Another Whiff of Radiation Data… (WHERE (?!) did the MAJOR FALLOUT of late come from?)

Crestone, Colorado,  USA – May 6, 2016

(The “normal” background radiation I have observed here @ 8,000 to 8,200 feet elevation, with my Medcom Inspector Alert geiger counter, is around 65 CPM, or roughly “below 70 CPM”.  I left it outside last night, 3 feet above the ground, Beta window exposed, horizontal, and found:

the 12-hour average was 87 CPM, or about 24% above its normal fluctuation range.) 

Winding down this latest spate of data researching…  w/ some more data. ;-)

Quote and link.  Please DO NOT repost in full.  DISCLAIMER

!-> For context, see the previous blog post, which links to my documentation of the highly unusual detections of Ru-103, Te-132 and the Cs-137 upticks, data gaps, as well as various related additional links (!-> @ (May 4, 2016) HIGHEST SINCE 2011: Cesium-137, Ruthenium-103, Tellurium-132 (!-> Period: Jan.-Apr., 2016) )

So, just a tiny bit more data before I “let it go” again…

  • Here’s 3 months from Poitiers, France:

Poitiers_86_AGG_CP_LaFrance_3mo_preMay5_2016How many examples would it take before it’s *obvious* that “something” is going on and ‘news media’ actually begin to report?  (Oh yes… I can still dream…)

  •  St.-Ciers-du-Taillon, France:

STCiersDuTaillon_17_LaFrance_3mo_preMay6_2016

  • Remember Exeter, UK?  After it was setting records in February, the monitor was adjusted. A notable data gap shortly after the Te-132 spike was detected in Germany, though:Exeter_UK_3mo_preMay6_2016
  • The highest spike in over two years at Coimbra, Portugal, with a notable overall increase since just after April 24…:

Coimbra_Portugal_3mo_preMay6_2016And so forth.  You probably got the idea by now…

  • I tried to find some more Asian data, to see if there’s chances that the radioactivity is not coming from Japan but from China or Korea, but have had very little luck due to lack of monitors.    This monitor (via http://www.uradmonitor.com/ ) @ Chupei, Taiwan shows a rather uneventful past month:  a slight disturbance at the end of April 19, 2016, but that’s all.  Not clear to me (yet) how to view previous months on this allegedly independent network.

uradmonitor_Taiwan_1month

radioactiveathome.org:map._SouthKorea_2_1week_preMay5_2016tiff radioactiveathome.org:map._SOuthKorea_1_1week_preMay5_2016tiff

…but Hong Kong has elevated measurements (a steady 2 µSv/hr ?  That would be news-worthy all by itself as well…), and a disturbance, with the red dot indicating values of over 0.8 µSv have been reached. Odd…

radioactiveathome.org:map._HongKong_1week_preMay5_2016tiff

Hong Kong is very close to the Daya NPP, which I’ve written about once in relation to major releases that must have happened ‘somewhere‘ in 2010.   (See (Nov. 7, 2015) “The Chinese Meltdown at Daya Bay NPP in May 2010“)

Like then, the Hong Kong Observatory doesn’t show anything unusual ( @ http://www.hko.gov.hk/radiation/ermp/rmn/applet/map/rmn_hourly_e.htm ):

HK_May6_Quiet…

–> Well…  surface wind @ Hong Kong is coming from the sea to the south, but jet stream wind begins to slow down there and is coming the west… from India and beyond…  http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/04/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-229.14,21.18,512

Quite possible this is just the same mess spreading further, making it increasingly difficult where it began… :-/

2016:05:04:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-229.14,21.18,512

Well, further downwind is a Radnet monitor @ Honolulu, Hawaii, same week… And it’s been véry quiet as well:

HonoluluHI_1week_May6_2016Same the week before.  To me, that suggests that the likelyhood that the radiation spewing source is in India, Vietnam or Southern China is pretty slim.  Northern Japan remains more likely… ;-/

(Not sure what to make of that red dot @ Hong Kong on that “your radiation at home” website, though.)  Would need to be able to view that monitor’s data in a much longer context.    My impression is that the radioactive cloud is predominantly blowing further north.

That’s was what I arrived at when tracing the beginning of data gaps in last week’s (April 29, 2016) “Planetary Emergency RED ALERT: Wind Patterns Trace Beginning of Major Radiological Disturbances in Europe to FUKUSHIMA: Plausibility of Still-Fissioning “Underground Breeder Reactor Gone Wild”

And as is often the case after I make such a claim, then I try to see if I can prove myself wrong.   (It’s a bit of an intellectual sport to try not to be attached to a conclusion.)   Unfortunately, while the picture has gotten quite complex in the past week, it remains my impression

Japan

The sites I liked where data was viewable for longer periods have either vanished, or I keep running into “unable to load” stuff

HelloJapan...Thus checking via http://new.atmc.jp/,

  • First, in Fukushima’s coastal area near the F1 Catastrophe site the contamination is so high that likely small fluctuations get lost in the the background.  At first glance, it looks radiologically almost as quiet as Siberia there:

FukushmaNPParea-> But as you can see, there are no monitors within the first kilometer near the plant, so (speculated)  fast-rising hot bursts of radioactive gasses wouldn’t per se affect monitors in the area.  Radioactive clouds like that would rise quickly, and be transported fast across the Pacific by the jet stream, only to show suggestive evidence on monitors in the US and Europe…

A look all over Japan leaves me thinking, that the source of the major disturbances and peculiar radioisotope-specific detection is “probably not west of Japan”…

Okinawa-> from all the way south (above) to the north (below), a major storm system moved over (coincided with those strong quakes near the Sendai NPP on Kyushu),  all of which resulted in more-the-less typical precipitation-caused radiation upticks (likely mostly natural radon progeny, as the spikes aren’t that unusual).   On April 18, the largest spike in Hokkaido for the past month did not even reach 0.1 µSv/hr.

Hokkaido

If the fallout clouds were coming from China, it would be visible, and much more pronounced on some monitors in Japan, I would think.   I’m not seeing that.

By the way, if you’re freaked out by the high radiation levels coming of kelp seaweeds, I like using my Geiger Counter to select those richest in Potassium.   Anything from Hokkaido that I didn’t send to a lab for analysis, I ATE.  Good nutritious delicious stuff!  ;-)   My grave concern about what is really happening at Fukushima has not stopped me from enjoying life thus far.  This just FYI.

  • Russia

The Russian monitoring “network” (Like that of the US, it isn’t much, Scandinavia has more monitors than the entire Russian Federation…), which includes some options not shared with EURDEP, @ http://www.russianatom.ru/ shows that it’s been very quiet in Siberia.  (Although they only show averages, which can easily hide disturbances and small data gaps):

SIberianQuiet

Near the Saint Petersburg NPP, you can see the minor uptick around April 26 (the day of the Te-132 detection in Germany), no different from what was seen all over Europe:

NearStPetersburgNPP

Some monitors, such as this one closer to Central Asia shows “forced zero” (a variation of the notorious data gap) in the past 24 hours.  We are now several weeks, to several months (depending on where you pick a possible beginning date), making this probably a later-stage phenomenon:

southcentral

  • Cobalt-60?

For the following search, see my in-depth investigative blogpost into “a little detail” that might have far more significance than officially admitted, @ !-> (Jan. 26, 2016Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?

  • A quick search for when the last time was that Cobalt-60 got detected on EURDEP (via http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EurdepMap/Disclaimer.aspx ) revealed that that was 9 months agao, at the beginning of September 2015, @ Kotka in Southern Finland(The reason Finland comes up so much is because they actually do some environmental monitoring, and share their findings with the public, which isn’t even the case for most nuclear countries.  It does not mean the source is in Finland):Last Co60detection_Kotka_Finland_Sept2015–> Also an unsolved mystery as to where that came from.  And jet stream patterns on Sept 5, 2015, leave possibilities wide open for that one as well…
  • a +4 µSv/hr mini spike in Ottenschlag, Austria this week. I guess someone was lucky that the hot particle hit the monitor, and thus probably didn’t get inhaled by someone…Ottenschlag_Ostenrijk_1week
    • Putting two peculiarities next to eachother.  See a few more examples in  (May 3, 2016), Data uit België & NederlandTerneuzenNL_Hoevenen_B_preMay5_2016Sorry for the repetition…
  • I guess you could call me naive or still not quite cynical enough, but do actually still find it odd that the largest validated measurement of Tellurium-132 since Chernobyl, precisely 30 years later, would not even be mentioned in ANY mainstream media outlet… not even in Germany where it was detected.  There are 3 times 132Te has been detected: right after Chernobyl, right after Fukushima, and last week.

Below, I’ll look at Nullschool wind data for the 3 times: low beta, beta spike, and the time the beta data gap began

Beta_spike_and_begin_DataGap_Fairbanks_AK_April2016.gif

I’ll look at wind for these 3 times at jetstream height (250 hPa), via http://earth.nullschool.net/

coordinates for Fairbanks are 64°50′37″N, 147°43′23″W.  The spot I marked on Nullschool is not spot-on, but close enough for this purpose.  Here’s the 3 jetstream wind maps, with my annotations added:

quiet time happened during a time of jet stream slow-down, which I’ve come to associate with upticks.  So this is an example of how that’s not always the case.  The higher-up wind blew over Hokkaido and eastern Russia:

2016:04:20:1500Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-180.64,64.34,512:loc=-147.322,64.624

I turned the globe a bit for a better view.  At the time of the spike… pretty much the same…

2016:04:24:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-205.71,57.30,512:loc=-147.322,64.624As well as for the time of the data gap:

2016:04:25:1500Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-205.71,57.30,512:loc=-147.322,64.624In short: as far as this little Nullschool inquiry went:  As far as Fairbanks, AK goes, tracing the wind upwind does not make a srong case for pointing at Fukushima here.

However, it is still possible, as the cloud would widen as it travels; and a massive cloud would widen a lot….  One of the better candidates of a “direct hit” in that period would have been Salt Lake City, Utah (you can see the Great Salt Lake on the Nullschool maps above if you look closely.  It was in a slow-down zone as well, but much closer to the windline that had passed of F1. And it looks like it’s been in that “potential downwind-Fukushima  fallout zone” for some time now…

Swinging by the EPA…

SLC_past two weeksAnd the week before:

SLC_bDang.  More gap than data…  The week before that, from mid-March 2016:

SLC-c

One thing that ought to be done is graphing the past half year for EVERY Radnet monitor in the US.  Perhaps the time differences between the onset of data gaps in the US and Europe would show revealing patterns.  Maybe some other day… (Or another month altogether…   This wilderness-loving soul is getting data-saturated again…)

And then there’s this… I wonder if it fits into the puzzle somehow:

http://fukushima-diary.com/2016/02/possible-explosion-in-iwaki-city-still-unidentified/

http-:fukushima-diary.com:2016:02:possible-explosion-in-iwaki-city-still-unidentified

… ’cause IF (and, really, it remains a big if.  I don’t know what is going on, but there are just enough reasons to not dismiss the possibility) there are ongoing criticalities at the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear catastrophe site, then… then it wouldn’t come as much of a surprise that the information war includes the planting of distracting stories…

Take, for instance, Benjamin Fulford, http://benjaminfulford.net/, and his alleged army of ninjas, for instance.  (Awesome ninjas, by the way:  no one has ever seen them! ;-) )   This author of colorful interpretations of geopolitical unfoldings is one of the various characters with a following on the one hand, and described as a PsyOp disinformation agent by others.  See, for instance, these selected sites:

Precisely on April 26, 2016, @ http://benjaminfulford.net/2016/04/26/hybrid-war-continues-with-japanese-underground-military-bases-hit-as-khazarian-mafia-under-attack-around-the-planet/ , he posts a claim that the 3 major quakes in the south of Japan were “artificially induced”, citing seismopgraph records and pointing out the similarity to the seismic signature (underground) nuclear explosions cause.   Just noting the timing of when a story was launched.

  • A month of gamma data from US EPA’s Radnet data from Corvalis, Oregon:

Corvalis_OregonI’m going to leave it at this, for now.

“CONCLUSION”:

Remains pretty obvious that something major happened somewhere, but WHERE?   I’ve giving this puzzle “slightly more time than your average concerned citizen” and I still don’t know. 

A reactor in China? See, I think if that were the case bloggers in Japan would be all over it.

So… my #1 suspect remains the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Catastrophe site.  The wind generally blows out to sea.  You could be in Iwaki and not be able to tell if they were venting massive amounts of underground radioactive gasses.

If you’re sure it’s coming from somewhere else, well, then show the world where you think it’s coming from, with data and wind maps and make a compelling case.  Go at it.  Drop me a link with your blog post.  Thanks.

Alright…  For what it was worth agin… if anything.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

HIGHEST SINCE 2011: Cesium-137, Ruthenium-103, Tellurium-132 (!-> Period: Jan.-Apr., 2016)

Colorado Rockies, North America, Planet Earth, May 5, 2016

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.”

– Dresden James [Donald James Wheal, UK, 1931-2008]

  • Hoevenen, Belgium:

Hoevenen_Belgium_3maanden_gamma_preMay4_2016

  • Konya Huyuk, Turkey:

Konya_Huyuk_Turkije_3maanden_gamma_preMay4_2016

  • Szolnok Relpuloter, Hungary:
  • Szolnok_Repuloter_Hungary_3maanden_gamma_preMay4_2016

  • Lublin, Poland:

LublinPOland_3maanden_pre3mei2016

  • Mochovce, Slovakia:

Mochovce_Slovakia_3mo_preMay3_2016

  • Kostelni Myslova, Czech Republic:

Kostelni_Myslova_CzechRepublic_3maanden_gamma_preMay4_2016

  • Stumica, Macedonia:

Strumica_Macedonia_3maanden_gamma_preMay4_2016

  • Neuwied, Germany:

Neuwied_Germany_3maanden_gamma_preMay4_2016.gif

…  Having a glass of red wine in a coffee shop, surrouded by gorgeous snow-capped mountains, while listening to Alors on danse, by Belgian musician Stromae…  While an invisibale inferno is raging in the Northern Hemisphere skies at the atomic level… 

FalloutOrNot_SandingAfloor

DISCLAIMER This is a one-amateur volunteer service only, free from corporate, institutional and/or governmental influence.  Much, though not all, of the data has been validated by las autoridades that supplied the data.   All necessary links are provided at Online Radiation Monitors to confirm the alleged for yourself.   Full DISCLAIMER.

This blogpost gives an overview of just 3 RECENT detections of artificial radioisotopes, and some redacted (data gapped) radiation monitoring data (see above), in the context of the past 5 years since the Fukushima Nuclear Catastrophe began in spring 2011.

It is my opinion that these radioisotope-specific detections, described in this blog post and dozens of previous ones, are significant all by thmselves, but even more so in the much broader geographical, meteorological and long-term chronological context they occured in (not to mention the geopolitical and esoteric contexts), and are deserving of urgent widespread scientific and political investigation, as well as major attention by the media, all of which so far all have remained strangely silent on the matter…

Signs point to an orchestrated cover-up of one of more MAJOR nuclear meltdown events in the past half year.

IF a series of seemingly isolated very peculiar (and for the most part so far officially unexplained) detections over the past few years are connected, for sure THEN it can not be ruled out, whatsoever, no matter how well-scripted, well-delivered and seemingly relatively comforting the various media messages coming from the Japanese government, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and/or Tokyo Electric Company  (TEPCO) have been thus far, and no matter how grave its implications, it cannot be ruled out that the molten coriums somewhere underneath the Fukushima-Daiichi disaster site are STILL fissioning.

Do yourself and the world a favor and read the whole thing first, thén explore the links; and only thén, when feeling objectively informed, and if concerned, contact your favorite political, NGO and media outlets. 

