make radiation measurements go up, it can also make them go ‘erratic’, including make them go far lower than usual values.   I’ve seen it too often.  There’s got to be a reason for this.  And NOT the standard excuse of “monitor malfunction”.

ChartImg-3.axd.gif

Tenerife

dipsDownRatherThanUpticks

By the way, new ground was just broken again @ Lamia…

Lamia_3mo_May31_2016–> this 3 month graph of gamma radiation @ Lamia, Greece, adds two weeks to the longer term record found @ Rambling Along a Decade of Gamma Radiation Data from Lamia, Greece.

But that’s probably just an isolated thing [sarc.], just like at Andujar, Spain…

SouthcentralSPain

SOUDA_Greece    Niewied_DAustria_1Data Gaps are often not visible on month graphs.  The shorter the time graphed, the more detail becomes visible.  hungaryTwo 1-week graphs:

MalySLovak  1WeekAustria

Anyhow…

!!!-> Important 2016 Detections:

The previous post, Another Look @ the 2016 Ru-103 & Te-132 Detections: Some Interesting Findings. + An Afterthought…  makes for a great addition to  some documented “peculiar radioisotope-specific detections”, which I documented in these blog posts (much more in my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive):

See also my most recent data-sprinkled ramble,  Fukshima Full-On China Syndrome, Still Fissioning! Just Another Opinion-Ramble, Sprinkled with Data (+ Possible Correction on Recent German Spikes; & Obama in Hiroshima – 2)

“Oh well…”

“Unless I find something truly striking” (no shortage lately…), I’ll be taking some time off from this endeaver again…

Maybe if I shut up* some media organization will get the time to catch up?

Wake me up if one does…

*haha.  Right…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Side-topic: Did you see NukePro / Stock’s findings on Chitin and fallout:  March 1, 2016, “Mechanism By Which Radiation Destroys “Chitin” Which Destroys The Ocean Food Chains and Bees

I think he might be on to something:

!-> @ http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2016/03/mechanism-by-which-radiation-destroys.html

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

And the beat will undoubtedly go on like this… for awhile. 

‘No blog posts’ will not mean nothing’s happening. 

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Ciao-issimos,

sdcw

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 6 Comments

Another Look @ the 2016 Ru-103 & Te-132 Detections: Some Interesting Findings. + An Afterthought…

Colorado Rocky Mountains… – Saturday May 28, 2016

[With a two US EPA Radnet graphs added on May 29]

Taking yet another look at the “peculiar radioisotope-specific detections” of this past half year, in particular the Ru-103 in Norway (sample period: January 11-18, 2016), and the Te-132 in Germany (sample period: just 2 hours at the onset of April 26, 2016), has revealed some darn interesting details…  Check this out:

I’ll start with the Ruthenium-103 @ Åsterås, just outside of Oslo, Norway.  (First mentioned in (Feb. 14, 2016) https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2016/02/14/ruthenium-103-detected-in-norway-in-mid-jan-2016/

Here shown together with Cesium-137: you can see this first validated detection of Ru-103  since 2011 coincided with an uptick of Cs-137:

Asteras_Ru103Cs137_followedByNoTesting_Jan2016

-> And, as you can see clearly as well, some folks in charge of radiation monitoring have a rather strange logic even in Norway:  After they detect Ru-103 at the highest level since 2011, they just take a break from monitoring for a couple weeks.  

(Maybe they were too busy playing cards in their fallout shelter? hehe [j/k] )

Could, of course, just be automated data processing algorithms that are making sure no “levels of concern” get reached…  (And if that happens, well.. there’s always the folks you share a building with to blame…  Right?)

Now check out the just-Cesium-137 record from this location, with my annotations added:  (March is compressed in time for some reason, but I’ve pasted the record together to show Jan 3 – May 3, 2016).  Note the incredibly well-timed data gaps, 3 times coinciding with an obvious Cesium-137 uptick ánd with extremely unusual radiosiotope-specific detections elsewhere in Europe:

Cs137_asterasNorsk_4months_MarchCompressed

Darn too uncanny to be coincidence, I’d say.

So, I went looking for clues as to what might have been detected right after January 18, during that long data gap.  Something that they don’t want us to see?    Well, check out what I foud on this monitor @ Cheb – Meteostanice Maskovska, Czech Republic:

Showing Cesium-137 and Iodine-131, same period:

C137_I131_Cheb_Meteo Maskovska_CZ_Jan2016

Very interesting, not?   A doubling of both Cs-137 ánd I-131 right then during Åsterås’ data gap!  I mean… Iodine-131?  I know these are mere traces, but… it’s the fact that, as a short-lived artificial fission radioisotope, an uptick in I-131 points at an active fissioning source, and it’s that what makes this significant.  Because the unusual detections span such a wide geographical region, a mere refueling or some other kind of just venting a little can be ruled out.  Ruthenium-103 had not been detected since 2011.  Refuelings and regular venting for various reasons occur all over the place every year.   Like I’ve said for quite awhile now: “Something’s up!”.   Both the Cs-137 ánd the I-131 uptick measured in Czech Republic were not surpassed since:

C137_I131_Cheb_Meteo Maskovska_CZ_afterJan2016

We can see that the radioactive cloud affected this monitor for about 3 weeks.  Then things quited down as far as Cesium-137 goes, but -bizarre and strikingly – there’s two more periods with significant upticks of Iodine-131: immediately following the time of the Helsinki Garage Media story (which I’ve quesioned a-plenty, see, for instance (April 22, 2016), Was Helsinki’s Cs-137 “Localized Garage Waste Leak” A Decoy For Hemisphere-Wide Fallout Upticks? Fukushima? EURDEP/Nullschool DATA + (Some Nuclear Occult Links), and just prior to the Te-132 detection in Northern Germany!