I combed through the entire EURDEP records (via http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EurdepMap/Disclaimer.aspx ) looking for detections of various radioisotopes and found out that:

  • Te-132: Prior to the April 26, 2016 detection of Tellurium-132 at Seehausen, Northern Germany, this artificial fission radioisotope with a short half-life of only 3.2 days, had not been detected in Europe since spring 2011.  After the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Catastrophe began, it was detected in April 2011 in Iceland and at several monitoring stations in April up till the very onset of May 2011, in Poland.   The magnitude of this most recent validated measurement is 10,000% higher than the highest validated measurement in 2011 (for European detections), making it, for Europe, without a doubt, the highest detection since 1986, when the USSR’s Chernobyl disaster happened. 
  • Ru-103:  The quantified and validated measurement of Ruthenium-103, which with its half-life of only 39.26 days is also an indicator of recent fission, was detected in outdoor air at Asteras, near Oslo, Southern Norway, in the period January 11-18, 2016. It did not received any media attention outside this blog either.  It happened in the middle of January 2016 and coincided with Cesium-137 upticks both locally, as well as elsewhere, such as observed at monitors in Finland. The ONLY other validated Ru-103 detection (in the EURDEP database I checked through browsing through the months) dates back to a little bit over a month after the Fukushima disaster, at a monitor in Warsaw, Poland.  So this was for sure the highest detection since 2011.  The detection in Warsaw during the sampling period April 18-21, 2011 measured 9.96E-05 Bq/m^3, while the one in Norway during samping period January 11-18, 2016 measured “only” 5.6E-08 Bq/m^3, some 3 orders of magnitude smaller.  Nevertheless, the significance is in the fact that it was detected, ánd this at a noramlly pristine monitor over 100 km from the nearest NPP (in Sweden) to boot.
  • Cs-137:  Cesium-137, probably with Iodine-131 and Strontium-90, the “most infamous” of the major radioactive pollutants, and one which can affect contaminated areas for many centuries due to its prevalence as a nuclear waste product ánd due to its half-life of 30.17 years.

(Note: via  Wikipedia, edited: about 95% of Cs-137 decays by beta emission [not measured for at most monitors!] to Barium-137m.  The remainder directly becomes Ba-137, which is stable.   Ba-137m, half-life only 153 seconds, emits gamma rays to also become stable Barium, which is why Cs-137 can be identified through gamma radioisotope spectroscopy and its radiation picked up on gamma monitors if the cloud is dense enough)

The largest detection of Cs-137 since Chernobyl, 1986, happened at a Helsinki, Finland monitor, in the first week of March 2016.  Unlike far more disturbing detections (Ru-103, Te-132, Zr-97, Co-60,…), this one received lots of mainstream media attention.  It was ‘a mystery’ for less than 72 hours, and came with a “bizarre, but relieving plot twist ending“, almost as if scripted.  Sucks: It just turned out that *I* was already documenting widespread disturbances across the entire Northern Hemisphere (HERE), including major gamma upticks and curious data gaps, especially in various parts of Europe not downwind from Helsinki, BEFORE I was aware of this trending bit of news.   This resulted in extra skepticism when the detection was explained awayas merely “a leak in some package, stored in the garage the monitoring agency shares a building with, owned by a nuclear waste company“.  Uh-huh… Sure.  Can’t rule it out, but… Finding interruptions in regular testing schedules for Cs-137 elsewhere in Finland, as well as highly-suspect interruptions of regular monitoring schedules at various monitoring stations throughout Europe, including in very nearby Estonia, as well as Czech RepublicCyprus, and other locations, did not help ease my skepticism.

Most strikingly, however, were the highest Cs-137 detections since 2011 in other parts of Scandinavia, such as Ivalo, Finland, which I don’t believe can be explained away by that presumably localized (no-longer-warm) nuclear waste “Helsinki garage leak”…

!-> See also (April 22, 2016) “Was Helsinki’s Cs-137 “Localized Garage Waste Leak” A Decoy For Hemisphere-Wide Fallout Upticks? Fukushima? EURDEP/Nullschool DATA […]”

As I would say at such a juncture…

ANYHOW…

Important related LINKS for additional documentation (a more complete list in my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive.):

+ much more @ Nuclear Blog Posts Archive

Or just click ‘Home’ and keep scrolling down to see what is now an immense library of graphed radiation data, which, especially when taken together, documents that the official monitoring networks are rigged to hide data when it matters most.  Nevertheless, if one takes the (bordering on ridiculous amounts of) time to put it together, it can be figured out that something major happened, likely either a major meltdown, or “China Syndrome” on steroids at Fukushima.  In either case, it is being covered-up.  That much is clear.

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, Fair Use Statement

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it may be plagiarized.  Please let me know.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
| 9 Comments

Data uit België & Nederland

!!!-> Radiological RED ALERT Situation is ongoing. <-!!!

No mainstream media attention yet…

North America, May 3, 2016 – DISCLAIMER

Blog Post Soundtrack: Nothing To See Here.

Was wondering if I could find anything unusual on the monitoring networks of The Netherland and Belgium (where there’s rarely ever anything to see, in part because of the low altitude, relatively flat geography near the sea (where air layers tend to not mix as much as further inland), and what appears to be monitor calibrations geared towards detecting as little of relevance as possible).  Neither of these nuclear countries monitor for specific radioisotopes on a regular basis.

Not much to see, but thought I’d just put a couple examples together for of what I found in the region I grew up in.  Individual countries’ interfaces often suck, but the same data is generally better viewable via the European Comission’s Data Exchange Platform, whose disclaimer is a bit Orwellian, ’cause it boils down to “even if any measurements look elevated, it’s not because they’re elevated” @ http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EurdepMap/Disclaimer.aspx

Some of this data I already touched upon, but here it is graphed for the past 3 months, with some annotations added:

  • Terneuzen, The Netherlands – A strikingly unusual amount of “glitch dots” (isolated high values that are rarely “validated”, and often dismissed by experts as “just errors”, but that I suspect hint of fallout clouds much higher up):

Terneuzen_3maanden_pre3mei2016

Less pronounced, but fitting an overall pattern, @

  • Vieux-Campenaire, Belgium:

Viaux_Campinaire_Belgie_3maanden_Pre3mei2016

Knesselare_3maanden_pre3mei2016_errorCorrected

  • Maasband, The Netherlands – A “glitch dot”, not per se related to the uptick in April, precedes the beginning of a long data gap.

Maasband_3maanden_pre3mei2016

I traced the data gap’s onset with the jet stream to Fukushima, in (April 29, 2016), “Planetary Emergency RED ALERT: Wind Patterns Trace Beginning of Major Radiological Disturbances in Europe to FUKUSHIMA: Plausibility of Still-Fissioning “Underground Breeder Reactor Gone Wild””  It is far from certain that Fukushima is the source of these major disturbances, but it can’t be ruled out just because Japan’s PM Shinzo Abe declared “cold shutdown” in December 2011.  That’s my opinion.   (Have a look at my Cobalt-60 findings if you’re interested in finding out “how deep this corium-dug rabbit hole” goes…)

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| 1 Comment

Metsavennad,

Radiological RED ALERT Situation is ongoing.

!!!-> No media attention yet:  COVER-UP of MAJOR NUCLEAR RIGHT NOW <-!!!

North America, May 2, 2016 (or 1984, not sure anymore…)

Gamma Radiation graphed for 3 months from the Baltics, selected monitors, accessed via EURDEP (Advanced Public map), http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EurdepMap/Disclaimer.aspx

  • Narva-Joesuu, Estonia:

Narva_Joesuu_Estonia_3months_preMay2_2016_EUDERP_Gamma

  • Salaspils, Latvia:

Salaspils_Latvia_3months_preMay2_2016_EUDERP_Gamma

  • Vasiginas, Lithuania:

Vasiginas_Lithuania_3mo_preMay2_2016_EURDEP_gamma

!!!–> For what compelled me looking into so much radiation data lately, see (April 26, 2016) “TELLURIUM-132 Detected in Northern Germany!“, and following posts, now chronologically listed HERE. (Or click ‘Home‘ and scroll down).

Drop me a note if you know which nuclear power plant is in full meltdown, spewing radioactive fallout across the planet.  Or just contact your free large mainstream media outlets, if you know of one that doesn’t take its cues from the IAEA…

Good luck to us all…

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| Leave a comment

ALASKA Turned Off Beta Radiation Monitoring Amidst Major Gamma Uptick (+Twitter & Gmail Communications Interference)

Radiological RED ALERT Situation is ongoing.

!!!-> No media attention yet:  COVER-UP of MAJOR NUCLEAR RIGHT NOW <-!!!

DISCLAIMER / Even if if I plaster disclaimers all over the place,  doesn’t mean I’m not onto something.  The data screams, “major meltdown accident!”  but WHERE?!

Southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado (USA) – May 2, 2016

I’ll start of with yet another radiation data chart, this one from the US EPA Radnet chart:

Past 2 weeks @ Fairbanks, Alaska:

Failbanks_AK_April17_throughMay2_2016

This obviously massive radioactive cloud has been affecting radiation monitors all across the Northern Hemisphere.

!!!- > The concentration of Tellurium-132 detected in Northern Germany on April 26, 2016 in the midst of these disturbances measured 100x higher than what was detected in Europe after the Fukushima disaster began!

!!!-> It is part of increasing abnormalities observed this year:   “Request for Investigative Assistance! WANTED: Verification of MAJOR Nuclear Accident(s) in 2016: WHEN, WHERE, HOW BAD, and WHO is covering it up?” for what has me very concerned, and explore my just-updated Nuclear Blog Posts Archive (or click Home and scroll down) for mountains of documentaion about widespread radiation abnormalities.

Just FYI, I did notify various organizations via Twitter, including the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) and even the Tokyo Electric Company (TEPCO), which created the mess at Fukushima-Daiichi, and which I suspect may be where this is coming from (the implications of which would be enormous).  If not thére, then they better have a good answer quickly, ’cause this is so big that even the rigged radiation monitoring networks are apparently incapable of hiding it.

SomeTweets_FallingOnMostlyDeafEarsApparently_May2_2016screenshotTwitter

(So far zero responses, zero acknowledgement, zero media attention.  May I say, “WTF!”?)

TwitterFollowingDisabledNotice:  Possible communications interference:  Twitter has dropped some of the people I ‘followed’, thus disabled direct communication.  When I re-added those who had been dropped without me doing so, I saw them dropping away again within seconds.  Very strange.

I tried to ‘follow’ anyone who already ‘follows’ me, and found that was not possible for 12 out of 18 people.  An annotated screenshot of who was either never dropped or could be added effortlessly, and those (red empahis) whom I for some bizarre reason can no longer ‘follow’, [see right insert]:

NoVirusSCannerAvailableSurrrr_May1.2016Also:  VirusScan is “temporarily out of order” on my gmail (so DO NOT send me attachments!), and replying to or sending email messages there has stopped  working there for the past few days…

ErrorsEh...

(And blog traffic from Japan is not even in my top 10 this past week. 1 week,  USA: 1700 views /  Germany: 720 views  / Japan: 71 views /  Malta: 61 views  / “European Union”: 16 views.)Just in case my blog gets taken down, feel free to make some copies of the blogposts you find important (just for your records; Please do not repost, though), unless my blog disappears.  I have no intentions to do so again.

Anyhow…

On the coast, where turbulance has not yet mixed air layers as much, the Anchorage, AK record shows merely a sprinkling of short data gaps (this actually fits with my hypothesis that the bulk of the fallout moves higher up with the jet stream…):

Anchorage_AK_April17_throughMay2_2016

You can check out the wind by clicking back in time via Nullschool:

http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/05/02/1200Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-169.22,63.42,512

Gotta go.  Maybe more later.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| 2 Comments

Request for Investigative Assistance! WANTED: Verification of MAJOR Nuclear Accident(s) in 2016: WHEN, WHERE, HOW BAD, and WHO is covering it up?

DISCLAIMER – Crestone, Colorado (USA) – May 1, 2016

Shortlink: https://goo.gl/ZYEdai

Any specific information leading to the indentification of the source(s) of these 3 events, all this year, would be greatly appreciated.

The 3 events I refer to, ALL of which where not documented, nor even mentioned anywhere outside my blog, until I brought it up, are:

Ruthenium-103, mid-January 2016, Southern Norway
Cesium-137, early/mid-March 2016, Far-Northern Finland
Tellurium-103, late April 2016, Northern Germany

Documentation, respectively:

Ru-103 !-> @ https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2016/02/14/ruthenium-103-detected-in-norway-in-mid-jan-2016/

Cs-137 uptick !-> @ https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2016/03/15/highest-cs-137-measured-since-may-2011-ivalo-far-northern-finland-march-7-2016/

(See also Was Helsinki’s Cs-137 “Localized Garage Waste Leak” A Decoy For Hemisphere-Wide Fallout Upticks? Fukushima? EURDEP/Nullschool DATA + (Some Nuclear Occult Links)

Te-132 !-> @ https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2016/04/26/tellurium-132-detected-in-northern-germany/

Related? 

Some curious detections in 2015 also remain unresolved as to where-oh-where it may have come from:

Co-60 !-> Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?

+ Much more documentation of widespread abnormalties, including widespread data gaps, can be found in my just-updated Nuclear Blog Posts Archive.

(I suspect Fukushima, but the implications are so dire that this situation demands additional and ongoing investigation by far more people than just an amateur as myself.)

Assistance to get to the bottom of the very obviously in-process-of-being-covered-up by nuclear oversight agencies (+ ZERO mainstream or major alternative media attention so far) of what appears to have been one or more MAJOR radiological accident(s) / incident(s) / and/or deterioration of Fukushima coriums would be greatly appreciated, especially by people directly downwind, who are currently being kept in the dark about what’s happening. 

Verification of data found in the blog posts is possible via these 3 main data sources I’ve used (and it should be noted that not all the data found there was verified by the authorities that supplied that data):

 

Kind Regards,

– Michaël Van Broekhoven (” MVB “)

   sole writer & administrator of this Allegedly Apparent Blog

https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.

Spring (SLV – May 1 2016 Photos)

That makes ‘spring’ official as far as I’m concerned:  The hummingbirds are back. ;-)

Otherwise, on this first day of May 2016, it’s just another casual spring weather day for the Colorado Rockies…

Had to be in Salida; This is on the descend after Poncha Pass.  (Tempting to slam on my breaks for the most annoying tailgater of the month, but I moved aside to let him pass.   The only time in my life I’ve gotten a traffic ticket was when I sped up (to 74 mph in a rural 55 zone, middle of nowhere) to get away from a tailgater who just would not pass me and kept his brights on the whole time; and just so happened that the one car in the other direction was a cop… ;-/)   Anyhow, this one went on to do the same to the next car…  and did not get down the mountain any faster (hehe):

DSCN1381

On the way back through a very mellow snow storm (maybe 10 cm of fresh snow, if that; roads stayed open):  Taken while driving, through the windshield, without flash:

DSCN1398

And with flash:

DSCN1399;-) Kinda like it.

And here’s May 1, 2016 @ 8,200 ft on the slopes of the Sangre de Cristo Mountain Range (between the friendly and artsy “free range insane asylum” town of Crestone and the majestic Great Sand Dunes National Park) in the Northern San Luis Valley of Southern Colorado:

DSCN1374

That’s when I think, “Six months before winter starts back up…”

Gotta love Colorado. ;-)

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| Leave a comment

Czech Republic’s Radiation Monitoring Network goes Offline Too, while Belgium Now Hides Data Closest to their NPPs…..

“… Claimed he was a terrorist
Claimed to avert a catastrophe
Someone should’a told him
That the buck stops here
No one ever said
That he was involved with thieves
And they’re blind, blind … “

Blind – by The Talking Heads

Can’t they just admit it’s game over for the nuclear industry and begin the long journey out of the madness?

After all all monitors in Iceland were taken down one by one in the past year (See: 4 years of data compiled in early 2015 for ‘Raufalhöfn, Iceland for some data from before the data freeze.), and after France’s monitors in the Southern Hemisphere were taken offline in February 2016 (see here), the recent data gap in Serbia and Slovakia (see here) now has company: Czech Republic has also made its measurmenets invisible to the public, for what is now over 48 hours, as well:

April30_2016_GammaMax_48hours

To add a little nuance: It’s not that uncommon.  I just find the timing striking.  It’s all just adding to what I’ve been saying for many years: the official radiation monitoring networks are rigged to hide data when it matters most.  Usually they (the algorithms, I suspect, embedded in the data processing software) only take down some monitors, not all, though.  Here’s two monitors less than 20 km from each other, showing the same 3-month peiod:

PrahaSuro_CZ_3mo_gamma_PreApril30_2016

Praha… beautiful city, but their cops can be a wee bit torturous….

Kamenice_CZ_3mo_gamma_PreApril30_2016

Have a look at the wind higher up:

http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/29/1500Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-6.61,59.12,608

Screenshot excerpt (April 29, 2016, 15:00 UTC, 250 hPa):

b

Absurdistan’s meteorological service: “Glitch dots may continue to strike various parts of western Europe.  Data Gaps are to be expected in the Baltics.  Serbia will likely come back online first.”