In Germany, where they do actually verify data on a regular basis, you can see (from the Bismuth-214 and other naturally ocurring radioisotopes tested at the German monitors) that they did actually do additional tests after that Te-132 detection, but no other manmade radioisotopes are listed for that site, and the natureal/ enhanced natural measurements were all normal: (I discovered this by odd coincidence the day itself (April 26, 2016): https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2016/04/26/tellurium-132-detected-in-northern-germany/

Te132_Bi214

Within less than 20 km from Seehausen, you can see a slight upticks in gamma radiation as well, possibly due to the further decay of Te-132, which decays by Beta decay to I-132, which in turn decays by gamma decay to stable Xenon-132. Example to that April 26 minor gamma uptick:

within20km_gamma

So, two wind pattern research attempts:

  • What wind pattern hit Southern Norway on Jan. 24, that also hit Western Czech Republic?
  • What wind pattern hit Southern Norway on Apr. 26 that also hit Northern Germany?
    • (And if I were to trace back those wind patterns, where would the windlines intersect, if they did?)

Nullschool…  http://earth.nullschool.net/    (There’s no need for a journalist to quote or refer to me: Just double check what I point at and use your intelligence.  It’s not that hard.  Everything I refer to is 100% public, non-secret, and verifiable by yourself via the links provided @ https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/radioactivity/current-radiation-levels-monitors/all/.

Location coordinates:

  • 52.9 N 11.7 E = Seehausen, D.
  • 50.1 N 12.4 E = Cheb, Cz.
  • 59.9 N 10.6 E = Åsterås, N.

-> you can get the green circle in the right place by changing it in the URL.

So… starting with the correlation between Southern Norway (start of data gap right after Ru-13 detection) and Western Czech Republic (start of Cs-137 & I-131 uptick) on Jan. 24, 2016, 12:00 UTC…  Near the surface, you can tell, there’s not much wind at all: @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/24/1200Z/wind/isobaric/1000hPa/orthographic=-8.75,50.75,1024

Just a bit higher up, already at 850 hPa, you see what I call a pattern “that fits the hypothesis” https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/24/1200Z/wind/isobaric/850hPa/orthographic=-1.71,51.50,1130/loc=12.400,50.100

  • 1) both were in obvious relative slow-down zones in air layers below the jet stream,
  • 2) both were fed with air that came from the jet stream arriving from across the Northern Atlantic…

Annotated screenshot:

2016:01:24:1200Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=-1.71,51.50,1130:loc=12.400,50.100

Are you just as curious as me to see if the jetstream really passed over my #1 suspect?

@ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/24/1200Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-102.91,64.55,512/loc=12.400,50.100

Annotated Screenshot: The red circle (top left) is Fukushima-Daiichi in Northern Japan; the green circles are the 2 monitors in Norway and Czech Republic.  The red arrows from F1 show where the jet stream blew at that moment downwind Fukushima.  The black arrows trace the wind upwind from the 2 monitors in Europe:

2016:01:24:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-102.91,64.55,512:loc=12.400,50.100.gif

Fits nicely…

Added May 29: From this snapshot in time, it seems to me that the most likely place for a data gap or uptick in the US, based on my hypothesis (fallout coming down in jet stream slow-down zones downwind Fukushima on a planetary scale), would have been the monitor @ Salt Lake City, Utah (that lake-dot in the blue slow-down zone on the edge of the northern arrow line in the mid-image dip.  See it?).  Okay… Graphing for Jan. 10 through Feb. 10, 2016…  And there you have it, a spike the day before, preceded by a major data gap:

cewolf;jsessionid=04313BFACAC4CAD74E2A50C86747296D

fits nicely as well…

Closer to my location, the monitor in Colorado Springs, Colorado had fast-wind higher up,  so, also fitting, at that time there isn’t much to see yet.  This one does, however, show a significant data gap starting on Jan. 26:

cewolf;jsessionid=04313BFACAC4CAD74E2A50C86747296D-1

And that actually fits too, if you run Nullschool and click through the 3-hour periods, you can see the slow-down zone move east and south, with the onset of the data gap nicely beginning when the slow zone first reaches this monitor’s area:  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/01/26/0600Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-102.91,64.55,512/loc=-104.490,38.500

Alright, on to Tellurium-132 land….  Northern Germany and Southern Norway, April 26…

Surface level wind… shows there still a decent amount of wind in the afternoon on April 23rd @ Seehausen in Northern Germany, but – how coincidentally [sarc.], there’s a major no-wind zone over the part of Southern Norway at the beginning of the data gap…  @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/1000hPa/orthographic=0.36,51.77,1130/loc=11.700,52.900

By the time the Te-132 is measured in Germany, there’s not all that much difference.  The slow-down is minor:  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/850hPa/orthographic=0.36,51.77,1130/loc=11.700,52.900

Yet at jet stream height, 250 hPa, you can see Seehausen (Te-132 spike) is in the slower bend, and Åsterås/Oslo (data gap) is in a slow zone:  @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-20.35,62.12,1130/loc=11.700,52.900

2016:04:24:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-20.35,62.12,1130:loc=11.700,52.900

Did the jet stream…?  Nah… Really?

https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/24/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-101.42,70.77,512/loc=11.700,52.900

2016:04:24:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-106.93,67.37,512:loc=11.700,52.900.gif

Hm…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Afterthought…

Come on, IAEA, CTBTO, PR specialists, corruptors of science, pro-nuclear cultists, bribed politicians, opportunistic greedy investors, sold-out editors-in-chiefs,

It’s okay.  Really: It’s okay.  You fucked up big time.  Shit happens.  It’s okay. 