Not going to hold my breath, but I hope the Finnish (STUK) will test air samples extra-vigorously in Central Finland the coming months.  (Even just a strange pinch of Mn-54, Nb-95, Sb-124 and/or Co-60 in the mix would be a very disturbing confirmation of my hypothesis…)

DOel_Tigange_In other news, Belgium will distribute Potassium Iodine pills to its entire population.  Supposedly due to some new risk assessment having to do with “the terrorist threat.”  It’s more like THEY’re the terrorists and will need someone to blame when there’s a major nuclear accident.  They’re just going for the gamble:

(Nov. 8, 2014):   Nuclear Power Company ELECTRABEL chooses to gamble… Belgium and surroundings

… and because its beginning to sink in that that’s actually insane, I guess these pro-nuclear authorities want to at least give the impression that they give a shit about the population, while in all actuality, they’re just laughing their way to the bank while saddling future generations up with the mounting nuclear waste problem (to which Belgium does not have a solution yet!)

Luxembourg did the same 2 years ago.  Has nothing to do with “the threat of terrorism”:  (The Independent, Oct. 17, 2014) Luxembourg hands out iodine pills over fears of French nuclear mishap.

Everything is as safe as can be, but here’s some pills for WHEN there’s a major nuclear accident.  That should make everyone feel safe again…   ;-)

And it looks like Belgium’s “watchdog” (very neutral, merely headed by the former director of the Doel NPP…) is suddenly no longer capable of transfering data from monitors closest to the nuclear power plants to their internet interface with the public.  “Due to technical difficulties”.   It’s a trend.

natuurlijk_dat_is_begrijpelijk_alweer...

Or in other words: they guarantee the safety of the nuclear power plants, but they can’t even figure out anymore how to stream data online?  I don’t buy it.   I think transparancy and providing important radiation in real time to the public is simply being deprioritized.    Or to put it differently:   They’re not going to prevent the next accident.  They’re getting ready to cover up how bad it was after it happened.   And they’ve already created the storyline to “blame it on the terorists…”

“Here’s some pills.  Now shut up.”

Though… speaking of terrorists, check out, “Erdogan Is The Father Of ISIS” – New Documentary Outlines Turkey’s Support Of The Islamic State.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| Tagged | 5 Comments

Planetary Emergency RED ALERT: Wind Patterns Trace Beginning of Major Radiological Disturbances in Europe to FUKUSHIMA: Plausibility of Still-Fissioning “Underground Breeder Reactor Gone Wild”

DISCLAIMER: Noncompliance is virtue.  Think for yourself — April 29, 2016

This post builds upon many previous blog posts, all part of an attempt to figure out where the radioactive spewing source is that has lead to major disturbances, upticks, data gaps, and even pollution with fingerprints of smoking gun evidence of VERY RECENT FISSION, on European radiation monitors:

And many more in my (soon to be updated again) Nuclear Blog Posts Archive.

As of April 29, 2016, ALL mainstream and the larger “alternative” media outlets remain completely silent on the matter.  I hope, as every now and then is the case, that I’m completely wrong.

Suggestive evidence is mounting, unfortunately, that the Fukushima nuclear crisis has just moved into its next phase:  Japan has truly become “the land of the Sinking Sun”…

( !!!->   For some clues, see also:  (May 29, 2015Land of the Sinking Sun…, and (Jan. 26, 2016) “Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?“, and (Nov. 20, 2015) “Debunking the ‘Impossibility’ of Ongoing Criticalities at Fukushima-Daiichi“)

I was doing my best to approach this latest investigation as objectively as posisble and find the radiation spewing culprit ‘in Europe’, not letting my “confirmation bias get in the way”… ;-/    No such “luck”…

So…, sadly following similar impressions (such as (June 7, 2015):  “Yup… Fukushima is Still Fissioning – A Nullschool Wind Data Analysis of May 2015 EURDEP-Finland/Germany Radioactive Air Samples.”, when Zirconium-97 was detected in Germany; and I guess I was right when I predicted, (Feb. 16, 2016) in “Absurdistan Calls on Nordic Alliance in Response to *Record Radiation Spike in Northern Sweden* (EURDEP/Nullschool)” that:

Spring’s coming.  Wind patterns will be in place for “curious detections” shortly.  Investigating countries will “ask their neighbors”, express some bafflement, and with no clue, will again “let it go”    Repeat ad nauseum for 5 years…

Radiological disturbances and various monitoring weirdness has been going on for over half a year (see my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive), but very recently, it’s moved into off-the-charts “red alert” territory again:

Coming within months of these unexplained peculiarities:

!-> A relatively extreme validated measurement of Tellurium-132 in Northern Germany at concentrations 100 times higher than what was measured in Europe in spring 2011 after the Fukushima-Daiichi multiple meltdown nuclear catastrophe began.

Now, my search today has been to find “a starting point” from which to trace wind back to a most likely source.  I spotted an uncanny time-correlation between a monitor in The Netherlands and a monitor in Western Turkey, both showing a data gap in April 2016:

Bilecik_Turkey_3months_preApril29_2016MaasbandNL_3months_PreApril29_2016

-> In Turkey, there’s a major shift right when the Cesium-137 spike is detected in Finland, which I’ve raised some questions about in, (April 22, 2016) “Was Helsinki’s Cs-137 “Localized Garage Waste Leak” A Decoy For Hemisphere-Wide Fallout Upticks? Fukushima? EURDEP/Nullschool DATA + (Some Nuclear Occult Links)“.

But what the two very far-from-each-other locations have in common is April 11, when both go into “data gap mode”Since surface winds could never explain this, I went looking at the wind at jet stream altitude to see …

@ http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/11/2100Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-0.93,44.80,512/loc=29.969,40.136

And lo and behold, both monitors were in relative slow-down zones (especially the one in Turkey,  and both came from a relatively narrow jet stream band that arrived from across the Atlantic.  Annotated screenshot excerpt:

2016:04:11:2100Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-0.93,44.80,512:loc=29.969,40.136

To reduce the errors at least a little bit (due to the time it takes for the wind to move half-way around the planet, including changes in the position of the jet stream), I’ve backracked 24 hours from the Atlantic perspective for this Pacific  jets stream map, to April 10th:

http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/10/2100Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-138.39,49.25,512

2016:04:10:2100Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-138.39,49.25,512.gif

There’s a couple options in the USA, but…

-> I marked Sendai NPP on the map, but the 6.5 quake that rattled that “monument to insanity” restarted NPP happened later (April 15 news: Japan Rattled by Magnitude 6.5 Earthquake near Sendai and Genkai Nuclear Plants), so that’s obviously NOT it.

Near the Great Lakes (Chicago area), you see where I marked the shift in the jet stream, and then continued to track the April 11 line as well as the April 10th wind line.  The southern (April 11 line) could have come from Southern California.  But, going with the not-perfect-but more correct adjustment…     I know I could keep going to the Koreas, China and so on, but…

Alright, if it’s from Fukushima, then it would be the more northern jet stream part of the branching… Let’s see if Juneau, in Southern Alaska on the coast gives any more clues…

Via US EPA Radnet’s https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/query.do

Juneau_AK

You got to be freak’n kidding me… SO, clearly this isn’t somewhere in the US… THUS the chances are real that I haven’t been off my rocker delusional this whole time… and the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear site REALLY has turned into the absolute worst nuclear nightmare possible:

 … a breeder reactor gone wild, underground …

Last mention of Tellurium-132 in the news, since Fukushima (and before that the last such significant detection was after Chernobyl), was… :

November 5, 2015http://enenews.com/former-japan-ambassador-uncontrolled-nuclear-chain-reactions-suspected-fukushima-troubling-indications-recurring-criticality-tellurium-132-detected-100-miles-plant-recriticality-issue-discussed

Screenshot excerpts:

http-:enenews.com:former-japan-ambassador-uncontrolled-nuclear-chain-reactions-suspected-fukushima-troubling-indications-recurring-criticality-tellurium-132-detected-100-miles-plant-recriticality-issue-discussed._1tiff

[…]

http-:enenews.com:former-japan-ambassador-uncontrolled-nuclear-chain-reactions-suspected-fukushima-troubling-indications-recurring-criticality-tellurium-132-detected-100-miles-plant-recriticality-issue-discussed._2tiff

[Sigh…]

Excuse me, I need to go for a walk…

The cover-up must end.

Additions

– April 30, 2016 – Added after posting: (and mentioned before, here):   The possibility, or even plausibility, of the molten corium(s) under Fukushima-Daiichi having turned into some kind of ‘breeder reactor’ (which produces its own fuel and can theoretically maintain fission reactions forever) has been brought up before, not in those words, but still mentioning, “something going on outside the tanks, some radioactive fission is occurring, like an open air reactor, if you like, under the ground.” (quoted repeated further below), found in an Op-ed @ RT, Sept. 2, 2013, by Chris Busby:

rt.com:op-edge:fukushima-radiation-threat-level-288.gif

From which this excerpt, my emphasis added:

[…] CB: “Today there was another leak found at 1.7 Sieverts per hour in more or less the same place. This huge radiation increase, in my mind means something going on outside the tanks, some radioactive fission is occurring, like an open air reactor, if you like, under the ground.

RT: What impact will this have on the clean-up operation and those who are involved in that operation?

CB: First of all it is clearly out of control and secondly no one can go anywhere near it. […]

 

May Sanity Prevail On Earth.

earth— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, Do Not Share in full, Fair Use Statement

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it may be plagiarized.  Please let me know.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
| 13 Comments

Isolated Radiation Spikes in Deutschland, La France, en Nederland, following data gaps in UK and elsewhere: Fallout Cloud still blowing higher up above Europe… + Near Chinon NPP, France: Major Radiation Spike on April 15, then Data Gap

NUCLEAR ACCIDENT COVER-UP (in Europe?)  ONGOING

 Colorado Rockies, snowing…, Coffee shop with wifi, Friday afternoon, April 29, 2016

(NOTE:  Most of this public data was NOT validated by the authorities that supplied the data.  And as per European Commission disclaimer it is NOT to be used for scientific research, and it never EVER to be interpreted outside the realm of “all is well in the nuclear world”, so I’m offering this here “purely for your entertainment”…  See also my Disclaimer.  But nevertheless you may still want to notify some mainstream media outlets, ’cause this ongoing cover-up looks pretty darn serious, if you’d ask this armchair researcher in the Colorado Rockies…)

To echo from the previous post:

!!!- > There’s been a serious nuclear accident somewhere, likely this month of April 2016, likely IN EUROPE, as evidenced by relatively high concentration of Tellurium-132 detected at Seehausen, Northern Germany, <-!!!  which came amidst widespread disturbances, glitch dots, spikes and especially data gaps.   The radioactive cloud is apparently still blowing around.  The rigging of the official networks, particularly in its use of data gaps, is obvious.  The apparent media blackout has yet to be lifted as well.

This blog post is part of a series to help independent investigators figure out WHERE the accident, likely a serious one, occurred.   Click ‘Home’ (period April 2016)  and scroll down for much more.

Just sharing stuff I’ve come across in hopes to figure out which NPP had a major accident…

  • A “glitch dot” at Terneuzen, in coastal Southern The Netherlands, here shown in the context of 3 months of data:

Terneuzen_NL_3mo_April29_2016

 

  • It coincided with a “glitch dot” much further south, not so far from Tours, France, but there the glitch dot appeared as part of a mini disturbances there (so more of a brief spike than a glitch dot):

April29_2016_TimingOfGlitchDotTerneuzen_ChinonNPP_

These glitch dots come in the wake of a data gap wave that swept across many monitors in the UK in the previous few days.  Most recently, UK monitors were turned off at 1 pm on April 27 (2016), and not all have come back online.  A random sampling with 2-day data zoom-in:

UK_dataArt.gif

I suspect is likely only a whiff of the radioactive clouds that are swirling around Europe (or so I fathom…) in the past few weeks, and are as such not per se pointing at an issue at a  nuclear Power Plants (NPP) near the monitor(s).

A look at the longer term data does show a peculiar spike at the aforementioned monitor near Chinon NPP (WSW of Tours, France), shortly after followed by a long data gap…

Chinon_NPP_France

A zoom-in at the (unvalidated) 0.42 SIEVERT spike shows the timing (and also the fact that this is obviously not “a callibration”.  It could be an instrument error, but the timing with the onset of continent-wide disturbances has me think actual radioactive fallout screwed up this monitor.  Here’s the timing for that spike:

TimingNVspike.gif

–> Before the mega spike, there’s a very brief “onramp”, not visible here on the above graph due to the massiveness of the data that followed.  So, a perfectly working monitor suddenly provides data they don’t want to acknowledge as real, so it is kept at the default, “non validated” ?   I don’t know how that works…   But, well…  vive ma liberté: I’m going read into it whatever I feel like.  And as goes with all art, including “data art”, it’s okay see it differently.

  • Oh, check this out: a glitch dot just colored a monitor in Neuwied, Germany maroon…  Let’s have a look…

LocationNeuwied_DeutschlandNeuwied_1monthAmazingly, the 6 µSv/hr (!) spike in Neuwied, Germany was ‘validated’:

Neuwied_Germany_spikeApril28_2016

I also checked two other monitors marked on the map:

NL_Lux_combo

Minor disturbances in Luxembourg begin around the same time as the data gap @ Maasband, Southern The Nederlands… and this all around April 11… that’s 4 days before the mega-spike near the Chinon NPP in France…  As well as before the very pronounced disturbances seen on some Latvian and Turkish monitors…

And then there’s that glitch dot @ Maasland in early April, as well… And the data gap around April 6 @ Neuwied, and so on…  Hm…

I’m trying to come up with a ‘time and place’ to trace wind patterns upwind from… The earliest whiff, the better, as it gets too complex to do “by hand” otherwise.    I’m still puzzled.   Serious suggestions welcome.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.

 

| 4 Comments

Serbia & Slovakia Turned their Radiation Networks Off…

April 28, 2016  – 8:58 pm in the Colorado Rockies

DISCLAIMER: This a volunteer amateur website.

(Check with official authories for reassuring bullshit.)

There’s been a serious nuclear accident somewhere, likely this month of April 2016, as evidenced by relatively high concentration of Tellurium-132 detected at Seehausen, Northern Germany, which came amidst widespread disturbances, glitch dots, spikes and especially data gaps.   The radioactive cloud is still very obviously blowing around.  The rigging of the official networks, particularly in its use of data gaps, is obvious.  The apparent media blackout has yet to be lifted as well.

This blog post is part of a series to help independent investigators figure out WHERE the accident, likely a serious one, occurred.   Click ‘Home’ (period April 2016)  and scroll down for much more.

Serbia cut its data flow, which could mean that data will be released later (after “being reviewed”), but more likely it will result in what will look like a data gap.

Here’s an example:

Vinca_Serbia_1month_April28_2016

Compare to neighboring Croatia (just one example):

Ploeee_Croatia_April28_2016_1mo

Turbulance, more common inland and over mountains, tends to bring more fallout down further from the coast.  Consider that the wind blew from west to east (first Croatia, then Serbia) at the time the data gap began:

http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/23/0600Z/wind/isobaric/850hPa/orthographic=9.83,46.01,2048

Screenshot (click on link above to see it move and move forward or back in time):

2016:04:23:0600Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=9.83,46.01,2048.gif

Slovakia imposed the same monitoring darkness…:

Slovakia_1mo_Gamma_APril28_2916

A look (EURDEP, top left: Advanced Map, Disclaimer, play with the settings.  Standard Deviation, last 2 days, shows the holes in the monitoring network, as well as a couple “glitch dots” in the extended region:

EURDEP_2days_StandardDeviationGamma_April28_2016

Glitch dots show “absurd” measurements, rarely ever ‘validated’.  I think they’re caused by ‘hot particles’ striking a monitor directly when they fall from higher up where the bulk of radioactive fallout cloud is suspected to be moving.   Might give a clue as to what some countries are trying to hide from the public…

HungaryGlitchDotENdApril2016

GlitchDotMacedonia_ENdApril2016

Note: on EURDEP, the y-axis is generally in nanoSievert per hour

1,000 nSv = 1 µSv/hr  See Radiation Units & Conversions for help.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| 4 Comments

Carhiciveen, Remote Western Irish Coast: 6 Yrs of EURDEP Gamma Radiation Data

“Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.” – April 27, 2016

Artists statement:   Crazy.  No word in any media outlet…  So, I guess that rubs in in quite well: It doesn’t matter how much time I spent researching and documenting the radiological landscape found on public monitors: western media or whatever’s left of a free and independent investigative mainstream press anywhere apparently don’t actually even care when an independent blogger reports about smoking evidence of a major nuclear accident, such as happened in Germany yesterday (See April 26, 2016: TELLURIUM-132 Detected in Northern Germany!).

How many “coincidences” does it take?  For instance… I was wondering, besides what’s already documented in the dozens of blog posts of the past months, if there’s more evidence of a radioactive cloud blowing over Europe right now.   Well…

There’s a couple “glitch dots” (unusally unvalidated data with ridiculously high values.  They often come as part of a sprinkling of data gaps amidst somehow validated normal values.  I interpret them as a hot particle having struck the monitor directly with the bulk of the radioactive cloud blowing at much higher altitude:

Skopje, Macedonia:

Skopje_GlitcDot

Alright, cruising through some hand-picked European monitors, showing the latest month of gamma data.  In no particular order, just from all over (north, south, east west, central…).  Watch the y-axis to see how high some of these spikes / glitch dots go; and keep in mind this is just “data art”…   “Harmful rumors” if you will…

Hatay_ErdoganistanMittelberg_AustriaMurau_oostenrijkVolos_GriekenlandCahirciveen_EireSalaspils_LatviaKomotini_GreeceLovelyLucerne_CHKomotini_GreeceRaipole_Lithuania_

That data gap on the far-western coast of Ireland I found interesting.  Did the radioactive cloud come from across the Atlantic perhaps?   The psychopathic liar Obama and his partner in war crimes, Hillary, are surely not going to tell anyone if a nuclear power plant melted down in the US, would they?

[pauze…]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESZN_YDE-TU

Nevermind that distraction…

So… I started going back in time and this “data painting” was the result.   Art critics might some day refer to this as part of my “ongoing radiological emergency period” (which overlaps with a period in which I more often created more colorful paintings with acrylic on canvas), marked by digital collages of seemingly scientific data that, as per European Commission EURDEP Disclaimer, may actually not be used for scientific purposes.  So I just scribble annotations onto them and explore the emotional colors that arise as a result of what looks like evidence of widespread rigging to hide data…

DISCLAIMER:  Check with so-called authorities and ‘experts’for a more comforting dose of denial, and feel free consider everything I post ‘for entertainment purposes only’…

I originally picked this monitor just because I’m trying to find out if the radioactive cloud that is obviously blowing over Europe now might have come from across the Atlantic.  Since ‘THEY’ shut down all 4 Icelandic monitors, as well as Greenland’s most southern monitor, it is much harder to figure out where upticks in Europe might have their source.

Location on map:

April27_2016_1week_GammaMax_excerpt_annotEire

The record goes back further in time, but I got tired of it (it happens…), so here showing the entire data-gapped record since Sept. 26, 2009:

25_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201624_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201623_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201622_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201621_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201620_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201619_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201618_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201617_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201616_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201615_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201614_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201613_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201612_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201611_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_201610_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_20169_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_20168_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_20167_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_20166_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_20165_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_20164_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_20163_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_20162_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_20160_Cahirciveen_EIre_past3mo_April26_2016

Maybe someday this will be part of “solving the puzzle” of what the hell has been going on…

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| 1 Comment

Past 9 months Radiation Data @ JRC Station 5 in Northern Italy + some Lublin, Poland Data

I think the record speaks for itself:  Supposedly isolated local detections, data gaps, odd spikes, etc., are only bits and pieces of a radiological puzzle that’s been leaving its mark all over Europe.   Bottom line remains: there’s been a very serious nuclear accident in the past half year and I want to know WHERE EXACTLY this occurred.

WHERE, WHEN, and HOW BAD is it?  And precisely WHO decided that people directly downwind don’t even need to be informed?  Arrest them.

JRC_Station_5_NorthernItalia_3mo_Oct26_2015JRC_Station_5_NorthernItalia_3mo_Jan26_2016JRC_Station_5_NorthernItalia_3mo_April26_2016

Everything can be verified (although it must be noted that the data is often “not validated” (yet) by the authorities that supplied them) via the options @ Online Radiation Monitors (also a subtab in the above ‘Nuclear’ tab in to top banner / menu).

Reference for the annotations added to the above graphs:

!-> Much more graphed data can be found by clicking ‘Home’ and scrolling back in time.  Every now and then I update my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive.

Added:  3.5 months of gamma data graphed for LUBLIN, Poland:  Isn’t that curious: a completely different part of Europe, yet again, striking correlations with sampling periods during which specific manmade radioisotopes were detected elsewhere in Europe…:

Lublin_Poland_3.5_months_gamma_preApril25_2016

Whether these events are connected is hard to say. but if they are, then whatever is leaking is still active…

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| 2 Comments

TELLURIUM-132 Detected in Northern Germany!

Shortlink:   http://wp.me/puwO9-7M9  Please share widely.

Note:  This post is a ‘sticky’: Many newer blog findings can be found below this one, which is temporarily kept at the top due to its significance.  Click ‘Home‘ and scroll down for latest.  Further investigation showed it fits into a very widespread pattern of radiological disturbances as far away as Alaska, suggesting it came from across the Pacific Ocean…

—- —- —-

This detection deserves an all hand on deck.  It just happened within less than 24 hours (on April 26, 2016) ago.   WHERE is this coming from!?!??

The sampling location, Seehausen, Deutschland (see map, below) is over 100 km from the nearest nuclear plant.  The wind was blowing in from the south, curving towards the monitor from the southwest, so the distance to the nearest Nuclear Powe Plant (NPP) upwind would be at the very least 200 km.  Wind maps below.  Please leave a comment if there’s something in the news about this.

The data was posted on the European Comission’s public Data Exchange Platform, EURDEP, accessible via Online Radiation Monitors –> EURDEP –> DISCLAIMER @ http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EurdepMap/Disclaimer.aspx   and was ‘VALIDATED’:  a whopping 1.25E-02 Bq/m^3 Te-132 (!!!)

Te132Detection_LocationOnMap_annot1.jpg

That may not be much as far as the dose you’would receive walking around in a cloud of that, but its significance is not its immediate danger.

!!!-> Its significance is twofold: 1) It’s likely mixed with a variety of other radioisotopes not tested for at that location, and 2) Tellurium-132’s  is a major short-lived FISSION PRODUCT, with a half-life of only 3.2 days, making it a tell-tale sign of a leaking ACTIVE reactor.

!-> Magnitude of detection over 100x larger than after Fukushima !

I doubt this came from outside the European region.  Here’s why:  It isn’t tested for much to begin with, but where they test for it, a validated actual measurement of Te-132 in outside air is extremely rare.   Last time Tellurium-132 was detected (that I know of, may need to comb through 5 years of data to get more certainty on that one) was in the 2 months after the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear accident in March and April 2011.  The first (published / public) detection, for Europe back then, was registered in Rejkiavik, Iceland, and then others measurements with validated detections followed at various monitoring locations in Poland.

Here’s the thing: the detection at Seehausen just the other moment was 100 to 1000 times LARGER than the concentrations of Te-132 measured in Europe in 2011.    It’s got to be somewhere relatively nearby.

Iceland_te132After F1

Above Icelandic data from after the Fukushima triple meltdowns in spring 2011. And here, below, is the Te-132 detection @ Seehausen in Germany at the end of April 2016.  Note that I put the y-axis @ 100 times of that seen in the above graph:

Seehausen_te132DataValidated

The sampling period was just 2 hours.

Wind maps show that, if the major nuclear accident just happened in the past 1 or 2 days, then the most likely countries the major release came from includes Germany, The Netherlands or Sweden.   Less likely, but not impossible would include France, Belgium, the UK, as well maybe even some nuclear Baltic states such as Finland.  I know that quite the array of reactors, but I hope this blog post is at least helpful to get an investigation going ASAP.

Added: See various blog posts after this one.  Even Fukushima-Daiichi is a possibility, the implications of which would be extremely dire.  Click ‘Home‘ in the top banner and view other posts after this sticky, or search the Nuclear Blog Posts Archive.

When looking at the bigger picture, as found partially documented on this blog (click home and check out the blogpost pre- May 2016), then the possibilities widen to “just about anywhere”.  The further away, of course, the more massive this meltdown accident likely is.

WIND MAPS for April 26, 2016 @ 00:00 UTC, different altitudes:

Wind maps, starting at 1000 hPa, just above the surface:  http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/26/0000Z/wind/isobaric/1000hPa/orthographic=-7.60,52.94,1024/loc=11.862,52.584

2016:04:26:0000Z:wind:isobaric:1000hPa:orthographic=-7.60,52.94,1024:loc=11.862,52.584 .gif

At 850 hPa, you can see the low pressure over Denmark, circling the wind around, adding a possibility that the radioactive cloud blew in from the west, leaving a possilities from several nuclear power plants in Northern Germany, The Netherlands, as well as Southern Sweden and beyond:

http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/26/0000Z/wind/isobaric/700hPa/orthographic=-7.60,52.94,1024/loc=11.862,52.584  Screenshot:

2016:04:26:0000Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=-7.60,52.94,1024:loc=11.862,52.584.gif

At 500 hPa, however, the bottom end of the jet stream…  http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/26/0000Z/wind/isobaric/500hPa/orthographic=-7.60,52.94,1024/loc=11.862,52.584… 

Although the most likely culprits are most likely in North-Western Europe, a slight possibility opens up it came from outside Europe (although the concentration seems to high for that, in my opinion):

2016:04:26:0000Z:wind:isobaric:500hPa:orthographic=-7.60,52.94,1024:loc=11.862,52.584.gif

And at last, the jet stream itself, @ 250 hPahttp://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/26/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-7.60,52.94,1024/loc=11.862,52.584

2016:04:26:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-7.60,52.94,1024:loc=11.862,52.584.gif

North Pole view:  if it came from very far away, it cannot be ruled out it came from a serious nuclear accident in the United States, Japan, Korea, China, Russia, or even further upwind closer to Europe (in a go-around-way):http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/04/26/0000Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-57.76,95.18,274/loc=11.862,52.584

2016:04:26:0000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=-57.76,95.18,274:loc=11.862,52.584

If there’s any free press left in Merkel’s Germany, I guess I’ll read about the nuclear accident in the newspapers some time this week…

Drop me a comment if you know more.  Thanks.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 46 Comments

Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster 30th Anniversary

Our world is faced with a crisis that has never before been envisaged in its whole existence… The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking, and thus we drift towards unparalleled catastrophe.

–  Albert Einstein, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May 1946

Awhile back I started with a Chernobyl page (a sub-tab in the ‘Nuclear’ banner at the top), but it got stalled and remains unfinished, disorganized.  I will be plucking bits and pieces from various blog posts and additional sources for this quick commemorative post.

For what might have happened, I think this documentary goes into some impressive details:  ! –> @ The True Battle of Chernobyl Uncensored – Documentary, highly recommended [search for it if the link changes again].  The testimony in the first 5 minutes, describing the colorful particle beam that shot up sky-high is incredible.

TrueBattleOfChernobyl.gif

For me personally, Chernobyl left a deep impression.  I was 11 years old, growing up in Belgium, and watched in horror as the news broke.  The reason it affected me profoundly was because just two weeks earlier I had had a nightmare, the only nightmare of my childhood I still remember.  In hindsight I would call it “a premonition dream”, as shared already many years ago in, (April 11, 2013), “My Humble Beginnings of Anti-Nuclear Warriorship for Mother Earth…“:

“In the dream I was sitting on a chair, descending into blue glowing water inside a huge steel-enforced concrete building.  Something was melting through the Earth’s crust…  I was spinning and terrified.  The word ‘radioactive’ kept going through my mind…  I had no idea what it meant.  The water was in danger…  I was overwhelmed with emotion.  I didn’t know what any of it meant. This was not an ordinary dream.  It shook me to the core.  I woke up soaked in sweat with my heart pounding loudly, wondering, “whát ís thát, ‘radio-activity’?”

The radioactive cloud blew around the planet, but most of it settled in erratic deposition patterns in far-Northern Ukraine, parts of Russia, a major part of Belarus, and then with hot zones in various locations, from Scandinavia to Austria, even some parts of the UK.

Wind at different altitudes carried the fallout to different regions:

WindAltitudes_FalloutDispersion.gif

Where there was precipitation was the main factor for where the fallout was deposited.  This maps goes an idea of where the bulk of the falout setted, at least the Cesium-137 aspect of the radioactive fallout:

unep_chernobyl_001_april_1986_mvb_annot1_redux.jpg

!-> I shared this map as part of my fallout map comparrisons found two ground-breaking blog posts written shortly after the Fukushima-Daiichi Mega-Catastrophe began in spring 2011, with sources used back then @:   See (May 19, 2011) Fukushima 2011 versus Chernobyl 1986: a fallout map comparison and (Sept 30, 2011) Extended Fukushima Fallout Maps – Sept 29 MEXT Release. Fukushima vs. Chernobyl – 2.

One of my key finding was that 1) The Japanese government chose their legend colors in such a way as that extremely contaminated areas, orange and dark orange on the Chernobyl map, appeared relatively uncontaminated (light blue):  Legend comparison:

fukushima_versus_chernobyl_cesium_bq-legends_mvb5

Where the gravity of the Fukushima-Daiichi Catastrophe becomes clearer is when you realize that most of Chernobyl’s fallout fell on land is as such fairly well documented; while all models about Fukushima fallout agree on one thing: Over 90% of the fallout did not fall on Japan, but blew to the east, and of what blew east, most of it was deposited in the waters of the Pacific Ocean.  It is extremely likely that Fukushima fallout is playing a not-yet-understood role in the ongoing ecological collapse of the Northern Pacific Ocean.

From the above-mentioned blogposts:  Below, the Cesium 134 + Cesium 137 combined map for Fukushima-Daiichi fallout, adjusted to Chernobyl’s Bq/m^2 legend colors, which I originally posted AS IF  comparable to the above Chernobyl (Cs137 only) map.  Not really comparable as such, as the Chernobyl fallout map only shows the Cs-137 deposition.  Yet it still shows the severity of the contamination, and makes it overly clear that in certain area far outside Fukushima’s evacuation zone, such as parts of the cities of Fukushima, Koriyama

The cover-ups of the severity of both Chernobyl and Fukushima continues.  If the full truth was known about nuclear energy, it wouldn’t be permitted.  The only reason we have large nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons is because we’ve been lied to since day 1 of the Manhattan Project, out of which this mostrous industry grew.

410-unit-4-zirc-fire-catastrophe-march-15th

“Unit 2 has breached containment, Unit 4’s Spent Fuel Pool is on Fire, Catastrophe.”  Included in the FOIA-released “Plume Gate” documents re. Fukushima. See link below.

Very early reports, later revealed under the Freedom of Information Act, revealed that government officials were fully aware of the “not one, but 5 worst case scenarios” playing out simultaniously at FDNNP.   -> See some details about that @ (Dec. 2, 2014PLUME GATE – Internal NRC Communications Released under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) proof deliberate Cover-Up of Severity of global Fukushima Fallout in 2011. Recent SFP4 News May Have Been Part of Cover-Up

+ See also the revelations included in , (Feb. 3, 2016):  Hillary Clinton’s Email (March 12, 2011) Re. Fukushima Nuclear Catastrophe: “STAY INDOORS, WEAR MASK, SHOWER IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMING HOME,…”

Add to that, that it took a couple years before it was admitted that estimates about the amount of Fukushima fallout, released in 2011 (so not incuding later releases), were ‘grossly underestimated’.

And add to that… that, unlike at Chernobyl where 200,000 labored 24/4 to prevent the molten corium from reaching the ground water, at Fukushima, with a surreal-corrupt bunch of TEPCO corporados and aligned mafioso in charge of disaster response… the worst case scenarios wasn’t prevented, and the coriums have been in direct contact with the ground water and have been leaching, non-stop for what is now over half a decade, some 300 tons of heavily contaminated radioactive water into the Pacifc Ocean. See also:

Perhaps it went that badly in Japan…, because top level management was more interested in keeping a lid on the suspected fact that the Fukushima nuclear complex might have included covert nuclear research, possibly including nuclear weapons research and/or breeder reactor experiments… (???)  See bits and pieces included in:

Anyhow… And add to that, that while after after the Chernobl accident, then-President of the USSR, Mikhael Gorbachov, innitiated a series of reforms that included more openess, Japan’s Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, with the full backing of his CIA-installed LDP cabinet, did the very opposite and passed the State Secrecy Act…  – See (Nov. 28, 2013) Orwellian Japan 2013.