That needed “moral revolution” that your frontman Obama referred to in Hiroshima… That’s only needed for you guys who’ve apparently long lost your moral compass with the onset of this misguided nuclear era.  You’ve gotten away with it because you’ve deceived most of us very skillfully.  I mean, it’s impressive the feat of deception you pulled off.  Many of your brightest even believe the lies you’ve fed them.  Maybe you even do.  But you can stop patting yourself on the back now.  The data I compile… don’t get me wrong: I’m just trying to reach you in a language I thought you’d understand.

We, who are energetically plugged in to the web of life of this incredible planet, whom many of us refer to as ‘Mother Earth’, we know the ocean’s in our blood and the mountains ‘re in our bones…  We know something’s off.  We can feel it.  We get clues in dreams and ceremonies.  You can quit the lies now, ’cause it’s game over.  And somewhere deep down in what’s left of your alienated fragmented souls, you know it too.

We will welcome you with open arms at our healing ceremonies, around the campfires deep in the jungles, in the silent meditation retreats high up in the snowy mountains.

Come and find us.

yoda-there-is-no-try

Or wait for us to come.  But meeting we will.

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

| 14 Comments

Finland, U still there? *

You know I love to watch what happens to blog stats…

Have I been “too critical” of that “Helsinki garage leak” the Finnish authorities explained the highest Cesium-137 levels since Chernobyl away with?   Is it inconvenient that I point out that that spike coincided with highly unusual spikes and data gaps all over Europe and North America?   Is there someone who prefers this issue hushed?   Does Finland not like that I also point out that this first half of 2016 has “mysteriously” ALSO seen the highest levels of Tellurium-132 since Chernobyl and the highest levels of Ruthenium-103 since 2011?  (Which, as recent short-lived fission products can’t be explained away that way…)   And what is Cobalt-60 doing in the Scandinavian air again?   Hm?

1weekFinlandGone

Been mightily quiet from Japan lately too.  (Used to always be in the top 5, until something suddenly changed this year.  Odd…   Too much wondering about its suspected secret nuclear weapons program in which Fukushima played a role, or something…?    Hm…

Just wondering…  

Much of the peculiar radioisotope-specific detections I documented in these blog posts (much more in my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive):

See also my most recent data-sprinkled ramble,  Fukshima Full-On China Syndrome, Still Fissioning! Just Another Opinion-Ramble, Sprinkled with Data (+ Possible Correction on Recent German Spikes; & Obama in Hiroshima – 2)

Ah… Maybe it’s nothing… [sarc.]

* The headline’s a play on the subject line in this FOIA-released email from back in the day:

410-unit-4-zirc-fire-catastrophe-march-15th.gif

See more in (Dec. 2, 2014)  PLUME GATE – Internal NRC Communications Released under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) proof deliberate Cover-Up of Severity of global Fukushima Fallout in 2011. Recent SFP4 News May Have Been Part of Cover-Up

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 4 Comments

WAKE UP! “Peer Deep into Pandora’s Box…” (Must-See VIDEO!)

Take some TRUTH from a Japanese artist, will you…:

If the link doesn’t work, find “FRYING DUTCHMAN “humanERROR”” on YouTube (@ https:// [delete this space] youtu.be/Q5p283KZGa8 )

H/T to PlowboyGrownUp  (comment @ ENEnews @ http://enenews.com/doctor-fukushima-radiation-be-eating-holes-peoples-brains-report-military-cover-true-radiation-levels-expert-govt-hiding-disastrous-consequences-nuclear-crisis-public-suffering-radioactive-re/comment-page-3#comment-773235), and acknowledged by fellow Fuku-researcher Dr. Goodheart. -> Check out his various quite interesting documentations @ http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/search?q=Fukushima&view=classic

People of the Earth, RISE UP !!! 

We MUST stop these self-deluded psychopaths!!!

Journalists, do not underestimate your responsibility!  DO your home work and make the most hard-hitting investigative journalistic piece you’ve ever written!  Take your time, but DO IT!!!  

If not… you might go down in history like the rest of us…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

co-60, dat gaps, spikes, fukushima, eurdep, radnet

 

| 1 Comment

Fukshima Full-On China Syndrome, Still Fissioning! Just Another Opinion-Ramble, Sprinkled with Data (+ Possible Correction on Recent German Spikes; & Obama in Hiroshima – 2)

Cs137Blip_Spitzbergen

Cesium-137 blowing around in the arctic air…  May 22, 2016

DISCLAIMER – Colorado Rocky Mountains (USA) – May 26-28, 2016

I know it’s overkill by now… I’ve long established the obviousness that the official radiation networks are rigged to hide much of the data when it matters most.  But at the same time, they have let an amazing amount of data slip through the nets, though.  The past couple years of on-and-off scrutinizing of some of this has failed to undo my “mere suspicion” that radioactive clouds continue to come from “Northern Japan somewhere” (or perhaps “something in the Pacific east of there”), with Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Catastrophe site remaining my #1 suspect.   But “What do I know?”…

The detections of the past half year have prompted me to have a new look at the detections in 2014 and 2015, now that I know a little bit more.  There’s no way you end up with a Ruthenium-103 detection in Norway (the first such detection in Europe since the ongoing Fukushima Catastrophe began), followed some 5 weeks later by the highest Cesium-137 detections since 2011 at several locations in Finland, coinciding with widespread data gaps, while many countries just right then in March skipped one or more weeks of radioisotope-specific monitoring (How can they be so blatant and get away with it?); and then in February more spikes and data gaps, with monitors being shut down as far as La Reunion and New Caledonia in the Southern Hemisphere; then followed in April by a spike in Tellurium-132 in Germany, highest measurment in European outdoor air since 1986, accompanied in the same past month by record gamma spikes in Russia, Turkey, Germany, Lithuania, Latvia, a curious spike of artificial alpha radiation in The Netherlands, and so on… -to me- that seems like there’s way too many abnormalities for none of them to be connected to a shared radiation-spewing source. 

Much of this I documented in blog posts, all listed in my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive, of which these radioisotope-specific detections stand out:

That’s quite an interesting bunch of (mostly validated) detections.  The alpha spike as well as the detections of Co-60, Te-132 and Ru-103 have not been explained by any expert, organization or government.  The unbelievably significant data was just posted on the data exchange network and otherwise entirely ignored.  No media attention.  No politician demanding an investigation.  Nothing….  Apparently. 

Lots of noise about the Cesium-137 uptick in Helsinki, subsequently followed by its rather unsatisfactory explanation, but all the far more troubling detections have been hushed.  Anything in the German media yet about that largest-since-Chernobyl detection of short-lived-fission-product Te-132?  (Drop me a link if that happens, ’cause I haven’t come across anything.)

Those detections point at something FISSIONING, not just a waste leak (which is bad enough, but even the leaking Hanford tank farm would not release artificial recent-fission radionuclides in relatively extreme quantities half-way around the world).  Part of what makes them significant is that they occured in the past half year, which is marked by a markedly more ‘disturbed’ radiological landscape:

  • Lots of “glitch dot” spikes,
  • significant upticks, many record spikes
  • tons of short and long data gaps
  • Beta monitors being taken offline
  • Abnormalities like forced-zero data, negative dose rates, baseline shifts and other evidence suggesting changes in data processing to hide what is really happening.

Scrutinize the long-term record of the few monitors that seem to be calibrated to at least not entirely hide abnormalities (every countries seems to have a few monitors that show more than most other monitors).  Take Salaspils, Latvia, for instance.  I don’t think these correlations are coincidence.  The correlation is far too strong:

Salaspils_Latvia_3mo_May26_2016At the time of the May 9th “obvious data processing shift”, besides strong gamma emitter Cobalt–60 detections in Norway, and the major disturbances seen in the graph above for a monitor in Latvia, there was also a spike detected in artificial Beta radiation in The Netherlands.

Also, the Ruthenium-103 Detected in Norway in mid-Jan. 2016 was part of a radioactive cloud that also very clearly contained Cesium-137, as seen in Finish data from Kotka (Southern Finnish coast, east of Helsinki’s notorious garage [sarc.]):

Kotka_Suomi_Cs137_3mo_3Kotka_Suomi_Cs137_3mo_1Kotka_Suomi_Cs137_3mo_2

curiously, again, there was Thorium-232 in the mix as well…  and a significant Be-7 uptick, odd in the middle of winter, not?

Jan24_2016Uptick_containedu103inNorway

Before I continue , some similarities in the recent German spikes has me wondering if they were in fact just calibrations after all.  Most calibrations go to 560 nSv/hr, as well-illustrated in the Lithuanian calibration cluster in February 2016.

Of the three recent spikes in Germany I mentioned, two show a strikingly similar pattern:

Both Saarburg and the Trier-Euren spikes occured in 3 hours, with each of the 3 hours being so similar, that I think these two might actually have been calibrations after all:

saarburg_germany_spike_may24_2016 may20_2016_1week_validated_eurdep_spike-onmay18_2016_6usv-hr_trier_euren_d

-> I don’t know, but just wanted to share that bit of doubt cast on those two spikes.

I wish they had a third category besides “Validated” or “Non-Validated”:  “Calibration”.  I mean… a calibration is at least a moment they KNOW the cause of a spike for.

By not pointing it out, and then framing their disclaimer as “Most of these measurements are unvalidated, which means that defects in the instruments, electronics or software can result in erroneous values. Who visits this site regularly will notice that on an almost daily basis, one or more of the 4200 monitoring stations are out of order and show abnormally high readings. As a consequence isolated violet or red dots on the map are NOT an indication of increased radiological values. Even several violet or red dots near to the same geographical location or near a Nuclear Power Plant is not a certainty of an ongoing accident because they are most likely caused by calibration tests on the related monitoring stations.”, the abnormalities get swept under the rug.  I’ve documented some examples that very clearly were not calibrations.

Anyhow, to continue…     This is just my non-credentialed amateur opinion:   I think that the Fukushima-Daiichi Catatstrophe has shifted gears in spring 2015, as evidenced in bursts of Fukushima-fingerprint radioisotopes in Europe, most notably Co-60 in mixtures and ratios that point at no other source.   I also wonder if progress with the under-construction ice wall on site is bringing to light how far-advanced this  STILL-ACTIVE meltdown truly is.   Not only did the meltdowns lead to a full-on “China Syndrome”, the concentration of Plutonium and various activation products in the fuel geometries is such that fissioning flares up might never end.   Just as grim:  It canot even be ruled out that the corium will grow over time.  Future underground prompt criticalities cannot be ruled out either.