+ See also (Japan Subculture, Dec. 17, 2012) “How The CIA Helped The Yakuza & The LDP Get Power & Promote Nuclear Power,” by Jake Adelstein

Anyhow… Long diversion short:  Chernobyl was bad and múch worse than pro-nuclear propagandists want to admit, but Fukushima is even worse than Chernobyl, and there’s no end in sight there yet.  (See also, from way back in Sept. 5, 2013: Fukushima is most likely worse than ‘Four Chernobyls’ now. Some Data suggest Fukushima = 3000+ times Hiroshima Cesium & 20,000+ times Nagasaki Strontium)

Various influences, including large forest fires (See also Chernobyl Forest Fires in spring 2015 + several posts after that), have redrawn these maps.  In addition to Cesium-134 & Cesium-137, the spead and deposition of other radioisotopes, from short-lived thyroid-cancer-causing Iodine-131, there were many other very health-hazardous radioisotopes that are often not even mentioned in mainstream media reports, such as Strontium-90, Americium-241, Plutonium, etc.   As part of looking into the forest fires last year, I found some fallout maps for a few of these radioactive pollutants:   (h/t http://aipri.blogspot.it/), included in http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Gaydar.pdf.   Screenshots of the fallout maps were added to Final Additions (to the Chernobyl Forst Fires 2015 series): 

  • Cesium-137, 1998 (only showing the Ukraine):

Cs137_1998_Ukraine_KyotoStudy

  • Plutonium 235+239+240:

Plutonium_1998_Ukraine_KyotoStudy

  • Americium-241, a prognostic map for where things would be at by 2056:

Americium_2056_Ukraine_KyotoStudy

!-> See more in the study pdf. @  http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Gaydar.pdf

For Iodine-131 maps, see also (May 26, 2011) IODINE-131 a basic map comparison: Fukushima versus Chernobyl

As far as the consequences…

We are currently in the midst of a massive pro-nuclear disinformation / propaganda campaign.   The United Nations (IAEA, UNEP, UNSCEAR, WHO,…) have shown themselves to be a formidable force of deception when it comes to all things nuclear.

Some important resources with better information that what the nuclear crime cartel supplies, perhaps see these 3 links to get started:

A few more links can be found under my static page Remember Chernobyl

A video often pushed by pro-nuclear propagandists is “Wolves of Chernobyl”, which was posted on YouTube under a misleading title, “Radioactive Wolves Of Chernobyl Scary Mutations – Full Documentary” @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLJuQQDPY8Y

Radioactive Wolves Of Chernobyl Scary Mutations - Full Documentary

-> It describes a study by two german wolf experts studying the wolf population in the Chernobyl exclusion zone.  The region was turned into an agricultural zone in the 1920’s and has returned to a wilderness since the 1986 nuclear accident.  WIldlife is thriving there again.  Part of the study included to see how the radioactive contamination affects the local wildlife.  It’s an awesome (highly recommended) documentary, but there is actually very little information on this aspect.  After a half hour or so, you might even begin to wondering why the hell the region was evacuated at all, if all wildlife is thriving in such a lovely manner…. Except for this one little bit of data more than half-way through…

[@ 35 minutes in, a study of mice begins ]

Even in the area that was previously known as “the red forest’ (now green again), the overall health of the mice populations is very good now.  However…The 6-year study of doormice revealed that [@ 37 minutes in):  “4% to 6% of every new generation living here shows slight abnormalities, twice the rate of clean areas.  For humans, this raised level of risk is unacceptable.

And, of course, no studies were conducted in the years immediately after the disaster.

Perhaps also of interest:

Peace –

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.

 

| Leave a comment

4µSv/hr in Latvia

Salaspils, Latvia – Location on map, in Northern Europe’s Baltic region:

Latvia_annot.gif

DISCLAIMER – April 25, 2016

  • Last 12 days in 2 lines, each with 3 x 48 hours pasted together, for Salaspils, Latvia:

Salaspils_Latvia_6days_preApril19_2016Salaspils_Latvia_6days_preApril25_2016

With the above-shown 12 days included, here’s the past month graphed:

Salaspils_1month_preApril26_2016.gifto show the spiking seen this first quarter of 2016 in a past year context (vertical scale left the same for all graphs)- Also note the data gaps:

Salaspils_Latvia_0

Salaspils_Latvia_1Salaspils_Latvia_2Salaspils_Latvia_3

(FYI  -> The mega-spikes seen above in the week Feb. 14-21, 2016 correspond with the timing of monitors being turned off in the Southern Hemisphere (Feb 11 & Feb 21).

It gets “interesting” when comparing this above 1 year at Salaspils to other monitors nearby, such as this one, shown below , a monitor just a stone’s throw away:

@ Rupniecibas Street in Riga, same 1 year, same region, same official Lavian monitoring network:

Riga_1Riga_2Riga_3Riga_4

Confused yet?  LOL

oneofoursSee, I’m showing this to point out that there’s quite the variety in what these monitors detect.  Different radioisotopes emit different very specific decay energies.  Top notch detectors, such as only government agencies and establishment labs have access to, can be dialed in to detect specific gamma ranges, for instance.

The Cesium-137 upticks in Finland in the first week of March only correspond with minor upticks at Riga, Latvia, and didn’t correlate with anything unusual at the Salaspils monitor.  And as you can see above, the spikes seen in the past week as well as in mid- to late February in Salaspils are strangely absent in Riga.  And the massive disturbace in January @ Riga didn’t show as such on the Salaspils monitor…  That January disturbance DOES correspond with the timing of the Ruthenium-103 detection in Southern Norway, however, which also corresponded with a (smaller than the one that got all the media attention, see previous posts for details) Cesium-137 uptick in Finland.

Just passing this along.  At some point someone, or a team of students perhaps, scrutinizing the redacted public data we do have available, will figure it out: Which reactor, where!?, had a major meltdown in the past half year?   Or it will be confirmed that Fukushima is still fissioning.  That remains a possibility.  Or that nuclear bomb tests are being conducted in secret somewhere, and the CTBTO, like the IAEA and bunch of nuclear mafioso all working in cahoots, covering for each other, is remaining silent even then.  Can’t even rule that out anymore either.  After all, Saudi Arabia said they were going do a test soon.  And Eurdep no longer has public monitors in the Southern Hemisphere now that France turned the data flow off for the last two in February…

Feel free to connect some dots and let me know where you end up…   ;-)

All I say is this:  I suspect most radioactive pollution events are being covered up.  I’m under the impression that some very significant radioactive clouds have drifted around the planet in the past few years.  If it’s not related to Fukushima, then one or more other very significant meltdown accidents occured since 2011.

It is imperative that the truth about how the nuclear industry truly operates is uncovered.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| 2 Comments

France Turned Off Both Its Public Radiation Monitors in the Southern Hemisphere (EURDEP, Feb. 2016)…

Colorado Rocky Mountains (USA) — April 23, 2016 – DISCLAIMER

APril21_2016_MVBOf its four very-far-from-mainland-France public radiation monitors, two are in the Southern Hemisphere (you have to zoom out on EURDEP to see ’em), one in the Southern Pacific, the other in the Indian Ocean.  It’s those two, marked on the right side of the below map, that both stopped reporting in the second half of February 2016:

ImperialFrance_monitors

Gamma radiation Data graphs of their last/latest data further down…

Via Online Radiation Monitors –> EURDEP (Advanced Public Map -> Disclaimer -> mostly unvalidated data and settings to toy around with).

For those two in the Southern Hemisphere, here’s 3 months of data pasted together, prior to Feb. 29, 23:55 UTC:

  • Noumea-Nouvelle-Caledonie, French-claimed island in Southern Indian Ocean:

Noumea_Nouvelle_Caledonia_988_AGG_CP_LaFrance

And then 2 weeks later…:

  • St.-Clothilde-La-Reunion, French-claimed island in Southern Pacific:

St_Clotilde_La_Reunion_974_AGG_CP_LaFrance–> as you can see both data freezes came shortly after minor and more significant radiological disturbaces were being detected in an otherwise extremely tranquil radiation data record.

As documented again in the previous post:  The Ruthenium-103 spike detected in Southern Norway occured in January 11-17, 2016.  The Cesium-137 spike and upticks detected in Finland occurred March 4-8, 2016.  These two French monitors on the other side of the planet were turned off roughly in between those two events.

That’s all.  Noticed it, thought I pass it along. 

—- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —–

  • NO CONCLUSION

Impossible for me to tell if there’s a connection between these two very uniquely positioned monitors being turned off, the fact that this apparent fact was preceded by a couple weeks of minor but increasingly unusual disturbances, and I don’t have a clue whether or not all that may be tied to the very strange radiation detections, upticks and widespread data gaps in many locations of the Northern Hemisphere the past half year.

That the radiological weirdness isn’t over yet, is obvious if you study the radiation monitors, but you’ll only notice it if you do it monitor by monitor and get an idea of the longer-term evolution.

—- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —–

The rest of this blog posts is just some more “random” radiation data.  Filler. “Move along, nothing to see here” stuff…

Starting out with the past half year data from the other remote French monitors:

  • Saint Pierre et Miquelon, France, off the Eastern Canada / Atlantic Coast:

St_Pierre_Et_Miquelon_France_Canada_3mo_B St_Pierre_Et_Miquelon_France_Canada_3mo_April24_2016

  • Cayenne, French Guyana, South America:

Cayenne_french_Guyana_SouthAmerica_BCayenne_french_Guyana_SouthAmerica_April24_2016_Ano comment about the last week…

By the way…

  • Some more high strangeness this past week on some monitors in Turkey:  Konya Huyuk, Turkey

KonyaHuyuk_Turkije_3monthsBefore3months_EURDEPgamma_April23_206 KonyaHuyuk_Turkije_3months_EURDEPgamma_April23_206

  • Also found elsewhere, like here at Ratten, Austria:

3more before_dreimonatenRats_Ostenreich_April23_2016EURDEPgamma

dreimonatenRats_Ostenreich_April23_2016EURDEPgamma

  • And thís radiation record from Acireale, Southern Italy, would that still be considered “environmental monitoring,” or does it perhaps constitute a new abstract art form, centered around omissions?

Acireale_Sicily_SouthernItalia_3mo_APril24_2016.gif

A swing by US EPA Radnet…

Here’s two months of data from Juneau, AlaskaJuneau_March1ThroughApril_23_2016_radnet

Ugh… such an annoying interface…  Back to EUrdep…

Oh Latvia‘s lovely-calibrated monitors…  What the hell is going on, man…?  Seriously…  Spikes going up to 4 µSv/hr in February, and up to 0.7 µSv/hr this past week?  And this with all the data gaps?  How bad is it really?   Any connection with so many people dropping dead, or with the so many folks struggling with strangely long-lasting flu-like respiratory issues???

Do I need to remind anyone that right after the Chernobyl accident, 30 years ago, when Finnish researchers took measurements flying straight through the radioactive cloud, the dose rate in the thick of that was just 0.8 µSv/hr?  (!!!–> See (Jan. 15, 2015), “Gaging Recent Radiation Spikes: How do the Recent Gamma Upticks Compare to those Observed after Chernobyl?“)…

Salaspils_Latvia_3months_April24_2016–> Anyhow, you see those weird little shifts?   Some monitors have these bizarre “baseline jumps”.  (yeah, add it to the list of negative dose rates, data gaps, capped maximum values, forced-down-to-zero moments, and so forth…).

I’ll zoom in on two…

First, here’s a “zoom-in” on some weirndness right around the time of the Helsinki Cs-137 spike (see previous post of why I’m skeptical that that was merely a leak in their garage….  Latvia was upwind, not downwinds from Helsinki, so… Yeah, just use your freak’n brain, please…)    Here’s that one:

ChartImg-17.axd–> It’s as if some time on March 4th, 2016, the sensors detected something, perhaps a decay energy level corresponding with a specific anthropogenic radionuclide (?), and switched to a higher baseline in an (I think automated, ’cause after all the IAEA was involved in writing the data-processing software…)  … in an effort to camouflage otherwise even more unusual data.

Another example from the same monitor, just last week: the reverse:

ChartImg-18.axd–> Was there was ‘something’ in the disturbances on April 14 that triggered a switch to a lower baseline?   The record after that is flat-lined at first, except for them “glitch dots” that go sky-high.  What’s up with that?

Anyhow.  SO much for radiation monitoring…    …. Rigged to its rotten core.  We’re being dosed with radioactive pollution, and all too many clowns in politics continue to push for more nuclear power generators…

444 large fission reactors have yet to be turned off.   At least 60 are ‘under construction’…  Thousands of nuclear bombs have yet to be taken off hair-trigger alert, meaning they can be launched on just a few minutes’ notice.

Thank goodness it’s só pretty here… 

I don’t think I could give this so much of my time otherwise…

DSCN1363Make it an awesome weekend LIFE, everyone!   

Peace –

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.

 

 

| 3 Comments

Was Helsinki’s Cs-137 “Localized Garage Waste Leak” A Decoy For Hemisphere-Wide Fallout Upticks? Fukushima? EURDEP/Nullschool DATA + (Some Nuclear Occult Links)

Colorado Rocky Mountains (USA) – Friday April 22, 2016

This is long post, packed with radiation data graphs from all over Europe to add broader context to the early March 2016 Cs-137 Helsinki spikes, which lead to me think that the Cs-137 spike may have been explained away as a purely local event IN ERROR.  Possibly even intentionally so, to distract from something much more serious.   (And then after all that data and pondering, I’ll “ruin it all” by dipping into very non-conventional-scientific “occult waters”…  hehe.)

Little bit of music…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMRqF1UMPhs

NOTICE:  This an amateur “one academic-credentials-less laptop-wielding mountain-man-show” volunteer service only.  Even if it appears differently, I do not claim to know the truth.  I offer the following public (and often officially unvalidated) data, as well as personal reflections, to further society towards greater understanding of facts, as well as to promote transparency and honesty.

DSCN1284

Home.  ;-)   Tuesday, April 19, 2016

All allegations, interpretations and speculations are my own.  Even though they may be spot-on correct, they could also be delusional and/or in error somehow.  If you are in a position of relevant institutional power, I merely request that you assess the provided in earnest and do everything in your power to respond to the apparent “disturbance in the force” appropriately: skillfully, compassionately and ethically.

– Go HERE for my full disclaimer and ‘do not share’ policy.

Key Background:  In the beginning of March 2016, I posted:

This blogpost elaborates on those.  It often takes awhile before radioisotope-specific data to become available, so I patiently waited to give the peculiar data of early March 2016 a new look.   If you haven’t yet, I recommend you read these two blogposts listed above (and much more if you feel like it, as found in my chronological Nuclear Blog Posts Archive) before proceeding, as those provide the context for this post.

This overview is just a sampling of data that made me go, “Hm…”.

See…, for anyone who doesn’t ‘monitor the monitors”, this all might seem isolated and easy to dismiss with a “local Helsinki finding”, but the fact remains: since summer 2015, data gaps and record-breaking radiation spikes all over the Northern Hemisphere have become increasingly common.   Something’s up.  I still feel that way.  I still think this deserves far greater investigation.

With all I’ve looked at, I can’t rule out… well, can’t rule out much yet at all, unfortunately…:  Nor that there has been some covered-up recent nuclear meltdown somewhere (the completely media-ignored and far more significant detection of Ruthenium-103 in Norway in January 2016 was perhaps “a hint”, I’d say [data on that repeated and expanded upon also in this post]), nor can I rule out (in relation to the Cs-137 and gamma spikes in early March 2016) some far more significant nuclear waste leak (the lack of detections of other radioisotopes besides Cs-137 @ Helsinki point in that direction), neither that Fukushima’s 2011-2012 massive radioactive plumes reached the upper atmosphere are just now making their way down to ground-monitor-levels…  Or, most likely, in my opinion, a combination of “all of the above”…     Anyhow…  Just check it out.   Please comment if you have something potentially helpful to contribute.

DISCLAIMER:  Much of the data I display has not even been ‘validated’ by the authorities that supplied the data.  I’m a volunteer amateur, not an official expert.  Check with the experts for a possibly different viewpoint.   Read my full DISCLAIMER.