It is interesting that TEPCO just admitted that they’re “still hunting for 600 tonnes of melted radioactive fuel” at Fukushima.   600 tons… where could it be?  Guess that “non-proliferation” isn’t going so well…

I haven’t made the “still fissioning” claim lightly, though.  The more I research the available data, the more I find bits and pieces that add further weight to that hypothesis.

For example… artificial beta radiation is one of the better indicators of nuclear fallout. (Hence the pro-nuclear and highly deceptive US government turning off its fleet of Beta monitors…).   There’s something interesting to be seen on the JRC Station 5 monitor in the Italian Alps:

  • T-BETA-ART (Total Artificial Beta, Outdoor air, Particulates filter only)  @ JRC STation 5, Northern Italy, period Nov. 20, 2014 through May 20, 2016:

JRC5_6 JRC5_5 JRC5_4 JRC5_3 JRC5_2 JRC5_1-> Most notable is the emergence of an aparent fallout cloud in early May 2015, intensifying in mid-June, with more isolated massive burst (of a magnitude higher; note the 2 months with a different y-axis) in July 2015.   (Also visible is the relative uptick that began in October 2015, intensified in November 2015, with data gaps here and there since.  This coincides with the widespread disturbanced I’ve been pointing at.)  This is just “artifical Beta emitters”.  We don’t know which ones exactly.

But we do, as mentioned in  !-> (June 6, 2015) Pink Unicorns beach themselves on the shores of Lake Dystopia, have some data from other places that give us clues…

1) For instance: the data flow from Iodine-131 & Cesium-137 detector in Nicosia, Cyprus was turned off right then in May 2015:

cyprus_i131_cs137_eurdep_marchaprilmay_20152) Even more striking:  May 13-15, 2015 (perfectly coinciding with the first spikes in the JRC 5 Beta-Art record) @ Kotka, Finland a mysterious mixture of radioisotopes was detected, which included Cs-134, Nb-95, Mn-54 and Co-60.

ce144_co60_finland_may2015Iodine-131 was picked up in Switzerland:

i131_co60_cernswitserland_may20151The Netherlands showed artificial Beta spikes, amidst likely “enhanced natural” Alpha upticks:

wijnandsradenl_tbetaart_talphanat_may15_2015__1monthprior_croppedJust like this year, Ru-103 was also in that cloud then:

ru103_te132_northfinland_may2015

So couple reflections,

 

  • Though I haven’t seen I-131 detections published lately, the spike in Te-132 is at least as significant.  The FACT that the radioactive cloud in spring 2015 also contained I-131 DOES leave no doubt that “whatever is spewing radioisotopes” is actively fissioning.  Thus,  actual nuclear chain reactions of Uranium that give rise to Cs-134, I-131, Ru-103, etc.  are still ocurring, as evidenced by detections in 2015 and 2016.
  • The presence of Ru-103 (in both springs 2015 % 2016) further underscores what the significance of the presence of Cs-134 and Nb-95 already did:  These radioisotopes have neither medical nor resource exploration use.   They are tell-tale fingerprints of a radioactive cloud that escaped from a badly leaking active reactor core somewhere.
  • In addition, for Co-60 not to just get flushed out of the rubble into the water, but to be hot and volatile enough to go airborne for very long distances suggests that inside this molten corium lava-like blob, massive neutron-bombardment of steel may actually still be happening, at least every time this mini-sun has a fission flare-up…   in the land of the Sinking Sun on the edge of the mighty Pacific Ocean…
    • !–> As I pointed out in my ground-breaking investigative article, (Jan 26, 2016),  Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?, the detections of Cobalt-60 in these whiffs does very strongly suggest this IS all coming from the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Catatstrophe site, because no other nuclear accident in history is known to have such unusual Co-60 concentrations in its fallout and contaminated cooling water.
  • That evidence of highly unusual neutron bombardment is a major part of my wondering about artificial creation of Polonium-210.  It would be darn twisted if they were aware of this (They may not be; I do occasionally think outside the box), but one popular way for experts to belittle the significance of man-made fallout is to refer to “naturally occurring Po-210, a hot alpha emitter”…  See more about this specific pondering HERE.

 

As far as I’m concerned, Cobalt-60 IS thé smoking gun, and that is exactly why I think it was omitted from (not even mentioned! in)  the well-received-by-the-establishment academic study, “Fukushima’s Forgotten Radionuclides: A Review of the Understudied Radioactive Emissions”, by Georg Steinhauser, to which Dr. Ken Buesseler of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute first referred me too.    (Given this blatant omission, Ken’s over-focus on just radioCesium-134/137 and I-131, as well as glaring lack of investigating  “enhanced natural” concentrations and ratios, such as of alpha-emitter Po-210, and so forth (all of which could shed much more light on ‘what really happenened at Fukushima’ and what is happening with the Pacific Ocean ecosystem as a result of Fukushima), I suspect these two fellows are knowingly licking the boots of the IAEA…   But that aside.)

Más data…

The below graphed gamma radiation record for Kicevo, Macedonia (period: Feb. 18, 2014 – May 18, 2016) :

Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.9 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.8 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.7 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.6 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.5 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.4-> Notice: the most extreme spikes in May-June 2015 are seen here as well.

Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.3 Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.2

-> A good week after the Ru-103 detection in Norway, we see some gamma spikes here too after January 24, 2016.  Then, right after the largest spike since August 2015, early February 2016, there’s data gaps (seen all over the world).

Kicevo_Macedonia_5.4ceiling_3mo_a.1-> And here too, a little blip right around the time the spike in Cesium-137 was detected in Helsinki the first week of March 2016…

I don’t know what else I can do.  ;-/  I thought this would have set off alarm bells all over, but it’s been pretty darn quite.

Sigh…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

To come back to the thoughts at the end of yesterday’s Entire Western North America now “Fallout Blind”

So Obama’s in Hiroshima… “Cute show…”  Baffling audacity of deception…

NoFadingAllowed

Obama’s making sure that if the memory “needs to be refreshed”, they’ll be ready to do so.

I find it unbelievable that media outlets aren’t pointing out the utter hypocrisy more (so blatant that it’s outright creepy): there’s a rather big gap between his speeches, and his actual decisions.  He’s the most pro-nuclear president in over 30 years, who’s in fact making sure nuclear weapons will not be eliminated from the US arsenal any time soon.

!-> https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/ArmsControlNow/2016-02-09/Last-Obama-Budget-Goes-for-Broke-on-Nuclear-Weapons

www.armscontrol.org:blog:ArmsControlNow:2016-02-09:Last-Obama-Budget-Goes-for-Broke-on-Nuclear-Weapons

continue reading at source listed above.

For the first time since the 1970s, he’s approved the construction of new nuclear power plants.  The Obama administration worked closely with Japan to cover up the seriousness of the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear catastrophe.  Japan’s State Secrets Act was reportedly “recommended” by the US.

And as far a ridding the world of nuclear weapons…

New York Times, May 26, 2016:   Reduction of Nuclear Arsenal Has Slowed Under Obama, Report Finds

The numbers, shown below, @ open.defense.gov/Portals/23/Documents/frddwg/2015_Tables_UNCLASS.pdf, show that if President Obama would have continued in the tracks of President George W. Bush, the US would be free of nuclear weapons by now, which would have given the US the moral high ground to demand this of other nations.

Instead, the current Commander in Chief has made sure that didn’t happen.   So all his talk in Hiroshima, of the need for a “moral revolution”, was just that:  Talk.  Unfortunately his policies tell a very different story than his eloquent speeches.

open.defense.gov:Portals:23:Documents:frddwg:2015_Tables_UNCLASS.pdfEXCERPT See als:

Sigh…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 8 Comments

Entire Western North America now “Fallout Blind”

May 26, 2016

Like a countdown to full-on nuclear war-like fallout conditions, the Western United States’ BETA radiation monitors have been steadily dropping away.

Just a week ago, in (May 20, 2016) “US Radiation Monitoring Network Becoming “FALLOUT BLIND”“, I reported that the number of Beta Radiation monitors has been steadily dropping since the beginning of the Fukushima Nuclear Catastrophe in spring 2011.  Just this last half year, it was reduced from 6 to 3 left in the western US (with west I mean “west of, but still including, Denver”), and only 14 left in the US.

The trend continues:

US EPA’s Radnet Beta data that was still visible for Grand Junction, Colorado… is apparently no longer viewable…

  • We’ve lost Grand Junction, CO:

DataDisappearing

  • Just a day after my report on the troubling trend, at the end of May 20th, we also lost the last one in the entire Pacific Northwest, Olympia, WA:

Olympia_WA_BetasLastBreath

  • Thus… the very last Beta monitoring station left in the entire western US, Albuquerque, New Mexico... is the last one left in all of Western North America.   It’s become entirely useless, though, spitting out almost entirely redacted data…:

Albequerque_NM_LastBetaStanding

To echo the gist once again:  The official radiation monitoring systems, all over the world, are RIGGED to hide the data when it matters most!

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

I know…   As I’ve touched upon so many times, such as in mid-February in “Former KGB Agent Explains Why My Blog Is Pointless. (1985 Video)“, understanding something is one thing, responding wisely is a whole other matter.  The problem takes on a whole other magnitude when most people are, so it seems, actually not really that interested in studying what’s going on in their world, to come to understanding…

And thus Earth was lost…

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Oh… and “OT” – but I don’t think Obama’s visit to Hiroshima is what it’s made out to be.

For starters, it’s beyond disgusting he would go there, like his buddy John Kerry, and not apologize for the war crime those nuclear attacks were. It had NOTHING to do with “ending World War 2”, and EVERYTHING to do with intentionally starting the Cold War, as part of a long-term plan towards establishing a de facto secular-Luciferian “New World Order”.   Honestly, I think he’s there not to pay tribute to the dead, but to the sinister heartlessness that was unleashed there.  Why?  Because they’re counting down… one monitor at a time… to fulfill their psychopathic plans…   and do it again.

Hiroshima, pretty much a refugee city full of families, where the majority of flash-incinerated-to-death were under 10 years old, is not a place you can visit and feel like, “Yup, we would do this again if we feel like it” unless you are a member of a most evil cabal that does not in any way have the best intentions at heart for humanity and kin.

I’ll leave it at that.