You can verify all data provided yourself via the data exchange platform of the European Commission (EURDEP –> Advanced Map –> Disclaimer –> then toy around with the settings).  That one and other online radiation monitors are all listed @ Online Radiation Monitors.  (I also have a page to help with radioactivity-related scientific units and conversions.)

Starting out with some Cs-137 data sampling locations:

Cs137DetectionsPastMonth_April21_2016

Starting with Finland…  (some data shared before will be repeated) There was the Cs-137 spike @ Helsinki that got tons of media attention, also covered in aforementioned blogposts:

Helsinki_Cs137_Spike_EarlyMarch2016While the explanation (a nuclear waste leak in the building, which the monitoring agency shares with a waste processing company), albeit bizarre, sounded convincing, it only did so because some “details” were not explained, nor even mentioned.  For instance, there wasn’t just “a very-local spike of Cs-137” at the monitor in Helsinki, it also just happened to be the case, not mentioned in any media outlet outside this blog that I know of, that  (See post, March 15, 2016) the highest Cs-137 was also measured (since May 2011 ! ) @ Ivalo, in Far-Northern Finland that same week…  Very likely way too far away to have been caused by the same leak in that Helsinki building:

ivalo_11The Berylium-7 uptick preceding it (coinciding with the sample time the Cs-137 spike occured in Helsinki) suggests the Cs-137 might have been delivered from much higher up in the atmosphere.  Further down in this blog post, I share wind maps that add weight to this possibilty.

Here’s the past year of Cs-137 @ Helsinki ( 4 x 3months per line, shown in 2 blocks) to put the spike in a larger time context first (before I expand it to a larger geographical context):

In spring and early summer, the minor upticks are almost certainly related to the Chernobyl forest fires, which re-released Cs-137 and various other radioisotopes as part of the smoke from the burning area:

Helsinki_A Helsinki_B -> That spike just prior to October 11, 2015, the highest in years for that monitor, (mentioned in (Nov. 8, 2015) “Another Round of Looking into Recent Radiological Disturbaces, and other reports linked from there) was never explained by any authorities.  That one included detections of Ac-227, Mn-54, and a few other rare detections, including Cesium-134, which suggests relatively recent fission.   The very strange detection ánd concentration of Cobalt-60 (same magnitude as the Cs-134!) was strikingly reminiscent to some significance-hushed data about the ongoing Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear catastrophe in Japan.  !!!-> Why I make that connection is explained in (Jan. 26, 2016), “Any Significance to Cobalt-60 in Fukushima Fallout?“;

Excerpt of zoom-in on October 2015 data:

Helsinki_Oct2015_weirdnessHelsinki Cs-137 year data continued:

Helsinki_C Helsinki_D

-> upticks in January 2016, a quiet month with daily testing, then the infamous spike, after which testing has been just weekly…  Decontamination has clearly not been completely succesful yet.

Finland, next monitor over to the east (so NOT downwind at the time of the Helsinki spike!), also on the Finland’s southern coast, @ KOTKA, here showing the past half year:

Kotka-Suomi_End2015_Cs137_Be7Kotka-Suomi_last3mo_Cs137_Be7–> During two sampling periods covering much of Jan. 15 – Jan. 25, 2016, we see  slightly elevated measurements of Cs-137.  This is the exact same period that Ruthenium-103 was detected just outside Oslo in Southern Norway, an extremely significant indicator of recent fission, previously only detected shortly after the Fukushima-Daiichi accident began.  The second time we see an uptick of Cs-137 is around March 13, 2016, just a week after the spike observed in Helsinki.  And then, as if all monitoring sites were just a contaminated by the “garage leak”, they quit monitoring for a couple weeks…

Obviously I subscribe to a different logic than the radiation monitoring authorities, ’cause… if I were in the region, such as right across the Strait of Finland, to the south of Finland, in Estonia… I would do additional tests to see if there’s any evidence that it wasn’t just a local leak.   @ Harku, Estonia, for instance , showing (below) both Cs-137 alongside Be-7, for the past 3 months:

HarkuEstonia_Cs137_Be7_Jan_April2016-> Don’t you think that’s strange?  There’s a Cesium-137 spike in Helsinki, the highest measurement since Chernobyl in 1986, and the Estonian radiation monitoring agency simply quits reporting data completely… on March 6, 2016… (so far, as accessed on April 20, 2016), and interestingly Be-7 showed a slight uptick right then before the data freeze.

And it’s not like the gamma record wasn’t showing some “encouragement to test” either…

Voru_Estonia.gif

In past I’ve documented (example: I-131 upticks correlating with Be-7 upticks, included in (June 9, 2015) Radiological Emergency – Northern Hemisphere – RED ALERT !), an uptick in Be-7  is also often followed by an uptick in radioCesium, possibly because both come from higher up in the atmosphere, Be-7 by cosmogenic origin, and Cs-137 as descending long-term nuclear micro-dust fallout.

Even further south… and completely not downwind from Helsinki at that time, no matter which wind layer you look at:   Czech Republic

If you look for Cs-134 1-month data on EURDEP, you almost always get just 1 monitor, @ HRADEC KRÁLOVÉ – PILETICE in Czech Republic.   Every now and then the one @ ÚSTÍ NAD LABEM – HABROVICE shows detections of Cs-134 too.  That latter one is shown here, below, showing 9 months of data for both Cs-137 and Cs-134 (3 months pasted together per line, with the graph shifting to just Cs-137 when no Cs-134 was detected, or that data was redacted:

UstiNadLabemHabrovice_CzechRepublic_Cs134_137_Jul.Oct2015_1-> We see here a signifcant uptick of Cs-137 in early October when the major disturbances began, coinciding with the minor spiking seen in Helsinki (shown above) as well.  Things shifted into ‘weird’ territory in that following month.  I’m bringing this up, because it is possible that some detections, peeking through the data gaps,  are related.   I noticed the weirdness back then and wrote these blog posts:

Continued:

UstiNadLabemHabrovice_CzechRepublic_Cs134_137_Oct2015_Jan2016_2

-> Strangely, after Oct. 25, 2015, a week period marked with major spikes and data gaps all over Europe, detections (or reporting…) of Cs-134 simply stops -(“poof! done with that until further orders…”)-.  Cs-137 returns to “nuclear era background levels”…

To refresh my memory, the exact timing of when that “merely a leak in some nuclear waste stored in the same garage” shared with the official Finnish radiation monitoring agency (STUK) occured… was in the sampling period, March 5-6, 2016 (as shown in the top graph)

See, then the Helsinki news broke.  If all the various official oversight agencies had integrity, or at the very least shared appropriate curiosity, they would all do additional tests to help get to the bottom of it.  Right?  Or at the very least stick to their schedules of regular testing.    Instead of extra testing… again, here, all the way south in Czech Republic, as well: a gaping hole in the record:

(continued:)

UstiNadLabemHabrovice_CzechRepublic_Cs134_137_Jan2016_Apr2016_3-> I find that “a little odd”…

And why would Nicosia, Cyprus‘ radioisotope-specific monitor (with what looks like an erroneous y-axis somehow) be turned off as well, all the way down south in the eastern Mediterranean?

Nicosia_Cs137_2mo Was troubling data redacted?   Were there massive spikes all over Europe perhaps, that if we were allowed to see them, the whole “leak in our Helsinki garage” story would fall apart?  Just wondering.  The timing of all these data gaps is just a bit suspicious.

This rather disgusting behavior of oversight agencies appears to be standard, though.  After the Ru-103 detection in Norway, they too, right as it would make sense to do MORE testing, they skipped a couple tests…: SOLA, Norway on the southern Norwegian coast:

SOla_Norway_3month_early 2016

And then, of course, there’s the Gamma radiation record.  Taking a second look at the data in (March 19, 2016) A Look at a EURDEP Oddity in Lithuania shows that all thát weirdness… also happened around the same time.

To repeat some excerpts from that post, one gamma radiation monitor, closest to Lithuania’s very unpopular but planned ‘Visaginas Nuclear Power Plant’ lit up.  Interestingly (also NOT DOWNWIND from Helsinki at that time, @ March 7, 2016 there’s a sudden shift in the otherwise very tranquil data:   the measurements, eventhough the dose rate remains relatively tiny, show upticks nearing double normal background, with increasing data gaps shortly after, followed by a very long data gap by March 10, 2016:

Visaginas_20367_6days_B

When data flow returns a week later, the monitor is showing astronomical readings just above 1,400 µSv/hr, then drops to zero and remains in what looks like a malfunction mode:

Visaginas_20367_past48hrs_preMarch19_2016_1111amMT

To echo what I said back then: “Was there a significant radioactive cloud and a hot particle messed up proper measurement?”

Many more monitors showed correlating disturbances as well:

Vasaginas_20367_aside_Macionys_Lithuania_1Month_preMarch19_2016

How about this odd graph from Bulgaria…   If this, below, is related, then it would place the origin of the Finnish detections far outside the Baltic region…:

Moussala1_Bulgaria_1month_Macrh20_2016

Latvia:

Demene_Latvia.gif

Baldone2_Parupes_Latvia.gif

Poland:

Wlodawa_PolandBialystok_Poland

After a very long data gap, there was a gamma spike at Hallandsvadero, Sweden right then, same early week of March 2016 again as well:

hallandsvaderosverige_3months_premarch7_2016

All of this leaves me wondering if the “Helsinki garage leak” story was concocted to cover up, and especially to distract from something far more serious.

Too far-fetched?  Maybe.  Yet… Given my impression that the nuclear industry as a whole operates akin to a sinister & multi-layered organized crime cartel (for real – from rampant human rights abuses surrounding Uranium mining, military interventions to secure those interests, the corrupted nuclear-scientific research grants process, electric power & weapons’ production, the waste processing & disposal politics, all the way down to the non-proliferation circus (which is obviously a deceptive scam, if even ISIL-like ánd terrorism-sponsoring dictatorships like Saudi Arabia got their hands on nuclear weapons…), as well as the (by now well-established, right?) RIGGED environmental monitoring, etc.), as far as I’m concerned it cannot even be ruled out that “the Helsinki garage leak” was intentionally created precisely to distract from what might otherwise have come to light. 

Yup, I know, that’s “a feat in conspiratorial thinking”, if you will, but when I reflect upon the madness of massive nuclear fission reactors built on fault lines and such, there’s a lot of room for scenarios that also easily qualify as ‘insane’, if you know what I mean.  It’s not because it’s far-fetched that it’s not possible.  That is especially true for anything related to the nuclear industry and the larger military-industrial complex as a whole.

(Then again, what do I know, as ‘THEY’ can even knock down THREE steel-reinforced skyscrapers perfectly onto their footprint with just TWO planes; with the 3rd announced as a fait accompli before it even happened, and their elected accomplices ‘somehow’ escape arrest, and even manage to get (re-)elected…   Amazing…  But I digress…)

So… Anyhow… Here’s my thinking:  It’s not impossible that many of the disturbances seen on monitors since late September 2015 are related to a shared leaking source somewhere.  The lack of radioisotope-specific monitoring, as well as its suspiciously timed interruptions, is the main reason solving this puzzle is extremely challenging.  I probably can’t do this one by myself, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be done.  (Please provide a link in comments with your analysis if you got some better leads than what I’ve come up with so far!)   Part of the complexity is this:  there have been SEVERAL distinct radiological events, obviously not natural, within this past half-year period that make the puzzle rather chaotic.  The Helsinki Cs-137 spike is only one such event.  It could be isolated, but the timing is so strongly correlating with events both downwind as upwind that I have a hard time accepting that just because the mainstream media made it sound acceptable, that we got to full scoop on what really happened. (Why no photos of the leaking waste packages or barrels?  How did they rupture?  How long had the waste been there?  What changed for it to suddenly start leaking? How come the waste company didn’t notice it themselves?  Who had handled the waste?  Is there surveillance footage of the waste storage area from the 24 hours prior to the leak?  And so on.  NONE of that was shared with the media.)

In the above I merely made a case for that event (time-wise) fitting into a pattern that extends far outside the Helsinki neighborhood.

Another landmark event, also shown and linked to above, was the early October 2015 spike, particularly because of the detected radioisotopes were of such a strange mixture that waste, medical and resource exploitation origins can be ruled out (leaving only a leaking ACTIVE fission reactor “somewhere” as the #1 suspect…).  Same goes for the Ru-103 detection at the Norwegian monitor NO3001 @ Asterias, outside of Oslo.   The complete absence of media attention on that one is in and of itself ‘interesting’ as well. 

So… here’s 3 months of radioisotope-specific data from that monitor in the region of Akershus, outside of Oslo, Norway (with the 2nd graph switching from Be-7 to Ru-103 to Be-7, to keep the Cs-137 graph comparable and because there’s been no Ru-103 data since 2011 anyhow:

Asteraes_Norway_3mo-> There obviously was a major release from a fissioning reactor, as evidenced by the Ru-103 detection.  The Cs-137 uptick in Helsinki (and curious data gaps, etc.) 5-6 weeks later could only be related if the accident occurred véry far away, I think.  Of course the most telling “detail” about this graph is the same as in the now countless of examples documented over the years:  rights as you would expect additional testing because something off-the-charts unusual was just measured (a spike in Ruthenium-103 is certainly such an event!), and instead: a data gap follows…   I find that suspiciously ‘negligent’, to say the least.

Back to March 2016…

Some more Gamma data locations shared further below:

Deviation_March10_2016_1300hrs_UTC_EURDEPgammaDev

When I browse through the Gamma record’s Standard Deviation day by day, just a few days after “the Helsinki garage leak”, there’s a rather odd amount of data redaction, as well as “forced-down-to-zero” data events:

West Coast of Norway:

 NO2028 - KAUTOKEINO_3months_preMarch29_2016_gamma

MoIrana_Norsk_3months_preMarch29_2016_gamma

Hitra_Norsk_3months_preMarch29_2016_gammaa “glitch dot” spike on the coast of Northern France:

NorthWesternCoastalFrance_PAOKRS924MA_&6_SIT_GM_LaFrance_3months_preMarch29_2016_gammaAlps of Northern Italy:

JRCstation5_NorthernItaly_Alps_3months_preMarch29_2016_gammaEven Belgium saw some minor disturbances, a data gap and data-forced-down-to-zero examples:

Pecq_Belgium_3months_preMarch29_2016_gammaNow, I could keep expanding, and fill this blog post to the brim with data from much further away as well…   (I’m not going to be able to figure out where it came from, but here’s a clue it didn’t even come from Europe:)

The closest monitor to me, Colorado Springs  (Colorado, USA), for instance, shows a data gap during the very same period as well.  How about that?  Completely different network, several thousand kilometers “upwind” (when looking at the jet stream)… What a coincidence [sarc.]…   Peculiar, no?

ColoradoSprings_endFebEarlyMarch_2016Gammas_USepaRadnetIf this data gap is hiding a major radiation spike and this spike is related to the spiking that occurred days later in Europe (which interestingly fits with my long-standing hypothesis that radioactive clouds are often being delivered to the US and Europe by the jet stream…), then the origin lies even further upwind, west of Colorado…

http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/03/02/0300Z/wind/isobaric/500hPa/orthographic=-171.13,42.12,512

The wind made landfall over Oregon.  Often higher-up fallout doesn’t reach the ground until further inland, due to geographical obstacles contributing to air layers mixing more.  West of North America then, I guess…

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:02:0300Z:wind:isobaric:500hPa:orthographic=-171.13,42.12,512Where-oh-where might it have come from…?   Fukushima, Japan?   North Korea?  I don’t know…  Just noting that the jet stream blew precisely over that region prior to reaching Colorado, and that the Colorado Springs monitor was situated in a relative jet-stream-slow-down-zone during much of the data gap.