Related to the latter…: 

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 9 Comments

+24 µSv/hr Spike in Hungary, Data Gaps Amidst Spikes & Peculiar Detections

Just data:

May25_2016_upticks

The +24 µSv/hr “glitch dot” @ Taborfalva, Hungary, was ‘not validated’, but in my non-expert opinion that doesn’t mean much when they don’t bother to validate anything at this monitoring site:

Taborfalva_Hungary_24uSvHrGlitchDotSpike_May25_2016

In a 3 month context, with the disturbances correlating with “peculiar detections” elsewhere in Europe:

Taborfalva_Hungary_3months

That and a very nearby other monitor show, as is otften the case, very different details, though they share the “data gaps amidst spikes” theme, with a data gap possibly hiding similarly or even more extreme spikes:

2days2nearbyMonitors

1 month data:

Pusztavacs_Hungary_1mo_May25_2016

Bujak_Hungary_1mo_May25_2016

Zalaegerszeg_Hungary_1mo_May25_2016

1 month data from 2 monitors at the same location:

2monitors_at_SzolnokRepuloter_Hungary_1mo_May25_2016monitors_at_

Some examples from outside of Hungary:

BilyKoiz_CzechRepublic_1mo_May25_2016

Praha_CzechRepublic_1mo_May25_2016Ottenschlag_Austria_1mo_May25_2016BranauInn_Austria_1mo_May25_2016Sostanj_Slovania

Related blogposts can be found in my (just updated) Nuclear Blog Post Archive (or by clicking ‘Home’ and scrolling down in time).  A small selection:

–> See MANY MORE in my Nuclear Blog Post Archive

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 8 Comments

+ 6 µSv/hr radiation spike @ Saarburg, Germany (May 24, 2016; near Luxembourg)

Online Radiation Monitors, May 24, 2016

This is the 3rd such spike in 10 days in the same region.

Data via EURDEP, validated:

Saarburg_Germany_spike_May24_2016

3 month context:

Saarburg_Germany_3mo_preMay24_2016

locationSaarburg.gif

See previous few months of blog posts (or click ‘Home‘ and scroll down) for broader context of increasing data gaps + spikes, amidst very “peculiar” detetions, including (all in 2016!) a spike in artificial alpha radiation, detections short-lived fission radioisotopes Ruthenium-103 and Tellurium-132, as well as upticks in Cesium-137 and detections of Cobalt-60.  On the latter, make sure to study (Jan. 26, 2016):  Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?

We’re in the midst of a nuclear crisis the world has never seen before.  Fukushima suffered full-on ‘China Syndrome’ meltdowns, of which one or more coriums is still actively fissioning.   The cover-up must end.  (This is my understanding and opinion. DISCLAIMER)

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 15 Comments

Denver & Colorado Springs 2 weeks of Radnet data

Just a blip of 2 weeks of US EPA Radnet data, on which you can see a data gap around another monitor not so far away showed a spike:  Denver & Colorado Springs, Colorado.

Anyone who pays close attention to the official (albeit often “not validated”) radiation data has seen evidence of apparent ‘algorithms’ operating within the data processing software that appears to have only one purpose: to hide as much of the evidence of highly unusual radioactive fallout events.

Denver_ColoradoSprings_CO_2weeks_preMay24_2016_dataGapAtSpikeTime

Would you like “a wind map clue” with that?  https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/16/1500Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-143.44,34.72,512/loc=-105.210,39.245

The systems are rigged to deceive the public that all is well, while in all actuality not all is well whatsoever:   We’re in the midst of a nuclear crisis the world has never seen before.  Fukushima suffered full-on ‘China Syndrome’ meltdowns, of which one or more coriums is still actively fissioning.   The cover-up must end.

Nuclear fission is neither safe nor clean.  It’s extreme disrespect towards humanity in general, particularly downwinders (which is increasingly everyone), the communities ravaged by the Uranium mining, as well as various imperilled species and future generations burdened by the spreading fallout, leaks, and growing piles of unsafely stored nuclear waste.

I’m hopeful.  But something’s got to change.

— — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 7 Comments

Cobalt-60 Detected in Southern Norway (2 Locations, May 2016!)

Disclaimer – May 23, 2016

I have been keeping an eye on Cobalt-60, thinking that if routine testing would continue, then, given all the upticks and data gaps lately, it would only be a matter of time before this Fukushima-fingerprint radioisotope would get picked up again.

!-> The significance of this neutron activation product, Cobalt-60, is explained in more detail in my groundbreaking research, see: (Jan. 26, 2016):  Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?

Normally a monitor turns yellow on the EURDEP Advanced Map (rather than its light blue “below detection limit” dot).  Sneaky little devils!:  The whole map only showed light blue dots:

Co60map_nocolorchange_may23_2016_1ma

Because I think we’re dealing with full-on ‘China Syndrome’ and still-fissioniong molten coriums underneath Fukushima-Daiichi’s nuclear catastrophe site, this has been and remains my #1 suspect for causing the major radiation upticks and strange detections this past half year.  Thus, I found it hard to believe that no one has picked up Co-60 yet.  So, eventhough the map told me that there was nothing to be seen, I decided to check all the monitors individually anyway.  Lo and behold, TWO actually measured, and validated, Cobalt-60 this past month!

  • May 2 – 4, 2016, VALIDATED Measurement at monitor# NO3001, just outside of Oslo, @ Åsterås, Norway, where Ruthenium-103 was also picked up in January (2016).
  • May 6 – 13, 2016, VALIDATED Measurement at monitor # NO3002, at Sola, southwesten coast of Norway.

These detections coincided with a significant uptick of Cesium-137:

Co60_Cs137_Asteras_Norway_May3_2016_1moMay23 Sola_Norway_Co60_Cs137_data1mo_May23_2016

Noteworthy also:

  • In both cases the concentration of Co-60 is only about half  that of Cs-137, meaning it is in the same order of magnitude.   This was also the case right after the Fukushima disaster began, for both on-site groundwater samples and far-away detections, such as in Finland.
  • On May 9th, there was a significant Artificial BETA Radiation Spike in The Netherlands.  This is significant because most nuclear fallout emits Beta radiation rather than gamma.
  • During the same period several Beta monitors in the US were shut down.

The radioactive trace whiff that blew over Finland just last year, in May-June 2015 also had this Co-60 to radioCesium ratio (same order of magnitude), ánd that one back then also contained Iodine-131, Cesium-134, and Niobium-95, among other validated detections.

Everything points at Fukushima having fission-flare-ups significant enough for its fingerprint radioisotopes being picked up all the way around the planet.

In a nutshell:  This is what I think is going on:  One or more of the molten coriums at the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Catastrophe site are in full-on ‘China Syndrome’, and it is STILL ACTIVE.  This molten fissioning lava-like blob could be anywhere from a few hundred meters deep to several miles.  Deep underground hydro-volcanic explosions (when the lava-like corium meets a water layer) are leading to burst of releases.

Sweet dreams, everyone…

im-telling-you-the-man-and-the-dog-are-working-together

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…
| 16 Comments

Chronological Overview of Nuclear-Related Blog Posts

Finally got to updating my ‘Nuclear Blog Posts Archive‘.  Check it out.

That’s all.


PS:    I have a pretty good idea of what the monitors would show  in Belgium if the NPPs in Doel or Tihange were to have a major accident…

Hoevenen_nearAntwerp_Belgium_1maand21mei2016Ukkel_nearBrussel_Belgium_1maand21mei2016

No, I’m not claiming either of ’em did.  If that were the case, there would be nothing to see on the monitors!.

:-D”   

That’s (apparently) part of the standard procedures of the perception management that goes with the deceptive nuclear industry.  A pro-nuclear politician cannot be trusted.  Period. The agencies in charge of oversight are entirely in cohoots with the industry.  Period.

Oostende_B_3ma_22mei2016

DeBlankaart_B-3ma_22mei2016

These data gaps more likely have ‘something‘ in common with the data gaps and spikes found all over the planet in recent months…  Perhaps even something “impossible“…  It has the potential to make one feel “a little blue”...

Maaaybe… there’s even some kind of connection between the explosion sounds heard in Iwaki, Fukushima prefecture in early February, and France turning off both its public radiation monitors in the Southern Hemisphere… and the crazy radiosiotope detections in Europe the past few months…?   Not to mention that mystery T-BETA-ART spike in The Netherlands… .

See my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive for a variety of documentation that SOMETHING’S UP.  Take it from one of the few independent bloggers and news aggregators covering this issue:  Whatever is going down is apparently big enough for a complete gag order for ALL mainstream (and so-called alternative) news outlets.

Wrap your mind around that fact, if you dare!

tumble… tumble…

…This corium-dug rabbit hole might take you deeper than you expected…

Peace –

chickens

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

 

| 3 Comments

Record Radiation Strikes Eastern Turkey (near Iran)

Location of spike, with 24 hour graph insert, showing a 12+ hour disturbance with a peak value (so far) of + 2 µSv/hr:

Ozalp_inVan_inTurkey.gif

Just the 24 graph (in nanoSievert, divide by 1,000 for microSievert – see Radiation Units & Conversions for additional help; Data can be verified via EURDEP’s public “Advanced Map”, one of the options @ Online Radiation Monitors.  Note the European Commission’s all-mighty disclaimer (aka “Not all shown measurements are validated.  Anything suggesting abnormal radiation levels is just your imagination.”)  Note my DISCLAIMER, too:  I’m just a laptop-wielding mountain dweller, entirely unaffiliated with the freak shows that pass for ‘governments’, any and all institutions, experts, or goat fuckers, for that matter.  Everything I post may be taken for entertainment.   But you are, of course, at liberty, to take it some other way as well…

VanOzalp_Turkey_24hrs_May21_2016.gif

Here’s the 1 month:

Ozalp_Kurdistan_1month.gif

  • And here’s the past 6 months with the y-axis at 0.3 µSv/hr to show the natural variability range better:

Ozalp_Turkey_3mo_2.gif

Ozalp_Kurdistan_3months.3

Just like the spikes and data gaps at various monitors in Europe and the US, this is obviously, again, extremely unusual.   Monitors high up in the mountains often pick up on radioactive clouds driving over better.

A look at wind patterns shows it lies on the jet stream path, with a slow-down in the 500 hPa height, and very little wind below that layer: See it move at nullschool, with Özalp, Van, Turkey (38.7 N, 44.0 E) marked: @ https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/21/1200Z/wind/isobaric/500hPa/orthographic=19.52,48.36,1024/loc=44.000,38.700

You can follow lines, right?    Here’s a larger view: https://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/21/1200Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-57.38,92.78,272/loc=44.000,38.700

It’s what I call, “uncanny”…

2016:05:21:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-57.38,92.78,272:loc=44.000,38.700

Care to have a peek at what this monitor showed in spring 2011?  Tada:

Ozalp_Van_Turkey_311period_4mo

 

 

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —    — — —  — — —    — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to probably obtain no such permission…

 

 

| 14 Comments