Anyways…  I might return to this some other time, but first a look at European wind patterns between March 4 and March 10:

Nullschool Wind Maps (annotations added):

http://earth.nullschool.net

  • March 4, 2016 @ 12:00 noon UTC

@ 850 hPa (just a bit above the surface, still far below jet stream level), made me wonder if any of the Ukrainian nuclear power plants might have played a role again… (as a leak there could have swirled around to hit monitors in Bulgaria, as well as gone north to reach Finland):

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:04:1200Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512@ 250 hPa (jet stream level)… the Ukraine is simply included in the fan-out of the jet stream, so perhaps that’s a bigger clue.  Let’s see how the wind proceeds the next few days…

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:04:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512

  • March 5, 2016 @ 12:00 noon UTC

@ 850 hPa (just a bit above the surface, still far below jet stream level), the wind patterns are chaotic and it’s not apparent how locations not clearly connected by surface winds could somehow have radiological disturbances around roughly the same times (circled here are spots in Finland, Northern Italy and Bulgaria).  The idea that maybe it came from the Ukraine falls apart quickly…

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:05:1200Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512@ 250 hPa (jet stream level), however, there appears to some common ground in a relatively narrow band of jet stream air that arrived from across the Atlantic, fanning out across the European continent…:

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:05:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512

[If you ever wonder why the most southern monitor in Greenland, as well as all 4 monitors in Iceland, remain turned off (apparently indefinitely), those 5 used to the most useful to help determine if a radioactive cloud came from across the Atlantic…  Anyhow…]

  • March 6, 2016 @ 12:00 noon UTC

@ 850 hPa (just a bit above the surface, still far below jet stream level):

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:06:1200Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512

One of the most interesting details in the wind patterns is that right then on March 6, when the disturbances begin to show their ugly head in the Baltics, and coinciding with the (oh-so-strangely-coincidental “Helsinki garage leak”…), @ 250 hPa (jet stream level): http://earth.nullschool.net/#2016/03/06/1200Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=0.02,59.89,512, a very pronounced slow zone in the jet stream is apparent, precisely over Southern Finland and Estonia (the latter which, as shown above, shuts its radioisotope-specific monitoring network off right then…):

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:06:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512-> Even the data gaps in Nicosia, Cyprus might find an explanation by looking into the jet stream.  And why nothing was detected in Spitzbergen (Arctic Norway) fits the hypothesis as well, as thát slow-down zone is not being fed by the jet stream directly.

By March 7 is when we start seeing the disturbances in Latvia and Lithuania…

  • March 7, 2016 @ 12:00 noon UTC

interestingly again, @ 850 hPa (just a bit above the surface, still far below jet stream level), we see little wind in that area:

earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:07:1200Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512ánd it is one of the areas being fed relatively directly by the meandering jet stream

@ 250 hPa (jet stream level), we see that the slow-down over Helsinki is gone, but there’s now a slow-down over Northern Finland (corresponding with the highest detection since 2011 of Cs-137 @ Ivalo…), a major slow down over southern Sweden, which saw an odd spike.  The weirdness further south in the Baltics, as well as in Poland, Czech Republic, etc., all fits with the jet stream patterns:

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:07:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512Just skipping annotations for a few days…

  • March 8, 2016 @ 12:00 noon UTC

@ 850 hPa (just a bit above the surface, still far below jet stream level):

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:08:1200Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512

@ 250 hPa (jet stream level):

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:08:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512

  • March 9, 2016 @ 12:00 noon UTC

@ 850 hPa (just a bit above the surface, still far below jet stream level):

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:09:1200Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512@ 250 hPa (jet stream level):

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:09:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512

  • March 10, 2016 @ 12:00 noon UTC

@ 850 hPa (just a bit above the surface, still far below jet stream level):

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:10:1200Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512

@ 250 hPa (jet stream level):

earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:10:1200Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=0.02,59.89,512-> the “glitch dot” in northern coastal France, the forced-down-to-zero and data gaps in Belgium… Again, all of it fits with *jet stream delivery of radionuclides*, none of which seems related when only looking at surface winds.

“CONCLUSION”:

Artificial radioactive fallout continues to come down all over the northern hemisphere.  The official radiation monitoring networks, originally intended to be able to alert populations of increasing ionizing pollution threats, have been co-opted by criminal elements and made RIGGED to hide data when it matters most.   Nuclear safety and oversight agencies, from the IAEA down, whether allegedly independent (such as FANC in Belgium) or steered by governments (such as is the case for the US, Canada, Germany, Japan, etc.) cannot be trusted.  They have proven that themselves with their track record of deception, negligence and way too many convenient omissions.  Every now and then something slips through the suspected rigging algorithms, which makes abnormalities appear isolated, nearly impossible to track to a leaking source, and thus pretty much impossible to explain satisfactory.  With only heavily redacted data to see, it is ridiculously time-consuming for your average concerned citizen to get a clue that the system is rigged, let alone figure out what might actually be happening.  In short: the nuclearists are on top of their game.  We’re pretty much toast, although it could be many more decades before that sinks in for more people.

That this slow-motion ionizing pollution is part of ultimately weakening the health of affected people and various strands in complex ecosystems over the decades (and as an extension reducing the chances of a meaningful political uprising against this organized crime establishment)  is something the elites in charge of the global nuclear cartel 1) must be aware of, and 2) are unlikely to change anytime soon as clearly they don’t care about about human beings or ecology, leaving room for 3) the development (since the 1940s) of this dire situation might be intentional.

——- —— —— —— —— —— ——

After-hours extra:

Cult of Deception

The level of willful ignorance and nefarious negligence is so extreme, so completely disrespectful of our environment, fellow human beings and kin, that whoever is pushing for ‘more of the same’ (Obama, Clinton, Abe, Erdogan, Modi, Putin, Hollande,… strangely ALL OF THEM) appears to subscribe to a shared belief system that is intrinsically self-deceptive.

Or to put it in pop culture terms:  The political elite acts like a Satanic cult of sorts.

satan

And thát… that would take this blog post in to a whole other vein of investigation…

(See also (Sept. 24, 2013) “‘The Darkest Dance’ – Archetypal Dynamics of the Nuclear Era“; (Feb 29, 2016) “The Sorcery Shockwave of a Nuclear Fission Blast“, and bits and pieces throughout…

I’ll leave you with some links instead:

(Note: I do not ascribe to, nor condone the pathetic Jew-bashing some otherwise more interesting viewpoints come wrapped in on some websites.)  Excerpts & links only; click through for more:

http-:www.texemarrs.com:082009:pyramid_mysteries.htm

occultphysics.com

http-:montalk.net:fukushima.htmlSome (or much?) of all that I might take with a grain of salt myself.

But I do consider that tricky vein of investigation (the occult underpinnings of the nuclear industry, and its inherent blind spots and/or ultimate malevolent nature) as essential to understand what might actually truly be happening.  Conventional explanations do not cut it.  It would not be in ANY human being’s interest, no matter how much money can be made along the way, to turn this magnificent planet into a toxic hellhole.

Anyhow…

Didn’t mean to “ruin a perfectly scientific-sounding blogpost.”  ;-)

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

— BAN ALL HARMONY-DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES —

— END THE MISGUIDED NUCLEAR ERA —

— MAY SANITY PREVAIL ON EARTH —

— — — — — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer, Fair Use Statementkarmapa-flag

May All Discord Be Pacified

If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it is plagiarized.  Please let me know.   All content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice  If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first to (maybe not) obtain permission.
| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Hanford Nuclear, North America’s Most Dangerous Radioactive Waste Site, LEAKING

Some background to help you grasp the seriousness of Hanford’s nuclear waste situation, see my older posts:

If you take the contents of these double-shelled nuclear waste tanks and ponder it all smeared it out over its surroundings at the contamination level of the Permanent Control Zone of Chernobyl (555,000 Bq/m^3 of Cs-137),… this would terribly contaminate and render uninhabitable a surface area as large as all of Oregon, all of Washington, all of Idaho, and all of British Colombia… COMBINED.

Related:

HANFORD IN THE NEWS AGAIN:

An overview of news snippets related to this very concerning news:

!-> RT:  https://www.rt.com/usa/340234-hanford-nuclear-waste-leak-washington/    Screenshot excerpt:

rt.com:usa:340234-hanford-nuclear-waste-leak-washington!!!-> KING5 TV News (Main SOURCE):  http://www.king5.com/news/local/investigations/catastrophic-event-at-hanford-prompts-emergency-response/140990679

“[…] one former tank farm worker said the leak should be considered a major problem.

“This is catastrophic. This is probably the biggest event to ever happen in tank farm history. The double shell tanks were supposed to be the saviors of all saviors (to hold waste safely from people and the environment),” said former Hanford worker Mike Geffre.

Geffre is the worker who first discovered that the tank, known as AY-102, was failing in 2011. In a 2013 series, “Hanford’s Dirty Secrets,” the KING 5 Investigators exposed that the government contractor in charge of the tanks, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), ignored Geffre’s findings for nearly a year. The company finally admitted the problem in 2012. […]”

“[…]  DOE said Monday said the rupture was an “anticipated” result of ongoing efforts to fully decommission the most contaminated nuclear site in the nation.

However, the new leak at the site poses several problems, King-TV reporter Susannah Frame writes:

The outer shell of AY-102 [the tank] does not have the exhaust or filtration system needed to keep the dangerous gases created by the waste in check. Workers have been ordered to wear full respiratory safety gear in the area, but the risk remains.

“The hazards to workers just went up by a factor of 10,” said Geffre.

In addition, the breakdown calls into question the viability of three other double-shell tanks at Hanford that have the exact design of AY-102.

Environmental groups also issued words of caution. Columbia Riverkeepers, an Oregon-based advocacy organization, said in a statement that the leak is “another reminder of the cost of nuclear waste, and the unexpected outcomes of handling radioactive material.”

The AY-102 tank “holds some of the most dangerous nuclear waste on Earth,” said the group’s executive director Brett VandenHeuvel. “These tanks were not designed to hold waste for decades. It’s past time to get the waste out of the unsafe tanks.” […]”

https://youtu.be/6a87JoLI-4Q

I have nothing to add, just passing along this bit of news. 

By the way… When Obama, totally in the pocket of the military industrial complex, who increased the nuclear weapons research budget, did not reduce the arsenal during his two terms, did not take the thousands of nukes off hair-trigger alert, and who was the first US president in decades to approve new nuclear power plants,… when he was running for office, he didn’t even know what Hanford was…  Easy to be “pro-nuclear” when choosing to be completely ignorant on its consequences, I suppose…  Video from back then:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGZbgMQZATs

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB
If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jiddu Krishnamurti : Breaking the Pattern of Conditioning

“[…] And we have been asking, examining, observing – not analysing – why the human mind has lived with this despair, this depression. Why human beings have not, during all these millennia, changed radically. That is the problem. That is what we have been talking over together. Talking over together, not listening to the speaker and say ‘Well, he is theoretical, nonsensical, oriental,’ and all the rest of that nonsense. Thought is neither oriental nor occidental. I think this is the basic fact. You may in the West think along a particular line, scientific, industrial and so on; and in the East it may be different, but essentially it is thought, thinking, which is common to all of us. It is the lot of man to think. And thinking is not yours or mine, it is common.

And this thought born of knowledge, experience, memory, this thought has created the industrial world, built extraordinary bridges, beautiful bridges, great scientific inventions, surgery, medicine; and also thought has created wars. Thought has created all the architecture, beautiful and ugly, all the great paintings, the statues, and music. Thought has also created all those things that are in the cathedrals, in the temples, in the mosques. And thought has divided the religious world into Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and so on. These are all facts. It is not the speaker’s invention. These are obvious, observable facts.

And we have lived that way – tribally, which has become glorified nationality. And is it possible for this brain, which has been moulded in a particular pattern, and has existed in a particular way: suffering, demanding, obeying, not obeying, conforming and revolting against conformity – this has been the pattern.

And any serious person must enquire whether it is possible to break down this pattern and live totally differently, without war, without antagonism, without anxiety, fear, sorrow. And if you are willing, and capable naturally, to think together we can find out for ourselves whether it is possible or not. […]”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DV9LNmTX3k

Text @ http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/print.php?tid=1390&chid=1087

| Leave a comment

7

 

7

 

Image | Posted on by | Leave a comment

Winter WONDERland (SLV – April 19, 2016 Photos)

Blog Post Soundtrack:  The Sound of Silence, by Paul Simon

“[…]  Because a vision softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains within the sound of silence […]”

!-> Added:  Also in this blogpost, after the OKCB intro and today’s photos, I touch lightly upon the dark topic of ‘mind control‘ as it possibly relates to some local, national and international weirdness…  The “blog soundtrack” was chosen along that vein, which includes  Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) Mind Control…

❋  Northern San Luis Valley (SLV) -April 19, 2016  ❋

Today marks my ***21 years in the USA*** anniversary.    I arrived on this lovely continent on the day of the Oklahoma City Bombing…

!-> Highly recommended:  The Corbett Report did a damn interesting exposé of that horrific event:  (May 11, 2015), “The Secret Life of Timothy McVeigh“)

  • PHOTOS

All Photos (© Michaël Van Broekhoven. Please DO NOT share.) were taken in the Baca Grande (an expansive  subdivision between the Great Sand Dunes National Park and the tiny town of Crestone, which lies on the slopes of the Sangre de Cristo mountain range of Southern Colorado.

This morning (April 19, 2016):

DSCN1292 DSCN1305

DSCN1300

I had a feeling it was a bit more than the predicted <1″ when the weight of the snow was pushing the tarp over my tent down.   I got up to shake it off.   (The tent is toast, shredded to smithereens by the spring winds.)

DSCN1284

My lovely tree…  ;-)   :

DSCN1283

Couple more from earlier in the week:

DSCN1247DSCN1241

The following photo lead to the additions to this post…

DSCN1257Speaking of…

Added Later in the day:  I checked out that website, https://fightgangstalking.com/ , which I find interesting to see posted on the back of a downtown Crestone stop sign.

From that website:

“[…]  “Gang Stalking” is, very likely, a disinformation term created by U.S. intelligence agencies. It refers to the intense, long-term, unconstitutional surveillance and harassment of a person who has been designated as a target by someone associated with America’s security industry. […]”

Interesting….  because Crestone/Baca, this gorgeous peculiar (and at times freaking weird, as well as rather energetically and climatically challenging) place I call home, has also been described, even by academics such as Dr. Eric Karlstrom (Emeritus Professor of Geography, California State University) in Dec. 2014 in these rather unflattering ways [my emphasis]:

“[…] because of our distinctive history, Crestone/Baca also seems to be ground zero for the implementation of the New World Order, United Nations Agenda 21, the New World Religion, earth worship, Gaia, “sustainability,” the Ancient Mysteries, and as such we also share our “sacred space” with St. Germain, the Illuminati, the Machiavellian machinations of military/intelligence, “UFOs,” the paranormal, remote viewing, “change agents,” foreign agents, spies, and gang stalkers, and probably, various government mind contol programs.  My research into mind control programs and cults […] suggests that Crestone/Baca is a petri-dish of mind-control experiments and cults.  These kinds of military/intelligence programs are extensions of MKULTRA, the “Human Potential Movement,” and government remote viewing programs that may feature some admixture of pain-drug-hypnosis (PDH), occultism, theurgy (summoning of spirits), cognitive dissonance, double-binds, the double mind, secret societies, and Enochian magic. […]

!-> More @ http://911nwo.com/?p=3622

Anyhow…   I came across the last link when, a couple months ago actually, I googled, “military mind control experiments Crestone Colorado“, which brought up http://911nwo.com/?p=2156 at #3 in the findings.

You might wonder why I would google thát…  Well…

The reason for my inquiry was a nagging suspicion that

1) One or two (and maybe more) individuals that resided in this area, who (allegedly) committed suicide in the past 2-3 years, may have been driven to that point through psychotronic and other manipulative means that lead to a debilitating cognitive dissonance, which I suspect lead them to somehow believe that only ‘assassinating themselves’ offered an escape; and

2) Though this is, for the most part, ‘speculative’ as well, I also suspect that these covert forms of harassment/manipulation have been tried on me at several distinct points in the past 2-3 years.   I base that latter on observing my mind making shifts, such a particular emotions and thoughts that appeared strangely unlike myself, as well as “letting my guard down” in ways that made no sense in hindsight, all of which only occurred in this specific area; as well as very strange interactions with people who barely know me (ranging from indirect death threats, direct warnings that is indeed the case and I’m “being tested”, and more…).  Literally ‘leaving the valley’, or heading higher up into the mountains has so far been quite helpful to reduce this bizarre form of subtle torment.

But for nuance:  I don’t really know what to make of any of this.  I do feel pretty grounded and level-headed, though. (Having abstained from pharmaceuticals for 15 years, and written off marijuana as ‘fundamentally not helpful for deep shamanic healing work’ over 3 years ago, and not even participated in ayahuasca ceremonies in several years now, either, my mind, in as far as I can assess this myself, is what I’d call, ‘rather sober‘ on the psychoactives end.)

Add to the local colorful mix a rather high percentage of people with “interesting backgrounds” (NSA, Navy Seals, Special Forces, FEMA,…), disaster preppers, as well just people liking to get drunk and/or stoned (as well as a apparent heroin and meth problem, acknowledged (but somehow allowed to fester on) by the Saguache County Sheriffs Dept. [See Crestone Eagle, Sept 2015, etc.), plus an at times hard-to-discern mixture of New Age bullshit ánd genuine spiritual practitioners (Buddhist, Hindu, Catholic, Native American, etc.), within the context of a ‘heightening everything’ energy vortex at 8,000+ ft elevation… , and it doesn’t take too long before you’re not quite sure what to make of anything anymore…

Or, “to make that an I-statement“:  “Anyhow… I don’t know.”

More background on this fascinating dark topic can be found in these links:

Screenshot excerpt:
wanttoknow.info:mind_control:cia_mind_control_experiments

Screenshot Excerpt:

globalresearch.ca:psychotronic-and-electromagnetic-weapons-remote-control-of-the-human-nervous-system:5319111

Screenshot Excerpt:

bibliotecapleyades.net:ciencia:ciencia_psychotronicweapons10.htm

Screenshot excerpt: Deuteronomy 27-24

Screenshot excerpt:

change.org:p:member-of-congress-investigate-misuse-of-psychotronic-mind-control-weapons

Screenshot excerpt:

washingtonsblog.com:2016:04:nsa-whistleblower-karen-stewart-speaks-candidly-illegal-criminal-nsa-fbi-programs-organized-stalking-electronic-harassment-usa-abroad.html

  • There’s YouTube videos, support groups (infiltrated or not, I don’t know), and much more.

Anyhow…   ;-)

“Whatever.”

Along Highway 17:   “Good Planets are hard to find.  Take Care of Our Home”:

DSCN1242

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

— MAY INTEGRITY PREVAIL ON EARTH — 

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB
If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

LaborNet TV: Fukushima Evacuees 5 Years Later, then and now / あれから五年 福島からの避難者は今 (English subtitles / 英語字幕つき ): Surge in Deformed Babies, Abortions

h/t ENENews, April 18th, 2016, “TV: Surge in babies being born with extra arms, legs after Fukushima — “I feel officials know the cause is radiation” — Nurse says many are getting abortions to avoid ‘inconvenient’ babies — “High number of stillbirths” — Many people reporting cancers, even far away from Fukushima (VIDEO)” -> Additional resources in ENEnews comments.

Click link or image to watch on Youtube [ @ https://youtu.be/DAc8K_to1Vc]:

A shorter more edited version was broadcast on February 24, 2016.  The short reports are sprinkled with images

v=DAc8K_to1Vc&feature=youtu.be.gif

About half-way through, it also includes reports from Fukushima farmers, clips from the film on the topic, ‘Inheritance,’ and discussion thereof.

!-> Many more news stories of the ungoing crisis at Fukushima-Daiichi, and how it is affecting life can be found through my list of Nuclear News Sources.

A chronological overview of my nuclear-topic-related posts can be found in my Nuclear Blog Posts Archive.

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB
If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| Leave a comment

A Somewhat Typical Spring… (SLV Spring 2016 Photos)

Alamosa, Colorado (USA) – April 13, 2016

The following photos were all taken in past few weeks in the Northern San Luis Valley (SLC) of Southern Colorado, most near Crestone:

It is apparently a 3-hour walk from my home to the Karmapa Stupa (kttg.org) and back…  A lovely sight arriving in the sunset light, with Mount Blanca to the south in the distant background:

DSCN1006

“When the iron bird flies and horses run on wheels,

the Tibetan people will be scattered like ants across the world,

and the Dharma will come to the Land of the Red Man.”

– 8th century prophecy ascribed to Padmasambhava (Guru Rinpoche), whose blessings are seen here, flapping off prayer flags:

DSCN1022DSCN1000DSCN1029

Decoration on some electric box:

DSCN0989

The Sand Cranes are back! ;-)    Every year, like clockwork, nearly 20,000 Sandhill Cranes descend on Colorado’s scenic San Luis Valley for a six­-week stopover to rest and refuel before continuing their northward migration. To celebrate the cranes’ return the town of Monte Vista hosts the Monte Vista Crane Festival.

I love the sound they make when flying over:

DSCN0912

Cottonwoods along Cottonwood Creek, as seen from near Shumei International (see also photos from May 2015), with the Great Sand Dune National Park and Mount Blanca in the distance:

DSCN0990

Much of the valley is desert-like (albeit sprinkled with wetlands and a couple hot springs), it’s not the redwoods, but I basically live in an ancient forest.  :-)   Some of these Junipers are well over half a millenium old:

DSCN0954DSCN0933

Dust devils in the wind.  This tornado-like one, shown below, I found pretty enough to pull over for:

DSCN1236DSCN1237

Rain, hail, and some snow… Here a brief storm cell blessing Crestone on the slopes of the Sangre de Cristo mountain range with some well-needed moisture:

DSCN1240

Much of our rain has been just ‘virga‘, shifting from liquid to vapor on the descend, and thus not making it all the way down…:

DSCN0958

All Photos © Michaël Van Broekhoven.  Please DO NOT Share.  See also my Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB
If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| 4 Comments

A Mix: Kissinger Quote to Explain the Paris/Brussels Gladio-style False Flags, Walk Along the Rio Grande, An Apparent Mystery Radioactive Cloud Just Blew Over the Benelux (EURDEP/Nullschool), Some Radiation Data, Fukushima News & WW3 Update

Important compilation of various nuclear-related issues  —  March 30-31, 2016

A note on the (Maalbeek / Airport) Brussels Terrorist Attacks

IF the whole idea that various terrorist attacks might not have quite been what mainstream media portrayed them to be is new to you, I can suggest a couple links to get you started…:

(On another side-note,  Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange just happened to run into a notorious war criminal and was nice and polite to him: (March 22, 2016)  https://youtu.be/OdbknSpnt2A)

Anyhow… Feel free to ‘connect the dots’…

!!!-> One clue about the big ‘WHY‘ various western Intelligence Agencies / NATO might be the ones steering these terrorist acts of late, through highly-masked covert Gladio-style operations (that most, if not all, elected officials may not be in-the-know about themselves), perhaps this little tidbit from psychopath Henry Kissinger in 2011 offers a clue:

The United States is baiting China and Russia, and the final nail in the coffin will be Iran, which is, of course, the main target of Israel. We have allowed China to increase their military strength and Russia to recover from Sovietization, to give them a false sense of bravado, this will create an all together faster demise for them. We’re like the sharp shooter daring the noob to pick up the gun, and when they try, it’s bang bang. The coming war will be so severe that only one superpower can win, and that’s us folks. This is why the EU is in such a hurry to form a complete superstate because they know what is coming, and to survive, Europe will have to be one whole cohesive state.  Their urgency tells me that they know full well that the big showdown is upon us. O how I have dreamed of this delightful moment.

– SOURCE:  The Daily Squib, Nov. 11, 2011, “Henry Kissinger: “If You Can’t Hear the Drums of War You Must Be Deaf”“, By Alfred Heinz

!-> Ha: I noticed it only after posting the above, that Kissinger never actually said that.  The source was SATIRE.   Oops: Joke’s on me… ;-)

As I said just a month ago (Feb. 29, 2016) in “Glory Trip 218”, the Start Shot of “Northern Thunder…”, Rumors have it, we’re on the eve of destruction…

I went for a walk:

MtBlanca_FromAlamosa_March30_2016

Between errands in Alamosa, I went for a walk along the Rio Grande today.   Mount Blanca, the fourth highest summit (14,351 ft. / 4,374 m) of the Rocky Mountains, in the background.

In other news…

March 30, 2016 Radiation Data shows ‘some irregularities‘ in The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, France and beyond…:

Alright… Them rigged radiation monitors...

There were a few “glitch dot” spikes in The Netherlands during the same period that some radiation monitors in Belgium “curiously” show larger data gaps…

Oss-NL Bassenge_BMaasband_NL KleineBrogel_B Curiouser and curiouser, also: right around the same time, there were also 6 examples of “forced-to-zero” values, all in the higher part of Belgium near the border with Luxembourg, such as (my apologies that some show 24 hours, while others show 48 hours – Always check both x- and y-axis):

Herbeumont_B Manderfeld_B Nadrin_BNear the nuclear waster generator / power plant south of Luxembourg, in France, some monitors just show data gaps, as was the case for Luxembourg as well:FrancePlantJustSouthOfLuxembourgI then browsed through the ‘Standard Deviation’ monitor map by the hour… hour by hour… Noteworthy:  various data gaps (monitors briefly disappear from map), values forced down to zero, and glitch dot spikes, all occur within the same 6 hours…  You can almost see “the invisible radioactive” cloud (DISCLAIMERaka “my imagination”) move…

Look very closely (or pluck these next 7 images off and then view them rapidly in sequence; easier to spot disappearing monitors that way):

All from March 30, 2016, starting with 7:00 am UTC:

3.30.2016_700UTC8:00 am UTC: glitch dot in The Netherlands…3.30.2016_800UTC9:00 am UTC: 6 Belgian monitors drop to zero:3.30.2016_900UTC10:00 am UTC:  Another Dutch glitch dot:3.30.2016_1000UTC11:00 am UTC:  several monitors disappear (data gaps)3.30.2016_1100UTC12:00 am UTC: 3.30.2016_1200UTC1:00 pm UTC: 3.30.2016_1300UTCPeculiar, eh?

When doing the mini-animation, did you spot the 3 monitors in Germany that also data-gapped out?  That makes it an event visible on the monitors of at least 5 countries, which all have independent radiation monitoring networks (which all feed into EURDEP).  Highly unlikely to “just be a glitch”.   It was a neatly covered-up radioactive cloud blowing over.

When doing the same zoomed-out, at 10:00, for instance, you can see the widespread data gaps were not a local phenomenon:  (NOTE:  you have to switch to ‘latest value’ or ‘max value’ (!), ’cause some countries only provide hourly data, and thus do not have a multi-point average to deviate from when looking at 1-hour data.

This is Gamma-T-max for March 30, 2016 @ 10:00 am UTC:

http-:eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu:EurdepMap:Default.aspx._1HOUR_GammaTmax_March30_2016_1000amUTCtiffThis, below, is the same 1 hour, but showing “Standard Devation” – Note that this setting shows the ‘forced-down-to-zero’ examples, not visible with the ‘maximum value’ setting.  You have to play around with it a bit to find the irregularities:

3.30.2016_1000UTC_widerThat 1-standard-deviation dot in Slovakia shows a minor uptick:

MalyJavornik_SlovakiaETC.   You get the idea.

Anyhow…  That kind of widespread effect of “some mysterious unseen force” could only have two causes, I think:  Either it’s solely some glitch inside EURDEP’s data processing itself somehow, OR… there was a significant non-local radiological event that blew in from afar affecting some ground monitors (and then the data processing software did its rigging so that the public won’t notice something is going on, unless they go through the kind of trouble of scrutinizing the data that I do every now and then “for fun”…).

(It’s not even certain that’s it’s from a new release (although it could very well be refueling-related), it could also be older stuff, such as from Fukushima in 2011, still coming down from higher-up.)

In any case, such a widespread continent-wide event suggests it’s possibly being delivered  with the jet stream…

The area of the Benelux in the square, with the 850 hPa winds (just a bit higher than surface) shows those winds (@ 9:00 am UTC)  apparently re-converging over that area, after a fan-out over the Northern Atlantic…:

annot___earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:30:1000Z:wind:isobaric:850hPa:orthographic=-7.64,49.86,1024…while it was much windier higher up, shown below.  (This is not the typical pattern of a slow-down in the jetstream corresponding with radiation upticks at ground level, as has been the case most other times I’ve looked into this.)

http-:earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:30:1000Z:wind:isobaric:500hPa:orthographic=-7.64,49.86,1024

IF it came from afar… then it could truly have come just about any potential source…, as that windline, more-the-less… at that moment… :

annot___earth.nullschool.net:#2016:03:30:1000Z:wind:isobaric:250hPa:orthographic=9.15,83.31,265…passed over Northern France, North of The Great Lakes, over the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, over Alaska, crossed the Pacific to have blown straight over the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Catastrophe site (which is still leaking hundreds of tons of radioactively contaminated water into the Pacific, with no end in sight… – Although they’ll try the ice dam again, see further below), passed over the Koreas just before that, over the Lop Nor area where China used to test their nukes, even over Kazakhstan (where the USSR used to test many of their nukes), to apparantly even have passed over Iran and Syria…  and then you’re back in Europe (when following the wind up-wind, that is)

So: No clue what the cause is, but that the publicly-accessible radiation monitoring system is RIGGED to hide and mask radiological events… that has been pretty much ‘established’ as a FACT by now, I think. 

!-> Tons of similar examples can be found throughout my blog posts of the past few years, chronologically listed in my Nuclear Blog Post Archive.

PS:  [Inserted after posting – March 31, 2016] If Blog Statistics are any clue, China, from which I rarely see ány traffic, as their internet is highly censored, somehow has begun taking an interest in this blog (in brief blips of increased interest).  Like right now, March 31, just after midnight…

100minutesIntoMarch31_2016.gif…they’re apparently getting around the blocks and looking at radiation monitors in Japan.  Is Japan downwind from something they know about…?  [Added even later:  Nevermind, the BlogStats were a none-event; merely got mentioned @ http://xqwh.org/ ]

When looking @ http://new.atmc.jp/, however,… it appears that some minor radiological disturbance is apparent on some monitors.  Such minor kinds of upticks in gamma background can be both natural or manmade, or a mix, and without more data it is nearly impossible to determine what is going on.  A random monitor checked in the south:

new.atmc.jp:___p=undefined.gif

All remains within the ranges that ‘natural variability’ occurs in.  Tokyo saw a brief spike, as apparent from the Hino data:

radiationyesterday

No idea if this is related to the upticks and likely data-gagged spikes in Europe.  No idea yet if something’s up.  Clues welcome.

(The sun is currently very quiet, so that can be ruled out this time. See http://www.solarham.net/ for latest data compilation).

One of the annoying things about the NETC is that it’s “deviation from average” is based on the preceding 3 months, making areas that are covered in snow in winter, such as Hokkaido in the north, always light up in spring…  Not the case for the south, though…

NETC_March31_2016_2.18amMT.gif

(Hokkaido not shown)

Not sure what’s up.  Something very well may be up…

Since I’m looking at Japan…

Fukushima News

By the way, after trying it, failing, then halting it, now (RT, Mar. 31, 2016) Japan reportedly has given the green light to the launch of its 35 billion yen ($312mn) underground ice wall system around the Fukushima plant.  (Again? Nevermind…)

-> See also NHK @ TEPCO starts freezing soil around reactors,

www3.nhk.or.jp:nhkworld:en:news:20160331_21.gif

When considering the price of nuclear energy, all these disaster mitigation costs ought to be included as well.   Without all these taxpayer-funded government-to-corporation handouts, ‘nuclear’ would look as insane as it is rather quickly… also financially.

FDNNP

“Good job, modern civilization”   That used to be a nice beach right there…

[Sigh…]

WW3 Update

Meanwhile…  The gears of war continue to move in their rather predictable direction:

” […] As of today, assessing as a whole what that the US and NATO are doing, the point at issue is a substantial change for the worse in the security situation […]” 

Aleksandr Grushko, Moscow’s representative to NATO

(RT, March 31, 2016)

https-:www.rt.com:news:337818-russia-nato-asymmetrical-responseAnd if that whole scene weren’t stupid enough…

” […] According to new reports, tensions are mounting among Russia and Japan with each country questioning the military moves of the other. […]”

Morning News USA, March 30, 2016

http-:www.morningnewsusa.com:looming-ww3-south-china-sea-russia-joins-conflict-ally-china-2367488.html

Enjoy your weekend. ;-)

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

Disclaimer

— — — — — — —   — — —  — — —   — — — — — — —

FlagMVB
If you are viewing this page on any website other than allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/ it IS plagiarized.  Please let me know.  All original content is copyright © Michaël Van Broekhoven, administrator of the Allegedly Apparent Blog.  Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner.  For more details, see my Disclaimer, Share Policy and Fair Use Notice.   If you wish to reproduce any of my content in full or in more than a paragraph or quote, please contact me first, to probably obtain no such permission.
| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment